| 參考文獻 |
1.Abrantes, A. C. M., Passos, A. M., e Cunha, M. P., & Santos, C. M. (2018). Bringing team improvisation to team adaptation: The combined role of shared temporal cognitions and team learning behaviors fostering team performance. Journal of Business Research, 84, 59-71.
2.Abrantes, A. C. M., Passos, A. M., Pina e Cunha, M., & Miner, A. S. (2020). Managing the unforeseen when time is scarce: How temporal personality and team improvised adaptation can foster team performance. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 24(1), 42-58.
3.Abrantes, A. C., Passos, A. M., Cunha, M. P. E., & Santos, C. M. (2022). Getting the knack for team-improvised adaptation: The role of reflexivity and team mental model similarity. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 58(2), 281-315.
4.Akbar, R. (2019), “Tailoring agile-based software development processes”, IEEE Access, Vol. 7, 139852-139869.
5. Alegria, J.A., Bastarrica, M.C., Quispe, A. and Ochoa, S.F. (2014), “MDE-based process tailoring strategy”, Journal of Software: Evolution and Process, Vol. 26 No. 4, pp. 386-403.
6.Baard, S. K., Rench, T. A., & Kozlowski, S. W. (2014). Performance adaptation: A theoretical integration and review. Journal of Management, 40(1), 48-99.
7.Bass, J. M. (2016). Artefacts and agile method tailoring in large-scale offshore software development programmes. Information and software technology, 75, 1-16.
8.Beersma, B., Hollenbeck, J. R., Conlon, D. E., Humphrey, S. E., Moon, H., & Ilgen, D. R. (2009). Cutthroat cooperation: The effects of team role decisions on adaptation to alternative reward structures. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 108, 131–142.
9.Bowers, J., May, J., Melander, E., Baarman, M., & Ayoob, A. (2002, August). Tailoring XP for large system mission critical software development. In Conference on Extreme Programming and Agile Methods (pp. 100-111). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.
10.Burke, C. S., Stagl, K. C., Salas, E., Pierce, L., & Kendall, D. (2006). Understanding team adaptation: a conceptual analysis and model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(6), 1189-1207.
11. Burke, C. S., Pierce, L. G. and Salas, E. (2006). Understanding Adaptability: A Prerequisite for Effective Performance within Complex Environments (Advances in Human Performance and Cognitive Engineering Research, Vol. 6), Emerald Group Publishing Limited, Bingley, 117-141.
12.Burtscher, M. J., Manser, T., Kolbe, M., Grote, G., Grande, B., Spahn, D. R., & Wacker, J. (2011). Adaptation in anaesthesia team coordination in response to a simulated critical event and its relationship to clinical performance. British Journal of Anaesthesia, 106, 801– 806.
13.Campanelli, A. S., & Parreiras, F. S. (2015). Agile methods tailoring–A systematic literature review. Journal of Systems and Software, 110, 85-100.
14.Campanelli, A. S., Camilo, R. D., & Parreiras, F. S. (2018). The impact of tailoring criteria on agile practices adoption: A survey with novice agile practitioners in Brazil. Journal of Systems and Software, 137, 366-379.
15.Cannon‐Bowers, J. A., & Salas, E. (2001). Reflections on shared cognition. Journal of Organizational Behavior: The International Journal of Industrial, Occupational and Organizational Psychology and Behavior, 22(2), 195-202.
16.Chen, C. Y., Hsu, P. Y., & Vu, H. N. (2023). Collaborative process tailoring in evolutionary software development: a teamwork-quality perspective. Software Quality Journal, 31(1), 89-119.
17.Cannon-Bowers, J. A., Salas, E., & Converse, S. (1993). Shared mental models in expert team decision making. In N. J. Castellan, Jr. (Ed.), Individual and group decision making: Current issues (221–246). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
18.Cannon-Bowers, J. A., Tannenbaum, S. I., Salas, E., & Volpe, C. E. (1995). Defining competencies and establishing team training requirements. Team effectiveness and decision making in organizations, 333–380.
