博碩士論文 108421057 詳細資訊



以作者查詢圖書館館藏 、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士 、以作者查詢全國書目 、勘誤回報 、線上人數：14 、訪客IP：18.191.165.252
姓名 廖婕妘(Chieh-Yun Liao)  查詢紙本館藏   畢業系所 企業管理學系
論文名稱 風險態度與 P2P 借貸投資意願: 探討過度自信與知覺投資價值之中介
(Risk Attitude and Investment Intention of P2P Lending: Exploring the Mediation of Overconfidence Behavior and Perceived Investment Value)
檔案 [Endnote RIS 格式]    [Bibtex 格式]    [相關文章]   [文章引用]   [完整記錄]   [館藏目錄]   至系統瀏覽論文 (2027-7-4以後開放)
摘要(中) 本研究主要目的為探討投資者之風險態度對於其參與P2P借貸投資意願之關係，以投資者本身之過度自信與知覺投資價值為中介。本研究以網路問卷發放於P2P借貸平台、P2P借貸投資討論相關線上群組、及社群媒體。最終共蒐集533份有效問卷，樣本統整及分析由SPSS及AMOS軟體完成，並透過SEM完成路徑分析及假說檢定。研究結果顯示投資者之風險態度正向顯著影響其P2P借貸投資意願，並且其知覺投資價值存在正向顯著之中介效果。過度自信雖在有P2P借貸投資經驗者不具中介效果，但在無P2P借貸投資經驗者則具中介效果。並提供管理意涵、研究限制及未來建議，期許有助於P2P借貸於臺灣推廣。
摘要(英) The purpose of the research is to investigate the relationship between risk attitude and P2P lending investment intention, with overconfidence behavior and perceived investment value as mediators. An online questionnaire was distributed to P2P lending platform users, online P2P lending investment discussion groups, and social media. A total of 533 valid responses were retained for further analysis using SPSS and AMOS, with structural equation modeling applied for path analysis and hypotheses testing. Results show risk attitude is positively and significantly related to P2P lending investment intention. While perceived investment value is found to mediate the relationship, the mediation of overconfidence is found in people without P2P lending experience. Managerial implications, research limitations, and future recommendations are provided.
關鍵字(中) ★ P2P借貸
★ 投資意願
★ 風險態度
★ 過度自信
★ 知覺投資價值		 關鍵字(英) ★ P2P Lending
★ Investment Intention
★ Risk Attitude
★ Overconfidence Behavior
★ Perceived Investment Value
論文目次
Table of Content
摘要 vii
Abstract viii
致謝 ix
Table of Content x
List of Figures xii
Chapter 1 Introduction 1
Chapter 2 Literature Review 7
2.1 Peer-to-peer Lending (P2P lending) 7
2.2 Peer-to-peer Lending Investment Intention 8
2.3 Risk Attitude 11
2.4 Overconfidence Behavior 14
2.4.1 Risk Attitude and Overconfidence Behavior 16
2.4.2 Overconfidence Behavior and Investment Intention 16
2.5 Perceived Investment Value 17
2.5.1 Perceived Value 17
2.5.2 Perceived Investment Value 19
2.5.3 Risk Attitude, Perceived Investment Value, and P2P Lending Investment Intention 22
Chapter 3 Method 24
3.1. Conceptual Framework 24
3.2. Sample Collection 24
3.3. Instrument 25
3.4. Study Process 27
Chapter 4 Data Analysis and Results 31
4.1. Descriptive Statistics 31
4.2. Independent Sample t Test 33
4.3. Reliability Analysis 34
4.4. Correlation Analysis 34
4.5. Validity Analysis and Model Fit 36
4.5.1. Convergent Validity 36
4.5.2. Discriminant Validity 38
4.6. Structural Equation Modeling 38
Chapter 5 Conclusion and Discussion 47
5.1 Research Conclusion 47
5.2 Management Implications 51
5.2.1 Suggestions for P2P Lending Platforms and Companies 51
5.2.2 Suggestions for P2P Lending Investors 55
5.3 Research Limitations and Future Recommendations 56
References 60
參考文獻 References
1. Ajzen, I. (1985). From intentions to actions: A theory of planned behavior. In Action control (pp. 11-39). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-69746-3_2
2. Anna, I., & Abhishek, M. (2020). LendingClub to acquire Radius Bank for $185 million. Reuters. https://www.reuters.com/article/us-lendingclub-radius-idUSKBN20C2LR
