是事不關己?還是責無旁貸? 消費者對無動物實驗化妝品之購買意圖研究

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：146

、訪客IP：3.22.171.120

姓名

吳雅筑(Ya-Jhu Wu) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

企業管理學系

論文名稱

是事不關己?還是責無旁貸? 消費者對無動物實驗化妝品之購買意圖研究
(Be Concerned or Duty-bound? The Research on Consumers′ Purchase Intentions of Cruelty-free Cosmetics)

相關論文

★ 資訊探求：以電子口碑觀點探討消費者購買決策過程	★ 共享電動機車的服務品質探討-以知覺價格為干擾變項
★ 影響遊戲實況觀眾之黏著度研究 - 整合心流經驗與錯失恐懼觀點

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

至系統瀏覽論文 ( 永不開放)

摘要(中)

近年來全球針對動物實驗的適用範圍有著諸多的討論，其中以運用在化妝品檢測上，受到最多的關注與爭議。除了民間動保團體與消費者的討論外，各國政府也紛紛的制定了相關政策，限制化妝品動物實驗的使用。因此，無動物實驗化妝品將成為未來的消費趨勢，而消費者無動物實驗化妝品的購買意圖也成了值得關注的議題。本研究以規範激活理論為基礎及價值觀為起始觀點，探討消費者對於無動物實驗化妝品的購買意圖。並將預期情緒整合進模型中，以釐清感性層面的預期情緒在理性為主的規範激活理論中對無動物實驗化妝品購買決策的影響。本研究採用網路問卷方式，共回收 508 份有效問卷，並以線性結構方程式進行研究假說分析。本研究實證結果表明，結果意識的關鍵性，個人只有對化妝品動物實驗的不利後果產生意識，才可能採取後續行動。另一方面，不論是利己價值觀還是生物利他價值觀皆對規範激活有正向顯著影響。此外，本研究還發現了預期情緒的完全中介效果，顯示有別於理性的決策方式，消費者較容易受到情緒的影響，選擇無動物實驗化妝品。上述關於無動物實驗化妝品購買意圖的影響因素結果，能夠提供於學術界與實務界做為參考依據。

摘要(英)

In recent years, there have been many discussions about the scope of application of animal tests, among which the application in cosmetics testing has received the most attention and controversy. In addition to discussions between private animal protection groups and consumers, governments of various countries have also formulated relevant policies to restrict the use of cosmetic animal tests. Therefore, cruelty-free cosmetics will become the future consumer trends, and the purchase intention have also become a topic worthy of our attention. Based on the norm activation model and values as the starting point of view, this research explores consumers′ purchase intentions for cruelty-free cosmetics. And integrate the anticipated feeling into the model to clarify the influence of the perceptual level of the anticipated feeling on the purchase intention of cruelty-free cosmetics in the rational norm activation model.
The research model was tested with data collected from 508 potential customers, and using structural equation modeling (SEM) to validate the causal relationship between variables. The empirical results of this study show that the awareness of consequences is critical, and individuals can only take follow-up actions if they are aware of the adverse consequences of cosmetic animal tests. On the other hand, both egoistic value and bios-altruistic value have a positive and significant impact on norm activation.
In addition, this study also found the complete mediation effect of anticipated feeling, showing that different from rational decisionmaking, consumers are affected by feeling and choose cruelty-free cosmetics. The above results on the influencing factors of the purchase intention of cruelty-free cosmetics could provide a
reference on the academic and practical aspects.

