參考文獻 |
一、中文參考文獻
王朝暉:悖論式領導如何讓員工兩全其美—心理安全感和工作繁榮感的多重仲介作用,外國經濟與管理,2018年3月
王朝暉:員工資質過剩感與越軌創新—基於悖論視角的鏈式仲介關係研究,經濟經緯,2019年第5期
朱朝暉:《探索性學習、挖掘性學習和創新績效》,《科學學研究》,2008年第4期
宋錕泰,張正堂,趙李晶:《時間壓力對員工雙元創新行為的影響機制》,《經濟管理》,2019年第5期
李俊華,張春彩:雙元領導、員工雙元行為與企業創新績效-員工主動性人格的調節作用,河南師範大學學報(哲學社會科學版)2021年第48卷第4期
余惠敏,矛盾領導行為對部屬工作績效之影響:工作熟練度、適應行為與主動積極行為的仲介效果探討,國立中央大學,碩士論文,2019年
姚豔虹,季凡祺:悖論思維對創造力的“過猶不及”效應研究,中國人力資源開發,2021年第4期
陳婉如,矛盾領導行為對創新行為與工作績效之影響,國立中央大學,碩士論文,2020年
傅馨瑩,矛盾領導行為對部屬工作績效之影響:矛盾追隨行為的仲介與調節效果的探討,國立中央大學,碩士論文,2018年
張濤,悖論式領導、員工雙元行為與創新績效的關係研究,2018
鄧伊惠,矛盾領導行為與部屬任務性績效的關聯性─以部屬複雜整合力及部屬整合性思維為仲介變項,國立中央大學,碩士論文,2018年
韓楊, 羅瑾璉, 鐘競. 雙元領導對團隊創新績效影響研究—基於慣例視角[J]. 管理科學, 2016, 29(1):70-85.
蘇品真,矛盾領導行為、矛盾追隨行為與部屬適應性行為關聯性之探討—不確定性規避的調節式仲介效果的檢驗,國立中央大學,碩士論文,2019年
二、英文參考文獻
Andriopoulos C, Lewis M W. Exploitation-exploration tensions and organizational ambidexterity: managing paradoxes of innovation[J]. Organization Science, 2009, 20(4): 696–717.
Alexander L, Van Knippenberg D. Teams in pursuit of radical innovation: A goal orientation perspective [J]. IEEE Engineering Management Review, 2017, 45(1):105-120.
Angeliki Papachroni and Loizos Heracleous, Ambidexterity as Practice: Individual Ambidexterity Through Paradoxical Practices, The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science I-23. 2020.
Bentler, P. M., & Bonett, D. G., "Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures." Psychological bulletin, 88(3), pp 588. 1980.
Borman, W. C., & Motowidlo, S. (1993). Expanding the criterion domain to include elements of contextual performance. In Personnel selection in organizations, 71–98. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Brown S L, Eisenhardt K M. The art of continuous change: Linking complexity theory and time-based evolution in relentlessly shifting organizations [J]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1997, 42 (1): 1-34.
Benner M J, Tushman M L. Exploitation, Exploration, and Process Management: The Productivity Dilemma Revisited [J]. Academy of Management Review, 2003, 28(2):238-256.
Blanchard, K.,Leading at a higher level: Blanchard on leadership and creating high performing organisations, Pearson Education, 2007.
Bledow R, Frese M, Anderson N, et al. A Dialectic Perspective on Innovation: Conflicting Demands, Multiple Pathways, and Ambidexterity [J]. Industrial & Organizational Psychology, 2009, 2(3):305-337.
Borman, Bryant, & Dorio, J. (2010). The measurement of task performanceas criteria in selection research. In Handbook ofemployee selection , 439–462.
Campbell. (1990). Modeling the performance prediction problem in industrial and organizational psychology. In Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology, 687–732.
Carmeli A, Halevi M Y. How top management team behavioral integration and behavioral complexity enable organizational ambidexterity: The moderating role of contextual ambidexterity.[J]. Leadership Quarterly, 2009, 20(2):207-218.
Chang Chen and Zhe Zhang, Ming Jia Effect of stretch goals on work–family conflict Role of resource scarcity and employee paradox mindset, 2020.
Damanpour F. Organizational complexity and innovation: developing and testing multiple contingency models [J]. Management science 1996; 42(5): 693-716.
Duncan R B. The Ambidextrous Organization: Designing Dual Structures for Innovation. The Management of Organization Design, 1976(1).
Floyd S W, Lane P J. Strategizing throughout the organization: Managing role conflict in strategic renewal [J]. Academy of management review, 2000, 25(1): 154-177.
