摘要(英) |
In this study, the implicit solver of ANSYS Mechanical and the explicit solver of LS-DYNA were used to perform quasi-static tensile tests. Two material models, Bi-linear (BISO) and Multi-linear (MISO) stress-strain curves, were employed to simulate the mechanical behavior beyond the yield point. Finally, the pros and cons of both methods were compared to each other based on the validation of simulation against experimental data and computational efficiency.
First of all, the MTS810 was used to perform tensile tests on hot-dip galvanized steel (SGCC) specimens, and the engineering measurement was converted into the true stress-strain to obtain their mechanical properties. Subsequently, a finite element model was established using ANSYS. In order to reduce simulation errors and improve analysis accuracy, the parameters (integration settings, element shapes, and hourglass control) and convergence analysis were performed to select suitable parameters and meshes for this experiment. Finally, two material models were established based on the stress-strain curves obtained from the experiment. They were respectively incorporated into the finite element model with boundary conditions for tensile simulations.
The results of simulations around the ultimate tensile strength indicate that the implicit solver with the BISO model obtained a stress error of 1.017%, while the explicit solver with the BISO model obtained a stress error of 1.070%. Both results were close to the experimental data. Additionally, the implicit solver with the MISO model was used to achieve a stress error of only 0.334% which provides even more accurate analysis. The simulation results of the two solvers demonstrate that both implicit and explicit solvers are suitable for the quasi-static tensile test. The implicit algorithm offers fast solving speed and high CAE accuracy. In contrast, the explicit solver allows for individual settings for the model also stabilizes the calculation process and reduces simulation errors, especially for complex models or different loading conditions. |
參考文獻 |
[1] F. A. Sabet, S. Koric, A. Idkaidek and I. Jasiuk, "High-performance computing comparison of implicit and explicit nonlinear finite element simulations of trabecular bone." Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine, vol. 200,p. 105870, 2021.
[2] G. Akrivis, M. Crouzeix, and C. Makridakis, "Implicit-explicit multistep finite element methods for nonlinear parabolic problems," Mathematics of Computation, vol. 67, no. 222, pp. 457-477, Apr. 1998.
[3] J. S. Sun, K. H. Lee and H. P. Lee, "Comparison of implicit and explicit finite element methods for dynamic problems, " Journal of materials processing technology, vol.105, no. 1-2, pp. 110-118, 2000.
[4] L. E. Lindgren and J. Edberg, "Explicit versus implicit finite element formulation in simulation of rolling," Journal of Materials Processing Technology, vol. 24, pp. 85-94, Jul. 1990.
[5] H. H. Choi, S. M. Hwang, Y. H. Kang, J. Kim, and B. S. Kang, "Comparison of implicit and explicit finite-element methods for the hydroforming process of an automobile lower arm," The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, vol. 20, pp. 407-413, Apr. 2002.
[6] 連登輝,"有限元素二維摩擦接觸分析," 碩士, 淡江大學機械與機電工程學系碩士班, 淡江大學, 新北市, 2022.
[7] 李裕春、时党勇和赵远, ANSYS 11.0/LS-DYNA基础理论与工程实践. 水利水电出版社, 2008.
[8] 李輝煌, ANSYS 工程分析基礎與觀念. 高立圖書有限公司, 2005.
[9] 維基百科,自由的百科全書. 牛頓法. Available:
https://zh.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E7%89%9B%E9%A1%BF%E6%B3%95
[10] 周炬、苏金英, Ansys workbench有限元分析实例详解. 人民邮电出版社, 2019.
[11] 維基百科,自由的百科全書. 歐拉方法. Available: https://zh.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=%E6%AC%A7%E6%8B%89%E6%96%B9%E6%B3%95&oldid=76673115
[12] 劉晉奇、褚晴暉, 有限元素分析與ANSYS的工程應用. 滄海書局, 2006.
[13] B. Webster, Hourglassing and Shear Locking - What Are They And Why Does It Matter? Available:
https://www.fidelisfea.com/post/hourglassing-and-shear-locking-what-is-it-and-why-does-it-matter
[14] 維基百科,自由的百科全書. 應力-應變曲線. Available:
https://zh.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=%E5%BA%94%E5%8A%9B-%E5%BA%94%E5%8F%98%E6%9B%B2%E7%BA%BF&oldid=66546875
[15] 材料非線性. Available:
https://baike.baidu.hk/item/%E6%9D%90%E6%96%99%E9%9D%9E%E7%B7%9A%E6%80%A7/2918938
[16] 王澤鵬、胡仁喜和康士廷, ANSYS 13.0 /LS-DYNA 非線性有限元分析實例指導教程, 機械工業出版社, 2011.
[17] 國科企業有限公司. MTS810伺服液壓試驗系統使用手冊.
[18] Axial Extensometers with 25 Mm (1 in.) Gage Length. Available:
https://www.mts.com/en/products/materials/extensometers/axial-extensometers-25mm-gage
[19] ASTM International, "Standard test methods for tension testing of metallic materials," ASTM E8/E8M-16a, West Conshohocken, 2016.
[20] 立祥興業. 熱浸鍍鋅鋼板之製程. Available:
https://www.lh-steel.com/product-detail-495933.html
[21] 維基百科,自由的百科全書. 軋製. Available:
https://zh.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=%E8%BD%A7%E5%88%B6&oldid=70349904
[22] 熱浸鍍鋅, Available:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v8Qje9eId4E
[23] MTS引伸计應用與功能索引. Available:
https://www.mtschina.com/-/media/materials/pdfs/brochures/cn/mts-extensometers-cn-brochure.pdf?as=1
[24] 行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫成果報告.
子計劃三:膠結不良沈積岩層之邊坡行為. Available: https://ir.nctu.edu.tw/bitstream/11536/91457/1/932211E009002.pdf
[25] L. Noels, L. Stainier, J. P. Ponthot, and J. Bonini, "Combined implicit-explicit algorithms for non-linear structural dynamics," Revue Européenne des Éléments, vol. 11, no. 5, pp. 565-591, 2002.
[26] ANSYS Help Viewer(R15).
[27] JIS G 3302, "JIS G 3302 Hot-dip zinc-coated steel sheet and strip." Japanese Industrial Standard, 2007. |