博碩士論文 110421002 詳細資訊




以作者查詢圖書館館藏 以作者查詢臺灣博碩士 以作者查詢全國書目 勘誤回報 、線上人數:22 、訪客IP:18.118.163.179
姓名 蔡明翰(Ming-Han Tsai)  查詢紙本館藏   畢業系所 企業管理學系
論文名稱 員工離職率對過度自信經理人與財務績效關聯之中介效果
相關論文
★ 電動車產業之經營策略研究-以F公司為例★ 機車製造廠於新產品開發之過程管制探討-以Y公司為例
★ 跨境電商之倉儲物流管理研究-以K公司為研究對象★ 逆向抵押貸款之風險管理政策-以C銀行為研究對象
★ 酒類消費與犯罪率之視覺化分析★ 以均值回歸特性探討分析師個人評價產生之長短期預測不一致
★ 產業差異對於分析師目標價與推薦門檻影響之探討★ 分析師營收預測與油價變動關聯性之探討
★ 分析師多年期預測與其預測能力之探討★ 探討分析師對盈餘成份認定與其對資本市場之影響
★ 探討企業未來性資產對分析師盈餘預測與推薦不一致之影響★ 以中國新財富票選探討擇時能力對成為明星分析師之影響
★ 分析師觀點建構過度投資指標★ 公司財務限制與企業社會責任之關聯-以現金股利及庫藏股買回為指標
★ 探討分析師資本支出預測之資訊意涵★ 過度投資與球場因素對美國職棒關係之研究
檔案 [Endnote RIS 格式]    [Bibtex 格式]    [相關文章]   [文章引用]   [完整記錄]   [館藏目錄]   [檢視]  [下載]
  1. 本電子論文使用權限為同意立即開放。
  2. 已達開放權限電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。
  3. 請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。

摘要(中) 本研究旨在探討員工離職率對過度自信經理人與財務績效之中介效果。具
備過度自信特質的經理人,在資本支出方面會有超出同產業平均之傾向,進而使企業之財務績效有顯著影響。然而,考量員工滿意度是當代社會企業與公司治理聲浪興起下企業所著重之重要參考指標,而員工滿意度會反應在員工離職率指標上,且離職率指標不僅會受到經理人管理特質所影響,也會影響著企業之財務績效。因此,本研究首先探討具備過度自信特質的經理人是否會影響企業之財務績效,結果顯示過度自信經理人對當年度與下一年度之企業財務績效皆有正向顯著性。而後檢測過度自信經理人與員工離職率之關聯,結果顯示,過度自信經理人對下一年度之員工離職率具有正向顯著性。再針對員工離職率與企業之財務績效進行分析,結果表明,員工離職率對財務績效具有負向顯著性。最後,本研究著重探討員工離職率是否對過度自信經理人與財務績效有中介效果,研究結論表明,當財務績效指標為資產報酬率與權益報酬率時,員工離職率具有顯著中介效果,當財務績效指標為Tobin’s Q時,員工離職率不具有顯著中介效果。
摘要(英) This study aims to explore the mediating effect of employee turnover rate on overconfident CEO and financial performance. CEO with overconfidence traits tend to exceed the industry average in capital expenditure, which in turn has a significant impact on the financial performance of the enterprise. However, considering employee satisfaction is an important indicator that enterprises attach great importance to under the rise of corporate governance in contemporary society. Employee satisfaction is reflected in the employee turnover rate indicator, and the turnover rate indicator is not only influenced by the management characteristics of managers, but also affects the financial performance of enterprises. Therefore, this study first explores whether CEO with overconfident traits will affect the financial performance of a company. The results show that overconfident managers have a positive and significant impact on the financial performance of both the current and next years. Then, the association between overconfident managers and employee turnover rate was tested, and the results showed that overconfident managers had a positive and significant impact on the next year′s employee turnover rate. Further analysis was conducted on the relationship between employee turnover rate and financial performance of the enterprise, and the results showed that employee turnover rate has a negative significance on financial
performance. Finally, this study focuses on exploring whether employee turnover rate has a mediating effect on overconfident managers and financial performance. The
research conclusion shows that when the financial performance indicators are Return on Assets and Return on Equity, employee turnover rate has a significant mediating
effect. When the financial performance indicator is Tobin′s Q, employee turnover rate does not have a significant mediating effect.
