歐盟排放權配額價格與碳匯公司股票報酬之影響

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：16

、訪客IP：3.138.134.149

姓名

吳睿謹(Jui-Chin Wu) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

財務金融學系在職專班

論文名稱

歐盟排放權配額價格與碳匯公司股票報酬之影響

相關論文

★ 買賣價差之拆解－以台灣加權指數期貨與新加坡摩根台股指數期貨為例	★ 在不同模型、分組方式以及貝他估計情況下之Fama和French三因子模型表現
★ 延長交易時間對台灣股市之日內影響	★ 法人日內投資行為及跟隨法人投資策略
★ 結算制度與到期日效應	★ 台灣股市系統性風險之檢定
★ 提前平倉與轉倉策略對股價指數期貨到期日效應之實證:以台灣股票市場為例	★ 指數期貨操縱模型--以台灣股價指數為例
★ 台灣股市日內效果之研究	★ 從日、美看台灣股市的資產定價實證研究
★ 選擇權交易獲利性之分析：以交易資料為例	★ 資訊不對稱與公司特徵:市場微結構觀點
★ 企業商業模式及品牌價值創造—以宏達電為例	★ 企業商業模式及品牌價值創造—以宏碁集團為例
★ 法人期貨與選擇權交易量對市場報酬的影響	★ 台灣市場的關係公司與內部人交易

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

[檢視]

[下載]

本電子論文使用權限為同意立即開放。
已達開放權限電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的，進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。
請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定，切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送，以免觸法。

摘要(中)

本文研究主要在探討，歐盟排放權配額(European Union Allowance，EUA)期貨價格報酬與擁有碳匯林業公司股票、基金報酬之互動關係。變數選取EUA與9間林業公司股票及林業基金價格報酬，建立向量自我迴歸模型(VAR)，以計量分析EUA對變數報酬是否具有顯著性影響，再進行格蘭傑因果關係檢定、脈衝響應函數分析及預測誤差變異數分解。

研究時間，選取歐盟碳排放權交易體系(European Union Emissions Trading System，EU ETS)的三階段，從第一個階段的2005年至2007年、第二個階段的2008年至2012年、第三個階段的2013年至2020年。再進一步研究歐盟土地法案通過後的樣本時間從2018年5月至2021年11月。

結果表明，於EU ETS交易體系的三階段期間，EUA期貨價格對其它變數研究結果顯示，此三階段皆未有明顯對擁有碳匯之林業公司股票、基金價格報酬有顯著性影響。

進一步研究結果表明，以2018年5月至2021年11月為研究區間時。此階段EUA期貨價格對多個變數報酬有顯著性影響。此結果表示變數對政策變化具關聯性，對擁有碳匯之林業公司股票、基金報酬亦存在影響。

摘要(英)

This study is mainly to explore the relationship between the return of European Union Allowance (EUA) futures price and the return of the stocks and ETF funds which are hold by carbon sink companies. EUA, nine forestry company stocks and forestry fund (WOOD) price return are selected to set up VAR model and to analyze whether EUA has significant impact on variable returns by using quantitatively analysis methods. Further, it is to carry out Granger causality test, impulse response analysis and forecast error variance decomposition.

The research is to select European Union Emissions Trading System (EU ETS) which has three phases, the first phase is from 2005 to 2007, the second phase is from 2008 to 2012, and the third phase is from 2013 to 2020. After the EU laws of Land were approved, it is further to study some samples which are from May 2018 to November 2021.

The result shows that EUA future price does not have obvious effect on return of stocks and ETF funds which are hold by carbon sink companies during the three phases of the EU ETS.

Consequently, samples are selected from May 2018 to November 2021, it shows EUA future price has a significant impact on multiple variable returns, then the variables have influence on policy variable and return of the stocks and ETF funds which are hold by carbon sink companies

關鍵字(中)

★ 歐盟排放權配額
★ 碳匯
★ 向量自我迴歸模型

關鍵字(英)

★ European Union Allowance
★ Carbon sink
★ VAR

論文目次

摘要 I
ABSTRACT II
誌謝 III
目錄 IV
圖目錄 V
表目錄 V
第一章緒論 1
第二章文獻回顧 8
第三章資料來源及研究方法 10
3.1 資料來源 10
3.2 研究方法 13
第四章實證結果與分析 18
4.1敘述統計 18
4.2單位根檢定 21
4.3向量自我迴歸模型 21
4.4格蘭傑因果關係檢定 22
4.5脈衝響應函數分析 27
4.6預測誤差變異數分解 32
第五章結果與建議 37
5.1結論與建議 37
參考文獻 38
附錄一 41
附錄二 42
附錄三 44

