博碩士論文 110457022 詳細資訊




以作者查詢圖書館館藏 以作者查詢臺灣博碩士 以作者查詢全國書目 勘誤回報 、線上人數:21 、訪客IP:100.28.231.85
姓名 魏筱芬(Hsiao-Fen Wei)  查詢紙本館藏   畢業系所 人力資源管理研究所在職專班
論文名稱 組織公平知覺對員工敬業度之影響-以員工信任為中介變項
(The Effects of Perception of Organizational Justice on Employee Engagement: Employee’s Trust as the Mediator Variables)
相關論文
★ 企業內部人力資源入口網站使用者滿意度調查–以A公司為例★ 員工內部行銷知覺、組織承諾與離職傾向之關係研究─以某科技公司為例
★ 研發人員創造力人格特質、工作價值觀對工作績效之影響-以某高科技研究機構為例★ 組織生涯管理對組織承諾影響之探討-以A公司為例
★ 導入以職能為基礎之評鑑中心可行性研究--以銀行業為例★ 360 度管理職能評鑑與受評者自我覺察能力之探討-個案公司跨年度研究
★ 探討中階主管人格特質、領導風格與工作績效之關聯性--以Y公司為例★ 因應公司經營策略變革之人力資源配置調整個案探討
★ 從組織變革觀點探討業務流程管理成效之個案研究★ 主管領導風格與員工人格特質對工作績效之影響
★ 矩陣式組織之專案績效考核制度探討-以某公司為例★ 企業因應員工分紅費用化之措施及其成效探討
★ 證券後勤基層主管職業生涯地圖之建立★ 企業導入卓越經營績效評量之案例探討
★ 主管領導風格對組織氣候與績效之影響探討-以T公司為例★ 人力資源管理措施對工作態度之影響探討-以台灣高鐵為例
檔案 [Endnote RIS 格式]    [Bibtex 格式]    [相關文章]   [文章引用]   [完整記錄]   [館藏目錄]   [檢視]  [下載]
  1. 本電子論文使用權限為同意立即開放。
  2. 已達開放權限電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。
  3. 請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。

摘要(中) 近年來員工敬業度成為企業在人才留任率的最佳預測指標,而員工個人感受、感知以及組織公平也成為管理者關注的議題。本研究探討組織公平知覺對員工敬業度之影響,並分析員工信任的二個構面—同事信任與主管信任,在其中之作用。本研究對象為台灣跨產業在職之工作者,進行線上問卷調查,回收有效問卷共283份,採取實證方式進行結果分析。
研究結果顯示:(1)組織公平知覺對同事信任與主管信任有顯著正向影響效果;(2)同事信任對員工敬業度具有正向效果,主管信任對員工敬業度具有正向顯著效果;(3)組織公平知覺對員工敬業度具有負向不顯著之直接效果,但整體的總效果是正向顯著;(4)員工信任對組織公平知覺與員工敬業度具有完全中介作用,且中介作用主要來自主管信任。
摘要(英) Employee engagement has become the best predictor of talent retention in recent years, and employee perceptions, personal feelings and organizational justice have also become issues of concern to managers. This study investigates the effect of perception of organizational justice on employee engagement and analyzes the role of two components of employee trust - peer trust and supervisor trust. This study investigates the cross-industry employees who work in Taiwan, and there are 283 valid questionnaires.
The results of the study showed that: (1) Perception of organizational justice has a significant positive impact on peer’s trust and supervisor’s trust (2) Peer’s trust has a positive impact on employee engagement and supervisor’s trust has a significant positive impact on employee engagement. (3) Perception of organizational justice has a nonsignificant negative direct effect on employee engagement, but the total effect is significant positive. (4) Employee’s trust has a full mediation on the perception of organizational justice and employee engagement, and the mediation mainly comes from supervisor’s trust.
