台灣地區中小型製造業工業4.0數位化管理與工程配適對營運績效之影響實證研究

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：37

、訪客IP：18.217.198.254

姓名

羅子茵(Tzu-Yin Lo) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

企業管理學系

論文名稱

台灣地區中小型製造業工業4.0數位化管理與工程配適對營運績效之影響實證研究
(Impact of Strategic Alignment between Management and Technique of Industry 4.0 on Operational Performance)

相關論文

★ 企業流程為核心的食品產業運籌體系規劃:低溫物流部份	★ 以企業流程方法規劃整體飛航後勤維修體系之研究
★ 成衣產業導入ERP運籌管理方案之個案研究	★ 光電產業試產基地之生產最佳化模式：以光投影機為例
★ TFT LCD產業獲利因素之探討	★ 科技事業進行合併/讓售之決策過程與成效之個案探討
★ 企業治理、風險及遵循解決方案導入之個案研究-以職責分離資訊系統為例	★ 品質機能展開與多準則決策於設備開發應用
★ ERP導入品質因素對IFRS轉換專案之影響	★ ERP投資金額對服務品質及導入後IT治理目標之分析
★ ERP 導入問題對專案的影響	★ IFRS轉換對員工退休金計畫影響
★ IFRS轉換問題對IFRS效益的影響	★ 電子產業新產品開發參考模式之發展
★ 應用資料科學方法提昇國防裝備可靠度之研究－以防空系統為例	★ 企業資訊方案行銷歷程之探討-以MES為例

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

至系統瀏覽論文 (2027-7-1以後開放)

摘要(中)

目前國際上提出許多工業4.0（Industry 4.0）的相關研究，亦指出在實施工業4.0的情況下，能成功提升組織營運績效。然而，卻鮮少將工業4.0細分為管理層面及工程層面，並針對其策略配適度進行探討。因此，本研究欲探討工業4.0數位化管理與工業4.0數位化工程配適對營運績效之影響。
本研究透過157份樣本，針對台灣地區中小型製造業進行實證研究，採用三個配適模型：共變異模型、構型離差模型以及型態模型，透過偏最小平方結構方程模式（PLS-SEM）、歐基里德離差距離法（Euclidean Distance）、集群分析（Cluster Analysis）進行重複驗證，論證在考量策略配適的情況下，企業的營運績效是否會優於只探討單一面向策略。
研究結果顯示，企業在有效的工業4.0數位化管理與工程策略配適模型下，組織營運績表現較佳。因此，在實施工業4.0時，企業應考量多面向策略要能相互配合，方能有效提升組織營運績效並創造競爭優勢。

摘要(英)

Despite the variety of Industry 4.0 research, and it is also pointed out that the implementation of industry 4.0 can successfully improve the operation performance of enterprises, little attention has been given to the use of alignment of industry 4.0 in a supply chain and rarely subdivided industry 4.0 into management level and technique level. Therefore, this study intends to explore the impact of strategic alignment between management and technique of Industry 4.0 on operational performance.
Drawing on the alignment perspective, an alignment model is developed to identify the implications of industry 4.0 for operational performance. Empirical data used to test the research model were collected from Taiwan′s small and medium-sized manufacturing enterprises, yielding 157 valid samples. We discussed the relationship between industry 4.0, alignment and operational performance, using partial least square structural equation model（PLS-SEM）, Euclidean Distance and Cluster Analysis. Proposed a research model that combined the three dimensions for verification. It is used to confirm whether Alignment is a prerequisite for Taiwan′s small and medium-sized manufacturing enterprises to develop Industry 4.0, having influence on operating performance.
The results show that the alignment of management and technique in Industry 4.0 has a significant impact on operating performance and means that, to create maximum benefits, an enterprise needs to focus on the optimal strategy and strive to complement it with the development of management and technique skills.

