基於門控循環單元於塗佈機異常偵測之研究 —以A公司為例

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：54

、訪客IP：3.129.20.62

姓名

李珮榆(Pei-Yu Li) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

工業管理研究所

論文名稱

基於門控循環單元於塗佈機異常偵測之研究 —以A公司為例
(Anomaly Detection for Coating Machine Based on Gated Recurrent Unit Approach —A Case Study of Company A)

相關論文

★ 應用灰色理論於有機農產品之經營管理— 需求預測及關鍵成功因素探討	★ NAND型Flash價格與交運量預測在風險分析下之決策模式
★ 工業電腦用無鉛晶片組最適存貨政策之研究-以A公司為例	★ 砷化鎵代工廠磊晶之最適存貨管理-以W公司為例
★ 資訊分享&決策制定下產銷協同關係之研究 -以IC設計業為例	★ 應用分析層級法於電子化學品業委外供應商評選準則之研究
★ 應用資料探勘於汽車售服零件庫存滯銷因素分析-以C公司為例	★ 多目標規劃最佳六標準差水準: 以薄膜電晶體液晶顯示器C公司製造流程為例
★ 以資料探勘技術進行消費者返廠定期保養之實證研究	★ 以價值鏈觀點探討品牌公司關鍵組織流程之取決-以S公司為例
★ 應用產銷協同規劃之流程改善於化纖產業-現況改善與效益分析	★ 權力模式與合作關係對於報價策略之影響研究—以半導體產業A公司為例
★ 應用資料探勘於汽車製造業之庫存原因分析	★ 以類神經網路預測代工費報價---以中小面板產業C公司為例
★ 電路板產業存貨改善研究-以N公司為例	★ 運用六標準差改善機台備用零件(Spare parts)存貨管理

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

至系統瀏覽論文 ( 永不開放)

摘要(中)

隨著工業 4.0 的時代來臨，智慧製造成為近年來最熱門的產業趨勢與競爭決勝關鍵，世界各大廠商均紛紛導入智慧製造相關技術，臺灣各工具機大廠也整合人工智慧 (Artificial Intelligence, AI)、感測器 (Sensor) 及物聯網 (Internet of Things, IoT) 等技術，將設備轉型為智慧機械，發展成當今全球市場樣態，而預測性維護技術在智慧製造中扮演非常重要的角色，會將機器設備加裝的感測器所收集並儲存於雲端系統的即時資料進行分析，預測未來機台故障的可能性與時間點，避免停機問題的發生，進而提升整體設備效率。
本研究使用 A 公司塗佈機實際生產時所回傳的資料，提出一項基於門控循環單元 (Gated Recurrent Unit, GRU) 的異常檢測方法，對設備進行診斷，先將資料透過主成分分析 (Principal Components Analysis, PCA) 進行降維，取出重要特徵後再透過 GRU 來建置預測模型，最後將驗證結果繪製出來，可以觀察約能在 30.5 秒前偵測到異常，促使維修人員在設備故障前進行維護程序，預先解決潛在問題，進而提升設備正常運作時間與生產品質。

摘要(英)

With the advent of Industry 4.0, smart manufacturing has become the most popular industrial trend and the key to competition in recent years. The world′s leading manufacturers have imported into technologies related to smart manufacturing, and Taiwan′s major tool manufacturers have also integrated Artificial Intelligence (AI), Sensor and Internet of Things (IoT) technologies to transform their equipment into smart machines, which have developed into the current global market pattern. The technology of predictive maintenance plays a very important role in the smart manufacturing. Through the analysis of the real-time data collected by the sensors installed in the machine equipment and stored in the cloud system, the possibility and timing of future machine failure can be predicted to avoid the occurrence of machine downtime. This will prevent downtime problems and improve overall equipment efficiency.
In this study, we propose an anomaly detection method based on Gated Recurrent Unit (GRU) to diagnose the equipment by using the data returned from the actual production of coating machines in Company A. The data is reduced dimension through Principal Components Analysis (PCA) to extract important features and then GRU is used to build a predictive model. Finally, after plotting the validation results, you can observe that anomalies can be detected about 30.5 seconds earlier. To prompt service person to carry out maintenance procedures before equipment failure and solve potential problems in advance, thus improving equipment operation time and production quality.

關鍵字(中)

★ 深度學習
★ 主成分分析
★ 門控循環單元
★ 機台異常預診斷
★ 智慧製造

關鍵字(英)

★ Deep Learning
★ Principal Components Analysis
★ Gated Recurrent Unit
★ Anomaly Prognostics of Machine
★ Smart Manufacturing

論文目次

中文摘要...I
Abstract...II
目錄...III
圖目錄...V
表目錄...VII

一、緒論...1
1-1研究背景與動機...1
1-2研究目的...2
1-3研究架構...3

二、文獻探討...4
2-1故障預測與健康管理(Prognostic and Health Management, PHM)...4
2-2深度學習(Deep Learning, DL)...6
2-3門控循環單元 (Gated Recurrent Unit, GRU)...9
2-4主成分分析 (Principal Components Analysis , PCA)...11