關鍵字(中) ★ 組織公平知覺
★ 員工敬業度
★ 員工信任
關鍵字(英) ★ Perception of organizational justice
★ Employee engagement
★ Employee’s trust
論文目次 摘要 i
Abstract ii
誌謝 iii
目錄 iv
圖目錄 vi
表目錄 vii
第一章 緒論 1
1.1 研究緣起 1
1.2 研究的重要性 2
1.3 研究問題 2
1.4 研究流程 2
第二章 文獻探討 4
2.1 員工敬業度 4
2.2 組織公平知覺 5
2.3 員工信任 8
第三章 研究方法 10
3.1 研究架構 10
3.2 研究假說 10
3.3 研究對象 11
3.4 研究工具 11
3.5 資料分析方法 12
第四章 研究結果 14
4.1 樣本描述分析 14
4.2 信度與效度分析 16
4.3 相關分析 19
4.4 結構方程式模型分析 20
第五章 結論與建議 23
5.1 研究結論 23
5.2 管理意涵 24
5.3 研究限制與建議 26
參考文獻 28
附錄一 研究問卷 33
參考文獻 王麗丹(2021)。領導風格對工作敬業之影響性研究—組織認同為調節變項。國立中央大學,碩士論文。
李曉萍(2021)。以員工信任為中介變項探討主管人際能力對員工工作投入的影響。國立中央大學,碩士論文。
林弘儒(2014)。真誠領導對員工的組織公平認知、組織承諾與助人行為之影響。國立中央大學,碩士論文。
林鉦棽(2005)。組織公民行爲之跨層次分析。管理學報,22(4),503-524。
林晏瑜(2006)。組織權威主義對組織正義知覺形成與後續態度的干擾效果之研究。國立雲林科技大學,博士論文。
林秀英(2015)。組織公平、組織信任與職場幸福感之關係。國立臺北大學,碩士論文。
邱琛榆(2019)。人力資源管理措施對員工敬業度之影響-以創業導向氛圍為中介變項。國立中央大學,碩士論文。
陳增朋(2008)。大學校院體育行政組織公平行為影響因素研究。國立台灣師範大學體育學系,博士論文。
鄭雅文(2020)。組織溝通、組織信任與留任意願關係之研究-以總工作年資為調節變項。國立中央大學,碩士論文。
台灣員工敬業度調查研究白皮書,2021年2月1日,取自:https://www.mercer.com.tw/our-thinking/career/employee-engagement-survey.html#contactForm
2021年《全球領導力展望》台灣報告,2021年1月,取自: https://host.huiju.cool/page/188468601500217178/aedee17b77ef408aa98c2cf330db4e72
2021員工C.E.O.工作價值認知調查報告,2022年1月5日,取自: https://vip.104.com.tw/preLogin/recruiterForum/post/54531


Adams, J.S. (1965). Inequity in social exchange. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 2, 267-299.
Aquino, K. (1995). Relationships among pay inequity, perceptions of procedural justice, and organizational citizenship. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 8, 21-33.
Baldwin, S. (2006). Organisational Justice. UK: Institute for Employment Studies.
Bies, R. J. (2005). Are procedural justice and interactional justice conceptually distinct? In J. Greenberg & J. A. Colquitt (Eds.), Handbook of organizational justice (pp. 85-112). Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Bies, R. J., & Moag, J. S. (1986). Interactional justice: Communication criteria of fairness. Research on Negotiation in Organizations, 1, 43-55.
Blader, S. L., & Tyler, T. (2005). How can theories of organizational justice explain the effects of fairness? In J. Greenberg & J. A. Colquitt (Eds.), Handbook of organizational justice (pp. 329-354). Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Brown, S. P. (1996). A meta-analysis and review of organizational research on job involvement. Psychological Bulletin, 120(2), 235-255.
Colquitt, J. A. (2001). On the dimensionality of organizational justice: A construct validation of a measure. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(3), 386-400.
Colquitt, J. A., Greenberg, J., & Zapata-Phelan, C. P. (2005). What is organizational justice? A historical overview. In J. Greenberg & J. A. Colquitt (Eds.), Handbook of organizational justice. (pp. 3-56). Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Colquitt, J. A., Scott, B. A., & LePine, J. A. (2007). Trust, trustworthiness, and trust propensity: A meta-analytic test of their unique relationships with risk taking and job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(4), 909-927.
Cook, J., & Wall, T. (1980). New work attitude measures of trust, organizational commitment and personal need non‐fulfilment. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 53(1), 39-52.
Deluga, R. J. (1994). Supervisor trust building, leader-member exchange and organizational citizenship behaviour. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 67(4), 315-326.