Gerstner, C. R., &Day, D.V. (1997). Meta-Analytic review of leader–member exchange theory: Correlates and construct issues. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82(6), 827–844.
Gardner, H., & Hatch, T., "Educational implications of the theory of multiple intelligences." Educational researcher, 18(8), pp 4-10. 1989.
Gibson C B, Birkinshaw J. The Antecedents, Consequences, and Mediating Role of Organizational Ambidexterity [J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2004, 47(2):209-226.
Gupta A K, Smith K G, Shalley C E. The interplay between exploration and exploitation [J]. Academy of management journal, 2006, 49(4): 693-706.
Griffin, M. A., et al. (2007). "A new model of work role performance: Positive behavior in uncertain and interdependent contexts." Academy of Management journal 50(2): 327-347.
Hershey, P., & Blanchard, K. H., "Management of organizational behavior." Prentiss Hall, England Cleft, NJ, pp 236-244. 1977
Hochwarter, W. A., Kiewitz, C., Gundlach, M. J., & Stoner, J. (2004). The impact of ocational and social efficacy on job performance and career satisfaction. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 10(3), 27-40.
He Z L, Wong P K. Exploration v.s Exploitation: An Empirical Test of the Ambidexterity Hypothesis. Organization Science, 2004(4)
Han M. Achieving superior internationalization through strategic ambidexterity. Journal of Enterprising Culture, 2005, 15 (1): 43-77.
Harreld J B, Tushman M L. Organizational ambidexterity: IBM and emerging business opportunities [J]. California Management Review, 2009. 51(4): 75-99.
Heneman, H. G., & Judge, T.,Staffing Organizations, Mendota House, 2009.
Hair, J., Black, W., & Babin, B. (2010). R. Anderson (2010), Multivariate Data Analysis: Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
Holmqvist M, Spicer A. The Ambidextrous Employee: Exploiting and Exploring People′s Potential [M]. Emerald Group Publishing Limited, 2012:1-23.
Hoffman & Dilchert, S. (2012). A review of citizenship and counterproduc-tive behaviors in organizational decision-making. In The Oxfordhandbook of personnel assessment and selection, 543–569.
Hannah, S. T., Balthazard, P. A., Waldman, D. A., Jennings, P. L., & Thatcher, R. W., "The psychological and neurological bases of leader self-complexity and effects on adaptive decision-making." Journal of Applied Psychology, 98(3), pp 393. 2013.
Harris, T. B., Li, N., & Kirkman, B. L., "Leader–member exchange (LMX) in context: How LMX differentiation and LMX relational separation attenuate LMX′s influence on OCB and turnover intention." The Leadership Quarterly, 25(2), pp 314-328. 2014.
Ishaq, E., Bashir, S., & Khan, A. K. J. A. P. (2021). Paradoxical leader behaviors: Leader personality and follower outcomes. 70(1), 342-357.
Junni, P., Sarala, R. M., Taras, V., & Tarba, S. Y., "Organizational ambidexterity and performance: A meta-analysis." The Academy of Management Perspectives, 27(4), pp 299-312. 2013.
Johansson, P. E. Transcending the dichotomy of exploitative and explorative work-orientations[C]. 22nd International Annual EurOMA Conference EurOMA15, 26 Jun-26 July 1 2015, Neuchatel, Switzerland, 2015.
Kline, R. B., & Santor, D. A., "Principles & practice of structural equation modelling." Canadian Psychology, 40(4), pp 381. 1999.
Kauppila O P. Creating ambidexterity by integrating and balancing structurally separate interorganizational partnerships [J]. Strategic organization, 2010, 8(4): 283-312.
Knight E, Harvey W. Managing exploration and exploitation paradoxes in creative organisations[J]. Management Decision, 2015, 53(4):809-827.
Kao Y L, Chen C F. Antecedents, consequences and moderators of ambidextrous behaviours among frontline employees[J]. Management Decision, 2016, 54(8):1846-1860.
Lewis, M. W., ” Exploring paradox: Toward a more comprehensive guide”. The Academy of Management Review, 25(4), pp. 760-776, 2000.
Lüscher L S, Lewis M W. Organizational change and managerial sensemaking: Working through paradox[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2008, 51(2): 221–240.
Lavie D, Kang J, Rosenkopf L. Balance within and across domains: The performance implications of exploration and exploitation in alliances [J]. Organization Science, 2011, 22(6): 1517-1538
March JG. Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning [J]. Organization science 1991; 2(1): 71-87
Margolis, J. D., & Walsh, J. P., "Misery loves companies: Rethinking social initiatives by business." Administrative science quarterly, 48(2), pp 268-305. 2003.