三、研究方法...13
3-1研究項目...13
3-2研究問題...14
3-3主成分分析(PCA)...15
3-4門控循環單元(GRU)...18
3-4-1滑動窗口 (Sliding Window)...22
3-4-2激勵函數(Activation Function)...22
3-4-3損失函數 (Loss Function)...25
3-4-4優化器 (Optimizer)...25
3-5模型評估(Model Evaluation)...26

四、實驗與分析...28
4-1實驗環境與開發工具...28
4-2實驗流程...29
4-2-1實驗資料說明...29
4-2-2資料降維...31
4-2-3實驗設計...33
4-3實驗結果...37
4-3-1驗證資料...37
4-3-2驗證結果...38

五、結論與未來研究方向...42
5-1結論...42
5-2未來研究方向...43
參考文獻...44

參考文獻

1.Ye (2019) 维度規約(降维)算法在WEKA中應用，檢自
<http://tecdat.cn/%e7%bb%b4%e5%ba%a6%e8%a7%84%e7%ba%a6%ef%bc%88%e9%99%8d%e7%bb%b4%ef%bc%89%e7%ae%97%e6%b3%95%e5%9c%a8weka%e4%b8%ad%e5%ba%94%e7%94%a8/>
2.Bian, J., Wang, L., Scherer, R., Woźniak, M., Zhang, P., & Wei, W. (2021). Abnormal detection of electricity consumption of user based on particle swarm optimization and long short term memory with the attention mechanism. IEEE Access, 9, 47252-47265.
3.Braeken, J., & Van Assen, M. A. (2017). An empirical Kaiser criterion. Psychological Methods, 22(3), 450.
4.Cho, K., Van Merriënboer, B., Gulcehre, C., Bahdanau, D., Bougares, F., Schwenk, H., & Bengio, Y. (2014). Learning phrase representations using RNN encoder-decoder for statistical machine translation. arXiv preprint arXiv:1406.1078.
5.Compare, M., Baraldi, P., & Zio, E. (2019). Challenges to IoT-enabled predictive maintenance for industry 4.0. IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 7(5), 4585-4597.
6.DeLima, T. F., Shastri, B. J., Tait, A. N., Nahmias, M. A., & Prucnal, P. R. (2017). Progress in neuromorphic photonics. Nanophotonics, 6(3), 577-599.
7.Du, B., He, Y., An, B., & Zhang, C. (2020). Remaining useful performance estimation for complex analog circuit based on maximal information coefficient and bidirectional gate recurrent unit. IEEE Access, 8, 102449-102466..
8.Ejaz, M. S., Islam, M. R., Sifatullah, M., & Sarker, A. (2019). Implementation of principal component analysis on masked and non-masked face recognition. Paper presented at the 1st international conference on advances in science, engineering and robotics technology (ICASERT), Dhaka, Bangladesh.
9.Fei, J., Wang, H., & Hua, M. (2020). Double-Hidden-Layer Recurrent Neural Network Fractional-Order Sliding Mode Control of Shunt Active Power Filter. IFAC-PapersOnLine, 53(2), 6232-6237.
10.Framework for Complex Engineered Systems. IEEE Sensors Journal, 21(18), 20421-20430.
11.Fu, R., Zhang, Z., & Li, L. (2016). Using LSTM and GRU neural network methods for traffic flow prediction. Paper presented at the 31st Youth Academic Annual Conference of Chinese Association of Automation (YAC), Wuhan, China.
12.Hochreiter, S., & Schmidhuber, J. (1997). Long short-term memory. Neural computation, 9(8), 1735-1780.
13.Hota, H. S., Handa, R., & Shrivas, A. K. (2017). Time series data prediction using sliding window based RBF neural network. International Journal of Computational Intelligence Research, 13(5), 1145-1156.
14.Jiang, M., Fu, G., Wang, D., & Zhang, D. (2015). Using failure analysis techniques to identify key information of PHM, Prognostics and System Health Management Conference (PHM). IEEE, 1-4.
15.Kalgren, P. W., Byington, C. S., Roemer, M. J., & Watson, M. J. (2006). Defining PHM, a lexical evolution of maintenance and logistics. IEEE Autotestcon, 353-358.
16.Khelifi, L., & Mignotte, M. (2020). Deep learning for change detection in remote sensing images: Comprehensive review and meta-analysis. IEEE Access, 8, 126385-126400.
17.Kostadinov. (2017). Understanding GRU Networks. Retrieved from < https://towardsdatascience.com/understanding-gru-networks-2ef37df6c9be>
18.Krizhevsky, A., Sutskever, I., & Hinton, G. E. (2012). Imagenet classification with deep convolutional neural networks. Advances in neural information processing systems, 25.
19.Kumar, A., Shankar, R., & Thakur, L. S. (2018). A big data driven sustainable manufacturing framework for condition-based maintenance prediction. Journal of computational science, 27, 428-439.
20.Kwon, D., Hodkiewicz, M. R., Fan, J., Shibutani, T., & Pecht, M. G. (2016). IoT-based prognostics and systems health management for industrial applications. IEEE Access, 4, 3659-3670.
21.Liu, J., Wang, W., Ma, F., Yang, Y. B., & Yang, C. S. (2012). A data-model-fusion prognostic framework for dynamic system state forecasting. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 25(4), 814-823.