3. Arifin, Z., & Soleha, E. (2019). Overconfidence, attitude toward risk, and financial literacy: A case in Indonesia stock exchange. Review of Integrative Business and Economics Research, 8, 144-152. http://buscompress.com/uploads/3/4/9/8/34980536/riber_8-s4_10_k19-110_144-152.pdf
4. Awais, M., Laber, M. F., Rasheed, N., & Khursheed, A. (2016). Impact of financial literacy and investment experience on risk tolerance and investment decisions: empirical evidence from Pakistan. International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, 6(1), 73-79. https://www.econjournals.com/index.php/ijefi/article/view/1414
5. Balasubramnian, B., & Sargent, C. S. (2020). Impact of inflated perceptions of financial literacy on financial decision making. Journal of Economic Psychology, 80, 102306. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2020.102306
6. Balyuk, T. (2019). Financial innovation and borrowers: Evidence from peer-to-peer lending. Rotman School of Management Working Paper (2802220). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2802220
7. Barber, B. M., & Odean, T. (2001). Boys will be boys: Gender, overconfidence, and common stock investment. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 116(1), 261-292. https://doi.org/10.1162/003355301556400
8. Bloomberg. (2020). Peer-to-Peer (P2P) Lending Market Size is Expected to Reach USD 558.91 Billion by 2027 - Valuates Reports. Bloomberg. https://www.bloomberg.com/press-releases/2020-05-22/peer-to-peer-p2p-lending-market-size-is-expected-to-reach-usd-558-91-billion-by-2027-valuates-reports
9. Bucciol, A., & Miniaci, R. (2011). Household portfolios and implicit risk preference. Review of Economics and Statistics, 93(4), 1235-1250. https://doi.org/10.1162/REST_a_00138
10. Cardak, B. A., & Martin, V. L. (2019). Once in a lifetime? The effects of the global financial crisis on household willingness to take financial risk. Economic Record, 95(311), 442-461. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-4932.12506
11. CBC. (2018). 主要國家P2P借貸之發展經驗與借鏡. https://knowledge.cbc.gov.tw/uploads/20201201/6a0b744e-f136-4220-b35e-9155b403e920.pdf
12. Chandon, P., Wansink, B., & Laurent, G. (2000). A benefit congruency framework of sales promotion effectiveness. Journal of Marketing, 64(4), 65-81. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.64.4.65.18071
13. Chang, H. H., & Wang, H. W. (2011). The moderating effect of customer perceived value on online shopping behaviour. Online Information Review. https://doi.org/10.1108/14684521111151414
14. Chang, H. H., Wang, Y.-H., & Yang, W.-Y. (2009). The impact of e-service quality, customer satisfaction and loyalty on e-marketing: Moderating effect of perceived value. Total Quality Management, 20(4), 423-443. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICQR.2011.6031600
15. Chen, D., Lai, F., & Lin, Z. (2014). A trust model for online peer-to-peer lending: a lender’s perspective. Information Technology and Management, 15(4), 239-254. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10799-014-0187-z
16. Cheng, H., & Guo, R. (2020). Risk preference of the investors and the risk of peer-to-peer lending platform. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 56(7), 1520-1531. https://doi.org/10.1080/1540496X.2019.1574223
17. Chuang, W.-I., & Lee, B.-S. (2006). An empirical evaluation of the overconfidence hypothesis. Journal of Banking & Finance, 30(9), 2489-2515. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2005.08.007
18. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Routledge.
