訓練問答機器人對學生英語閱讀興趣之影響

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：45

、訪客IP：52.15.254.64

姓名

陳宛君(Wan-Jun Chen) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

資訊工程學系

論文名稱

訓練問答機器人對學生英語閱讀興趣之影響
(The Effect of Training Q&A Chatbots on Students′ Interest in English Reading)

相關論文

★ 以視覺為主的遊戲空間輔助全身性學習	★ 以數位教室環境增進同步遠距教學之臨場感
★ 以行動載具支援並分析合作式的探索活動	★ 以混合實境支援工作臺協同探究學習
★ 使用資料探勘輔助學習者探索大型資料庫—學習者經驗之研究	★ 以貢獻與聯結為基礎之社會知識創造模型—一個資源與概念合作聯結工具
★ 互動式計算桌面環境對於合作學習的優缺點	★ 以共享螢幕及群組軟體支援一對一環境下面對面的合作網路探索
★ 合作學習使用網際網路: 學習腳本在面對面網路合作探索的影響	★ 兒童使用超媒體的Web2.0創作故事平台之探究--衍生與重組
★ 以創用為基礎之合作說故事平台 - 衍生、重組、擁有感	★ 透過網路實施模擬實務社群並利用即興創作激發創意
★ 使用群組軟體與共同螢幕進行一對一合作網路探索活動	★ 以Cyber-Physical環境支援程式設計學習之探究
★ 跨領域合作設計活動之互動分析：群組軟體的支援與設計	★ 不同成就學生於模擬遊戲環境中程式學習效果之探究

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

至系統瀏覽論文 (2025-8-1以後開放)

摘要(中)

近年來，教育機構普遍引入人工智慧技術，以提升學生的學習體驗和知識內化能力。在許多學習方法中，教中學是其中一個有效的方式，研究指出教中學(LdL)的設計可以提升學生在活動中的興趣，透過讓學生擔任教學者，從而深化對所學知識的理解與應用，加強學生的積極參與。閱讀興趣對學生來說非常重要，能夠激發學生對於學習英語的熱情，並促使他們主動參與閱讀活動，特別是在國際化的環境中，英語能力成為一個關鍵的優勢，英語閱讀是學生必須培養和提升的必要能力之一。
此外，過去有許多研究探究聊天機器人對學習及閱讀成效的影響，在聊天機器人影響閱讀情意上的研究尚為少數。本研究結合英語繪本，開發出以問答對話為主要形式的聊天機器人系統，學生需理解繪本內容，在訓練機器人的過程中向機器人提問及教導它正確答案，並在同儕之間加入機器人競爭機制及排行榜的呈現，學生們互相挑戰對方所訓練的機器人，檢視他人的訓練成果，對方也能看到受挑戰的提問內容，達到提升學生參與度、互動性、即時回饋的效果。本研究實驗對象為臺灣桃園市某國民小學的95名五年級學生，實驗組的47名學生在閱讀時使用問答機器人，控制組的48名學生閱讀時不使用問答機器人，實驗期間學生每週進行一次英語閱讀活動，並設計最後一週為實驗組的決賽活動，探討學生在英語閱讀活動中若有問答機器人的加入對心流以及情境興趣是否有影響、分析學生與機器人互動時的提問情形，以及利用相關性分析來觀察學生在心流、情境興趣的情意層面中，與提問情形的關係。
研究結果顯示，在閱讀活動結束後，實驗組學生的心流隨著閱讀活動的參與次數顯著遞增，其對閱讀的專注力、好奇心、內在興趣及整體心流都顯著高於控制組學生，對閱讀的控制力上差異不大。另外在情境興趣上，顯示問答機器人能夠觸發實驗組學生的情境興趣，且不論是在維持感受、維持價值、觸發及整體情境興趣的向度上，實驗組學生均顯著高於控制組學生。相關性分析顯示學生對閱讀的情境興趣越高，其提出故事人物感受的問題數量也越多，其他的問題類型對投入狀況與情境興趣大多沒有關聯，此外發現英語能力高的學生著重於提出人物、環境及結果類型問題，英語能力低的學生更偏好探究因果關係的問題。

摘要(英)