22.Liu, L., Jiang, H., He, P., Chen, W., Liu, X., Gao, J., & Han, J. (2019). On the variance of the adaptive learning rate and beyond. arXiv preprint arXiv:1908.03265.
23.Liu, W., Qin, C., Gao, K., Li, H., Qin, Z., Cao, Y., & Si, W. (2019). Research on medical data feature extraction and intelligent recognition technology based on convolutional neural network. IEEE Access, 7, 150157-150167.
24.Li, Y., Zou, L., Jiang, L., & Zhou, X. (2019). Fault diagnosis of rotating machinery based on combination of deep belief network and one-dimensional convolutional neural network. IEEE Access, 7, 165710-165723.
25.Ortiz Laguna, J., Olaya, A. G., & Borrajo, D. (2011). A dynamic sliding window approach for activity recognition. In international conference on user modeling, adaptation, and personalization. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.
26.Pavithra, M., Saruladha, K., & Sathyabama, K. (2019). GRU based deep learning model for prognosis prediction of disease progression. Paper presented at the 3rd International Conference on Computing Methodologies and Communication(ICCMC), Erode, India.
27.Pereira, F. C., & Borysov, S. S. (2019). Machine learning fundamentals. In Mobility Patterns, Big Data and Transport Analytics. Elsevier, 9-29.
28.Pearson, K. (1901). LIII. On lines and planes of closest fit to systems of points in space. The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin philosophical magazine and journal of science, 2(11), 559-572.
29.Schmidhuber, J. (2015). Deep learning in neural networks: An overview. Neural networks, 61, 85-117.
30.Sehovac, L., & Grolinger, K. (2020). Deep learning for load forecasting: Sequence to sequence recurrent neural networks with attention. IEEE Access, 8, 36411-36426.
31.Sharma, S., Sharma, S., & Athaiya, A. (2017). Activation functions in neural networks. towards data science, 6(12), 310-316.
32.Shewalkar, A. N. (2018). Comparison of rnn, lstm and gru on speech recognition data.
33.Sui, X., Wu, Q., Liu, J., Chen, Q., & Gu, G. (2020). A review of optical neural networks. IEEE Access, 8, 70773-70783.
34.Tao, Y., Wang, X., Sánchez, R. V., Yang, S., & Bai, Y. (2019). Spur gear fault diagnosis using a multilayer gated recurrent unit approach with vibration signal. IEEE Access, 7, 56880-56889.
35.Vichare, N. M., & Pecht, M. G. (2006). Prognostics and health management of electronics. IEEE transactions on components and packaging technologies, 29(1), 222-229.
36.Wang, Y., Jiang, K., & Xu, L. (2021). Sensor-Data-Driven Fusion Prognostic
37.Wrught. (2019). New Deep Learning Optimizer, Ranger: Synergistic combination of RAdam + LookAhead for the best of both.
Retrieved from < https://lessw.medium.com/new-deep-learning-optimizer-ranger-synergistic-combination-of-radam-lookahead-for-the-best-of-2dc83f79a48d >
38.Yan, J., Meng, Y., Lu, L., & Guo, C. (2017). Big-data-driven based intelligent prognostics scheme in industry 4.0 environment. Paper presented at the Prognostics and System Health Management Conference (PHM), Harbin, China.
39.Yang, R., Feng, L., Wang, H., Yao, J., & Luo, S. (2020). Parallel recurrent convolutional neural networks-based music genre classification method for mobile devices. IEEE Access, 8, 19629-19637.
40.Yang, S., Yu, X., & Zhou, Y. (2020). Lstm and gru neural network performance comparison study: Taking yelp review dataset as an example. Paper presented at the International workshop on electronic communication and artificial intelligence (IWECAI), Shanghai, China.
41.Yang, X., Chen, J., & Moon, Y. S. (2010). Restoration of low resolution car plate images using PCA based image super-resolution. Paper presented at the IEEE International Conference on Image Processing, Dallas, TX, USA.
42.Ye, J., Zhao, J., Ye, K., & Xu, C. (2020). How to build a graph-based deep learning architecture in traffic domain: A survey. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.
43.Yu, Y., Zhu, Y., Li, S., & Wan, D. (2014). Time series outlier detection based on sliding window prediction. Mathematical problems in Engineering, 2014.
44.Zhang, M., Lucas, J., Ba, J., & Hinton, G. E. (2019). Lookahead optimizer: k steps forward, 1 step back. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 32.
45.Zhang, P., Yang, L., & Li, D. (2020). EfficientNet-B4-Ranger: A novel method for greenhouse cucumber disease recognition under natural complex environment. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 176, 105652.

指導教授

陳振明(Jen-Ming Chen)

審核日期

2022-7-5

推文