參考文獻

一、中文部分
鍾惠民、周賓凰、孫而音 (2011)，《財務計量-Eviews的運用》，台北：新陸書局。
二、外文部分
ALBEROLA, E.; CHEVALLIER, J.; Chèze B. T. Price drivers and structural breaks in European carbon prices 2005–2007. Energy Policy, 36, n. 2, p. 787-797, 2008.
BETZ, R.; SATO, M. Emissions trading: lessons learnt from the 1st phase of the EU ETS and prospects for the 2nd phase. In: National allocation plans in the EU emissions trading scheme: Routledge, p. 351-359,2010.
BOUTTI, R.; RODHAIN, F. Multivariate analysis of a time series EU ETS: methods and applications in carbon finance. Financial Markets, Institutions and Risks, 3, n. 1, p. 18-29, 2019.
CARNERO, M. A.; OLMO, J.; PASCUAL, L. Modelling the dynamics of fuel and EU allowance prices during phase 3 of the EU ETS. Energies, 11, n. 11, p. 3148, 2018.
CHEN, H.; LIU, Z.; ZHANG, Y.; WU, Y. The linkages of carbon spot-futures: evidence from EU-ETS in the third phase. Sustainability, 12, n. 6, p. 1-18, 2020.
CHEN, Y.; QU, F.; LI, W.; CHEN, M. Volatility spillover and dynamic correlation between the carbon market and energy markets. Journal of Business Economics and Management, 20, n. 5, p. 979-999, 2019.
CHEVALLIER, J. Carbon futures and macroeconomic risk factors: A view from the EU ETS. Energy Economics, 31, n. 4, p. 614-625, 2009.
CHEVALLIER, J. CO 2 price fundamentals. In: Econometric Analysis of Carbon Markets: Springer, p. 19-54,2012.
CHRISTIANSEN, A. C.; ARVANITAKIS, A.; TANGEN, K.; HASSELKNIPPE, H. Price determinants in the EU emissions trading scheme. Climate Policy, 5, n. 1, p. 15-30, 2005.
CHUNG, C. Y.; JEONG, M.; YOUNG, J. The price determinants of the EU allowance in the EU emissions trading scheme. Sustainability, 10, n. 11, p. 4009, 2018.
DICKEY, D. A.; FULLER, W. A. Distribution of the estimators for autoregressive time series with a unit root. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 74, n. 366a, p. 427-431, 1979.
DUTTA, A.; BOURI, E.; NOOR, M. H. Return and volatility linkages between CO2 emission and clean energy stock prices. Energy, 164, p. 803-810, 2018.
FULLERTON, D.; METCALF, G. E. Environmental controls, scarcity rents, and pre-existing distortions. Journal of Public Economics, 80, n. 2, p. 249-267, 2001.
GRANGER, C. W. Investigating causal relations by econometric models and cross-spectral methods. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, p. 424-438, 1969.
HAHN, R. W. Market power and transferable property rights. In: The Theory and Practice of Command and Control in Environmental Policy: Routledge, p. 381-393,2018..
HU, J. W.-S.; HU, Y.-C.; CHIEN, J. Elucidating the relationship among EUA spot price, brent oil price and three European stock indices. Universal Journal of Accounting and Finance, 4, n. 2, p. 53-72, 2016.
LAMBERTIDES, N.; SAVVA, C. S.; TSOUKNIDIS, D. A. The effects of oil price shocks on the prices of EU emission trading system and European stock returns. 2018.
LIU, J.; ZHANG, Z.; YAN, L.; WEN, F. Forecasting the volatility of EUA futures with economic policy uncertainty using the GARCH-MIDAS model. Financial Innovation, 7, n. 1, p. 1-19, 2021.
LOVCHA, Y.; PEREZ-LABORDA, A.; SIKORA, I. The determinants of CO2 prices in the EU emission trading system. Applied Energy, 305, p. 117903, 2022.
LUTZ, B. J.; PIGORSCH, U.; ROTFUï, W. Nonlinearity in cap-and-trade systems: The EUA price and its fundamentals. Energy Economics, 40, p. 222-232, 2013.
MANSANET-BATALLER, M.; PARDO, A.; VALOR, E. CO2 prices, energy and weather. The Energy Journal, 28, n. 3, 2007.
MEIER, J.-H.; VOSS, N. Do commodities determine the EU emission allowances price? 423-437,2020.
PALAO, F.; PARDO, A. Do price barriers exist in the European carbon market? Journal of Behavioral Finance, 19, n. 1, p. 111-124, 2018.
SAID, S. E.; DICKEY, D. A. Testing for unit roots in autoregressive-moving average models of unknown order. Biometrika, 71, n. 3, p. 599-607, 1984.
SIMS, C. A. Macroeconomics and reality. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, p. 1-48, 1980.
SPRINGER, U. The market for tradable GHG permits under the Kyoto Protocol: a survey of model studies. Energy Economics, 25, n. 5, p. 527-551, 2003.
三、網路資料
SANTIKARN, M.; CHURIE KALLHAUGE, A. N.; BOZCAGA, M. O.; SATTLER, L. et al. State and trends of carbon pricing 2021.
REGULATION, E. 841 of the European parliament and of the council of 30 May 2018 on the inclusion of greenhouse gas emissions and removals from land use, land use change and forestry in the 2030 climate and energy framework, and amending Regulation (EU) No 525/2013 and Decision No 529/2013/EU. Official Journal of the European Union, 19, p. 1-25, 2018.
European Commission, 2022, Development of EU ETS(2005-2020), available from URL: https://ec.europa.eu/clima/eu-action/eu-emissions-trading-system-eu-ets/development-eu-ets-2005-2020_en.
VCS Project Development. available from URL: https://verra.org/methodologies/
Paris Agreement.2015 available from URL: https://unfccc.int/process-and-meetings/the-paris-agreement/the-paris-agreement
Statista Research Department, Apr 20, 2021. available from URL: https://www.statista.com/statistics/1023169/leading-forestry-and-paper-company-revenues-europe/

指導教授

賴弘能

審核日期

2022-6-24

推文