摘要(英) |
The study is based on an actual soil profile from the Engineering Geological Database for TSMIP (EGDT), and then sets the geological conditions of the empirical model, mainly focusing on the soil liquefaction assessment of the sandy soil layer, referring to Andrus and Stokoe [1] made the following recommendations, or constraints: (1) groundwater table is situated at 0.5-6 m, (2) the soil’s Vs is within 100-200 m/s, (3) uncemented soils of Holocene (< 10,000 years), and (4) the middle point of the target (sandy) layer is no deeper than 10 m. In addition, the database in 17 N-Vs relationships was analyzed under the conditions of different earthquakes and different fines content, with a total of 1683 data points.
Mainly based on three soil liquefaction assessment procedures [1-3], 17 empirical relationships between shear wave velocity and SPT-N values [12-28], calculate each factor of safety, effectively observe the difference, and find out which is more conservative in engineering. Next, we developed the liquefaction assessment model which is based on the ratio of SPT- to Vs-based liquefaction factors of safety.
It shows that the probability distribution of R can be well modeled by the lognormal distribution with mean value = 1.76 and standard deviation (SD) = 0.59. This probability model can help us estimate soil liquefaction probability more easily, via an unsophisticated, deterministic calculation. Last but not least, the model is statistically robust according to the results of 105 verification tests. |
參考文獻 |
[1] Andrus RD, Stokoe KH. Liquefaction resistance of soils from shear-wave velocity. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, ASCE 2000;126(11):1015-1025.
[2] Boulanger RW, Idriss IM. CPT and SPT Based Liquefaction Triggering Procedures. Report No. UCD/CGM-14/01, Center for Geotechnical Modeling, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering. University of California, Davis, CA, 2014.
[3] Youd TL, Idriss IM, Andrus RD, Arango I, Castro G, Christian JT, Dobry R, Liam Finn WD, Harder Jr LF, Hynes ME, Ishihara K, Koester JP, Liao SSC, Marcuson III WF, Martin GR, Mitchell JK, Moriwaki Y, Power MS, Robertson PK, Seed RB, Stokoe II KH. Liquefaction resistance of soils: summary report from the 1996 NCEER/NSF workshops on evaluation of liquefaction resistance of soils. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, ASCE 2001;127(10):817-833.
[4] Seed HB, Idriss IM. Simplified procedure for evaluating soil liquefaction potential. Journal of the Geotechnical Engineering Division, ASCE 1971;97(9):1249-1273.
[5] Seed HB, Tokimatsu K, Harder LF, Chung RM. Influence of SPT procedures in soil liquefaction resistance evaluation. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, ASCE 1985;111(12):1425-1445.
[6] JRA (Japan Road Association). Road Bridge Specifications: Part V Series of Earthquake-Proof Design. 1996. (in Japanese).
[7] AIJ (Architectural Institute of Japan). Recommendations for the Design of Building Foundations. 2001. (in Japanese).
[8] Hwang JH, Khoshnevisan S, Juang CH, Lu CC. Soil liquefaction potential evaluation – An update of the HBF method focusing on research and practice in Taiwan. Engineering Geology 2021;280:105926.
[9] Robertson PK, Woeller DJ, Finn WDL. Seismic cone penetration test for evaluating liquefaction potential under cyclic loading. Canadian Geotechnical Journal 1992;29(4): 686-695.
[10] Tokimatsu K, Uchida A. Correlation between liquefaction resistance and shear wave velocity. Soils and Foundations 1990;30(2):33-42.
[11] Kayen RE, Mitchell JK, Seed RB, Lodge A, Nishio S, Coutinho RQ. Evaluation of SPT-, CPT-, and shear wave-based methods for liquefaction potential assessment using Loma Prieta data. In Proceedings of the 4th Japan-U.S. Workshop on Earthquake-Resistant Design of Lifeline Facilities and Countermeasures for Soil Liquefaction, New York, 1992;19:177-204.
[12] Ohta T, Hara A, Niwa M, Sakano T. Elastic shear moduli as estimated from N-value. In Proceedings of the 7th Annual Convention of Japan Society of Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, Tokyo, 1972;265-268.
