Investigating Multiple Recognitions for EFL Writing in Authentic Contexts with Contextualization, Personalization, and Socialization

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：25

、訪客IP：3.14.249.33

姓名

阮文甲(Nguyen Van Giap) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

網路學習科技研究所

論文名稱

(Investigating Multiple Recognitions for EFL Writing in Authentic Contexts with Contextualization, Personalization, and Socialization)

相關論文

★ 同步表演機器人之建構與成效評估	★ 探討國小學童使用電子書多媒體註記系統結合註記分享機制對其學習行為與時間之影響
★ 先備知識對註記式多媒體電子書的影響研究：從個別環境到分享環境	★ Facilitating EFL speaking and writing with peer-tutoring and storytelling strategies in authentic learning context
★ An investigation into CKEL-supported EFL learning with TPR to reveal the importance of pronunciation and interactive sentence making	★ Investigation of Facilitating Physics Learning using Ubiquitous-Physics APP with Learning Map and Discussion Board in Authentic Contexts
★ 智慧互動SmartVpen在真實情境對於英文學習之影響	★ 利用合作虛擬化的網絡設計輔助計算機網路學習
★ 探討擴展合作式多媒體認知理論和其對EFL聽力與口語能力之影響 - 結合動覺辨識和學習者設計內容之猜謎遊戲	★ 在真實情境中利用智慧機制提升國小學生之外語口說及對話能力之評估
★ 探討在真實情境下教師回饋對學習認知與學習持續性之影響	★ 註釋、對話代理和協作概念圖支持大學生議論文寫作和後設認知的培養
★ Developing and Validating the Questionnaire and Its Model for Sustainable and Scalable Authentic Contextual Learning Supported by Mobile Apps	★ 探討個人化、情境化及社會化的智慧機制輔助真實情境國小幾何學習與其對學習成效之影響
★ Investigation of smart mechanisms for authentic contextual learning with sensor and recognition technologies	★ 探討智慧回饋如何影響學習時眼動和觸控操作的表現-以 Covid-19 快篩模擬為例

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

至系統瀏覽論文 (2026-1-1以後開放)

摘要(中)

英語作為外國語言（EFL）的寫作對許多學生來說是一項困難的技能，主要問題包括英語詞彙量的不足、寫作思路上的困難、母語與EFL語系之間的差異等等，幸運的是，辨識技術已經相當成熟，在( EFL) 學習中發揮了關鍵的作用，除此之外，情境化、個性化和社會化也對EFL寫作帶來正面效益，因為它們具備著獨特的機制，然而，很少有研究專注於整合多種辨識技術以促進 ( EFL ) 寫作。本研究探討將多種辨識技術（如圖像轉文字辨識技術（ITR）、語音轉文字辨識技術（STR）和位置轉文字辨識技術（LTR））與情境化、個性化和社會化整合，以增強不同學習者的EFL寫作。透過了三個實驗深入探究了不同辨識技術的影響力、示能力以及潛力。在台灣的一所國民小學和一所技職高中進行了三個實驗，並為這些實驗開發了三個行動應用程式，結果顯示，與STR相比，ITR和LTR更加顯著地增強了EFL寫作，主要是因為它們具有圖像和情境化的表現，然而，STR對EFL寫作比ITR和LTR有著更高的示能力，LTR因為繼承了ITR和STR獨特且有用的特性，對EFL寫作展現出了顯著的潛力，將多種辨識技術和社會化整合對改善EFL寫作發揮出至關重要的作用，特別是進階ITR和來自同儕的鼓勵對於EFL寫作的質量有顯著影響。對於不同的學習者來說，國小生在寫作過程中受惠於基於視覺表徵的辨識技術，以強化其寫作能力，而高中生則利用這些辨識技術拓展思維並使寫作內容更加充實，基於語言表徵的辨識技術有助於高中生方便地生成文本或句子，本研究對該領域的教學提出了啟發、建議以及限制，並根據研究結果提出了全面的框架。

摘要(英)