19.Chen, C. Y., & Lee, J. C. (2023). Exploring Teams′ Temporal Factors for Determining Process Tailoring that Promotes the Evolution of Agile based Software Development. ACM SIGMIS Database: the DATABASE for Advances in Information Systems, 54(1), 46-65.
20.Chen, P. C., Lee, J. C., & Chen, C. Y. (2021). A Preliminary Study of Transactive Memory System and Shared Temporal Cognition in the Collaborative Software Process Tailoring. In Advances in Software Engineering, Education, and e-Learning: Proceedings from FECS′20, FCS′20, SERP′20, and EEE′20 (523-531). Springer International Publishing.
21.Christian, J. S., Christian, M. S., Pearsall, M. J., & Long, E. C. (2017). Team adaptation in context: An integrated conceptual model and meta-analytic review. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 140, 62-89.
22.Crawford, B., Soto, R., de la Barra, C. L., Crawford, K., & Olguín, E. (2014). Agile software teams can use conflict to create a better products. In HCI International 2014-Posters’ Extended Abstracts: International Conference, HCI International 2014, Heraklion, Crete, Greece, June 22-27, 2014. Proceedings, Part I 16 , 24-29.
23.Crossan, M., Cunha, M. P. E., Vera, D., & Cunha, J. (2005). Time and organizational improvisation. Academy of Management Review, 30(1), 129-145.
24.Cohen, J. (2013). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Academic press.
25.Chin, W. W. (1998). Commentary: Issues and opinion on structural equation modeling. MIS quarterly, vii-xvi.
26.Cheong, M., Yammarino, F. J., Dionne, S. D., Spain, S. M., & Tsai, C. Y. (2019). A review of the effectiveness of empowering leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 30(1), 34-58.
27.De Wit, F. R. C., Greer, L. L., & Jehn, K. A. (2012). The paradox of intragroup conflict: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97(2), 360–390.
28.DeChurch, L. A., & Haas, C. D. (2008). Examining team planning through an episodic lens: Effects of deliberate, contingency, and reactive planning on team effectiveness. Small Group Research, 39(5), 542–568.
29.DeRue, D. S., Hollenbeck, J. R., Johnson, M. D., Ilgen, D. R., & Jundt, D. K. (2008). How different team downsizing approaches influence team-level adaptation and performance. Academy of Management Journal, 51, 182–196.
30.Dawson, J. F. (2014). Moderation in management research: What, why, when, and how. Journal of business and psychology, 29(1), 1-19.
31.Edgar, L., Jones Jr, M. D., Harsy, B., Passiment, M., & Hauer, K. E. (2021). Better decision-making: shared mental models and the clinical competency committee. Journal of Graduate Medical Education, 13(2s), 51-58.
32.Epstein, J., Santo, R. M., & Guillemin, F. (2015). A review of guidelines for crosscultural adaptation of questionnaires could not bring out a consensus. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 68(4), 435-441.
33.Espinosa, A., Kraut, R., Slaughter, S., Lerch, J., Herbsleb, J., & Mockus, A. (2002). Shared mental models, familiarity, and coordination: A multi-method study of distributed software teams. ICIS 2002 Proceedings, 39.
34.Evans, J. M., Palmer, K. S., Brown, A. D., Marani, H., Russell, K. K., Martin, D., & Ivers, N. M. (2019). Out of sync: a Shared Mental Models perspective on policy implementation in healthcare. Health Research Policy and Systems, 17(1), 1-6.
35.Eldor, L., & Harpaz, I. (2016). A process model of employee engagement: The learning climate and its relationship with extra-role performance behaviors. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 37(2), 213-235.
36.Edwards, J. R. (2001). Multidimensional constructs in organizational behavior research: An integrative analytical framework. Organizational Research Methods, 4(2), 144-192.
