博碩士論文 110427010 詳細資訊




以作者查詢圖書館館藏 以作者查詢臺灣博碩士 以作者查詢全國書目 勘誤回報 、線上人數:61 、訪客IP:3.22.42.25
姓名 林芷均(Zhi-Jun LIN)  查詢紙本館藏   畢業系所 人力資源管理研究所
論文名稱 組織公平對安靜離職傾向之影響 -以領導成員交換關係為中介變項
(The impact of organizational justice and quiet quitting:leader-member exchange as the Mediator)
相關論文
★ 業務主管領導力對部屬招募行為之影響-以S壽險公司為例★ 人力精簡對企業績效的影響–以產業特性為調節變項
★ 經理人超額薪酬、經理人異動與公司績效之關係★ 人口老化對企業之影響與因應對策-以傳統產業為例
★ 運用羅吉斯迴歸探討企業績效、公司治理與經理人異動之關聯性★ 護理人員組織承諾與專業承諾對離職傾向與離業傾向的影響
★ 運用存活分析探討高科技產業招募者人格特質與離職風險之關聯性-以A公司為例★ 金融電子化對台灣銀行業組織績效及人力彈性影響之探討
★ 人力資源部門角色與功能轉變之個案研究★ 高階主管薪酬級距與公司績效之關聯性分析
★ 人力招募政策及主管領導風格對新進人員晉升與離職傾向之影響-以房仲業S公司為例★ 影響台灣勞工赴海外就業的決定性因素
★ 董事會特性對企業績效之影響-以人力資本為調節變項★ 董事會異質性之決定因素
★ 公司治理結構與就業調整★ 總經理雙元性、股權集中度、人力資本與組織績效
檔案 [Endnote RIS 格式]    [Bibtex 格式]    [相關文章]   [文章引用]   [完整記錄]   [館藏目錄]   [檢視]  [下載]
  1. 本電子論文使用權限為同意立即開放。
  2. 已達開放權限電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。
  3. 請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。