Writing in English as a Foreign Language (EFL) is challenging for many students due to several issues, such as the lack of English vocabulary, difficulty in generating ideas, and differences between their first language and the English language system. Fortunately, recognition technology has become more mature and played an important role in EFL acquisition. Additionally, contextualization, personalization, and socialization are also beneficial for EFL writing, due to their unique mechanisms. Therefore, it is worthy to examine the integration of different recognitions with contextualization, personalization, and socialization to facilitate EFL writing. This research investigated the integration of multiple recognitions—such as image-to-text recognition (ITR), translated speech-to-text recognition (TSTR), and location-to-text recognition (LTR)—with contextualization, personalization, and socialization to enhance EFL writing of different learners. The significant influences, affordances, and potentials of the different recognitions mentioned and their extra treatments were deeply studied via three experiments. Three mobile apps were also developed and used for three experiments in an elementary school and a vocational high school in Taiwan. The results indicated that ITR and LTR significantly enhance EFL writing compared to STR due to their pictorial and contextual representations. However, TSTR offers higher affordances for EFL writing than ITR and LTR. Regarding LTR, it has played an important role in improving EFL writing due to its transfer features from both ITR and STR. Especially, integrating multiple recognitions with socialization plays an important role in improving EFL writing, the advanced ITR and peers’ suggestions contribute to the quality of EFL writing. Regarding different learners, elementary school students benefit from visual representation-based recognition as reinforcement with suitable language scaffoldings in the writing process; whereas high school students tend to use these recognitions to develop ideas and convey their thoughts into words more meaningfully. Verbal representation-based recognitions facilitate high school students in producing vocabularies and sentences. The expression motive is the major driver of the high school students’ usage recognition; whereas the interest motive is the major driver of the children′s usage of them. Based on the studies, some implications, suggestions, limitations, and a framework would be provided for the community in this issue.

關鍵字(中)

★ 適性學習
★ 示能性
★ 真實情境
★ 情境化
★ EFL寫作
★ 多重辨識
★ 個性化
★ 鷹架教學
★ 社會化

關鍵字(英)

★ Adaption
★ Affordance
★ Authentic context
★ Contextualization
★ EFL writing
★ Multiple recognitions
★ Personalization
★ Scaffolding
★ Socialization