37.Eschleman, K. J., Mathieu, M., & Cooper, J. (2017). Creating a recovery filled weekend: The moderating effect of occupation type on the relationship between non-work creative activity and state of feeling recovered at work. Creativity Research Journal, 29(2), 97-107.
38.F. Tripp, J., & Armstrong, D. J. (2018). Agile methodologies: organizational adoption motives, tailoring, and performance. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 58(2), 170-179.
39.Fitzgerald, B., Russo, N. L., & O′Kane, T. (2003). Software development method tailoring at Motorola. Communications of the ACM, 46(4), 64-70.
40.Fuller, C. M., Simmering, M. J., Atinc, G., Atinc, Y., & Babin, B. J. (2016). Common methods variance detection in business research. Journal of business research, 69(8), 3192-3198.
41.Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error: Algebra and statistics. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(3), 382-388.
42.Falk, R. F., & Miller, N. B. (1992). A primer for soft modeling. University of Akron Press.
43.Gerow, J. E., Grover, V., Thatcher, J. B., & Roth, P. L. (2014). Looking toward the future of IT-business strategic alignment through the past: A meta-analysis. MIS Quarterly, 38(4), 1059–1085.
44.Ginsberg, M. P., & Quinn, L. H. (1995). Process tailoring and the software capability maturity model. Technical Report CMU/SEI-94-TR-024. Software Engineering Institute, Pittsburgh, PA.
45.Goodhue, D., Lewis, W., & Thompson, R. (2007). Research note—Statistical power in analyzing interaction effects: Questioning the advantage of PLS with product indicators. Information Systems Research, 18(2), 211-227.
46.Gurtner, A., Tschan, F., Semmer, N. K., & Nägele, C. (2007). Getting groups to develop good strategies: Effects of reflexivity interventions on team process, team performance, and shared mental models. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 102(2), 127-142.
47.Goodhue, D., Lewis, W., & Thompson, R. (2006, January). PLS, small sample size, and statistical power in MIS research. In Proceedings of the 39th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS′06) (Vol. 8, pp. 202b-202b). IEEE.
48.Haig, K. M., Sutton, S., & Whittington, J. (2006). SBAR: a shared mental model for improving communication between clinicians. The joint commission journal on quality and patient safety, 32(3), 167-175.
49.Hair, J. F., Risher, J. J., Sarstedt, M., & Ringle, C. M. (2019). When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. European business review, 31, 2-24.
50.Humphrey, W. S., Snyder, T. R., & Willis, R. R. (1991). Software process improvement at Hughes Aircraft. IEEE software, 8(4), 11-23.
51.Hair, J., & Alamer, A. (2022). Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) in second language and education research: Guidelines using an applied example. Research Methods in Applied Linguistics, 1(3), 100027.
52.Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2022). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage
53.Hair Jr, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2021). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). Sage publications.
54.Hair, J. F., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2011). PLS-SEM: Indeed a silver bullet. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 19(2), 139-152.
55.Hair Jr, J. F., Sarstedt, M., Matthews, L. M., & Ringle, C. M. (2016). Identifying and treating unobserved heterogeneity with FIMIX-PLS: part I–method. European Business Review, 28(1), 63-76.
56.Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115-135.
57.Hanssen, G. K., Westerheim, H., & Bjørnson, F. O. (2005, June). Tailoring RUP to a defined project type: A case study. In International Conference on Product Focused Software Process Improvement (pp. 314-327). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.
58.Jones, N. A., Ross, H., Lynam, T., Perez, P., & Leitch, A. (2011). Mental models: an interdisciplinary synthesis of theory and methods. Ecology and society, 16(1), 46-46.
59.Kearns, G. S., & Sabherwal, R. (2006). Strategic alignment between business and information technology: A knowledge-based view of behaviors, outcome, and consequences. Journal of Management Information Systems, 23(3), 129–162.