關鍵字(中)

★ 化妝品動物實驗
★ 規範激活理論
★ 價值觀
★ 預期情緒
★ 購買意圖

關鍵字(英)

★ Cosmetic animal tests
★ Norm Activation Theory
★ Values
★ Anticipated Feeling
★ Purchase Intention

論文目次

摘要 i
Abstract ii
致謝 iii
圖目錄 vi
表目錄 vi
第一章緒論 1
1-1研究背景與動機 1
1-2 研究目的 3
1-3 研究流程 4
第二章文獻探討 5
2-1 規範激活理論 5
2-2 價值觀 7
2-3 預期情緒 9
2-4 購買意圖 10
第三章研究方法 11
3-1 研究架構 11
3-2 研究假設 12
3-2-1價值觀與結果意識之關係 12
3-2-2 規範激活理論三變量之間關係 14
3-2-3預期情緒對責任歸屬及個人規範的中介關係 15
3-2-4購買意圖與個人規範、責任歸屬之關係 16
3-3 研究對象與資料蒐集 17
3-4 操作性定義與問卷設計 17
3.5 統計方法分析 21
3-5-1 敘述性統計分析 21
3-5-2 信度分析 22
3-5-3 效度分析 22
3-5-4 假設檢驗 23
第四章資料分析與研究討論 27
4-1 樣本基本資料分析 27
4-2 研究構面敘述性統計分析 30
4-3信效度分析 32
4-3-1 信度分析 32
4-3-2 效度分析 33
4-4 結構模型路徑分析 36
4-4-1 研究模型與模型配適度檢定 36
4-4-2 路徑分析 37
4-4-3 中介效果分析驗證 38
4-4-4 實證討論 41
第五章結論與建議 46
5-1 結論 46
5-2研究意涵 47
5-2-1 學術意涵 47
5-2-2 實務建議 48
5-3公共政策建議 50
5-4研究限制與未來方向 50
參考文獻 52

圖目錄
圖 1本研究流程 4
圖 2研究架構 11
圖 3研究模型路徑分析結果 37
表目錄
表 1價值觀變數之操作型定義及問項 17
表 2規範激活理論變數之操作型定義及問項 19
表 3預期情緒之操作型定義及問項 20
表 4購買意圖之操作型定義及問項 21
表 5配適指標參考值 23
表 6人口統計變項資料 28
表 7問項平均數與標準差統計表 30
表 8各構面之信度分析表 32
表 9驗證性因素分析表 33
表 10變數區別效度分析矩陣 35
表 11結構模型之整體模型配適度 36
表 12中介效果驗證 (結果意識中介改變的開放性與責任歸屬) 38
表 13中介效果驗證 (結果意識中介保護與責任歸屬) 39
表 14中介效果驗證 (結果意識中介自我超越與責任歸屬) 39
表 15中介效果驗證 (預期驕傲感中介責任歸屬與個人規範) 40
表 16中介效果驗證 (預期內疚感中介責任歸屬與個人規範) 40
表 17整體模型假說驗證彙整表 44