論文目次

摘要 iii
ABSTRACT iv
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS v
TABLES OF CONTENTS vi
LIST OF FIGURES x
LIST OF TABLES xi
EXPLANATION OF SYMBOLS xii
CHAPTER I. INTRODUCTION - 1 -
1.1.Motivation and Research Questions - 1 -
1.1.1.Research Motivation - 1 -
1.1.2.Research Questions - 3 -
1.2.Objectives - 4 -
1.3.Significance and Scope - 7 -
1.3.1.Significance - 7 -
1.3.2.Scope - 7 -
1.4.Thesi Outline - 7 -
CHAPTER II. LITERATURE REVIEW - 9 -
2.1.Multimedia Learning and Digital Multimodal Composing - 9 -
2.2.Authentic Context Learning for EFL Writing - 10 -
2.3.Recognitions for EFL Writing - 11 -
2.4.Scaffoldings Used for EFL Writing - 12 -
2.5.Affordances of Recognition Technology for EFL Writing - 13 -
2.6.Contextualization, Personalization, and Socialization for EFL Writing - 14 -
2.7.Frameworks for EFL Learning Related to Recognitions - 15 -
CHAPTER III. INSTRUMENTS AND METHODOLOGIES - 17 -
3.1.Experimental Apps - 17 -
3.1.1.AuthWrite App - 17 -
3.1.2.AuthWritePlus App - 22 -
3.1.3.AdvancedAuthWrite App - 24 -
3.2.Experimental Design - 27 -
3.2.1.Study 1 - 27 -
3.2.2.Study 2 - 29 -
3.3.3.Study 3 - 32 -
3.3.Data Collection and Analysis - 34 -
3.3.1.Research Architecture for Study 1 - 35 -
3.3.2.Research Architecture for Study 2 - 36 -
3.3.3.Research Architecture for Study 3 - 38 -
CHAPTER IV. RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS - 40 -
4.1.The Results and Discussions in Study 1 - 40 -
4.1.1.Investigating EFL Writing Achievement in Two Groups - 40 -
4.1.2.Effectiveness of ITR Texts and Language Scaffolding - 42 -
4.1.3.Effectiveness of ITR Added Texts and Their Usages - 45 -
4.1.4.Student Perception Analysis in Study 1 - 45 -
4.1.5.Conclusion for Study 1 - 48 -
4.2.The Results and Discussions in Study 2 - 48 -
4.2.1.Investigating Writing Achievement in two Groups - 48 -
4.2.2.Effectiveness of Multiple Recognitions for EFL Writing - 51 -
4.2.3.Investigating Affordances of Multiple Recognitions for EFL Writing - 55 -
4.2.4.Student Perceptions in Study 2 - 57 -
4.2.5.Conclusion for Study 2 - 59 -
4.3.Results and Discussions Study 3 - 60 -
4.3.1.Investigating EFL Writing Achievement of Two Groups in Stage 1 - 60 -
4.3.2.Comparison of Learning Behaviors Between 2 Groups in Stage 1 - 61 -
4.3.3.Effectiveness of Advanced ITR and LTR on EFL Writing in Stage 1 - 62 -
4.3.4.Investigating Effectiveness of LTR Places on EFL Writing - 64 -
4.3.5.Investigating Writing Achievement of Two Groups in Stage 2 - 65 -
4.3.6.Comparison of Behaviors Between 2 Groups in Study 3 Stage 2 - 66 -
4.3.7.Effects of Socialization with Advanced ITR and LTR on EFL Writing - 67 -
4.3.8.Student Perceptions Analysis in Study 3 - 70 -
4.3.9.Conclusion for Study 3 - 72 -
CHAPTER V. IMPLICATIONS AND SUGGESTIONS - 73 -
5.1.Implications and Suggestions - 73 -
5.2.Limitations and Suggestions - 75 -
5.3.Framework Based on Multiple Recognitions for EFL Writing - 75 -
CHAPTER VI. CONCLUSIONS - 79 -
REFERENCES - 81 -
APPENDICES - 88 -
Appendix 1. Language Scaffolding for Study 1 - 88 -
Appendix 2.Rubric for EFL Writing Evaluation in Study 1 - 90 -
Appendix 3. Pre- and Post-tests for Study 1 - 91 -
Appendix 4. TAM Questionnaire for Study 1 - 92 -
Appendix 5. LTR Vocabulary Database for Study 2 - 93 -
Appendix 6. Rubric for EFL Writing Evaluation in Study 2 - 95 -
Appendix 7. Pre- and Post-tests for Study 2 - 96 -
Appendix 8. TAM Questionnaires 1&2 in Study 2 - 98 -
Appendix 9. LTR Vocabulary Database for Study 3 - 101 -
LIST OF PUBLICATIONS - 105 -

