| 摘要(英) |
The value of land in Taiwan is the main reason why it is more difficult for homeowners to sell land, and the resulting high housing prices make basic housing needs more like luxury goods that people cannot afford. Most young people are forced to live in private housing with expensive rents, and the limited rent subsidies of the government and the slow construction of social housing due to the problems are exacerbated by the limitations of their institutions. In addition, in response to the hidden worry of insufficient pension for the elderly that the aging population will face, the traditional concept of "housing for the aged" policy advocated by Taiwan′s government agencies tends to be ineffective in leaving children and grandchildren in real estate.
None of the housing policies set by government agencies have been effective in reducing national economic risks and maintaining social stability. In the analysis of national housing annuities and case studies, this study explores the historical evolution of social housing in various countries to understand its sustainable operation mechanism and ways to improve it, and concentrates on the core housing issues of various countries as a reference for improving Taiwan′s housing dilemma. It will explore the social and economic problems of national housing annuities to solve the social and economic problems of youth unaffordable housing, slow urban prosperity, insufficient pensions, and the crisis of national security with a declining birthrate. The results of the study cite the economic cycle theory, combining the advantages of the system operation of housing cooperatives and social housing foundation to sands implement the recycling of idle land as a feasible way to solve Taiwan′s core housing problems.
This study takes housing as a basic human right and suggests that government agencies should reward and assist local or private enterprises in providing vacant land as residential land for the construction of national housing annuities. Through the joint agreement between the government and the private sector, a feasible system to solve the phased housing dilemma will be established, and the financial system and working citizens will jointly build a national housing annuity. Jointly achieving the right of residence is the due obligation of the government to guarantee the working people, and the construction of nests and the choice of housing forms are the due rights of all Taiwan people.
|
| 參考文獻 |
[1] 余騰耀、等, “永續循環經濟概念_案例分享,”211頁,初版,台北,財團法人中技社,民國一百零七年十二月.
[2] 梁玲菁, “社區力點線面,”民國一百零九年六月.取自
https://ms-community.azurewebsites.net/page/9/.
[3] M. Lafond著,合作住宅指南,賴彥如譯, OURs 都市改革組織,台北,民國一百零九年.
[4] 彭楊凱、詹俊傑, “社會住宅民間來蓋！荷蘭經驗的台灣啟事,” 天下雜誌, 台北, 台灣,民國一百零七年三月十日. 取自https://opinion.cw.com.tw/blog/profile/411/article/6193.
[5] 彭揚凱、詹竣傑, “專題特輯_住宅法人的必要性與國外,”台北,台灣,民國一百零七年十二月.取自https://www.villagetaipei.net/Post?PId=14443
[6] P. Boelhouwer, “The housing market in The Netherlands as a driver for social inequalities: proposals for reform,”Internaltionnal Journal of Housing Policy, Vol 44, pp. 430-456,November 2019.
[7] 夏磊、任澤平, 全球房地產,1-457頁,初版,中信出版集團股份有限公司,北京市,民國一百一十年四月.
[8] 楊恭豪, “無殼蝸牛三十週年,”OURs 都市改革組織,民國一百零九年.
[9] 馬瑞辰, “執行長專欄－談台灣和南韓房地產現況 Executive Director′s Column,” 民國一百一十年.
[10] 鄭紹鈺, “新加坡「住者有其屋」政策（上）,”民國一百零七年八月二日.取自https://www.thenewslens.com/article/146901.
[11] 游榮富, 100張圖輕鬆變成地產大亨！,1-271頁,初版,台灣廣廈有聲圖書有限公司編者, 新北市, 民國一百零八年五月.
[12] Alexander Osterwalder&Yves Pigneur著,獲利世代,1-101頁,尤傳莉譯,早安財經文化有限公司,台北,民國一百一十年.
[13] 李澤旭、等, “中國第一家住宅合作社正式誕生於上海,民國93年十二月二十七日.取自http://news.sina.com.cn/c/2004-12-27/10415342305.shtml.
[14] 許信強、黃昭閔, “淺析不動產估價重置提撥費與折舊提存費之疑義”.
[15]《報導者》, “政府給地、你蓋屋：荷蘭青年合作造屋實驗中，台灣能否跟上多元住宅生產模式？,”民國一百一十年五月十日.取自https://www.twreporter.org/a/youth-house-rent-issue-affordable-housing-nederland.
[16] 社會住宅推動聯盟, “國外案例─亞洲五國社會住宅比較,” 民國一百一十一年一月二十六日.取自http://socialhousingtw.blogspot.com/2014/08/blog-post_66.html.
[17] 張月瑩、等, Interviewee, 【座談筆記】台灣合作住宅的先行者：淺談合作住宅推動實務的現況與挑戰. [採訪].民國一百零八年十一月二十五日.
[18] 張金鶚, 張金鶚的都市更新九堂課, 初版,方智出版社故份有限公司,台北市, 民國一百年十二月.
[19] 陳奎河, “Housing markets and government intervention in East Asian countries,” International Journal of Urban Scriences,Vol 17, pp32-45,2013.
[20] 陳正浩, “從地價調查估計規則及不不動產估價技術規則探討賣賣交易案例房地價格拆分,”1-22頁 新莊市, 民國一百零三年十月三十一日.
[21] 陳順宇, 多變量分析,2-7頁,第四版, 台北, 華泰書局,民國九十五年六月.
|
[Endnote RIS 格式]
[相關文章]
[文章引用]
[完整記錄]
[館藏目錄]
至系統瀏覽論文 ( 永不開放)
plurk
funp
live
udn
HD
myshare
netvibes
friend
youpush
delicious
baidu
Google bookmarks
del.icio.us
hemidemi
facebook
twitter
google
reddit