參考文獻

1. Abramson, L., Daniel, E., & Knafo-Noam, A. (2018). The role of personal values in children’s costly sharing and non-costly giving. Journal of experimental child psychology, 165, 117-134.
2. Agissova, F., & Sautkina, E. (2020). The Role of Personal and Political Values in Predicting Environmental Attitudes and Pro-environmental Behavior in Kazakhstan. Frontiers in psychology, 11, 3660.
3. Ajzen, I. (1985). From intentions to actions: A theory of planned behavior. In Action control (pp. 11-39). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.
4. Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1975). A Bayesian analysis of attribution processes. Psychological bulletin, 82(2), 261.
5. Amatulli, C., De Angelis, M., Peluso, A. M., Soscia, I., & Guido, G. (2019). The effect of negative message framing on green consumption: An investigation of the role of shame. Journal of Business Ethics, 157(4), 1111-1132.
6. APA, 2014. Retrieved from
https://www.apatw.org/node/1562
7. Avila, A. M., Bebenek, I., Bonzo, J. A., Bourcier, T., Bruno, K. L. D., Carlson, D. B., ... & Brown, P. C. (2020). An FDA/CDER perspective on nonclinical testing strategies: Classical toxicology approaches and new approach methodologies (NAMs). Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology, 114, 104662.
8. Bagozzi, R. P., & Yi, Y. (1988). On the evaluation of structural equation models. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 16(1), 74-94.
9. Baker, M. J., & Churchill Jr, G. A. (1977). The impact of physically attractive models on advertising evaluations. Journal of Marketing research, 14(4), 538-555.
10. Bamberg, S., Ajzen, I., & Schmidt, P. (2003). Choice of travel mode in the theory of planned behavior: The roles of past behavior, habit, and reasoned action. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 25, 175–188.
11. Bamberg, S., Hunecke, M., & Blöbaum, A. (2007). Social context, personal norms and the use of public transportation: Two field studies. Journal of environmental psychology, 27(3), 190-203.
12. Bardi, A., & Schwartz, S. H. (2003). Values and behavior: Strength and structure of relations. Personality and social psychology bulletin, 29(10), 1207-1220.
13. Braito, M. T., Böck, K., Flint, C., Muhar, A., Muhar, S., & Penker, M. (2017). Human-nature relationships and linkages to environmental behaviour. Environmental Values, 26(3), 365-389.
14. Browne, M. W. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. Testing structural equation models.
15. Büchs, M., & Koch, M. (2017). Postgrowth and wellbeing: Challenges to sustainable welfare. Springer.
16. Carrus, G., Passafaro, P., & Bonnes, M. (2008). Emotions, habits and rational choices in ecological behaviours: The case of recycling and use of public transportation. Journal of environmental psychology, 28(1), 51-62.
17. Claeys, C., Swinnen, A., & Abeele, P. V. (1995). Consumer′s means-end chains for “think” and “feel” products. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 12(3), 193-208.
18. Cordano, M., Welcomer, S., Scherer, R. F., Pradenas, L., & Parada, V. (2011). A cross-cultural assessment of three theories of pro-environmental behavior: A comparison between business students of Chile and the United States. Environment and Behavior, 43(5), 634-657.
19. Cronin, M. T., Bajot, F., Enoch, S. J., Madden, J. C., Roberts, D. W., & Schwöbel, J. (2009). The in chemico–in silico interface: challenges for integrating experimental and computational chemistry to identify toxicity. Alternatives to Laboratory Animals, 37(5), 513-521.
20. De Groot, J. I., & Steg, L. (2009). Morality and prosocial behavior: The role of awareness, responsibility, and norms in the norm activation model. The Journal of social psychology, 149(4), 425-449.
21. De Groot, J. I., & Steg, L. (2010). Relationships between value orientations, self-determined motivational types and pro-environmental behavioural intentions. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30(4), 368-378.
22. Denley, T. J., Woosnam, K. M., Ribeiro, M. A., Boley, B. B., Hehir, C., & Abrams, J. (2020). Individuals’ intentions to engage in last chance tourism: applying the value-belief-norm model. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 28(11), 1860-1881.