參考文獻

Andrade, H. G. (2000). Using rubrics to promote thinking and learning. Educational Leadership, 57(5), 13–18.
Andrade, H. L., Du, Y., & Wang, X. (2008). Putting rubrics to the test: The effect of a model, criteria generation, and rubric-referenced self-assessment on elementary school students’ writing. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 27(2), 3–13. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-3992.2008.00118.x
Anrzejczakd, N., Trainin, G., & Poldberg, M. (2005). From image to text: Using images in the writing process. International Journal of Education and the Arts, 6, 1–17.
Bain, K., Basson, S. H., & Wald, M. (2002). Speech recognition in university classrooms. 192. https://doi.org/10.1145/638281.638284
Boggs, J. A. (2019). Effects of teacher-scaffolded and self-scaffolded corrective feedback compared to direct corrective feedback on grammatical accuracy in English L2 writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 46(October). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2019.100671
Chatti, M. A., Jarke, M., & Specht, M. (2010). The 3P learning model. Educational Technology and Society, 13(4), 74–85.
Chen, M. P., Wang, L. C., Zou, D., Lin, S. Y., & Xie, H. (2019). Effects of caption and gender on junior high students’ EFL learning from iMap-enhanced contextualized learning. Computers and Education, 140(June), 103602. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103602
Chen, N. S., Hsieh, S. W., & Kinshuk. (2008). Effects of short-term memory and content representation type on mobile language learning. Language Learning and Technology, 12(3), 93–113.
Cohen, J. (1960). A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20(1), 37–46. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316446002000104
Cohen, J. (2013). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. In Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203771587
Cohen, R. (1993). The use of voice synthesizer in the discovery of the written language by young children. Computers and Education, 21(1–2), 25–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/0360-1315(93)90044-J
Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly: Management Information Systems, 13(3), 319–339. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
Fu, Q. K., Lin, C. J., Hwang, G. J., & Zhang, L. (2019). Impacts of a mind mapping-based contextual gaming approach on EFL students’ writing performance, learning perceptions and generative uses in an English course. Computers and Education, 137(July 2018), 59–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.04.005
Fujieda, Y. (2019). Academic Discourse Socialization in a Research Seminar Course: A Case Study of a Japanese EFL Undergraduate Learner. Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 28(2), 93–100. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-018-0416-z
García-Pinar, A. (2024). Mapping undergraduates’ engagement through multimodal composing. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 33(3), 363–374. https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2024.2324331
Garrett, P. B. (2008). Researching Language Socialization. Encyclopedia of Language and Education, 10, 3386–3398. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-30424-3_254
Hafner, C. A., & Ho, W. Y. J. (2020). Assessing digital multimodal composing in second language writing: Towards a process-based model. Journal of Second Language Writing, 47(April 2019), 100710. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2020.100710
Herrington, J., & Oliver, R. (2000). An instructional design framework for authentic learning environments. Educational Technology Research and Development, 48(3), 23–48. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02319856
Hwang, G. J., Tsai, C. C., & Yang, S. J. H. (2008). Criteria, strategies and research issues of context-aware ubiquitous learning. Educational Technology and Society, 11(2), 81–91.
Hwang, W.-Y., Nurtantyana, R., Purba, S. W. D., Hariyanti, U., Indrihapsari, Y., & Surjono, H. D. (2023). AI and Recognition Technologies to Facilitate English as Foreign Language Writing for Supporting Personalization and Contextualization in Authentic Contexts. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 61(5), 1008–1035. https://doi.org/10.1177/07356331221137253
Hwang, W., Giap, N. Van, & Chin, C. (2024). Affordances and influences of multiple technologically-stimulated recognitions for EFL descriptive writing in authentic contextual learning. Educational Technology & Society, 27(2), 165–182. https://doi.org/10.30191/ETS.
Hwang, W. Y., Chen, H. S. L., Shadiev, R., Huang, R. Y. M., & Chen, C. Y. (2014). Improving English as a foreign language writing in elementary schools using mobile devices in familiar situational contexts. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 27(5), 359–378. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2012.733711
Hwang, W. Y., Manabe, K., Cai, D. J., & Ma, Z. H. (2020). Collaborative Kinesthetic English Learning With Recognition Technology. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 58(5), 946–977. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633119893117