摘要(中) 隨著職場中不同世代的更迭,工作者對於工作場域的型態和工作內容上的心態也不斷地在改變。安靜離職可能成為組織中一種隱性的問題,提醒企業更加重視員工的情感和需求,並與員工建立良好的溝通關係,以避免員工默默地將生活重心離開公司。領導者的角色在於促進員工對工作的投入和對組織的參與度,以提升企業績效,實現員工和企業的雙贏狀態。
本研究以組織公平 (Organizational justice) 的三個構面:分配公平 (Distributive justice)、程序公平 (Procedural justice)、互動公平 (Interactional justice) 為研究主題,探討其對於員工安靜離職傾向 (Quiet quitting) 的影響,並以領導成員交換關係 (Leader-Member Exchange, LMX) 為中介變項,過程以隨機抽樣的方式針對臺灣從業人員進行問卷調查,共計回收 372 份有效問卷。研究結果發現:(1) 分配公平對於安靜離職傾向無顯著負向影響;(2) 程序公平對於安靜離職傾向無顯著負向影響;(3) 互動公平對於安靜離職傾向無顯著負向影響;(4) 分配公平對於領導成員交換關係具有正向影響;(5) 程序公平對於領導成員交換關係具有正向影響;(6) 互動公平對於領導成員交換關係具有正向影響;(7) 領導成員交換關係對於安靜離職傾向具有負向影響;(8) 組織公平 (程序公平、分配公平、互動公平) 對於安靜離職傾向具有負向影響,而在其中領導成員交換關係具有間接中介效果。
由於安靜離職傾向是近期才被廣為討論的現象,過去相關研究文獻數量較少,透過本研究討論安靜離職傾向是否受組織公平所影響,並探討領導成員交換關係在其中的效果,讓組織在預防及改善安靜離職現象時能有參考依據。
摘要(英) With the succession of different generations in the workplace, workers′ attitudes about the nature of the work environment and the content of their jobs are constantly changing. Quiet quitting can be an implicit issue within an organization, emphasizing the need for companies to prioritize the emotions and conditions of their employees, and establish excellent communication and relationships with them, in order to prevent employees be quiet quitting in the organization. The role of leaders needs to promote employee engagement and organizational involvement, aiming to enhance business performance and achieve a win-win situation for both employees and company.
This study focuses on the topic of organizational justice, including distributive justice, procedural justice, and interactional justice, and examines their impact on quiet quitting, with the leader-member exchange as a mediator.
The research objects are the people who have work experience in Taiwan. A total of 372 valid questionnaires were collected. The results of the study found that: (1) distributive justice not has a significant negative impact on quiet quitting; (2) procedural justice not has a significant negative impact on quiet quitting; (3) interactional justice not has a significant negative impact on quiet quitting; (4) distributive justice has a positive impact on leader-member exchange; (5) procedural justice has a positive impact on leader-member exchange; (6) interactional justice has a positive impact on leader-member exchange; (7) leader-member exchange has a negative impact on quiet quitting; (8) leader-member exchange has indirect mediation effect between organizational justice (including distributive justice, procedural justice, and interactional justice) and quiet quitting.
As quiet quitting is a relatively recent phenomenon that has been attention in recent years, the literature on related research is limited. This thesis discusses quiet quitting whether it is influenced by organizational justice and leader-member exchange, in order to help companies prevent and address the issue of quiet quitting.
關鍵字(中) ★ 組織公平
★ 分配公平
★ 程序公平
★ 互動公平
★ 領導成員交換關係
★ 安靜離職傾向
關鍵字(英) ★ Organizational justice
★ Distributive justice
★ Procedural justice
★ Interactional justice
★ Leader-member exchange
★ Quiet quitting
論文目次 第一章 緒論..............................................1
1-1 研究背景與動機.......................................1
1-2 研究目的............................................4
1-3 研究流程........................................... 4
第二章 文獻探討與假設................................... 5
2-1 組織公平........................................... 5
2-2 安靜離職傾向....................................... 7
2-3 領導成員交換關係................................... 8
2-4 組織公平對安靜離職傾向的影響........................ 9
2-5 組織公平對領導成員交換關係的影響.................... 12
2-6 領導成員交換關係對安靜離職傾向的影響................ 15
第三章 研究方法........................................ 17
3-1 研究架構與假設..................................... 17
3-2 研究變項的操作與衡量工具............................18
3-3 資料蒐集與統計分析方法............................. 20
第四章 資料分析與研究結果.............................. 22
4-1 樣本敘述統計...................................... 22
4-2 信度與效度分析.................................... 24
V
4-3 各變項之敘述統計與相關分析......................... 32
4-4 共同方法變異檢測.................................. 33
4-5 迴歸分析與假設驗證................................ 33
第五章 結論與建議..................................... 40
5-1 研究結論.......................................... 40
5-2 管理意涵.......................................... 43
5-3 研究限制與未來研究建議............................ 44
參考文獻............................................. 45
附錄:研究問卷....................................... 56
參考文獻 中文文獻
1.王淑貞. (1999). 新進人員角色期望對其工作行為之影響—並檢驗 [與主管關係] 及 [與同事關係] 之干擾效果, 國立中央大學人力資源管理研究所未出版之碩士論文. 國立中央大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文, 桃園.
2.王玉珍, & 吳清麟.(2017). 成人生涯召喚量表之編製及其信效度分析.教育心理學報, 49(1), 1-21.
3.李文忠. (2006). 領導風格、工作滿足、人格特質對離職傾向之關聯性研究-以醫藥代表為例. 佛光人文社會學院管理學研究所碩士論文, 宜蘭.
4.栢思皓.(2013). 組織公平對工作倦怠關係之研究-以移民署國境事務大隊國境事務隊為例. 國立政治大學公共行政研究所, 臺北市.
5.晉麗明.(2022). 企業如何因應「躺平主義」及「在職離職」. 104獵才顧問, 取自https://hunter.104.com.tw/zh-tw/articles/91102
6.陳慧穎.(2007). 校長領導行為、組織公平及教師組織公民行為關係之研究-以南部四縣市立國小為例. 國立台南大學,台南市.
7.郭維哲,& 方聰安.(2006). 學校組織公平對教師組織公民行為影響之研究—以信任及承諾為中介變項. 教育經營與管理研究集刊, 2 ,p.145-179.
8.黃玉嬿. (2012). 主管你如何對待員工. 管理雜誌, 455, p.6.
9.黃正秋,& 翁良杰 (2015). 轉換型領導與創造力之關係: 探討領導者部屬交換關係的中介效果及績效付酬公平性的干擾效果. 遠東學報第三十二卷第二期, 中華民國一百零四年八月出版.
10.黃珮婷,& 陳慧娟.(2016). 大學生未來時間觀與自我調整學習之關係:知覺工具性中介效果檢驗. 教育心理學報, 47(3), 329-354.
11.蔡書妮.(2005). 領導行為對於員工的組織公平認知與工作滿意度之影響-以主管與部屬交換理論觀點探討. 國立中央大學企業管理研究所碩士論文.

