摘要(英) |
ABSTRACT
Since the whole biotechnology industry has been developed and product functions have been improved, the features of industrial products has become lighter, thinner, shorter, and smaller. The issues of material surface and characteristics of interface are relatively important. It will be helpful for product development and product analysis when we understand the surface and interface microstructure, chemical ingredients. In order to fulfill the functionality and production line with high capacity and to achieve cost efficiency, the plastic arc-shaped design blister which contains medical grade product develops the highly valued key factor consequently.
This study focuses on the injection molding technology. Take the arc-shaped design blister container with an outer diameter of 20 mm and a depth of 7.6 mm for example, the injection molding plastic is polypropylene resin, the structure of contact area between the content HEMA lens and the blister container will result in the adherence scale after the content HEMA lens is sterilized by high pressure and heat. Therefore, this study focuses on the copy feature of cavity core surface design in the injection molding process, and then to identify the relationship between the surface roughness and adhesion by surface profiler; moreover, to investigate the impact that manufacturing condition will bring to roughness and the microstructure copy rate in means of injection molding experiments.
Experimental mold verification shows that the microstructure has an effective transfer roughness range of 0.6~0.9μm, and it has a value of 1.57 in the process capability index, according to the full factor experiment, the best injection parameter is. The mold temperature is 35 degrees, the plastic temperature is 240 degrees, the injection speed is 30 mm/s, and the clamping force is 130 ton, which is the best injection molding parameter provided for the system of this paper. |
參考文獻 |
[1] S.S.Schwartz and S.H.Goodman﹐ Plastics Materials and Processes﹐Van Nostrand Reinhold Co.﹐New York﹐1982.
[2] Chang, J. H., and Yang, S. Y., Microsystem Technologies, Vol. 10, No. 1, pp. 76-80, 2003.
[3] Heckele, M.; Schomburg, K., Journal of Micromechanics and Microengineering, 14 R1-R14, 2004.
[4] Rötting, O., Röpke, W., Becker, H., Gartner, C., Microsystem Technologies. 8, p. 32, 2002.
[5] Michaeli, W., Rogalla, A., Ziegrmann, C., Kunststoffe Plast Europe, 89, pp.27-29, 1999.
[6] Eberle, H., Kunststoff, Sep, 1344-1346 ,1998.
[7] Kukla, C.; Loibl, H.; Detter, H., Kunststoffe, Sep, 1331-1336 ,1998.
[8] Yang, S.Y., Nian, S.C. and Sun, I.C., International polymer processing, Vol.17, Issue 4, pp. 355-360, 2002.
[9] Yang, S.Y., Nian, S.C. and Sun, I.C., PPS18, Portugal, June 2002.
[10] Xu,H. H., H. W. Wu “The rapid thermal response for injection moulds”, Molding Technology, Vol. 10, pp.34-37, 2004.
[11] 洪瑞庭, 塑膠加工技術與工程,高立圖書有限公司,2004。
[12] 沈永康,張宏榮,沈煜勝,林柏村,微射出壓縮成型於背光模組導光板微結構之研究,中國機械工程學會第二十一屆全國學術研討會,中山大學,pp.5177,2004。
[13] 張勝來,模溫控制技術的研究與應用,電子工藝技術Vol.pp.46-50,1992。
[14] 洪佳銘,模具的冷卻設計及其效果,高分子工業,Vol.122,pp.47-52,2006。
[15] Heyderman LJ, Schift H, David C, Ketterer B, Auf Der Maur M, Gobrecht J:Nanofabrication using hot embossing lithography and electroforming. Microelectron Eng ,57(58):375-380, 2001.
[16] 簡聰海,李永晃,全面品質管理,高立圖書有限公司,2004。
[17] 吳復強,田口品質工程,全威圖書有限公司,2004。
[18] 劉漢容,陳文魁,品質管理-六標準差式,蒼海書局,2005。
[19] 鄭希龍,量測系統分析(MSA)之作法與解析,量測資訊,第77期,54~60頁2001。
[20] 劉昔福,六標準差相關工具應用之心得(四):量測系統分析,品質月刊,39卷,第一期,56~59頁,2003年1月。
[21] Mandel, J., Repeatability and Reproducibility, Journal of Quality Technology, Vol.4, No2, pp.74-85, 1972.
[22] Tsai, P., Variable Gauge Repeatability and Reproducibility Study Using The Analysis of Variance Method, Quality Engineering, Vol.1, No.1 pp.107-115,1988-89.
[23] Vardeman, S. B. and VanValkenburg, E. S., Two-way Random-effect Analyses and Gauge R&R Studies, Technometrics, Vol.41, No.3, pp202-211,1999.
[24] John Wiley and Sons, Montgomery, D.C., Design and Analysis of Experiments, 5th Edition, 2001. |