23. Diekmann, M., & Theuvsen, L. (2019). Non-participants interest in CSA–Insights from Germany. Journal of Rural Studies, 69, 1-10.
24. Döring, A. K., Daniel, E., & Knafo‐Noam, A. (2016). Introduction to the special section value development from middle childhood to early adulthood—New insights from longitudinal and genetically informed research. Social Development, 25(3), 471-481.
25. Dunlap, R. E., & Van Liere, K. D. (1978). The “new environmental paradigm”. The journal of environmental education, 9(4), 10-19.
26. Dunlap, R., Van Liere, K., Mertig, A. & Howell, R. (1992, August). Measuring endorsement of an ecological worldview: a revised NEP scale. Paper presented in the Annual Meeting of the Rural Sociology Society, PA.
27. Elster, A., & Gelfand, M. J. (2021). When guiding principles do not guide: The moderating effects of cultural tightness on value‐behavior links. Journal of Personality, 89(2), 325-337.
28. Erlandsson, A., Jungstrand, A. Å., & Västfjäll, D. (2016). Anticipated guilt for not helping and anticipated warm glow for helping are differently impacted by personal responsibility to help. Frontiers in psychology, 7, 1475.
29. Esfandiar, K., Dowling, R., Pearce, J., & Goh, E. (2020). Personal norms and the adoption of pro-environmental binning behaviour in national parks: An integrated structural model approach. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 28(1), 10-32.
30. Fellner, C. H., & Schwartz, S. H. (1971). Altruism in disrepute: medical versus public attitudes toward the living organ donor. New England Journal of Medicine, 284(11), 582-585.
31. Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error: Algebra and statistics. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(3), 382-388.
32. Frijda, N. H. (2007). What might emotions be? Comments on the Comments. Social Science Information, 46(3), 433-443.
33. Gao, J., Huang, Z., & Zhang, C. (2017). Tourists′ perceptions of responsibility: an application of norm-activation theory. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 25(2), 276-291.
34. Gärling, T., Fujii, S., Gärling, A., & Jakobsson, C. (2003). Moderating effects of social value orientation on determinants of proenvironmental behavior intention. Journal of environmental psychology, 23(1), 1-9.
35. Grankvist, G., Johnsen, S. Å. K., & Hanss, D. (2019). Values and willingness-to-pay for sustainability-certified mobile phones. International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology, 26(7), 657-664.
36. Grebitus, C., Steiner, B., & Veeman, M. (2015). The roles of human values and generalized trust on stated preferences when food is labeled with environmental footprints: Insights from Germany. Food Policy, 52, 84-91.
37. Guilford, J. P. (1966). Intelligence: 1965 model. American Psychologist, 21(1), 20.
38. Hammond, P. B., & Coppock, R. (1990). Valuing health risks, costs, and benefits for environmental decision making. National Academy Press.
39. Han, H. (2014). The norm activation model and theory-broadening: Individuals′ decision-making on environmentally-responsible convention attendance. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 40, 462-471.
40. Han, H., Hwang, J., & Lee, M. J. (2017). The value–belief–emotion–norm model: Investigating customers’ eco-friendly behavior. Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing, 34(5), 590-607.
41. Han, H., Hwang, J., Lee, M. J., & Kim, J. (2019). Word-of-mouth, buying, and sacrifice intentions for eco-cruises: Exploring the function of norm activation and value-attitude-behavior. Tourism Management, 70, 430-443.
42. Hansen, T., Sørensen, M. I., & Eriksen, M. L. R. (2018). How the interplay between consumer motivations and values influences organic food identity and behavior. Food Policy, 74, 39-52.
43. Harth, N. S., Leach, C. W., & Kessler, T. (2013). Guilt, anger, and pride about in-group environmental behaviour: Different emotions predict distinct intentions. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 34, 18-26.
44. He, X., & Zhan, W. (2018). How to activate moral norm to adopt electric vehicles in China? An empirical study based on extended norm activation theory. Journal of Cleaner Production, 172, 3546-3556.