[13] Ohsaki Y, Iwasaki R. On dynamic shear module and Poisson’s ratio of soil deposits. Soils and Foundations 1973;13(4):61-73.
[14] Imai T. P- and S-wave velocities of the ground in Japan. In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, Tokyo, 1977;2:127-132.
[15] JRA (Japan Road Association). Specification and Interpretation of Bridge, Design for Highway-Part V: Resilient Design. 1980. (in Japanese).
[16] Seed HB, Idriss IM. Evaluation of liquefaction potential sand deposits based on observation of performance in previous earthquakes. ASCE National Convention (MO) 1981;481-544.
[17] Sykora DW, Stokoe KH. Correlations of in-situ measurements in sands of shear wave velocity. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 1983;20:125-136.
[18] Lee HH. Regression models of shear wave velocities in Taipei basin. Journal of the Chinese Institute of Engineers 1990;13(5):519-53.
[19] Kalteziotis N, Sabatakakis N, Vassiliou J. Evaluation of dynamic characteristics of Greek soil formations. Second Hellenic Conference on Geotechnical Engineering, Thessaloniki, 1992;2:239-246.
[20] Raptakis DG, Anastasiadis SAJ, Pitilakis KD, Lontzetidis KS. Shear wave velocities and damping of Greek natural soils. In Proceedings of the 10th European Conference Earthquake Engineering, Vienna, 1995;1:477-482.
[21] Jafari MK, Shafiee A, Razmkhah A. Dynamic properties of fine grained soils in south of Tehran. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 2002;4:25-35.
[22] Hasancebi N, Ulusay R. Empirical correlations between shear wave velocity and penetration resistance for ground shaking assessments. Bulletin Engineering Geology and the Environment 2007;66:203-213.
[23] Lee CT, Tsai BR. Mapping Vs30 in Taiwan. Terrestrial, Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences 2008;19(6):671-682.
[24] Hanumantharao C, Ramana GV. Dynamic soil properties for microzonation of Delhi, India. Journal of Earth System Science 2008;117(S2):719-730.
[25] Dikmen U. Statistical correlations of shear wave velocity and penetration resistance for soils. Journal of Geophysics and Engineering 2009;6:61-72.
[26] Uma Maheswari R, Boominathan A, Dodagoudar GR. Use of surface waves in statistical correlations of shear wave velocity and penetration resistance of Chennai soils. Geotechnical and Geological Engineering 2010;28(2):119-137.
[27] Anbazhagan P, Parihar A, Rashmi HN. Review of correlations between SPT-N and shear modulus: A new correlation applicable to any region. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 2012;36:52-69.
[28] 周辰諭,基於多個非本地經驗關係預測土壤剪力波速(Vs)下之新方法,國立中央大學,碩士論文,桃園市,(2022)。
[29] 陳正興與陳家漢,地震引致的土壤液化與側潰現象,科學發展,第四百九十八期,第12-17頁,(2014)。
[30] 三元,標準貫入試驗的問題與轉機,中興工程,第六十卷,第81-94頁,(1998)。
[31] 歐陽,解說土壤力學,初版,文笙書局,臺北市,(2014)。
[32] 林志峯、曾俊傑、蕭秋安、周坤賢、胡志昕與王鶴翔,多種地球物理探測法於基隆河河岸土層剪力波波速調查,土木水利,第四十七卷,第71-78頁,(2020)。
[33] 張健邦,統計學,初版,三民書局,臺北市,(2001)。
[34] Ishihara K. Stability of natural deposits during earthquakes. In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering. San Francisco, CA, USA, 1985;1:321-376.
[35] 黃安斌,土壤力學與基礎工程,二版,高立圖書,新北市,(2016)。
[36] Bolt BA. Earthquakes: A Primer. San Francisco: W.H. Freeman and Company, 1978.
[37] 李咸亨與吳志明,下井探測法量測剪力波速之影響因,中國土木水利工程學刊,第三卷,第一期,第15-28頁,(1991)。
[38] Ang AH, Tang W. Probability Concepts in Engineering Planning: Emphasis on Applications to Civil and Environmental Engineering. New Jersey: John Wiley and Sons, Inc., 2007. |