關鍵字(中)

★ 配適
★ 工業4.0
★ 中小型企業
★ 製造業
★ 營運績效

關鍵字(英)

★ Alignment
★ Industry 4.0
★ Small and Medium Enterprise
★ Manufacturing
★ Operational performance

論文目次

摘要 i
ABSTRACT ii
目錄 iii
圖目錄 v
表目錄 vi
第一章緒論 1
1.1 研究背景與動機 1
1.2 研究目的與範圍 2
1.3 研究流程與論文結構 3
1.3.1 研究流程 3
1.3.2 論文結構 4
第二章相關研究 6
2.1 工業4.0 6
2.1.1 工業4.0的發展 6
2.1.2 工業4.0的觀念與技術 7
2.2 營運績效 8
2.3 中小型製造業 8
2.4 配適 9
第三章研究模型 12
3.1 研究模型構面 12
3.2 研究分析方法與假設 14
3.2.1 共變異模型 15
3.2.2 構型離差模型 17
3.2.3 型態模型 17
第四章實證研究 19
4.1 研究問卷發展 19
4.1.1 研究問卷問項與意涵 19
4.1.2 研究問卷尺度衡量方法 21
4.2 研究問卷發放與資料蒐集 23
4.2.1 研究問卷發放方式 23
4.2.2 研究問卷回收概況 24
4.3 敘述性統計分析 25
4.4 測量模型分析 31
4.4.1 信度及效度分析 31
4.4.2 區別效度分析 34
4.5 策略配適模型檢測 35
4.5.1 共變異模型 35
4.5.2 構型離差模型 39
4.5.3 型態模型 41
4.6 研究論述 43
4.6.1 組織設立之工業4.0策略與組目標及營運績效間的關係 44
4.6.2 組織工業4.0策略的理想狀態與企業營運績效間的關係 44
4.6.3 部門間工業4.0策略表現之配合程度與營運績效之關係 45
4.6.4 理論意涵 46
4.6.5 實務論述 47
第五章結論與後續研究 48
5.1 研究結論 48
5.2 研究限制與後續研究 49
參考文獻 50