12.鄭月英.(2015). 程序公平與情感型組織承諾之關係:以主管部屬關係為中介變數. 明新科技大學管理研究所碩士學位論文.
13.謝明玲.(2015). 讓員工熱血又投入的祕密. 天下雜誌, 568, p.106.

英文文獻

Adams, J. S. (1963). Towards an understanding of inequity. The journal of abnormal and social psychology, 67(5), 422.

Ambrose, M. L., & Cropanzano, R. (2003). A longitudinal analysis of organizational fairness: an examination of reactions to tenure and promotion decisions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(2), 266.

Ambrose, M. L., & Schminke, M. (2007). Examining justice climate: Issues of fit, simplicity, and content. In Multi-level issues in organizations and time (Vol. 6, pp. 397-413). Emerald Group Publishing Limited.

Ambrose, M. L., Arnaud, A., Greenberg, J., & Colquitt, J. (2005). Distributive and procedural justice: Construct distinctiveness, construct interdependence, and overall justice. The handbook of organizational justice, 59, 84.

Aryee, S., Budhwar, P. S., & Chen, Z. X. (2002). Trust as a mediator of the relationship between organizational justice and work outcomes: Test of a social exchange model. Journal of Organizational Behavior: The International Journal of Industrial, Occupational and Organizational Psychology and Behavior, 23(3), 267-285.

Bakker, A. B., & Leiter, M. P. (2010). Work engagement: A handbook of essential theory and research. Psychology press.

Bauer, T. N., & Green, S. G. (1996). Development of leader-member exchange: A longitudinal test. Academy of management journal, 39(6), 1538-1567.

Bies, R. J. (1986). Interactional justice: Communication criteria of fairness. Research on negotiation in organizations, 1, 43-55.

Bies, R. J. (2001). Interactional (in) justice: The sacred and the profane. Advances in organizational justice, 89118.

Bhal, K. T., & Ansari, M. A. (2007). Leader‐member exchange‐subordinate outcomes relationship: Role of voice and justice. Leadership & organization development journal.

Bies, R. J., & Shapiro, D. L. (1987). Interactional fairness judgments: The influence of causal accounts. Social justice research, 1, 199-218.

Bies, R. J., Shapiro, D. L., & Cummings, L. L. (1988).Causal accounts and managing organizational conflict: Is it enough to say it′s not my fault?. Communication Research, 15(4), 381-399.

Blau, P. M. (1964). Exchange and Power in Social Life. New York: Wiley. Department of Sociology, Universtly of Chicago. IL, 352 p.

Bretous, M. (2022). What is "Quiet Quitting"? And Why It′s Trending on Social Media. Hubspot. https://blog.hubspot.com/marketing/quiet-quitting

Campbell, N. M., Dawel, A., Edwards, M., & Goodhew, S. C. (2022). Motivational direction diverges from valence for sadness, anger, and amusement: A role for appraisals?. Emotion.

Chang, E., & Hahn, J. (2006). Does pay‐for‐performance enhance perceived distributive justice for collectivistic employees?. Personnel Review, 35(4), 397-412.

Colquitt, J. A., Conlon, D. E., Wesson, M. J., Porter, C. O., & Ng, K. Y. (2001). Justice at the millennium: a meta-analytic review of 25 years of organizational justice
research. Journal of applied psychology, 86(3), 425.

Cropanzano, R., & Mitchell, M. S. (2005). Social exchange theory: An interdisciplinary review. Journal of management, 31(6), 874-900.

Cropanzano, R., Prehar, C. A., & Chen, P. Y. (2002). Using social exchange theory to distinguish procedural from interactional justice. Group & organization management, 27(3), 324-351.

Dansereau Jr, F., Graen, G., & Haga, W. J. (1975). A vertical dyad linkage approach to leadership within formal organizations: A longitudinal investigation of the role making process. Organizational behavior and human performance, 13(1), 46-78.

Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1987). The support of autonomy and the control of behavior. Journal of personality and social psychology, 53(6), 1024.

Deci, E. L., Connell, J. P., & Ryan, R. M. (1989). Self-determination in a work organization. Journal of applied psychology, 74(4), 580.

DeConinck, J. B., & Stilwell, C. D. (2004). Incorporating organizational justice, role states, pay satisfaction and supervisor satisfaction in a model of turnover intentions. Journal of Business Research, 57(3), 225-231.