60.Klimoski, R., & Mohammed, S. (1994). Team mental model: Construct or metaphor?. Journal of management, 20(2), 403-437.
61.Kude, T., Mithas, S., Schmidt, C. T., & Heinzl, A. (2019). How pair programming influences team performance: The role of backup behavior, shared mental models, and task novelty. Information Systems Research, 30(4), 1145-1163.
62.Kozlowski, S. W. J., Gully, S. M., Nason, E. R., & Smith, E. M. (1999). Developing adaptive teams: A theory of compilation and performance across levels and time. In D. R. Ilgen & E. D. Pulakos (Eds.), The changing nature of performance: Implications for staffing, motivation, and development (pp. 240 –292). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass
63.Kock, N. (2017). Common method bias: a full collinearity assessment method for PLS-SEM. Partial least squares path modeling: Basic concepts, methodological issues and applications, 245-257.
64.Lai, J.-M., Lee, G.-G., & Hsu, W.-L. (2009). The influence of Partner’s trust-commitment relationship on electronic commerce strategic planning. Management Decision, 47(3), 491–507.
65.Langan‐Fox, J., Anglim, J., & Wilson, J. R. (2004). Mental models, team mental models, and performance: Process, development, and future directions. Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing & Service Industries, 14(4), 331-352.
66.Lee, J. C. and Chen, C. Y. (2020), "Exploring the team dynamic learning process in software process tailoring performance: A theoretical perspective", Journal of Enterprise Information Management, Vol. 33 No. 3, pp. 502-518.
67.Lee, J. C., & Chen, C. Y. (2022). Exploring the effects of team coordination and power distance on effective software process tailoring: a theoretical perspective. Information Technology & People, 35(3), 1009-1028.
68.Lee, J. C., & Chen, C. Y. (2022). Motivating members’ involvement to effectually conduct collaborative software process tailoring. Empirical Software Engineering, 27(7), 183.
69.Lee, J. C., Chou, I. C., & Chen, C. Y. (2021). The effect of process tailoring on software project performance: the role of team absorptive capacity and its knowledge‐based enablers. Information systems journal, 31(1), 120-147.
70.Lee, J. C., Shiue, Y. C., & Chen, C. Y. (2020). An integrated model of the knowledge antecedents for exploring software process improvement success. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 33(6), 1537-1556.
71.Lee, J. C., Wang, Y. T., & Chen, C. Y. (2020). The effect of transactive memory systems on process tailoring in software projects: The moderating role of task conflict and shared temporal cognitions. Journal of Systems and Software, 164, 110545.
72.LePine, J. A. (2003). Team adaptation and postchange performance: Effects of team composition in terms of members′ cognitive ability and personality. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(1), 27–39.
73.LePine, J. A. (2005). Adaptation of teams in response to unforeseen change: Effects of goal difficulty and team composition in terms of cognitive ability and goal orientation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(6), 1153–1167.
74.Levesque, L. L., Wilson, J. M., & Wholey, D. R. (2001). Cognitive divergence and shared mental models in software development project teams. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 22(2), 135-144.
75.Lim B-C, Klein KJ. Team mental models and team performance: a field study of the effects of team mental model similarity and accuracy. J Organ Behav. 2006;27(4):403–418.
76.Manser, T., Howard, S. K., & Gaba, D. M. (2008). Adaptive coordination in cardiac anaesthesia: A study of situational changes in coordination patterns using a new observation system. Ergonomics, 51(8), 1153–1178.
77.Marks, M. A., Zaccaro, S. J., & Mathieu, J. E. (2000). Performance implications of leader briefings and team-interaction training for team adaptation to novel environments. Journal of applied psychology, 85(6), 971-86.
78.Marques-Quinteiro, P., Curral, L., Passos, A. M., & Lewis, K. (2013). And now what do we do? The role of transactive memory systems and task coordination in action teams. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 17(3), 194–206.
