| 摘要(英) |
In recent years, Taiwan has promoted the 108 curriculum guidelines, and we have seen more and more literacy-oriented question types in the Comprehensive Assessment Program for Junior High School Students and General Scholastic Ability Test. Therefore, students’ “mathematical problem-solving process” and “metacognitive ability” are particularly important. Teachers should train students’ skills and attitude when solving mathematical problems. And students should reflect the appropriateness of problem-solving strategies to improve their mathematical ability through the learning process of mathematical problem-solving. Therefore, the main purpose of this study is to develop a mathematical problem-solving process that emphasizes “metacognition”, and provide a mathematical problem-solving process scaffolding to help teacher master students’ learning situations and help students solve mathematical problems like experts. Teachers can effectively manage multiple units at the same time and provide adaptive teaching content through the arrangement of unit activities. Besides, students can learn mathematics through the system. By combining their metacognitive ability, students can reflect on their own learning process after completing the learning task. Furthermore, they can get the connection between problems and those problem-solving strategies in the past.
After the platform was developed, the study used the method of “questionnaire survey” to conduct a preliminary evaluation of the system. The participants were 46 math teachers of junior high school and senior high school. Through questionnaire collations, the teachers’ acceptance of technology of the system, the perceived usefulness of the scaffolding and interactive tools were evaluated, and also we collected their suggestions and feedback. The results show that most of the teachers give positive feedback and have the intention to use the system in learning mathematics. According to the results of this study, suggestions for the system are put forward as a reference direction for future research and system improvement. |
| 參考文獻 |
岳修平和劉芳秀 (2001)。網路輔助遠距教學互動活動設計之研究。教育研究資訊雙月刊, 9(1), 76-90
李俊賢. (2018). 應用因材網進行七年級整數運算單元適性補救教學之研究。國立台中教育大學教育資訊與測驗統計研究所碩士論文，台中市。
林清山和張景媛 (1993)。國中生後設認知、動機信念與數學解題策略之關系研究。教育心理學報，（26），54-74
林慧敏. (2020). 翻轉教學融入國小數學資訊教育之成效分析.
范敏華. (2020). 運用因材網進行六年級學習低成就學生補救教學之研究-以桃園市一所國小為例 (Doctoral dissertation, 國立清華大學).
國家教育研究院 (2012)。雙語詞彙、學術名詞暨辭書資訊網。擷取自 https://terms.naer.edu.tw/
張春興 (1996)。教育心理學。臺北市: 東華書局。
張靖敏, 張道宜, 劉雅萍, & 陳美瑩. (2022). 因材網: 教育部人工智慧知識結構分析診斷及適性學習平台之析論. 台灣教育研究期刊, 3(1), 313-331.
温富榮, & 趙元炤. (2019). 南投縣適性教學之實踐與探究—以國小為例. 臺灣教育評論月刊, 8(3), 205-209.
教育部 (2014)。十二年國民基本教育課程綱要總綱。臺北市。
楊肅健, 郭伯臣, & 林秋斌. (2021). 知識結構的電腦化適性診斷測驗數位平臺應用於國小數學補救教學成效之研究. 數位學習科技期刊, 13(1), 23-48.
陳怡靜和劉祥通（2013）。國中生數學解題能力量表編制之理念。科學教育，（357），29-37
劉育隆, 曾筱倩, & 郭伯臣. (2006). 以知識結構為基礎之適性測驗系統建置. 測驗統計年刊, (14), 17-35.
薛雅純. (2019). 以均一教育平台實施差異化教學之實務見解. 臺灣教育評論月刊, 8(1), 245-248.
謝豐瑞、 單維彰、 曾明德、 吳汀菱、 鄭章華 (2020)。素養導向系列叢書: 中學數學教材教法 108課綱。五南圖書出版股份有限公司。
蘇育賢. (2021). 強調後設認知之科技輔助數學建模教學對國中生後設認知能力與數學解題歷程表現之影響：以「數列與級數」單元為例。國立中央大學網路學習科技研究所碩士論文，桃園縣。
Byrnes, J. P., & Miller-Cotto, D. (2016). The growth of mathematics and reading skills in segregated and diverse schools: An opportunity-propensity analysis of a national database. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 46, 34-51.
Flavell, J. H., Miller, P. H., & Miller, S. A. (2002). Cognitive development (4th ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Good, M., Galbraith, P., & Renshaw, P. (2002). . Socially mediated metacognition: Creating collaborative zones of proximal development in small group problem solving. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 49, 193-223.
Lester Jr, F. K. (1989). The Role of Metacognition in Mathematical Problem Solving: A Study of Two Grade Seven Classes. Final Report.
National Research Council. (1989). Everybody counts: A report to the nation on the future of mathematics education. National Academies Press.
Polya, G. (1962). Mathematical discovery, 1962. John Wiley & Sons.
Polya, G. (2004). How to solve it: A new aspect of mathematical method (Vol. 85). Princeton university press.
Polya, G. (2020). Mathematics and plausible reasoning, Volume 1: Induction and analogy in mathematics. Princeton University Press.
Schoenfeld, A. H. (1983). Problem Solving in the Mathematics Curriculum. A Report, Recommendations, and an Annotated Bibliography. MAA Notes, Number 1.
Schoenfeld, A. H. (1985). Metacognitive and epistemological issues in mathematical understanding. Teaching and learning mathematical problem solving: Multiple research perspectives, 89(4), 361-380.
Schoenfeld, A. H. (2014). Mathematical problem solving. Elsevier.
Schoenfeld, A. H. (2016). Learning to think mathematically: Problem solving, metacognition, and sense making in mathematics (Reprint). Journal of education, 196(2), 1-38.
Schneider, W., & Artelt, C. (2010). Metacognition and mathematics education. ZDM, 42(2), 149-161.
Schraw, G. (2001). Promoting general metacognitive awareness. In Metacognition in learning and instruction (pp. 3-16). Springer, Dordrecht.
Silver, E. A. (1981). Recall of mathematical problem information: Solving related problems. Journal for research in mathematics education, 12(1), 54-64.
Silver, E. A. (1982). Knowledge organization and mathematical problem solving. In F. K. Lester & J. Garofalo (Eds.), Mathematical problem solving (pp. 15–25). Philadelphia: Franklin Institute Press.
Silver, E. A. (Ed.). (2013). Teaching and learning mathematical problem solving: Multiple research perspectives. Routledge.
Silver, E. A. (2013). Metacognitive and Epistemological Issues in Mathematical Understanding. In Teaching and Learning Mathematical Problem Solving (pp. 375-394). Routledge.
.Yuen, A. H., & Ma, W. W. (2008). Exploring teacher acceptance of e‐learning technology. Asia‐Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 36(3), 229-243. |
[Endnote RIS 格式]
[相關文章]
[文章引用]
[完整記錄]
[館藏目錄]
至系統瀏覽論文 (2027-8-1以後開放)
plurk
funp
live
udn
HD
myshare
netvibes
friend
youpush
delicious
baidu
Google bookmarks
del.icio.us
hemidemi
facebook
twitter
google
reddit