19. Croce, A., Ughetto, E., & Cowling, M. (2020). Investment motivations and UK business angels’ appetite for risk taking: The moderating role of experience. British Journal of Management, 31(4), 728-751. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.12380
20. Daniel, K., & Hirshleifer, D. (2015). Overconfident investors, predictable returns, and excessive trading. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 29(4), 61-88. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.29.4.61
21. Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1989). User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science, 35(8), 982-1003. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.35.8.982
22. Demirguc-Kunt, A., Klapper, L., & Singer, D. (2017). Financial inclusion and inclusive growth: A review of recent empirical evidence. Policy Research Working Paper, No. 8040. World Bank. https://doi.org/10.1596/1813-9450-8040
23. Demyanyk, Y., & Kolliner, D. (2014). Peer-to-peer lending is poised to grow. Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland. https://www.clevelandfed.org/newsroom-and-events/publications/economic-trends/2014-economic-trends/et-20140814-peer-to-peer-lending-is-poised-to-grow.aspx
24. Díaz, A., & Esparcia, C. (2019). Assessing risk aversion from the investor’s point of view. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 1490. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01490
25. Doll, W. J., Xia, W., & Torkzadeh, G. (1994). A confirmatory factor analysis of the end-user computing satisfaction instrument. MIS quarterly, 453-461. https://doi.org/10.2307/249524
26. Fisher, I. N., & Hall, G. R. (1969). Risk and corporate rates of return. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 79-92. https://doi.org/10.2307/1883994
27. Fisk, R. P., Patrício, L., Ordanini, A., Miceli, L., Pizzetti, M., & Parasuraman, A. (2011). Crowd‐funding: Transforming customers into investors through innovative service platforms. Journal of Service Management. https://doi.org/10.1108/09564231111155079
28. Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981a). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50. https://doi.org/10.2307/3150979
29. Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981b). Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error: Algebra and statistics. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(3), 382-388. https://doi.org/10.2307/3150980
30. Friedman, R. (2018). How China’s peer-to-peer lending crash is destroying lives. Bloomberg Businessweek. https://www.bloombergquint.com/global-economics/peer-to-peer-lending-crash-in-china-leads-to-suicide-and-protest
31. Gao, Y., & Han, K.-S. (2020). Managerial overconfidence, CSR and firm value. Asia-Pacific Journal of Accounting & Economics, 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1080/16081625.2020.1830558
32. Gervais, S., Heaton, J. B., & Odean, T. (2011). Overconfidence, compensation contracts, and capital budgeting. The Journal of Finance, 66(5), 1735-1777. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2011.01686.x
33. Gervais, S., & Odean, T. (2001). Learning to be overconfident. The Review of Financial Studies, 14(1), 1-27. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/14.1.1
34. Gonzalez, L., & McAleer, K. (2011). Determinants of success in online social lending: A peak at US prosper & UK Zopa. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2442442
35. Grable, J., Lytton, R., & O′Neill, B. (2004). Projection bias and financial risk tolerance. The Journal of Behavioral Finance, 5(3), 142-147. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15427579jpfm0503_2
36. Grinblatt, M., & Keloharju, M. (2009). Sensation seeking, overconfidence, and trading activity. The Journal of Finance, 64(2), 549-578. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2009.01443.x
37. Guilford, J. P. (1965). Fundamental statistics in psychology and Education. McGraw-Hill.
38. Guo, Y., Zhou, W., Luo, C., Liu, C., & Xiong, H. (2016). Instance-based credit risk assessment for investment decisions in P2P lending. European Journal of Operational Research, 249(2), 417-426. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2015.05.050
39. Hair, J. F., A Tatham, R. L., A Anderson, R. E., & A Black, W. (2006). Multivariate Data Analysis (6th ed). Prentice Hall.
40. Han, L., Xiao, J. J., & Su, Z. (2019). Financing knowledge, risk attitude and P2P borrowing in China. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 43(2), 166-177. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijcs.12494
41. Hayduk, L. A. (1987). Structural equation modeling with LISREL: Essentials and advances. JHU Press.
42. Hoffmann, A. O., Post, T., & Pennings, J. M. (2015). How investor perceptions drive actual trading and risk-taking behavior. Journal of Behavioral Finance, 16(1), 94-103. https://doi.org/10.1080/15427560.2015.1000332