In recent years, many educational institutions have adopted artificial intelligence technology to enhance students′ learning experiences and promote the internalization of knowledge. Among various learning methods, Learning by Teaching(LdL) has been identified as an effective approach that can increase students′ interest and deepen their understanding and application of the learned content. Developing a strong interest in reading is crucial for students as it stimulates their enthusiasm for learning English and encourages active participation in reading activities. Particularly in the context of internationalization, English proficiency has become a key advantage, and the ability to read in English is considered a necessary skill that students must cultivate and improve.
Furthermore, previous research has explored the impact of chatbots on learning and reading outcomes, although studies focusing on the influence of chatbots on emotional engagement during reading remain limited. This study combines English picture books with a chatbot system, utilizing a question-and-answer dialogue as the primary form of interaction. Students are required to comprehend the book′s content during the picture book reading activity, ask questions to the chatbot, and teach it the correct answers. Additionally, a competitive mechanism and leaderboard are introduced among peers, allowing students to challenge each other′s trained chatbots and evaluate the performance of their peers′ training outcomes. This competition mechanism aims to enhance student engagement, interactivity, and provide real-time feedback.
The experimental study involved 95 fifth-grade students from a elementary school in Taiwan. The experimental group of 47 students used the QA Chatbots during their English reading activities, while the control group of 48 students did not utilize the QA chatbot. Throughout the experiment period, students engaged in weekly English reading activities, and arranged competition activities for the experimental group in the last week. The study aimed to investigate the impact of incorporating chatbots into English reading activities on flow experience, situational interest, student-questioning patterns during interactions with the chatbot, and the relationship between flow, situational interest, and questioning patterns using correlational analysis.
The research findings indicate that after participating in the reading activities, students in the experimental group demonstrated a significant increase in flow experience with the frequency of their engagement. They exhibited higher levels of concentration, curiosity, intrinsic interest, and overall flow experience compared to the control group, while the differences in control over reading were not significant. Furthermore, regarding situational interest, the results revealed that the QA Chatbots triggered higher levels of situational interest among students in the experimental group. In dimensions such as Maintained-SI-Feeling, Maintained-SI-Value, Triggered-SI, and overall situational interest, the experimental group outperformed the control group significantly. Correlational analysis demonstrated that students with higher situational interest generated more questions related to the characters′ “Feeling”, while other types of questions showed little or no correlation with engagement and situational interest. Additionally, it was observed that students with higher English proficiency focused more on asking questions related to “Character”, “Setting”, and “Outcome resolution”, whereas students with lower English proficiency preferred exploring causal relationships in their questions.

關鍵字(中)

★ 閱讀興趣
★ 教中學
★ 聊天機器人
★ 心流
★ 情境興趣

關鍵字(英)

★ Reading Interest
★ Learning by Teaching
★ Chatbot
★ Flow
★ Situational Interest

論文目次

摘要 i
Abstract ii
致謝 iv
目錄 vi
圖目錄 ix
表目錄 xi
第一章緒論 1
1-1研究背景與動機 1
1-2研究目的與問題 1
1-3名詞解釋 2
1-3-1心流 2
1-3-2情境興趣 2
1-4研究範圍與限制 3
1-5論文架構 3
第二章文獻探討 4
2-1閱讀興趣 4
2-2教中學 6
2-3聊天機器人 8
第三章系統設計 10
3-1系統特色 10
3-2系統架構 11
3-2-1前後端及系統介面 11
3-2-2資料庫 16
3-2-3問題答案生成 18
3-3系統對話流程 20
第四章研究方法 26
4-1研究對象 26
4-2研究流程 27
4-3學習活動設計 29
4-3-1英語書籍 29
4-3-2個人英語閱讀活動 30
4-3-3問答機器人英語閱讀活動 32
4-4實驗設計 35
4-5研究工具 37
4-5-1心流量表 37
4-5-2情境興趣量表 40
4-6研究資料收集與分析 42
4-6-1學生提問資料分析 43
4-6-5學生英語能力數據 45
4-6-6閱讀活動後訪談分析 46
第五章研究結果與討論 48
5-1學生的提問方式及學生與問答機器人互動狀況分析 48
5-2學生與問答機器人閱讀活動投入狀況分析 61
5-3學生在問答機器人閱讀活動情境興趣分析 72
5-4問答機器人狀況與學生的閱讀活動投入狀況及情境興趣分析 83
5-5學生與問答機器人之特定互動模式分析 90
第六章結論與建議 95
6-1結論 95
6-1-1學生如何以問題訓練機器人並與機器人互動? 95
6-1-2學生在「英語閱讀活動」中，問答機器人的加入是否對學生的英語閱讀「投入狀況」有所影響? 96
6-1-3學生在「英語閱讀活動」中，問答機器人的加入是否對學生的英語閱讀「情境興趣」有所影響? 97
6-1-4問答機器人的狀況是否對學生的英語閱讀「投入狀況」與「情境興趣」有所關聯? 98
6-1-5學生與問答機器人互動有無特定的模式? 99
6-2未來發展 99
參考文獻 100
中文文獻 100
英文文獻 101
附錄 A 書籍列表 107
附錄 B 心流量表問卷 108
附錄 C 情境興趣量表問卷 109
附錄 D 任務說明文件 110
附錄 E 機器人挑戰紀錄申訴單 111
附錄 F 詳細控制組心流重複量數 112
附錄 G 詳細實驗組心流重複量數 114
附錄 H 詳細組別間心流重複量數 116