關鍵字(中) ★ 過度自信經理人
★ 員工離職率
★ 財務績效
關鍵字(英) ★ overconfident CEO
★ turnover rate
★ financial performance
論文目次 第一章、緒論 ........................................................................................................................... 1
第一節 研究背景與動機 ..................................................................................................... 1
第二節 研究目的 ................................................................................................................. 3
第三節 研究架構 ................................................................................................................. 4
第二章、文獻探討 ................................................................................................................... 5
第一節 文獻蒐集 ................................................................................................................. 5
第二節 研究假說 ............................................................................................................... 10
第三章、研究方法 ................................................................................................................. 12
第一節 資料來源與樣本篩選 ........................................................................................... 12
第二節 過度自信經理人衡量方法 ................................................................................... 13
第三節 研究方法與模型 ................................................................................................... 15
第四章、實證結果 ................................................................................................................. 21
第一節 敘述性統計 ........................................................................................................... 21
第二節 相關性分析 ........................................................................................................... 24
第三節 迴歸結果 ............................................................................................................... 26
第四節 Sobel test中介效果檢定 ...................................................................................... 34
第五章、結論與建議 ............................................................................................................. 35
第一節 研究結論 ............................................................................................................... 35
第二節 研究貢獻與管理意涵 ........................................................................................... 37
第三節 研究建議 ............................................................................................................... 38
參考文獻 ................................................................................................................................. 39
參考文獻 1.Malmendier, U., & Tate, G. (2005). CEO overconfidence and corporate investment. The journal of finance, 60(6), 2661-2700.
2.Ben-David, I., Graham, J. R., & Harvey, C. R. (2007). Managerial overconfidence and corporate policies (No. w13711). National Bureau of Economic Research.
3.Roll, R. (1986). The hubris hypothesis of corporate takeovers. Journal of business, 197-216.
4.Mair, J., & Marti, I. (2006). Social entrepreneurship research: A source of explanation, prediction, and delight. Journal of world business, 41(1), 36-44.
5.Li, N., Liang, J., & Crant, J. M. (2010). The role of proactive personality in job satisfaction and organizational citizenship behavior: a relational perspective. Journal of applied psychology, 95(2), 395.
6.Goel, A. M., & Thakor, A. V. (2008). Overconfidence, CEO selection, and corporate governance. the Journal of Finance, 63(6), 2737-2784.
7.Kahneman, D., & Lovallo, D. (1993). Timid choices and bold forecasts: A cognitive perspective on risk taking. Management science, 39(1), 17-31.
8.Vitanova, I. (2021). Nurturing overconfidence: The relationship between leader power, overconfidence and firm performance. The Leadership Quarterly, 32(4), 101342.
9.Langer, E. J. (1975). The illusion of control. Journal of personality and social psychology, 32(2), 311.
10.Svenson, O. (1981). Are we all less risky and more skillful than our fellow drivers?. Acta psychologica, 47(2), 143-148.
11.Meikle, N. L., Tenney, E. R., & Moore, D. A. (2016). Overconfidence at work: Does overconfidence survive the checks and balances of organizational life?. Research in Organizational Behavior, 36, 121-134.
12.Kim, J., & Lee, J. C. (2020). Effects of COVID-19 on preferences for private dining facilities in restaurants. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management, 45, 67-70.
13.Roberts, B. W., & Robins, R. W. (2000). Broad dispositions, broad aspirations: The intersection of personality traits and major life goals. Personality and social psychology bulletin, 26(10), 1284-1296.