43. Holbrook, M. B. (1999). Consumer value: a framework for analysis and research. Psychology Press.
44. Hu, L. t., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural equation modeling: a multidisciplinary journal, 6(1), 1-55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
45. Jianakoplos, N. A., & Bernasek, A. (2008). Family financial risk taking when the wife earns more. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 29(2), 289-306. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10834-008-9102-2
46. Jiang, Y., Ho, Y.-C., Yan, X., & Tan, Y. (2018). Investor platform choice: herding, platform attributes, and regulations. Journal of Management Information Systems, 35(1), 86-116. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2018.1440770
47. Keller, C., & Siegrist, M. (2006). Investing in stocks: The influence of financial risk attitude and values-related money and stock market attitudes. Journal of Economic Psychology, 27(2), 285-303. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2005.07.002
48. Khan, M. T. I., Tan, S.-H., & Chong, L.-L. (2017). How past perceived portfolio returns affect financial behaviors—The underlying psychological mechanism. Research in International Business and Finance, 42, 1478-1488. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2017.07.088
49. KPMG, & H2Ventures. (2019). 2019 Fintech100: Leading Global fintech innovators. KPMG & H. Ventures. https://assets.kpmg/content/dam/kpmg/ch/pdf/fintech100-report-2019-en.pdf
50. Lee, S. (2017). Evaluation of Mobile Application in User′s Perspective: Case of P2P Lending Apps in FinTech Industry. KSII Transactions on Internet and Information Systems, 11(2), 1105-1117. https://doi.org/10.3837/tiis.2017.02.027
51. Li, J., Zheng, H., Kang, M., Wang, T., & Chen, S. (2016). Understanding Investment Intention towards P2P Lending: An Empirical Study. PACIS 216 Proceedings, 82. https://aisel.aisnet.org/pacis2016/82/
52. Lounio, M. (2014). Factors Affecting Consumer Investment Intentions. Empirical Evidence from Finland. Unpublished master′s thesis, Lappeenranta University of Technology. https://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi-fe2014093044982
53. Lv, Y., Dong, J., & Shi, X. (2018). An empirical study on the influencing factors of the P2P lending investment behavior of Chinese college students. 2018 International Conference on Management Science and Engineering (ICMSE), 289-295. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1109/ICMSE.2018.8744696
54. MacCallum, R. C., & Hong, S. (1997). Power analysis in covariance structure modeling using GFI and AGFI. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 32(2), 193-210. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327906mbr3202_5
55. Malekipirbazari, M., & Aksakalli, V. (2015). Risk assessment in social lending via random forests. Expert Systems with Applications, 42(10), 4621-4631. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2015.02.001
56. Markiewicz, Ł., Muda, R., Kubińska, E., & Augustynowicz, P. (2020). An explanatory analysis of perceived risk decision weights (perceived-risk attitudes) and perceived benefit decision weights (perceived-benefit attitudes) in risk-value models. Journal of Risk Research, 23(6), 739-761. https://doi.org/10.1080/13669877.2019.1628089
57. Markowitz, H. (1959). Portfolio selection. Yale University Press.
58. McDonald, R. P., & Ho, M.-H. R. (2002). Principles and practice in reporting structural equation analyses. Psychological Methods, 7(1), 64-82. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.7.1.64
59. Mengel, F., Tsakas, E., & Vostroknutov, A. (2016). Past experience of uncertainty affects risk aversion. Experimental Economics, 19(1), 151-176. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10683-015-9431-6
60. Merkle, C. (2017). Financial overconfidence over time: Foresight, hindsight, and insight of investors. Journal of Banking & Finance, 84, 68-87. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2001513
61. Moore, D. A., & Healy, P. J. (2008). The trouble with overconfidence. Psychological review, 115(2), 502. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.115.2.502
62. Ngai, J. (2018). What today’s shake-out in China’s peer-to-peer lending market means for fintech. McKinsey & Company Insights. https://www.mckinsey.com/cn/our-insights/perspectives-on-china-blog/what-todays-shakeout-in-chinas-peer-to-peer-lending-market-means-for-fintech
63. Nguyen, L., Gallery, G., & Newton, C. (2019). The joint influence of financial risk perception and risk tolerance on individual investment decision‐making. Accounting & Finance, 59, 747-771. https://doi.org/10.1111/acfi.12295
64. Nosić, A., & Weber, M. (2010). How riskily do I invest? The role of risk attitudes, risk perceptions, and overconfidence. Decision Analysis, 7(3), 282-301. https://doi.org/10.1287/deca.1100.0178
65. Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory (2nd ed.). McGraw-Hill.