參考文獻

中文文獻
王品卿. (2014). Web 2.0 英語學習活動之學生心流與學習動機歷程研究. In 網路學習科技研究所 (Vol. 碩士, pp. 1-121). 桃園市: 國立中央大學.
張文聰. (2017). 網路學習社群中社會網路、知識分享與投入之關聯;An Analysis of Correlations among Social Network, Knowledge Sharing, and Engagement in a Networked Learning Community 國立中央大學]. http://ir.lib.ncu.edu.tw/handle/987654321/74899
黃雅英. (2021). LdL教中學應用於大學國際學位生華語教學場域之先導研究 [A Pilot Study of Integrated the LdL into Higher Education System Mandarin L2 Curriculum]. 台灣教育研究期刊, 2(1), 113-135.
廖墨剛. (2021). 聊天機器人對國小學生英語閱讀興趣的影響. In 網路學習科技研究所 (Vol. 碩士, pp. 324). 桃園市: 國立中央大學.

英文文獻
Ainley, M. (2006). Connecting with learning: Motivation, affect and cognition in interest processes. Educational psychology review, 18, 391-405.
Ainley, M., Hidi, S., & Berndorff, D. (2002). Interest, learning, and the psychological processes that mediate their relationship. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94(3), 545.
Alexander, J. E., & Heathington, B. S. (1988). Assessing and correcting classroom reading problems. Scott Foresman & Company.
Alexander, P. A. (1997). Mapping the multidimensional nature of domain learning: The interplay of cognitive, motivational, and strategic forces. Advances in motivation and achievement, 10, 213-250.
Berlyne, D. E. (1960). Conflict, arousal, and curiosity [doi:10.1037/11164-000]. McGraw-Hill Book Company. https://doi.org/10.1037/11164-000
Brandtzaeg, P. B., & Følstad, A. (2018). Chatbots: changing user needs and motivations. interactions, 25(5), 38-43.
Brewster, S. (2019). Extended Abstracts of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Association for Computing Machinery.
Calero, M. D., Mata, S., Bonete, S., Molinero, C., & Gómez-Pérez, M. M. (2015). Relations between learning potential, cognitive and interpersonal skills in Asperger children. Learning and Individual Differences, 44, 53-60.
Chen, H.-L., Vicki Widarso, G., & Sutrisno, H. (2020). A chatbot for learning Chinese: Learning achievement and technology acceptance. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 58(6), 1161-1189.
Clarizia, F., Colace, F., Lombardi, M., Pascale, F., & Santaniello, D. (2018). Chatbot: An education support system for student. Cyberspace Safety and Security: 10th International Symposium, CSS 2018, Amalfi, Italy, October 29–31, 2018, Proceedings 10,
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1975). Beyond boredom and anxiety (1st ed.). Jossey-Bass Publishers.
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1988). The flow experience and its significance for human psychology. In Optimal experience: Psychological studies of flow in consciousness. (pp. 15-35). Cambridge University Press.
De Koning, B. B., Tabbers, H. K., Rikers, R. M., & Paas, F. (2011). Improved effectiveness of cueing by self‐explanations when learning from a complex animation. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 25(2), 183-194.
Endres, T., Weyreter, S., Renkl, A., & Eitel, A. (2020). When and why does emotional design foster learning? Evidence for situational interest as a mediator of increased persistence. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 36(4), 514-525.
Eriksson, K. (2002). Booktalk Dilemmas: teachers′ organisation of pupils′ reading. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 46(4), 391-408.
Essel, H., Vlachopoulos, D., Tachie-Menson, A., Johnson, E., & Baah, P. (2022). The impact of a virtual teaching assistant (chatbot) on students′ learning in Ghanaian higher education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 19, 57. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-022-00362-6
Essel, H. B., Vlachopoulos, D., Tachie-Menson, A., Johnson, E. E., & Baah, P. K. (2022). The impact of a virtual teaching assistant (chatbot) on students′ learning in Ghanaian higher education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 19(1), 1-19.
Gerjets, P., Scheiter, K., & Catrambone, R. (2006). Can learning from molar and modular worked examples be enhanced by providing instructional explanations and prompting self-explanations? Learning and Instruction, 16(2), 104-121.