Dienesch, R. M., & Liden, R. C. (1986). Leader-member exchange model of leadership: A critique and further development. Academy of management review, 11(3), 618-634.

Duchon, D., Green, S. G., & Taber, T. D. (1986). Vertical dyad linkage: A longitudinal assessment of antecedents, measures, and consequences. Journal of applied psychology, 71(1), 56.

Dulebohn, J. H., Bommer, W. H., Liden, R. C., Brouer, R. L., & Ferris, G. R. (2012). A meta-analysis of antecedents and consequences of leader-member exchange: Integrating the past with an eye toward the future. Journal of management, 38(6), 1715-1759.

Edmondson, A. C. (1996). Learning from mistakes is easier said than done: Group and organizational influences on the detection and correction of human error. The Journal of
Applied Behavioral Science, 32(1), 5-28.

Edmondson, A. (1999). Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Administrative science quarterly, 44(2), 350-383.

Erdogan, B. (2002). Antecedents and consequences of justice perceptions in performance appraisals. Human resource management review, 12(4), 555-578.

Ellis, L.& Yang, A. (2022) If Your Co-Workers Are ‘Quiet Quitting,’ Here’s What That Means, THE WALL STREET JOURNAL, https://www.wsj.com/articles/if-your-gen-z-co-workers-are-quiet-quitting-heres-what-that-means-11660260608

Epitropaki, O., & Martin, R. (2005). From ideal to real: a longitudinal study of the role of implicit leadership theories on leader-member exchanges and employee outcomes. Journal of applied psychology, 90(4), 659.

Fairhurst, G. T., & Chandler, T. A. (1989). Social structure in leader‐member interaction. Communications Monographs, 56(3), 215-239.

Folger, R., Gilliland, S. W., Steiner, D. D., & Skarlicki, D. P. (2001). Fairness as deonance. Theoretical and cultural perspectives on organizational justice, 3-33.

Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of marketing research, 18(1), 39-50.

Formica, S., & Sfodera, F. (2022). The Great Resignation and Quiet Quitting paradigm shifts: An overview of current situation and future research directions. Journal of Hospitality Marketing & Management, 31(8), 899-907.

Gerstner, C. R., & Day, D. V. (1997). Meta-Analytic review of leader–member exchange theory: Correlates and construct issues. Journal of applied psychology, 82(6), 827.

Goldman, B. M. (2003). The application of referent cognitions theory to legal-claiming by terminated workers: The role of organizational justice and anger. Journal of Management, 29(5), 705-728.

Gottschalg, O., & Zollo, M. (2007). Interest alignment and competitive advantage. Academy of management review, 32(2), 418-437.

Graen, G., & Cashman, J. F. (1975). A role-making model of leadership in formal organizations: A developmental approach. Leadership frontiers, 143, 165.

Graen, G., & Schiemann, W. (1978). Leader–member agreement: A vertical dyad linkage approach. Journal of Applied psychology, 63(2), 206.

Graen, G. B., & Uhl-Bien, M. (1995). Relationship-based approach to leadership: Development of leader-member exchange (LMX) theory of leadership over 25 years:
Applying a multi-level multi-domain perspective. The leadership quarterly, 6(2), 219-247.

Graen, G., Novak, M. A., & Sommerkamp, P. (1982). The effects of leader—member exchange and job design on productivity and satisfaction: Testing a dual attachment
model. Organizational behavior and human performance, 30(1), 109-131.

Greenberg, J. (1990). Organizational justice: Yesterday, today, and tomorrow. Journal of management, 16(2), 399-432.

HARTER, J. (2022). Is Quiet Quitting Real?, Gallup,
https://www.gallup.com/workplace/398306/quiet-quitting-real.aspx

Hofmann, D. A., Morgeson, F. P., & Gerras, S. J. (2003). Climate as a moderator of the relationship between leader-member exchange and content specific citizenship: safety climate as an exemplar. Journal of applied psychology, 88(1), 170.

Homans, G. C. (1961). Social behavior: Its elementary forms, brace & world. Inc.. New York^ eHarcourt Harcourt.

Isaac, J. E. (2001). Performance related pay: The importance of fairness. Journal of Industrial Relations, 43(2), 111-123.

Jones, D. A., & Skarlicki, D. P. (2003). The Relationship Between Perceptions of Fairness and Voluntary Turnover Among Retail Employees 1. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 33(6), 1226-1243.