79.Marques-Quinteiro, P., van Dijk, H., Peterson, D. R., Adamovic, M., Buengeler, C., & Santos, C. M. (2022). A model of leadership transitions in teams. Group & Organization Management, 47(2), 342-372.
80.Mathieu, J. E., Heffner, T. S., Goodwin, G. E, Cannon-Bowers, J. A., & Salas, E. (2005). Scaling the quality teammates′ mental models: Equifinality and normative comparisons. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 2 37-56.
81.Mathieu, J. E., Heffner, T. S., Goodwin, G. F., Salas, E., & Cannon-Bowers, J. A. (2000). The influence of shared mental models on team process and performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(2), 273–283.
82.Maynard, M. T., & Gilson, L. L. (2014). The role of shared mental model development in understanding virtual team effectiveness. Group & Organization Management, 39(1), 3-32.
83.Maynard, M. T., Kennedy, D. M., & Sommer, S. A. (2015). Team adaptation: A fifteen-year synthesis (1998–2013) and framework for how this literature needs to “adapt” going forward. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 24(5), 652-677.
84.Mohammed, S., Ferzandi, L., & Hamilton, K. (2010). Metaphor no more: A 15-year review of the team mental model construct. Journal of management, 36(4), 876-910.
85.Morrison-Smith, S., & Ruiz, J. (2020). Challenges and barriers in virtual teams: a literature review. SN Applied Sciences, 2, 1-33.
86.Memon, M. A., Cheah, J. H., Ramayah, T., Ting, H., Chuah, F., & Cham, T. H. (2019). Moderation analysis: issues and guidelines. Journal of Applied Structural Equation Modeling, 3(1), 1-11.
87.Nanda, V. (2001, October). On tailoring an organizational standard software development process for specific projects. In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Software Quality (pp. 1-13). Madird, Spain: IEEE Computer Society.
88.Oesterle, S., Buchwald, A., & Urbach, N. (2020). Investigating the co-creation of IT consulting service value: empirical findings of a matched pair analysis. Electronic Markets, 1-27.
89.Park, S. H., & Bae, D. H. (2013). Tailoring a large-sized software process using process slicing and case-based reasoning technique. IET Software, 7(1), 47–55.
90.Park, S., & Bae, D. H. (2011). An approach to analyzing the software process change impact using process slicing and simulation. Journal of Systems and Software, 84(4), 528-543.
91.Parker, S. K., Williams, H. M., & Turner, N. (2006). Modeling the antecedents of proactive behavior at work. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(3), 636-652.
92.Pearsall, M., Ellis, A., & Stein, J. (2009). Coping with challenge and hindrance stressors in teams: Behavioral, cognitive, and affective outcomes. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 109, 18–28.
93.Pedreira, O., Piattini, M., Luaces, M. R., & Brisaboa, N. R. (2007). A systematic review of software process tailoring. ACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes, 32(3), 1-6.
94.Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of applied psychology, 88(5), 879-903.
95.Preston, D. S., & Karahanna, E. (2009). Antecedents of IS strategic alignment: A Nomological network. Information Systems Research, 20(2), 159–179.
96.Pillat, R. M., Oliveira, T. C., Alencar, P. S., & Cowan, D. D. (2015). BPMNt: A BPMN extension for specifying software process tailoring. Information and Software Technology, 57, 95-115.
97.Purwanto, A., & Sudargini, Y. (2021). Partial least squares structural squation modeling (PLS-SEM) analysis for social and management research: a literature review. Journal of Industrial Engineering & Management Research, 2(4), 114-123.
98.Ramos-Villagrasa, P. J., Navarro, J., & García-Izquierdo, A. L. (2012). Chaotic dynamics and team effectiveness: Evidence from professional basketball. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 21(5), 778–802.
99.Ramos-Villagrasa, P. J., Passos, A. M., & García-Izquierdo, A. L. (2019). From planning to performance: The adaptation process as a determinant of outcomes. the Journal of Applied behavioral science, 55(1), 96-114.