45. Hopper, J. R., & Nielsen, J. M. (1991). Recycling as altruistic behavior: Normative and behavioral strategies to expand participation in a community recycling program. Environment and behavior, 23(2), 195-220.
46. Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural equation modeling: a multidisciplinary journal, 6(1), 1-55.
47. Hunecke, M., Blöbaum, A., Matthies, E., & Höger, R. (2001). Responsibility and environment: Ecological norm orientation and external factors in the domain of travel mode choice behavior. Environment and behavior, 33(6), 830-852.
48. Hüttel, A., Balderjahn, I., & Hoffmann, S. (2020). Welfare beyond consumption: The benefits of having less. Ecological Economics, 176, 106719.
49. Kang, J., & Moreno, F. (2020). Driving values to actions: Predictive modeling for environmentally sustainable product purchases. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 23, 224-235.
50. Kim, H., Lee, E. J., & Hur, W. M. (2012). The normative social influence on eco-friendly consumer behavior: The moderating effect of environmental marketing claims. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 30(1), 4-18.
51. Konuk, F. A. (2018). The role of store image, perceived quality, trust and perceived value in predicting consumers’ purchase intentions towards organic private label food. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 43, 304-310.
52. Kumar, B., Manrai, A. K., & Manrai, L. A. (2017). Purchasing behaviour for environmentally sustainable products: A conceptual framework and empirical study. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 34, 1-9.
53. Landon, A. C., Woosnam, K. M., & Boley, B. B. (2018). Modeling the psychological antecedents to tourists’ pro-sustainable behaviors: An application of the value-belief-norm model. Journal of sustainable tourism, 26(6), 957-972.
54. Lewis, M. (1993). Self-conscious emotions: Embarrassment, pride, shame, and guilt. In M. Lewis & J. M. Haviland (Eds.), Handbook of emotions (pp. 563-573). New York: Guilford.
55. Leyva, R. (2019). Experimental insights into the socio-cognitive effects of viewing materialistic media messages on welfare support. Media Psychology, 22(4), 601-625.
56. Liobikienė, G., & Juknys, R. (2016). The role of values, environmental risk perception, awareness of consequences, and willingness to assume responsibility for environmentally-friendly behaviour: The Lithuanian case. Journal of Cleaner Production, 112, 3413-3422.
57. Londono, J. C., Davies, K., & Elms, J. (2017). Extending the Theory of Planned Behavior to examine the role of anticipated negative emotions on channel intention: The case of an embarrassing product. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 36, 8-20.
58. MacKinnon, D. P., & Luecken, L. J. (2008). How and for whom? Mediation and moderation in health psychology. Health psychology, 27(2S), S99.
59. Manosuthi, N., Lee, J. S., & Han, H. (2020). Predicting the revisit intention of volunteer tourists using the merged model between the theory of planned behavior and norm activation model. Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing, 37(4), 510-532.
60. Meng, B., Chua, B. L., Ryu, H. B., & Han, H. (2020). Volunteer tourism (VT) traveler behavior: merging norm activation model and theory of planned behavior. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 28(12), 1947-1969.
61. Moghavvemi, S., Jaafar, N. I., Sulaiman, A., & Parveen Tajudeen, F. (2020). Feelings of guilt and pride: Consumer intention to buy LED lights. PloS one, 15(6), e0234602.
62. Muehlhauser, L. (2015). Four focus areas of effective altruism. The Effective Altruism Handbook. Oxford: Centre for Effective Altruism, 99-106.
63. Mulaik, S. A., James, L. R., Van Alstine, J., Bennett, N., Lind, S., & Stilwell, C. D. (1989). Evaluation of goodness-of-fit indices for structural equation models. Psychological bulletin, 105(3), 430.
64. Onwezen, M. C., Antonides, G., & Bartels, J. (2013). The Norm Activation Model: An exploration of the functions of anticipated pride and guilt in pro-environmental behaviour. Journal of economic psychology, 39, 141-153.
65. Park, J. (2002). The effect of product presentation on mood, perceived risk, and apparel purchase intention in internet apparel shopping. Diss.The Ohio State University.
