參考文獻 |
1. Donkuru, M., et al., Advancing nonviral gene delivery: lipid-and surfactant-based nanoparticle design strategies. Nanomedicine, 2010. 5(7): p. 1103-1127.
2. Niidome, T. and L. Huang, Gene therapy progress and prospects: nonviral vectors. Gene therapy, 2002. 9(24): p. 1647-1652.
3. Mellott, A.J., M.L. Forrest, and M.S. Detamore, Physical non-viral gene delivery methods for tissue engineering. Annals of biomedical engineering, 2013. 41(3): p. 446-468.
4. Caffery, B., J.S. Lee, and A.A. Alexander-Bryant, Vectors for glioblastoma gene therapy: viral & non-viral delivery strategies. Nanomaterials, 2019. 9(1): p. 105.
5. Somia, N. and I.M. Verma, Gene therapy: trials and tribulations. Nature Reviews Genetics, 2000. 1(2): p. 91-99.
6. Islam, M.A., et al., Major degradable polycations as carriers for DNA and siRNA. Journal of Controlled Release, 2014. 193: p. 74-89.
7. Mintzer, M.A. and E.E. Simanek, Nonviral vectors for gene delivery. Chemical reviews, 2009. 109(2): p. 259-302.
8. Hayat, S.M.G., et al., Gene delivery using lipoplexes and polyplexes: principles, limitations and solutions. Critical Reviews™ in Eukaryotic Gene Expression, 2019. 29(1).
9. Toualbi, L., M. Toms, and M. Moosajee, The landscape of non-viral gene augmentation strategies for inherited retinal diseases. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 2021. 22(5): p. 2318.
10. Rajala, A., et al., Nanoparticle-assisted targeted delivery of eye-specific genes to eyes significantly improves the vision of blind mice in vivo. Nano letters, 2014. 14(9): p. 5257-5263.
11. Sum, C.H., et al., Physical characterization of gemini surfactant-based synthetic vectors for the delivery of linear covalently closed (LCC) DNA ministrings. PLoS One, 2015. 10(11): p. e0142875.
12. Kamal, M.S., A review of gemini surfactants: potential application in enhanced oil recovery. Journal of Surfactants and Detergents, 2016. 19(2): p. 223-236.
13. Kirby, A.J., et al., Gemini surfactants: new synthetic vectors for gene transfection. Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 2003. 42(13): p. 1448-1457.
14. Bombelli, C., et al., Gemini surfactant based carriers in gene and drug delivery. Current medicinal chemistry, 2009. 16(2): p. 171-183.
15. Zana, R., Dimeric (gemini) surfactants: effect of the spacer group on the association behavior in aqueous solution. Journal of colloid and interface science, 2002. 248(2): p. 203-220.
16. Moghaddam, B., Design and development of cationic liposomes as DNA vaccine adjuvants. 2013, Aston University.
17. Menger, F.M. and B.N. Mbadugha, Gemini surfactants with a disaccharide spacer. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 2001. 123(5): p. 875-885.
18. Lin, L.-H., et al., Oxyethylene chain length affects the physicochemical properties of sugar-based anionic surfactants with phosphates groups. Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects, 2015. 485: p. 118-124.
19. Johnsson, M., et al., Sugar-based gemini surfactants with pH-dependent aggregation behavior: vesicle-to-micelle transition, critical micelle concentration, and vesicle surface charge reversal. Langmuir, 2003. 19(11): p. 4609-4618.
20. Donkuru, M., et al., Designing pH-sensitive gemini nanoparticles for non-viral gene delivery into keratinocytes. Journal of Materials Chemistry, 2012. 22(13): p. 6232-6244.
21. Hoque, J., et al., Effect of amide bonds on the self-assembly of gemini surfactants. Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics, 2014. 16(23): p. 11279-11288.
22. Fielden, M.L., et al., Sugar‐based tertiary amino gemini surfactants with a vesicle‐to‐micelle transition in the endosomal pH range mediate efficient transfection in vitro. European Journal of Biochemistry, 2001. 268(5): p. 1269-1279.
23. Aldosari, B.N., I.M. Alfagih, and A.S. Almurshedi, Lipid nanoparticles as delivery systems for RNA-based vaccines. Pharmaceutics, 2021. 13(2): p. 206.
24. Rejman, J., et al., Size-dependent internalization of particles via the pathways of clathrin-and caveolae-mediated endocytosis. Biochemical journal, 2004. 377(1): p. 159-169.
25. Parton, R.G., Caveolae: structure, function, and relationship to disease. Annual review of cell and developmental biology, 2018. 34: p. 111-136.
26. Gilleron, J., et al., Image-based analysis of lipid nanoparticle–mediated siRNA delivery, intracellular trafficking and endosomal escape. Nature biotechnology, 2013. 31(7): p. 638-646.
27. Sahay, G., D.Y. Alakhova, and A.V. Kabanov, Endocytosis of nanomedicines. Journal of controlled release, 2010. 145(3): p. 182-195.
28. Bus, T., A. Traeger, and U.S. Schubert, The great escape: how cationic polyplexes overcome the endosomal barrier. Journal of Materials Chemistry B, 2018. 6(43): p. 6904-6918.
29. Wang, R., et al., Synthesis and Aggregation of Novel Sugar‐Based Gemini Surfactant with a N, N′‐Acetylethylenediamine Spacer in Aqueous Solution. Journal of Surfactants and Detergents, 2020. 23(4): p. 697-703.