100.Randall, K. R., Resick, C. J., & DeChurch, L. A. (2011). Building team adaptive capacity: The roles of sensegiving and team composition. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96(3), 525-540.
101. Resick, C. J., Murase, T., Bedwell, W. L., Sanz, E., Jimenez, M., & DeChurch, L. A. (2010). Mental model metrics and team adaptability: A multi-facet multi-method examination. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 14, 332–349.
102.Rosen, M. A., Bedwell, W. L., Wildman, J. L., Fritzsche, B. A., Salas, E., & Burke, C. S. (2011). Managing adaptive performance in teams: Guiding principles and behavioral markers for measurement. Human resource management review, 21(2), 107-122.
103.Rouse, W. B., & Morris, N. M. (1986). On looking into the black box: Prospects and limits in the search for mental models. Psychological bulletin, 100(3), 349-363.
104.Rouse, W. B., Cannon-Bowers, J. A., & Salas, E. (1992). The role of mental models in team performance in complex systems. Systems, Man and Cybernetics, IEEE Transactions on, 22(6), 1296–1308.
105.Ramayah, T. J. F. H., Cheah, J., Chuah, F., Ting, H., & Memon, M. A. (2018). Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) using smartPLS 3.0. An updated guide and practical guide to statistical analysis.
106.Salas, E., Sims, D. E., & Burke, C. S. (2005). Is there a ‘‘big five’’ in teamwork? Small Group Research, 36(5), 555–599.
107.Stagl, K. C., Shawn Burke, C., Salas, E., & Pierce, L. (2006). Team adaptation: Realizing team synergy. In Understanding adaptability: A prerequisite for effective performance within complex environments (pp. 117-141). Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
108.Sanchez-Manzanares, M., Rico, R., Antino, M., & Uitdewilligen, S. (2020). The joint effects of leadership style and magnitude of the disruption on team adaptation: A longitudinal experiment. Group & Organization Management, 45(6), 836-864.
109.Santos, C. M., Passos, A. M., & Uitdewilligen, S. (2016). When shared cognition leads to closed minds: Temporal mental models, team learning, adaptation and performance. European Management Journal, 34(3), 258-268.
110.Santos, C. M., Uitdewilligen, S., & Passos, A. M. (2015). Why is your team more creative than mine? The influence of shared mental models on intra‐group conflict, team creativity and effectiveness. Creativity and innovation management, 24(4), 645-658.
111.Shimoni, B. (2018). Bringing agency and social structure back into organization development: Toward a practice of habitus consulting. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 54(2), 208-225.
112.Sharma, P. N., & Kirkman, B. L. (2015). Leveraging leaders: A literature review and future lines of inquiry for empowering leadership research. Group & Organization Management, 40(2), 193-237.
113.Singh, K. (2021, December). Leadership for Team Adaptation and Performance During COVID-19 Crisis and Beyond: An Examination of Leader-member Exchange and Leader Humility. In 2021 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management (IEEM) (pp. 1294-1298).
114.Slaughter, S. A., Levine, L., Ramesh, B., Pries-Heje, J., & Baskerville, R. (2006). Aligning software processes with strategy. Mis Quarterly, 891-918.
115.Smith-Jentsch, K. A., Mathieu, J. E., & Kraiger, K. (2005). Investigating linear and interactive effects of shared mental models on safety and efficiency in a field setting. Journal of applied psychology, 90(3), 523-535.
116.Schneider, Hanges, P. J., Smith, D. B., & Salvaggio, A. N. (2003). Which Comes First: Employee Attitudes or Organizational Financial and Market Performance? Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 836–851.
117.Shin, Y., Kim, M., Choi, J. N., & Lee, S. H. (2016). Does team culture matter? Roles of team culture and collective regulatory focus in team task and creative performance. Group & Organization Management, 41(2), 232-265.