66. Pérez-Villarreal, H. H., Martínez-Ruiz, M. P., & Izquierdo-Yusta, A. (2019). Testing model of purchase intention for fast food in mexico: How do consumers react to food values, positive anticipated emotions, attitude toward the brand, and attitude toward eating hamburgers?. Foods, 8(9), 369.
67. Perugini, M., & Bagozzi, R. P. (2001). The role of desires and anticipated emotions in goal‐directed behaviours: Broadening and deepening the theory of planned behaviour. British Journal of Social Psychology, 40(1), 79-98.
68. Ponte, E. B., Carvajal-Trujillo, E., & Escobar-Rodríguez, T. (2015). Influence of trust and perceived value on the intention to purchase travel online: Integrating the effects of assurance on trust antecedents. Tourism Management, 47, 286-302.
69. Ramayah, T., Lee, J. W. C., & Mohamad, O. (2010). Green product purchase intention: Some insights from a developing country. Resources, conservation and recycling, 54(12), 1419-1427.
70. Reinders, M. J., Onwezen, M. C., & Meeusen, M. J. (2017). Can bio-based attributes upgrade a brand? How partial and full use of bio-based materials affects the purchase intention of brands. Journal of Cleaner Production, 162, 1169-1179.
71. Rezaei, R., Safa, L., Damalas, C. A., & Ganjkhanloo, M. M. (2019). Drivers of farmers′ intention to use integrated pest management: Integrating theory of planned behavior and norm activation model. Journal of environmental management, 236, 328-339.
72. Ritov, I., & Baron. J. (1990). Reluctance to vaccinate: Omission bias and ambiguity. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 3, 263-277.
73. Robert-Demontrond, P., Beaudouin, V., & Dabadie, I. (2017). Diverse, conflicting and complementary worldviews: An anthropological investigation of consumption in CSA. Recherche et Applications en Marketing (English Edition), 32(4), 32-52.
74. Rokeach, M. (1968). A Theory of Organization and Change Within Value‐Attitude Systems 1. Journal of social issues, 24(1), 13-33.
75. Rosenthal, S., & Ho, K. L. (2020). Minding other people′s business: Community attachment and anticipated negative emotion in an extended norm activation model. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 69, 101439.
76. Rowe, Z. O., Wilson, H. N., Dimitriu, R. M., Breiter, K., & Charnley, F. J. (2017). The Best I Can Be: How Self‐Accountability Impacts Product Choice in Technology‐Mediated Environments. Psychology & Marketing, 34(5), 521-537.
77. Schmidt, P., Bamberg, S., Davidov, E., Herrmann, J., & Schwartz, S. H. (2007). Die Messung von Werten mit dem “Portraits Value Questionnaire”. Zeitschrift für Sozialpsychologie, 38(4), 261-275.
78. Schneider, C. R., Zaval, L., Weber, E. U., & Markowitz, E. M. (2017). The influence of anticipated pride and guilt on pro-environmental decision making. PloS one, 12(11), e0188781.
79. Schultz, R. T. (2005). Developmental deficits in social perception in autism: the role of the amygdala and fusiform face area. International Journal of Developmental Neuroscience, 23(2-3), 125-141.
80. Schwartz, S. H. (1977). Normative influences on altruism. In Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 10, pp. 221-279). Academic Press.
81. Schwartz, S. H., & Bardi, A. (2001). Value hierarchies across cultures: Taking a similarities perspective. Journal of cross-cultural Psychology, 32(3), 268-290.
82. Schwartz, S. H., & Fleishman, J. A. (1982). Effects of negative personal norms on helping behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 8(1), 81-86.
83. Schwartz, S. H., & Howard, J. A. (1980). Explanations of the moderating effect of responsibility denial on the personal norm-behavior relationship. Social Psychology Quarterly, 441-446.
84. Schwartz, S. H., & Sagiv, L. (1995). Identifying culture-specifics in the content and structure of values. Journal of cross-cultural psychology, 26(1), 92-116.
85. Sharma, R., & Jha, M. (2017). Values influencing sustainable consumption behaviour: Exploring the contextual relationship. Journal of Business Research, 76, 77-88.
86. Shin, Y. H., Im, J., Jung, S. E., & Severt, K. (2018). The theory of planned behavior and the norm activation model approach to consumer behavior regarding organic menus. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 69, 21-29.
87. Singer, P. (1972). Is act-utilitarianism self-defeating?. The Philosophical Review, 81(1), 94-104.