Donald, S., Charles, S., & Ben, Z. (2022/1/11). Toxic Culture Is Driving the Great Resignation. MITSloan Management Revuew. https://sloanreview.mit.edu/article/toxic-culture-is-driving-the-great-resignation/
Greenberg, J. (1987a). A taxonomy of organizational justice theories. The Academy of Management Review, 12(1), 9-22.
Greenberg, J. (1987b). Reactions to procedural injustice in payment distributions: Do the means justify the ends? Journal of Applied Psychology, 72(1), 55-61.
Greenberg, J. (1990a). Organizational justice: Yesterday, today, and tomorrow. Journal of Management, 16(2), 399-432.
Greenberg, J. (1990b). Employee theft as a reaction to underpayment inequity: The hidden cost of pay cuts. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75(5), 561-568.
Homans, G. C. (1958). Social behavior as exchange. American Journal of Sociology, 63(6), 597-606.
Homans, G. C. (1961). Social behavior: Its elementary forms. New York: Harcourt, Brace, and World.
Kahn, W. A. (1990). Psychological conditions of personal engagement and disengagement at work. Academy of Management Journal, 33(4), 692-724.
Leventhal, G. S. (1980). What should be done with equity theory? New approaches to the study of fairness in social relationships. In K. J. Gergen, M. S. Greenberg, & R. H. Willis (Eds.), Social exchange: Advances in theory and research (pp. 27-55). New York: Plenum.
Lewis, J. D., & Weigert, A. (1985). Trust as a social reality. Social Forces, 63(4), 967-985.
Lockwood, N. R. (2007). Leveraging employee engagement for competitive advantage: HR′s strategic role. HRMagazine, 52(3), 1-11.
Macey, W. H., & Schneider, B. (2008). The meaning of employee engagement. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 1(1), 3-30.
McCauley, D. P., & Kuhnert, K. W. (1992). A theoretical review and empirical investigation of employee trust in management. Public Administration Quarterly, 16(2), 265-285.
Memon, M. A., Salleh, R., Baharom, M. N. R., & Harun, H. (2014). Person-organization fit and turnover intention: The mediating role of employee engagement. Global Business and Management Research, 6(3), 205-209.
Niehoff, B. P., & Moorman, R. H. (1993). Justice as a mediator of the relationship between methods of monitoring and organizational citizenship behavior. Academy of Management Journal, 36(3), 527-556.
Nyhan, R. C., & Marlowe Jr, H. A. (1997). Development and psychometric properties of the organizational trust inventory. Evaluation Review, 21(5), 614-635.
Robbins, S. P., & Judge, T. A. (2019). Organizational Behavior (18th ed.). UK: Pearson Education.
Schaufeli, W. B., & Bakker, A. B. (2004). Job demands, job resources, and their relationship with burnout and engagement: A multi‐sample study. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25(3), 293-315.
Schaufeli, W. B., Salanova, M., González-romá, V., & Bakker, A. B. (2002). The measurement of engagement and burnout: A two sample confirmatory factor analytic approach. Journal of Happiness Studies, 3(1), 71-92.
Schaufeli(2004). UWES. https://www.wilmarschaufeli.nl/tests/#engagement
Scholl, R. W., Cooper, E. A., & McKenna, J. F. (1987). Referent selection in determining equity perceptions: Differential effects on behavioral and attitudinal outcomes. Personnel Psychology, 40(1), 113-124.
Thackray, J. (2001). Feedback for real. Gallup Management Journal, 1, 1-5.
Thibaut, J., & Walker, L. (1978). A theory of procedure. California Law Review, 66(3), 541-566.
Vidmar, N. (1990). The origins and consequences of procedural fairness [The Social Psychology of Procedural Justice, E. Allan Lind, Tom R. Tyler]. Law & Social Inquiry, 15(4), 877-892.
Walster, E., Berscheid, E., & Walster, G. (1973). New directions in equity research. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 25, 151-176.
指導教授 鄭晉昌(Jihn-Chang Jehng) 審核日期 2023-5-22
推文 facebook   plurk   twitter   funp   google   live   udn   HD   myshare   reddit   netvibes   friend   youpush   delicious   baidu   
網路書籤 Google bookmarks   del.icio.us   hemidemi   myshare   

若有論文相關問題,請聯絡國立中央大學圖書館推廣服務組 TEL:(03)422-7151轉57407,或E-mail聯絡  - 隱私權政策聲明