118.Streukens, S., & Leroi-Werelds, S. (2016). Bootstrapping and PLS-SEM: A step-by-step guide to get more out of your bootstrap results. European management journal, 34(6), 618-632.
119.Shmueli, G., Sarstedt, M., Hair, J. F., Cheah, J. H., Ting, H., Vaithilingam, S., & Ringle, C. M. (2019). Predictive model assessment in PLS-SEM: guidelines for using PLSpredict. European journal of marketing, 53(11), 2322-2347.
120.Sarstedt, M., Hair, J. F., Pick, M., Liengaard, B. D., Radomir, L., & Ringle, C. M. (2022). Progress in partial least squares structural equation modeling use in marketing research in the last decade. Psychology & Marketing, 39(5), 1035-1064.
121.Shmueli, G., Ray, S., Estrada, J. M. V., & Chatla, S. B. (2016). The Elephant in the Room: Predictive Performance of PLS Models. Journal of Business Research, 69(10), 4552-4564.
122.Tallon, P. P. (2007). A process-oriented perspective on the alignment of information technology and business strategy. Journal of Management Information Systems, 24(3), 227–268.
123.Tallon, P. P. (2010). A service science perspective on strategic choice, IT, and performance in U.S. banking. Journal of Management Information Systems, 26(4), 219–252.
124.Tallon, P. P., & Pinsonneault, A. (2011). Competing perspectives on the link between strategic information technology alignment and organizational agility: Insights from a mediation model. MIS Quarterly, 35(2), 463–486.
125.Tinsley, H. E., & Tinsley, D. J. (1987). Uses of factor analysis in counseling psychology. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 34, 414-424.
126.Uitdewilligen, S., Waller, M. J., & Pitariu, A. H. (2013). Mental model updating and team adaptation. Small Group Research, 44(2), 127-158.
127.von Wangenheim, C. G., Weber, S., Hauck, J. C. R., & Trentin, G. (2006). Experiences on establishing software processes in small companies. Information and Software Technology, 48(9), 890-900.
128.Xu, P. (2005). Knowledge support in software process tailoring. In Proceedings of the 38th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (pp. 87c-87c). Berlin: IEEE.
129.Xu, P., & Ramesh, B. (2007). Software process tailoring: an empirical investigation. Journal of Management Information Systems, 24(2), 293-328.
130.Xu, P., & Ramesh, B. (2008). Impact of knowledge support on the performance of software process tailoring. Journal of Management Information Systems, 25(3), 277-314.
131.Xu, P., & Ramesh, B. (2008). Using process tailoring to manage software development challenges. IT Professional, 10(4), 39-45.
132.Yang, H. D., Kang, H. R., & Mason, R. M. (2008). An exploratory study on meta skills in software development teams: antecedent cooperation skills and personality for shared mental models. European Journal of Information Systems, 17, 47-61.
133.Yu, X., & Petter, S. (2014). Understanding agile software development practices using shared mental models theory. Information and software technology, 56(8), 911-921.
134.Yamin, S., & Kurniawan, H. (2011). Generasi baru mengolah data penelitian dengan partial least square path modeling. Jakarta: Salemba Infotek.
135.Zamani, E. D., & Pouloudi, N. (2022). Shared mental models and perceived proximity: a comparative case study. Information Technology & People, 35(2), 723-749.
136.Zhou, Y., & Wang, E. (2010). Shared mental models as moderators of team process-performance relationships. Social Behavior and Personality: an international journal, 38(4), 433-444. |
[Endnote RIS 格式]
[相關文章]
[文章引用]
[完整記錄]
[館藏目錄]
至系統瀏覽論文 (2028-7-1以後開放)
plurk
funp
live
udn
HD
myshare
netvibes
friend
youpush
delicious
baidu
Google bookmarks
del.icio.us
hemidemi
facebook
twitter
google
reddit