88. Song, H. J., Lee, C. K., Kang, S. K., & Boo, S. J. (2012). The effect of environmentally friendly perceptions on festival visitors’ decision-making process using an extended model of goal-directed behavior. Tourism Management, 33(6), 1417-1428.
89. Sonoda, Y., Oishi, K., Chomei, Y., & Hirooka, H. (2018). How do human values influence the beef preferences of consumer segments regarding animal welfare and environmentally friendly production?. Meat science, 146, 75-86.
90. SPCA (2014). Retrieved from
https://spca.org.tw/post/xie-hui-xin-wen-gao-hua-zhuang-pin-dong-wu-shi-yan-mei-bi-yao-dong-bao-zu-zhi-qi-pan-xiu-fa (April 16, 2021)
91. Stern, P. C., & Dietz, T. (1994). The value basis of environmental concern. Journal of social issues, 50(3), 65-84.
92. Stern, P. C., Dietz, T., Abel, T., Guagnano, G. A., & Kalof, L. (1999). A value-belief-norm theory of support for social movements: The case of environmentalism. Human ecology review, 81-97.
93. TABS Analytics (2016). Retrieved from
https://www.tabsanalytics.com/blog/millennial-women-key-to-growth-in-cosmetics-industry (May 5, 2021)
94. Testa, F., Annunziata, E., Iraldo, F., & Frey, M. (2016). Drawbacks and opportunities of green public procurement: an effective tool for sustainable production. Journal of cleaner production, 112, 1893-1900.
95. Thøgersen, J. (2009). Promoting public transport as a subscription service: Effects of a free month travel card. Transport Policy, 16(6), 335-343.
96. Tracy, J. L., & Robins, R. W. (2004). " Putting the Self Into Self-Conscious Emotions: A Theoretical Model". Psychological Inquiry, 15(2), 103-125.
97. Ünal, A. B., Steg, L., & Granskaya, J. (2019). “To support or not to support, that is the question”. Testing the VBN theory in predicting support for car use reduction policies in Russia. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 119, 73-81.
98. Vaske, J. J., Landon, A. C., & Miller, C. A. (2020). Normative influences on farmers’ intentions to practice conservation without compensation. Environmental Management, 66, 191-201.
99. Vecchione, M., Schwartz, S. H., Davidov, E., Cieciuch, J., Alessandri, G., & Marsicano, G. (2020). Stability and change of basic personal values in early adolescence: A 2‐year longitudinal study. Journal of personality, 88(3), 447-463.
100. Venugopal, A., & Shukla, D. (2019). Between hesitation and decisiveness—Understanding consumers′ ego, altruism, and eagerness to pay for renewable energy. Sustainable Development, 27(5), 932-944.
101. Verma, V. K., Chandra, B., & Kumar, S. (2019). Values and ascribed responsibility to predict consumers′ attitude and concern towards green hotel visit intention. Journal of Business Research, 96, 206-216.
102. Vermeir, I., & Verbeke, W. (2006). Sustainable food consumption: Exploring the consumer “attitude–behavioral intention” gap. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental ethics, 19(2), 169-194.
103. Vicente-Molina, M. A., Fernandez-Sainz, A., & Izagirre-Olaizola, J. (2018). Does gender make a difference in pro-environmental behavior? The case of the Basque Country University students. Journal of Cleaner Production, 176, 89–98.
104. Wang, B., Wang, X., Guo, D., Zhang, B., & Wang, Z. (2018). Analysis of factors influencing residents’ habitual energy-saving behaviour based on NAM and TPB models: Egoism or altruism?. Energy policy, 116, 68-77.
105. WWD BEAUTY INC (2021) Retrieved from
https://wwd.com/beauty-industry-news/beauty-features/loreal-unilever-lauder-top-wwd-beauty-incs-top-100-ranking-1234807041/ (May 15, 2021)
106. Zeelenberg, M., Nelissen, R. M., Breugelmans, S. M., & Pieters, R. (2008). On emotion specificity in decision making: Why feeling is for doing. Judgment and Decision making, 3(1), 18.
107. Zhang, Y., Zhang, H. L., Zhang, J., & Cheng, S. (2014). Predicting residents′ pro-environmental behaviors at tourist sites: The role of awareness of disaster′s consequences, values, and place attachment. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 40, 131-146.
108. Zuckerman, M., Siegelbaum, H., & Williams, R. (1977). Predicting helping behavior: Willingness and ascription of responsibility. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 7(4), 295-299.

指導教授

洪秀婉陳德釗(Shiu-Wan Hung Der-Chao Chen)

審核日期

2021-7-30

推文