66. Park, E., & Yao, R. (2016). Financial risk attitude and behavior: do planners help increase consistency? Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 37(4), 624-638. https://doi.org/10.32469/10355/42971
67. Peng, L., Zhang, W., Wang, X., & Liang, S. (2019). Moderating effects of time pressure on the relationship between perceived value and purchase intention in social E-commerce sales promotion: Considering the impact of product involvement. Information & Management, 56(2), 317-328. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2018.11.007
68. Puustinen, P. (2012). Towards a consumer-centric definition of value in the non-institutional investment context-conceptualization and measurement of perceived investment value. Tampere University Press.
69. Puustinen, P., Kuusela, H., & Rintamäki, T. (2012). Investment service providers gaining competitive advantage by focusing on consumers’ varying investment goals. Journal of Financial Services Marketing, 17(3), 191-205. https://doi.org/10.1057/fsm.2012.17
70. Puustinen, P., Maas, P., & Karjaluoto, H. (2013). Development and validation of the Perceived Investment Value (PIV) scale. Journal of Economic Psychology, 36, 41-54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2013.02.009
71. PwC. (2015). Peer pressure: How peer-to-peer lending platforms are transforming the consumer lending industry. https://www.pwc.com/us/en/consumer-finance/publications/assets/peer-to-peer-lending.pdf
72. Quiggin, J., & Chambers, R. G. (1998). Risk premiums and benefit measures for generalized-expected-utility theories. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 17(2), 121-138. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007767512327
73. Rohrmann, B. (2008). Risk perception, risk attitude, risk communication, risk management: A conceptual appraisal. 15th Internaional Emergency Management Society Annual Conference. https://tiems.info/dmdocuments/events/TIEMS_2008_Bernd_Rohrmann_Keynote.pdf
74. Russo, J. E., & Schoemaker, P. J. H. (2016). Overconfidence. In M. Augier & D. J. Teece (Eds.), The Palgrave Encyclopedia of Strategic Management (pp. 1-11). Palgrave Macmillan UK. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-94848-2_323-1
75. Schumacker, R. E., & Lomax, R. G. (2004). A beginner′s guide to structural equation modeling. Psychology Press.
76. Shneor, R., & Munim, Z. H. (2019). Reward crowdfunding contribution as planned behaviour: An extended framework. Journal of Business Research, 103, 56-70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.06.013
77. Simon, H. A. (1956). Rational choice and the structure of the environment. Psychological review, 63(2), 129. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0042769
78. Sipangkar, H., & Wijaya, C. (2020). Factors Affecting Intention to Investing in Peer-to-Peer Lending Platform toward Universitas Indonesia Students. International Journal of Management, 11(5), 751-763. https://doi.org/10.34218/IJM.11.5.2020.067
79. Sirdeshmukh, D., Singh, J., & Sabol, B. (2002). Consumer trust, value, and loyalty in relational exchanges. Journal of Marketing, 66(1), 15-37. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.66.1.15.18449
80. Sitkin, S. B., & Weingart, L. R. (1995). Determinants of risky decision-making behavior: A test of the mediating role of risk perceptions and propensity. Academy of management Journal, 38(6), 1573-1592. https://doi.org/10.2307/256844
81. Smith, J. B., & Colgate, M. (2007). Customer value creation: a practical framework. Journal of marketing Theory and Practice, 15(1), 7-23. https://doi.org/10.2753/MTP1069-6679150101
82. Statman, M., Thorley, S., & Vorkink, K. (2006). Investor overconfidence and trading volume. the Review of financial studies, 19(4), 1531-1565. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhj032
83. Swait, J., & Sweeney, J. C. (2000). Perceived value and its impact on choice behavior in a retail setting. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 7(2), 77-88. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0969-6989(99)00012-0
84. Sweeney, J. C., & Soutar, G. N. (2001). Consumer perceived value: The development of a multiple item scale. Journal of retailing, 77(2), 203-220. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-4359(01)00041-0