Mom T J M, Van Den Bosch F A J, Volberda H W. Investigating managers′ exploration and exploitation activities: The influence of top‐down, bottom‐up, and horizontal knowledge inflows [J]. Journal of management studies, 2007, 44(6): 910-931.
Mironspektor E, Gino F, Argote L. Paradoxical frames and creative sparks: Enhancing individual creativity through conflict and integration. [J]. Organizational Behavior & Human Decision Processes, 2011, 116(2):229-240.
Martinperez V. Does HRM generate ambidextrous employees for ambidextrous learning? The moderating role of management support [J]. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 2015, 26(5):589-615.
Moscoso, S., Salgado, J. F., &Anderson, N. (2017). How Do I Get a Job, What Are They Looking For? Personnel Selection and Assessment. In An Introduction to Work and Organizational Psychology, 25–47. Oxford, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Marjolein C.J. Caniëls, Carmen Neghina and Nico Schaetsaert, Ambidexterity of employees: the role of empowerment and knowledge sharing, JOURNAL OF KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT VoL.21, 2017.
Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H., "Psychometric theory." 1978.
O′Reilly C A, Tushman M L. Organizational ambidexterity: Past, present, and future [J]. The Academy of Management Perspectives, 2013, 27(4): 324-338. [46].Brown S L, Eisenhardt K M. The art of continuous change: Linking complexity theory and time-based evolution in relentlessly shifting organizations [J]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1997, 42 (1): 1-34.
Parker S K. Beyond motivation: Job and work design for development, health, ambidexterity, and more [J]. Annual review of psychology, 2014, 65: 661-691.
Papachroni A, Heracleous L, Paroutis S. Organizational ambidexterity through the lens of paradox theory: Extending the research agenda[J]. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 2015, Forthcoming(1).
Reddin, W. J., "Managerial effectiveness." 1970.
Robbins, S. P., Judge, T., & Breward, K.,Essentials of organizational behavior, Vol. 7, Prentice Hall Upper Saddle River, 2003.
Raisch S, Birkinshaw J. Organizational Ambidexterity: Antecedents, Outcomes, and Moderators [J]. Journal of Management: Official Journal of the Southern Management Association, 2008, 34(3): 375-409.
Rogan M, Mors M L. A network perspective on individual-level ambidexterity in organizations [J]. Organization Science, 2014, 25(6): 1860-1877.
Rosing K, Zacher H. Individual ambidexterity: the duality of exploration and exploitation and its relationship with innovative performance[J]. European Journal of Work & Organizational Psychology, 2016, 26(5):694-709.
Rothman, N. B., &Melwani, S. (2017). Feeling Mixed, Ambivalent, and in Flux: The Social Functions of Emotional Complexity for Leaders. Academy of Management Review, 42(2), 259–282.
Shamir, B., “Social distance and charisma: Theoretical notes and an exploratory study.” Leadership Quarterly, 6, 19-47, 1995.
Smith W K, Binns A, Tushman M L. Complex Business Models: Managing Strategic Paradoxes Simultaneously [J]. Long Range Planning, 2010, 43(2): 448-461.
Smith, W. K., & Lewis, M. W., "Toward a theory of paradox: A dynamic equilibrium model of organizing." Academy of management Review, 36(2), pp 381-403. 2011.
Schad J, Lewis M W, Raisch S, et al. Paradox Research in Management Science: Looking Back to Move Forward[J]. Academy of Management Annals, 2016, 10(1):1-60.
Tushman M L, O′Reilly III C A. Ambidextrous organizations: Managing evolutionary and revolutionary change [J]. California management review, 1996, 38(4): 8-29.
Turner N, Swart J, Maylar H. Mechanisms for Managing Ambidexterity: A Review and Research Agenda. International Journal of Management Reviews, 2013(3)
Tran, H. Q. Organizational ambidexterity in small firms: the role of top management team behavioral integration and entrepreneurial orientation[J]. Journal of Business & Economic Policy, 2015(4):31-39.
Ullman, J. B., & Bentler, P. M.,Structural equation modeling, Wiley Online Library, 2003.
Yukl, G. (2010). Leadership in organizations (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Yu T, Patterson P. ACHIEVING SERVICE-SALES AMBIDEXTERITY IN HETEROGENEOUS SERVICE BRANCHES[C]// 2013.
Zhang, Y., Waldman, D. A., Han, Y.-L., & Li, X.-B. (2015). Paradoxical Leader Behaviors in People Management: Antecedents and consequences. Academy of Management Journal, 58(2), 538-566. |