30. Rabi, I.I., et al., A new method of measuring nuclear magnetic moment. Physical review, 1938. 53(4): p. 318.
31. Skoog, D.A., F.J. Holler, and S.R. Crouch, Principles of instrumental analysis. 2017: Cengage learning.
32. 邱玉洁, et al., 生物医学核磁共振中的模式识别方法. 波谱学杂志, 2005. 22(1): p. 99-111.
33. Bax, A. and S. Grzesiek, Methodological advances in protein NMR. Accounts of Chemical Research, 1993. 26(4): p. 131-138.
34. Govindaraju, V., K. Young, and A.A. Maudsley, Proton NMR chemical shifts and coupling constants for brain metabolites. NMR in Biomedicine: An International Journal Devoted to the Development and Application of Magnetic Resonance In Vivo, 2000. 13(3): p. 129-153.
35. Uhlenbeck, G.E. and L.S. Ornstein, On the theory of the Brownian motion. Physical review, 1930. 36(5): p. 823.
36. Arzenšek, D., R. Podgornik, and D. Kuzman. Dynamic light scattering and application to proteins in solutions. in Seminar, Department of Physics, University of Ljubljana. 2010.
37. Bhattacharjee, S., DLS and zeta potential–what they are and what they are not? Journal of controlled release, 2016. 235: p. 337-351.
38. Goldburg, W.I., Dynamic light scattering. American Journal of Physics, 1999. 67(12): p. 1152-1160.
39. Champness, P.E., Electron diffraction in the transmission electron microscope. 2020: Garland Science.
40. Giannuzzi, L.A. and F.A. Stevie, A review of focused ion beam milling techniques for TEM specimen preparation. Micron, 1999. 30(3): p. 197-204.
41. Williams, D.B. and C.B. Carter, The transmission electron microscope, in Transmission electron microscopy. 1996, Springer. p. 3-17.
42. De Broglie, L., Waves and quanta. Nature, 1923. 112(2815): p. 540-540.
43. Kwiecińska, B., S. Pusz, and B.J. Valentine, Application of electron microscopy TEM and SEM for analysis of coals, organic-rich shales and carbonaceous matter. International Journal of Coal Geology, 2019. 211: p. 103203.
44. Clark, B.R. and E. Engvall, Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA): Theoretical and practical aspects, in Enzyme-immunoassay. 2018, CRC Press. p. 167-180.
45. Lin, A.V., Indirect Elisa, in ELISA. 2015, Springer. p. 51-59.
46. Gonzalez, R.M., et al., Development and validation of sandwich ELISA microarrays with minimal assay interference. Journal of proteome research, 2008. 7(6): p. 2406-2414.
47. Libeau, G., et al., Development of a competitive ELISA for detecting antibodies to the peste des petits ruminants virus using a recombinant nucleobrotein. Research in veterinary science, 1995. 58(1): p. 50-55.
48. Juers, D.H., B.W. Matthews, and R.E. Huber, LacZ β‐galactosidase: structure and function of an enzyme of historical and molecular biological importance. Protein Science, 2012. 21(12): p. 1792-1807.
49. Lyklema, J., Fundamentals of interface and colloid science: soft colloids. Vol. 5. 2005: Elsevier.
50. Timms, J.F. and R. Cramer, Difference gel electrophoresis. Proteomics, 2008. 8(23‐24): p. 4886-4897.
51. Aaij, C. and P. Borst, The gel electrophoresis of DNA. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA)-Nucleic Acids and Protein Synthesis, 1972. 269(2): p. 192-200.
52. Hames, B.D., Gel electrophoresis of proteins: a practical approach. Vol. 197. 1998: OUP Oxford.
53. Adan, A., et al., Flow cytometry: basic principles and applications. Critical reviews in biotechnology, 2017. 37(2): p. 163-176.
54. McKinnon, K.M., Flow cytometry: an overview. Current protocols in immunology, 2018. 120(1): p. 5.1. 1-5.1. 11.
55. Kron, P., J. Suda, and B.C. Husband, Applications of flow cytometry to evolutionary and population biology. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics, 2007: p. 847-876.
56. Barlogie, B., et al., Flow cytometry in clinical cancer research. Cancer research, 1983. 43(9): p. 3982-3997.
57. Zana, R. and Y. Talmon, Dependence of aggregate morphology on structure of dimeric surfactants. Nature, 1993. 362(6417): p. 228-230.
58. Peltonen, L.J. and J. Yliruusi, Surface pressure, hysteresis, interfacial tension, and CMC of four sorbitan monoesters at water–air, water–hexane, and hexane–air interfaces. Journal of colloid and interface science, 2000. 227(1): p. 1-6.
59. Pérez-Rodríguez, M., et al., A comparative study of the determination of the critical micelle concentration by conductivity and dielectric constant measurements. Langmuir, 1998. 14(16): p. 4422-4426.
60. Patist, A., et al., On the measurement of critical micelle concentrations of pure and technical‐grade nonionic surfactants. Journal of Surfactants and Detergents, 2000. 3(1): p. 53-58.
61. Wang, L.-H., K.G. Rothberg, and R. Anderson, Mis-assembly of clathrin lattices on endosomes reveals a regulatory switch for coated pit formation. The Journal of cell biology, 1993. 123(5): p. 1107-1117.
62. Koivusalo, M., et al., Amiloride inhibits macropinocytosis by lowering submembranous pH and preventing Rac1 and Cdc42 signaling. Journal of Cell Biology, 2010. 188(4): p. 547-563.
63. Horikawa, Y.T., et al., Caveolin-3 expression and caveolae are required for isoflurane-induced cardiac protection from hypoxia and ischemia/reperfusion injury. Journal of molecular and cellular cardiology, 2008. 44(1): p. 123-130. |