Kamdar, D., & Van Dyne, L. (2007). The joint effects of personality and workplace social exchange relationships in predicting task performance and citizenship performance. Journal of applied psychology, 92(5), 1286.

Karim, J. (2011). Emotional intelligence: A cross-cultural psychometric analysis (Doctoral dissertation, Aix-Marseille 3).

Kaplan, J. (2022). Pyramid of Quiet Quitting. LinkedIn.
https://www.linkedin.com/posts/jason-kaplan-67b52610_leadership-personaldevelopment-management-activity-6971789378721345536-b8jn/

Kelner, S. P., Rivers, C. A., & O’Connell, K. H. (1996). Managerial style as a behavioral predictor of organizational climate. Boston: McBer y Company.

Korman, A. K. (1977). Organizational behavior. Prentice Hall., Englewood Cliffs, N.J:Prentice Hall, Inc.

Krehbiel, P. J., & Cropanzano, R. (2000). Procedural justice, outcome favorability and emotion. Social justice research, 13, 339-360.

Lam, S. S., Schaubroeck, J., & Aryee, S. (2002). Relationship between organizational justice and employee work outcomes: a cross‐national study. Journal of organizational behavior, 23(1), 1-18.

Lee, J. (2001). Leader-member exchange, perceived organizational justice, and cooperative communication. Management Communication Quarterly, 14(4), 574-589.

Liden, R. C., & Graen, G. (1980). Generalizability of the vertical dyad linkage model of leadership. Academy of Management journal, 23(3), 451-465.

Liden, R. C., Sparrowe, R. T., & Wayne, S. J. (1997). Leader-member exchange theory: The past and potential for the future.

Liden, R. C., Wayne, S. J., & Stilwell, D. (1993). A longitudinal study on the early development of leader-member exchanges. Journal of applied psychology, 78(4), 662.

Lind, E. A., & Van den Bos, K. (2002). When fairness works: Toward a general theory of uncertainty management. Research in organizational behavior, 24, 181-223.

Manogran, P., Stauffer, J., & Conlon, E. J. (1994). LEADER-MEMBER EXCHANGE AS A KEY MEDIATING VARIABLE BETWEEN EMPLOYEES PERCEPTIONS OF FAIRNESS AND ORGANIZATIONAL CITIZENSHIP BEHAVIOR. In Academy of Management Proceedings (Vol. 1994, No. 1, pp. 249-253).Briarcliff Manor, NY 10510: Academy of Management.

Marshall Goldsmith Stakeholder Centered Coaching. (2022). 7 Proactive Steps To Prevent ‘Quiet Quitting’. https://knowledgebank.mgscc.net/7-proactive-steps-to-prevent-quiet-quitting/Masterson, S. S., Lewis, K., Goldman,

B. M., & Taylor, M. S. (2000). Integrating justice and social exchange: The differing effects of fair procedures and treatment on work relationships. Academy of Management journal, 43(4), 738-748.

May, D. R., Gilson, R. L., & Harter, L. M. (2004). The psychological conditions of meaningfulness, safety and availability and the engagement of the human spirit at work. Journal of occupational and organizational psychology, 77(1), 11-37.

McDowall, A., & Fletcher, C. (2004). Employee development: an organizational justice perspective. Personnel review, 33(1), 8-29.

McFarlin, D. B., & Sweeney, P. D. (1992). Distributive and procedural justice as predictors of satisfaction with personal and organizational outcomes. Academy of management
Journal, 35(3), 626-637.

Moorman, R. H. (1991). Relationship between organizational justice and organizational citizenship behaviors: Do fairness perceptions influence employee citizenship?. Journal of applied psychology, 76(6), 845.

Moorman, R. H., & Byrne, Z. S. (2013). How does organizational justice affect organizational citizenship behavior?. In Handbook of organizational justice (pp. 355-380). Psychology Press.

Niehoff, B. P., & Moorman, R. H. (1993). Justice as a mediator of the relationship between methods of monitoring and organizational citizenship behavior. Academy of Management journal, 36(3), 527-556.

Nystrom, P. C. (1990). Vertical exchanges and organizational commitments of American business managers. Group & Organization Studies, 15(3), 296 312.

Oldham, G. R., & Cummings, A. (1996). Employee creativity: Personal and contextual factors at work. Academy of management journal, 39(3), 607-634.

Pearce, M. (2022).Gen Z didn’t coin ‘quiet quitting’— Gen X did. Los Angeles Times. Los Angeles Times. https://www.latimes.com/entertainment-arts/story/2022-08-27/la-ent-quiet-quitting-origins

Pillai, R., Schriesheim, C. A., & Williams, E. S. (1999). Fairness perceptions and trust as mediators for transformational and transactional leadership: A two-sample study. Journal of management, 25(6), 897-933.

Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Moorman, R. H., & Fetter, R. (1990). Transformational leader behaviors and their effects on followers′ trust in leader, satisfaction, and organizational citizenship behaviors. The leadership quarterly, 1(2), 107-142.

Rosalsky, G & Selyukh, A. (2022). The economics of quiet quitting–and what we should call it instead. National Public Radio.https://www.npr.org/sections/money/2022/09/13/1122059402/the-economics-behind-quiet-quitting-and-what-we-should-call-it-instead

Schaufeli, W. B., Salanova, M., González-Romá, V., & Bakker, A. B. (2002). The measurement of engagement and burnout: A two sample confirmatory factor analytic approach. Journal of Happiness studies, 3, 71-92.

Schiemann, W. A. (1977). The nature and prediction of organizational communication: A review of the literature and an empirical investigation. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.

Shore, L. M., & Shore, T. H. (1995). Perceived organizational support and organizational justice. Organizational politics, justice, and support: Managing the social climate of the workplace, 149, 164.

Sias, P. M., & Jablin, F. M. (1995). Differential superior-subordinate relations, perceptions of fairness, and coworker communication. Human Communication Research, 22(1), 5-38.

Skarlicki, D. P., & Folger, R. (1997). Retaliation in the workplace: The roles of distributive, procedural, and interactional justice. Journal of applied Psychology, 82(3), 434.

Snyder, R. A., & Bruning, N. S. (1985). Quality of vertical dyad linkages: Congruence of supervisor and subordinate competence and role stress as explanatory variables. Group &
Organization Studies, 10(1), 81-94.

Tekleab, A. G., Takeuchi, R., & Taylor, M. S. (2005). Extending the chain of relationships among organizational justice, social exchange, and employee reactions: The role of contract violations. Academy of Management journal, 48(1), 146-157.

Tsai, K. H., Chou, C., & Chen, M. Y. (2008). Does matching pay policy with innovation strategy really improve firm performance? An examination of technology‐based service firms. Personnel Review, 37(3), 300-316.

Van Dam, K., Oreg, S., & Schyns, B. (2008). Daily work contexts and resistance to organisational change: The role of leader–member exchange, development climate, and
change process characteristics. Applied psychology, 57(2), 313-334.

Vecchio, R. P., & Gobdel, B. C. (1984). The vertical dyad linkage model of leadership: Problems and prospects. Organizational behavior and human performance, 34(1), 5-20.

Uhl-Bien, M., Graen, G. B., & Scandura, T. A. (2000). Implications of leader-member exchange (LMX) for strategic human resource management systems: Relationships as
social capital for competitive advantage. Research in personnel and human resources management, 18, 137-186.

Weiss, H. M., Suckow, K., & Cropanzano, R. (1999). Effects of justice conditions on discrete emotions. Journal of applied Psychology, 84(5), 786.

Williams, K. D., Ringer, M. A., Senior, C. A., Webb, M. J., McAvaney, B. J., Andronova, N., ... & Mitchell, J. F. B. (2006). Evaluation of a component of the cloud response to
climate change in an intercomparison of climate models. Climate Dynamics, 26, 145-
165.
Wilson, K., Fornasier, S., & White, K. M. (2010). Psychological predictors of young adults′ use of social networking sites. Cyberpsychology, behavior, and social networking, 13(2), 173-177.

Yu, J., Park, J., & Hyun, S. S. (2021). Impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on employees’ work stress, well-being, mental health, organizational citizenship behavior, and employee-customer identification. Journal of Hospitality Marketing & Management, 30(5), 529-548.

Zenger, J. & Folkman, J. (2022). quitting-is-about-bad-bosses-not-bad-employees. Harvard Business Review. https://hbr.org/2022/08/quiet-quitting-is-about-bad-bosses-not-bad-employees
指導教授 陳明園(Ming-Yuan Chen) 審核日期 2023-6-19
推文 facebook   plurk   twitter   funp   google   live   udn   HD   myshare   reddit   netvibes   friend   youpush   delicious   baidu   
網路書籤 Google bookmarks   del.icio.us   hemidemi   myshare   

若有論文相關問題,請聯絡國立中央大學圖書館推廣服務組 TEL:(03)422-7151轉57407,或E-mail聯絡  - 隱私權政策聲明