參考文獻

主計總處（2020）。國民所得統計及國內經濟情勢展望。行政院。
主計總處（2021）。行業統計分類。行政院。
經濟部中小企業處（2020）。中小企業統計。行政院。
經濟部中小企業處（2020）。中小企業認定標準。行政院
張文文（2013）。台灣地區中型企業供應鏈基本佈局型態之探討。國立中央大學企業管理學系碩士班。
黃佳琦（2015）。中型製造業永續供應鏈實踐機制之探討。國立中央大學企業管理學系碩士班。
蔡薈芳（2021）。從精實生產到工業4.0：台灣地區中小企業的實證研究。國立中央大學企業管理學系碩士班。
Aspesi, C., & Vardhan, D. (1999). Brilliant strategy, but can you execute?. The McKinsey Quarterly, (1), 89-90.
Azab, N. A. (2005). Investigating IT-Business Alignment in an Egyptian Medium-Sized Enterprise (Case Study). In European and Mediterranean Conference on Information systems, Cairo, Egypt. .
Belekoukias, I., Garza-Reyes, J. A., & Kumar, V. (2014). The impact of lean methods and tools on the operational performance of manufacturing organisations. International Journal of Production Research, 52(18), 5346-5366.
Bergeron, F., Raymond, L., & Rivard, S. (2001). Fit in strategic information technology management research: an empirical comparison of perspectives. Omega, 29(2), 125-142.
Bergeron, F., Raymond, L., & Rivard, S. (2004). Ideal patterns of strategic alignment and business performance. Information & management, 41(8), 1003-1020.
Bower, J. L. (2007). How managers′ everyday decisions create or destroy your company′s strategy. Strategic Direction.
Brinch, M. (2018). Understanding the value of big data in supply chain management and its business processes: Towards a conceptual framework. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 38(7), 1589-1614.
Buer, S.-V., Strandhagen, J. O., & Chan, F. T. S. (2018). The link between Industry 4.0 and lean manufacturing: mapping current research and establishing a research agenda. International Journal of Production Research, 56(8), 2924-2940.
Carr, N. G. (2003). IT doesn′t matter. Educause Review, 38, 24-38.
Čater, T., & Pučko, D. (2010). Factors of effective strategy implementation: Empirical evidence from Slovenian business practice. Journal for East European Management Studies, 207-236.
Chan, Y. E., Huff, S. L., Barclay, D. W., & Copeland, D. G. (1997). Business strategic orientation, information systems strategic orientation, and strategic alignment. Information systems research, 8(2), 125-150.
Chan, Y. E., & Reich, B. H. (2007). IT alignment: What have we learned? Journal of Information Technology, 22(4), 297-315.
Croteau, A. M., & Bergeron, F. (2001). An information technology trilogy: business strategy, technological deployment and organizational performance. The journal of strategic information systems, 10(2), 77-99.
Dalenogare, L. S., Benitez, G. B., Ayala, N. F., & Frank, A. G. (2018). The expected contribution of Industry 4.0 technologies for industrial performance. International Journal of production economics, 204, 383-394.
Delery, J. E., & Doty, D. H. (1996). Modes of theorizing in strategic human resource management: Tests of universalistic, contingency, and configurational performance predictions. Academy of management Journal, 39(4), 802-835.
Drazin, R., & Van de Ven, A. H. (1985). Alternative forms of fit in contingency theory. Administrative science quarterly, 514-539.
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50.
Galpin, T. J. (1998). When Leaders Really Walk the Talk: Making Strategy Work Through People. Human Resource Planning, 21(3).
Giles, W. D. (1991). Making strategy work. Long range planning, 24(5), 75-91.
Gupta, A. K., & Govindarajan, V. (1984). Business unit strategy, managerial characteristics, and business unit effectiveness at strategy implementation. Academy of Management journal, 27(1), 25-41.
Hair Jr, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2021). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). Sage publications.
Hambrick, D. C., & Cannella Jr, A. A. (1989). Strategy implementation as substance and selling. Academy of Management Perspectives, 3(4), 278-285.
Heide, M., Grønhaug, K., & Johannessen, S. (2002). Exploring barriers to the successful implementation of a formulated strategy. Scandinavian journal of management, 18(2), 217-231.
Henderson, J. C., & Venkatraman, H. (1999). Strategic alignment: Leveraging information technology for transforming organizations. IBM systems journal, 38(2.3), 472-484.
Hrebiniak, L. (2008). Making strategy work: Overcoming the obstacles to effective execution. Ivey Business Journal, 72(2), 1-6.
Higgins, J. M. (2005). The eight ‘S’s of successful strategy execution. Journal of change management, 5(1), 3-13.
Hulland, J. (1999). Use of partial least squares (PLS) in strategic management research: A review of four recent studies. Strategic management journal, 20(2), 195-204.
Li, Y., Guohui, S., & Eppler, M. J. (2008). Making strategy work: A literature review on the factors influencing strategy implementation.
Lippitt, M. (2007). Fix the disconnect between strategy and execution. T AND D, 61(8), 54.
Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (2006). How to implement a new strategy without disrupting your organization. Harvard business review, 84(3), 100.
Kolla, S., Minufekr, M., & Plapper, P. (2019). Deriving essential components of lean and industry 4.0 assessment model for manufacturing SMEs. Procedia Cirp, 81, 753-758.
Marsh, H. W., & Hocevar, D. (1985). Application of confirmatory factor analysis to the study of self-concept: First-and higher order factor models and their invariance across groups. Psychological bulletin, 97(3), 562.
Martin, R. L. (2010). How hierarchy can hurt strategy execution. Harvard Business Review, 88(7-8), 74-75.
Martin, R. L. (2010). The execution trap. Harvard Business Review, 88(7/8), 64.
Miles, R. E., & Snow, C. C. (1984). Fit, failure and the hall of fame. California Management Review, 26(3), 10-28.
Miller, D. (1981). Toward a new contingency approach: The search for organizational gestalts. Journal of management studies, 18(1), 1-26.
Miller, S. (1997). Implementing strategic decisions: Four key success factors. Organization studies, 18(4), 577-602.
Moeuf, A., Pellerin, R., Lamouri, S., Tamayo-Giraldo, S., & Barbaray, R. (2018). The industrial management of SMEs in the era of Industry 4.0. International Journal of Production Research, 56(3), 1118-1136.
Nunnally, J. C. (1994). Psychometric theory 3E: Tata McGraw-hill education.
Porter, M.E. (1996), “What is strategy”, Harvard Business Review, November-December, pp. 60-78.
Puchan, J., Zeifang, A., & Leu, J. D. (2018, December). Industry 4.0 in practice-identification of industry 4.0 success patterns. In 2018 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management (IEEM) (pp. 1091-1095). IEEE.
Puchan, J., Krischke, A., & Leu, J.D. (2019年1月)。全台首次566家公司智慧製造大調查：誰是最佳工業4.0企業﹖。天下雜誌，665，72-86。
Rashidirad, M., Soltani, E., & Syed, J. (2013). Strategic alignment between competitive strategy and dynamic capability: Conceptual framework and hypothesis development. Strategic change, 22(3‐4), 213-224.
Rosin, F., Forget, P., Lamouri, S., & Pellerin, R. (2020). Impacts of Industry 4.0 technologies on Lean principles. International Journal of Production Research, 58(6), 1644-1661.
Schmidt, S. L., & Brauer, M. (2006). Strategic governance: How to assess board effectiveness in guiding strategy execution. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 14(1), 13-22.
Segars, A. H., & Grover, V. (1998). Strategic information systems planning success: an investigation of the construct and its measurement. MIS quarterly, 139-163.
Shaw, J. D., Gupta, N., & Delery, J. E. (2001). Congruence between technology and compensation systems: Implications for strategy implementation. Strategic Management Journal, 22(4), 379-386.
Srivastava, A. K. (2015). Modeling organizational and information systems for effective strategy execution. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 28(4), 556.
Srivastava, A. K. (2017). Alignment: the foundation of effective strategy execution. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 66(8), 1043-1063.
Thomas, A. J. (2008). Advanced manufacturing technology implementation: A review of benefits and a model for change. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 57(2), 156-176.
Thompson, A. A., & Strickland, A. J. (2003). Strategic Management: Concepts and Cases. tata Mc Graw. New Delhi.
Van de Ven, A. H., & Drazin, R. (1984). The concept of fit in contingency theory. Minnesota univ minneapolis strategic management research center.
Venkatraman, N. (1989). The concept of fit in strategy research: Toward verbal and statistical correspondence. Academy of management review, 14(3), 423-444.
Venkatraman, N. (1990). Performance implications of strategic coalignment: a methodological perspective. Journal of management studies, 27(1), 19-41.
Venkatraman, N., & Prescott, J. E. (1990). Environment‐strategy coalignment: An empirical test of its performance implications. Strategic management journal, 11(1), 1-23.
Vinzi, V. E., Trinchera, L., & Amato, S. (2010). PLS path modeling: from foundations to recent developments and open issues for model assessment and improvement. In Handbook of partial least squares (pp. 47-82). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.
Weking, J., Stöcker, M., Kowalkiewicz, M., Böhm, M., & Krcmar, H. (2020). Leveraging industry 4.0–A business model pattern framework. International Journal of Production Economics, 225, 107588.
Xu, L. D., Xu, E. L., & Li, L. (2018). Industry 4.0: state of the art and future trends. International Journal of Production Research, 56(8), 2941-2962.
Youndt, M. A., Snell, S. A., Dean Jr, J. W., & Lepak, D. P. (1996). Human resource management, manufacturing strategy, and firm performance. Academy of management Journal, 39(4), 8

指導教授

呂俊德(Jun-Der Leu)

審核日期

2022-6-29

推文