14.Judge, T. A., & Bono, J. E. (2001). Relationship of core self-evaluations traits—self-esteem, generalized self-efficacy, locus of control, and emotional stability—with job satisfaction and job performance: A meta-analysis. Journal of applied Psychology, 86(1), 80.
15.Li, Q., Lourie, B., Nekrasov, A., & Shevlin, T. (2022). Employee turnover and firm performance: Large-sample archival evidence. Management Science, 68(8), 5667-5683.
16.Park, T. Y., & Shaw, J. D. (2013). Turnover rates and organizational performance: a meta-analysis. Journal of applied psychology, 98(2), 268.
17.Ostroff, C., Shin, Y., & Kinicki, A. J. (2005). Multiple perspectives of congruence: Relationships between value congruence and employee attitudes. Journal of Organizational Behavior: The International Journal of Industrial, Occupational and Organizational Psychology and Behavior, 26(6), 591-623.
18.Reyes, T., Vassolo, R. S., Kausel, E. E., Torres, D. P., & Zhang, S. (2022). Does overconfidence pay off when things go well? CEO overconfidence, firm performance, and the business cycle. Strategic Organization, 20(3), 510-540.
19.Hirshleifer, D., Low, A., & Teoh, S. H. (2012). Are overconfident CEOs better innovators?. The journal of finance, 67(4), 1457-1498.
20.Malmendier, U., & Tate, G. (2008). Who makes acquisitions? CEO overconfidence and the market′s reaction. Journal of financial Economics, 89(1), 20-43.
21.Graham, J. R., Harvey, C. R., & Puri, M. (2013). Managerial attitudes and corporate actions. Journal of financial economics, 109(1), 103-121.
22.Malmendier, U., Tate, G., & Yan, J. (2011). Overconfidence and early‐life experiences: the effect of managerial traits on corporate financial policies. The Journal of finance, 66(5), 1687-1733.
23.Hayward, M. L., & Hambrick, D. C. (1997). Explaining the premiums paid for large acquisitions: Evidence of CEO hubris. Administrative science quarterly, 103-127.
24.Zhang, Y. B., Lin, M. C., Nonaka, A., & Beom, K. (2005). Harmony, hierarchy and conservatism: A cross-cultural comparison of Confucian values in China, Korea, Japan, and Taiwan. Communication research reports, 22(2), 107-115.
25.Titman, S., Wei, K. J., & Xie, F. (2004). Capital investments and stock returns. Journal of financial and Quantitative Analysis, 39(4), 677-700.
26.陳柏錩. (1999). 上市公司資本支出, 成長機會與股東財富之關係, 國立中正大學, 財務金融研究所碩士論文.
27.Lin, Y., Yang, H., & Liou, D. (2012). The impact of family involvement and ownership concentration on the performance and risk-taking of Taiwanese firms. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 29(4), 923-940.
28.Reyes, T., Vassolo, R. S., Kausel, E. E., Torres, D. P., & Zhang, S. (2020). Does overconfidence pay off when things go well. CEO overconfidence, firm performance, and the business cycle. Strateg. Organ. 1476127020930659. doi, 10(147612702), 0930659.
29.Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of personality and social psychology, 51(6), 1173.
30.Hayes, A. F. (2009). Beyond Baron and Kenny: Statistical mediation analysis in the new millennium. Communication monographs, 76(4), 408-420.
指導教授 黃承祖(Cheng-Tsu Huang) 審核日期 2024-6-18
推文 facebook   plurk   twitter   funp   google   live   udn   HD   myshare   reddit   netvibes   friend   youpush   delicious   baidu   
網路書籤 Google bookmarks   del.icio.us   hemidemi   myshare   

若有論文相關問題,請聯絡國立中央大學圖書館推廣服務組 TEL:(03)422-7151轉57407,或E-mail聯絡  - 隱私權政策聲明