85. Thaker, M. A. B. M. T., Thaker, H. B. M. T., Rahman, M. P. B., Amin, M. F. B., Pitchay, A. B. A., & Olaniyi, N. O. (2019). Factors Affecting Investors′ Intention to Invest in Peer-to-Peer Lending Platform in Malaysia: An Extended Technology Acceptance Model. ADBI Working Papers No. 998. https://www.adb.org/publications/factors-affecting-investors-intention-invest-peer-peer-lending-platform-malaysia
86. Tsai, C.-H. (2018). To regulate or not to regulate: A comparison of government responses to peer-to-peer lending among the United States, China, and Taiwan. University of Cincinnati Law Review, 87, 1077. https://scholarship.law.uc.edu/uclr/vol87/iss4/5
87. United Nations (2005). Importance of inclusive financial sector for poverty reduction underlined, as chair of advisors to international year of microcredit closes forum. United Nations. https://www.un.org/press/en/2005/dev2554.doc.htm
88. Wan, Q., Chen, D., & Shi, W. (2016). Online peer-to-peer lending decision making: Model development and testing. Social Behavior and Personality: an international journal, 44(1), 117-130. https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.2016.44.1.117
89. Wang, C., & Tong, L. (2020). Lender rationality and trade-off behavior: Evidence from Lending Club and Renrendai. International Review of Economics & Finance, 70, 55-66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2020.07.014
90. Wang, P., Zheng, H., Chen, D., & Ding, L. (2015). Exploring the critical factors influencing online lending intentions. Financial Innovation, 1(1), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40854-015-0010-9
91. Wang, Q., Xiong, X., & Zheng, Z. (2021). Platform characteristics and online peer-to-peer lending: evidence from China. Finance Research Letters, 38, 101511. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2020.101511
92. Worldbank (2018). UFA2020 Overview: Universal Financial Access by 2020. Worldbank. https://www.worldbank.org/en/topic/financialinclusion/brief/achieving-universal-financial-access-by-2020
93. Weber, E. U., & Milliman, R. A. (1997). Perceived risk attitudes: Relating risk perception to risky choice. Management science, 43(2), 123-144. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.43.2.123
94. Yang, X., Zhao, K., Tao, X., & Shiu, E. (2019). Developing and validating a theory-based model of crowdfunding investment intention—Perspectives from social exchange theory and customer value perspective. Sustainability, 11(9), 2525. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11092525
95. Zeithaml, V. A. (1988). Consumer perceptions of price, quality, and value: a means-end model and synthesis of evidence. Journal of Marketing, 52(3), 2-22. https://doi.org/10.2307/1251446
96. Zhang, K., & Chen, X. (2017). Herding in a P2P lending market: Rational inference OR irrational trust? Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 23, 45-53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.elerap.2017.04.001
97. Zhang, Y., Jia, Q., & Chen, C. (2021). Risk attitude, financial literacy and household consumption: Evidence from stock market crash in China. Economic Modelling, 94, 995-1006. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2020.02.040
98. Zhang, Y., Wang, T., Kang, M., Li, Y., & Chen, Y. (2017). Understanding Investment Intention Towards Social Lending--Based on Social Exchange Theory. PACIS 2017 Proceedings, 168. https://aisel.aisnet.org/pacis2017/168/
99. Zhao, H., Ge, Y., Liu, Q., Wang, G., Chen, E., & Zhang, H. (2017). P2P lending survey: platforms, recent advances and prospects. ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology (TIST), 8(6), 1-28. https://doi.org/10.1145/3078848
100. Zhou, R., & Pham, M. T. (2004). Promotion and prevention across mental accounts: When financial products dictate consumers& investment goals. Journal of Consumer Research, 31(1), 125-135. https://doi.org/10.1086/383429
指導教授 杜秉叡、鄭明松 審核日期 2022-7-11
推文 facebook   plurk   twitter   funp   google   live   udn   HD   myshare   reddit   netvibes   friend   youpush   delicious   baidu   
網路書籤 Google bookmarks   del.icio.us   hemidemi   myshare   

若有論文相關問題，請聯絡國立中央大學圖書館推廣服務組 TEL:(03)422-7151轉57407，或E-mail聯絡  - 隱私權政策聲明