Hwang, W. Y., Nguyen, V. G., Chin, C. C., Purba, S. W. D., & Ghinea, G. (2022). Investigation of Multiple Recognitions Used for EFL Writing in Authentic Contexts. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics): Vol. 13449 LNCS. Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-15273-3_48
Hwang, W. Y., Nguyen, V. G., & Purba, S. W. D. (2022). Systematic survey of anything-to-text recognition and constructing its framework in language learning. Education and Information Technologies, 27(9), 12273–12299. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11112-6
Jafarigohar, M., & Mortazavi, M. (2017). The Impact of Scaffolding Mechanisms on EFL Learners’ Individual and Socially Shared Metacognition in Writing. Reading and Writing Quarterly, 33(3), 211–225. https://doi.org/10.1080/10573569.2016.1154488
Jiang, D., & Zhang, L. J. (2020). Collaborating with ‘familiar’ strangers in mobile-assisted environments: The effect of socializing activities on learning EFL writing. Computers and Education, 150(August 2019), 103841. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103841
Kessler, M., & Marino, F. (2023). Digital multimodal composing in English language teaching. ELT Journal, 77(3), 370–376. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccac047
King, B. W. (2015). Wikipedia writing as praxis: Computer-mediated socialization of second-language writers. Language Learning and Technology, 19(3), 106–123.
Koole, T., & Elbers, E. (2014). Responsiveness in teacher explanations: A conversation analytical perspective on scaffolding. Linguistics and Education, 26(1), 57–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2014.02.001
Kuo, F. R., Hsu, C. C., Fang, W. C., & Chen, N. S. (2014). The effects of Embodiment-based TPR approach on student English vocabulary learning achievement, retention and acceptance. Journal of King Saud University - Computer and Information Sciences, 26(1), 63–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jksuci.2013.10.003
Lan, Y. J. (2015). Contextual EFL learning in a 3D virtual environment. Language, Learning and Technology, 19(2), 16–31.
Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33(1), 159. https://doi.org/10.2307/2529310
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Ligitimate peripheral participation. In Cambridge University Press (Vol. 4, Issue 1). Cambridge: Cambridge university press.
Lee, S. (2018). Scaffolding Evidence-Based Writing for English Learners in Three Steps. Reading Teacher, 72(1), 99–106. https://doi.org/10.1002/trtr.1712
Lee, S. M., & Briggs, N. (2020). Effects of using machine translation to mediate the revision process of Korean university students’ academic writing. ReCALL, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344020000191
Leopold, C., & Mayer, R. E. (2015). An imagination effect in learning from scientific text. Journal of Educational Psychology, 107(1), 47–63. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037142
Li, D., & Zhang, L. (2022). Contextualizing feedback in L2 writing: the role of teacher scaffolding. Language Awareness, 31(3), 328–350. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658416.2021.1931261
Lin, C. C., & Yu, Y. C. (2017). Effects of presentation modes on mobile-assisted vocabulary learning and cognitive load. Interactive Learning Environments, 25(4), 528–542. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2016.1155160
Lin, C. J., Hwang, G. J., Fu, Q. K., & Cao, Y. H. (2020). Facilitating EFL students’ English grammar learning performance and behaviors: A contextual gaming approach. Computers and Education, 152(February), 103876. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103876
Liu, Y. (2008). Taiwanese students’ negotiations with academic writing: Becoming “playwrights and film directors.” Journal of Second Language Writing, 17(2), 86–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2007.10.003
Manabe, K., Hwang, W. Y., & Chuang, Y. W. (2021). English learning enhanced by collaborative contextual drama in an authentic context. Interactive Learning Environments, 0(0), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2021.1972321
Mayer, R. E. (2005). Cognitive theory of multimedia learning. In The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning, Second Edition (pp. 43–71). https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139547369.005
Mayer, R. E. (2017). Using multimedia for e-learning. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 33(5), 403–423. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12197
Nguyen, T. H., Hwang, W. Y., Pham, X. L., & Pham, T. (2020). Self-experienced storytelling in an authentic context to facilitate EFL writing. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 0(0), 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2020.1744665
Perin, D. (2011). Facilitating student learning through contextualization: A review of evidence. Community College Review, 39(3), 268–295. https://doi.org/10.1177/0091552111416227
Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2004). SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 36(4), 717–731.
Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40(3), 879–891. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.40.3.879
Puntambekar, S., & Hübscher, R. (2005). Tools for scaffolding students in a complex learning environment: What have we gained and what have we missed? Educational Psychologist, 40(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep4001_1
Reynolds, B. L., Cui, Y., Kao, C. W., & Thomas, N. (2022). Vocabulary Acquisition through Viewing Captioned and Subtitled Video: A Scoping Review and Meta-Analysis. Systems, 10(5), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.3390/systems10050133
Rezai, A., Soyoof, A., & Reynolds, B. L. (2024). Effectiveness of informal digital learning of English on EFL learners’ vocabulary knowledge: a mixed-methods investigation. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 0(0), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2024.2350419
Shadiev, R., Hwang, W. Y., & Huang, Y. M. (2017). Review of research on mobile language learning in authentic environments. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 30(3–4), 284–303. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2017.1308383
Shadiev, R., Hwang, W. Y., & Liu, T. Y. (2021). Facilitating cognitive processes during EFL smartwatch-supported learning activities in authentic contexts. British Journal of Educational Technology, 52(3), 1230–1243. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13069
Shadiev, R., & Sun, A. (2020). Using texts generated by STR and CAT to facilitate student comprehension of lecture content in a foreign language. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 32(3), 561–581. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-019-09246-7
Shadiev, R., Wu, T. T., & Huang, Y. M. (2020). Using image-to-text recognition technology to facilitate vocabulary acquisition in authentic contexts. ReCALL, 32(2), 195–212. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344020000038
Shadiev, R., Zhang, Z. H., Wu, T. T., & Huang, Y. M. (2020). Review of Studies on Recognition Technologies and Their Applications Used to Assist Learning and Instruction. Educational Technology and Society, 23(4), 59–74.
Shang, H. F. (2019). Exploring online peer feedback and automated corrective feedback on EFL writing performance. Interactive Learning Environments, 30(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2019.1629601
Shemshack, A., & Spector, J. M. (2020). A systematic literature review of personalized learning terms. Smart Learning Environments, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-020-00140-9
Shun, W., & Lam, E. (2004). Second Language Socialization in a Bilingual Chat Room: Global and Local Considerations. Language Learning & Technology, 8(3), 44–65.
Sobel M.E. (1982). Asymptotic confidence intervals for indirect effects in structural equation models. Sociological Methodology, 13(1982), 290–312.
Sun, J. C., Chang, K., & Chen, Y. (2015). GPS sensor-based mobile learning for English : an exploratory study on self- efficacy , self-regulation and student achievement. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41039-015-0024-y
Tarp, S., & Gouws, R. (2019). Lexicographical contextualization and personalization: A new perspective. Lexikos, 29(1), 250–268. https://doi.org/10.5788/29-1-1520
Thorne, S. L., Black, R. W., & Sykes, J. M. (2009). Second language use, socialization, and learning in internet interest communities and online gaming. Modern Language Journal, 93(SUPPL. 1), 802–821. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2009.00974.x
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society. The development of higher psychological processes. In The American Journal of Psychology (Vol. 93, Issue 1). https://doi.org/10.2307/1421493
Wadkar, S. K., Singh, K., Chakravarty, R., & Argade, S. D. (2016). Assessing the Reliability of Attitude Scale by Cronbach’s Alpha. Journal of Global Communication, 9(2), 113. https://doi.org/10.5958/0976-2442.2016.00019.7
Wang, F., Hwang, W. Y., Li, Y. H., Chen, P. T., & Manabe, K. (2019). Collaborative kinesthetic EFL learning with collaborative total physical response. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 32(7), 745–783. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2018.1540432
Wang, M., Kammeyer-Muelle, J., Liu, Y., & Li, Y. (2015). Context, socialization, and newcomer learning. Organizational Psychology Review, 5(1), 3–25. https://doi.org/10.1177/2041386614528832
Xie, H., Chu, H. C., Hwang, G. J., & Wang, C. C. (2019). Trends and development in technology-enhanced adaptive/personalized learning: A systematic review of journal publications from 2007 to 2017. Computers and Education, 140(June), 103599. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103599
Zheng, C., & Park, T. J. (2013). An analysis of errors in English writing made by Chinese and Korean University students. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 3(8), 1342–1351. https://doi.org/10.4304/tpls.3.8.1342-1351

指導教授

黃武元(Hwang Wu-Yuin)

審核日期

2024-7-4

推文