Gibson, E. J., & Levin, H. (1975). The psychology of reading. The MIT Press.
Gormley, C., & Tong, Z. (2015). Elasticsearch: the definitive guide: a distributed real-time search and analytics engine. " O′Reilly Media, Inc.".
Grzega, J. (2011). Das Leben für Lerner und Lehrer spannender machen: Eine Einführung in LdL. In Berger, Lutz (Hrsg.): Lernen durch Lehren im Fokus : Berichte von LdL-Einsteigern und LdL-Experten ; ein Workshop-Band zum LdL-Tag 2009 an der Pädagogischen Hochschule Ludwigsburg (pp. 11-20). epubli. https://edoc.ku.de/id/eprint/9297/
Grzega, J., & Schöner, M. (2008). The didactic model LdL (Lernen durch Lehren) as a way of preparing students for communication in a knowledge society. Journal of Education for Teaching, 34(3), 167-175.
Harackiewicz, J. M., Barron, K. E., Tauer, J. M., Carter, S. M., & Elliot, A. J. (2000). Short-term and long-term consequences of achievement goals: Predicting interest and performance over time. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 316-330. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.92.2.316
Hidi, S. (1990). Interest and Its Contribution as a Mental Resource for Learning. Review of Educational Research, 60(4), 549-571. https://doi.org/10.2307/1170506
Hidi, S. (2001). Interest, reading, and learning: Theoretical and practical considerations. Educational psychology review, 191-209.
Hidi, S. (2006). Interest: A unique motivational variable. Educational Research Review, 1(2), 69-82. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2006.09.001
Hidi, S., & Renninger, K. A. (2006). The Four-Phase Model of Interest Development. Educational Psychologist, 41, 111-127. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep4102_4
Hood, D., Lemaignan, S., & Dillenbourg, P. (2015). When children teach a robot to write: An autonomous teachable humanoid which uses simulated handwriting. Proceedings of the tenth annual ACM/IEEE international conference on human-robot interaction,
Hsu, C.-Y., & Tsai, C.-C. (2013). Examining the effects of combining self-explanation principles with an educational game on learning science concepts. Interactive Learning Environments, 21(2), 104-115.
Huck, C. S. (1971). Strategies for improving interest and appreciation in literature. Reaching children and young people through literature. Newark, DE: International Reading Association, 37-45.
Hunt, J. (1965). Intrinsic motivation and its role in psychological development. Nebraska symposium on motivation,
Kim, N.-Y., Cha, Y., & Kim, H.-S. (2019). Future english learning: Chatbots and artificial intelligence. Multimedia-Assisted Language Learning, 22(3).
Knill, O., Carlsson, J., Chi, A., & Lezama, M. (2004). An artificial intelligence experiment in college math education. Preprint available at http://www. math. harvard. edu/~ knill/preprints/sofia. pdf.
Kobayashi, K. (2019). Interactivity: A potential determinant of learning by preparing to teach and teaching. Frontiers in psychology, 9, 2755.
Krapp, A. (1999). Interest, motivation, and learning: An educational-psychological perspective. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 14, 23-40. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 14, 23-40. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03173109
Krapp, A., Hidi, S., & Renninger, K. (1992). Interest, learning, and development. In (pp. 3-25).
Krämer, N. C., Karacora, B., Lucas, G., Dehghani, M., Rüther, G., & Gratch, J. (2016). Closing the gender gap in STEM with friendly male instructors? On the effects of rapport behavior and gender of a virtual agent in an instructional interaction. Computers & Education, 99, 1-13.
Lan, Z., Chen, M., Goodman, S., Gimpel, K., Sharma, P., & Soricut, R. (2019). Albert: A lite bert for self-supervised learning of language representations. arXiv preprint arXiv:1909.11942.
Linnenbrink-Garcia, L., Durik, A. M., Conley, A. M., Barron, K. E., Tauer, J. M., Karabenick, S. A., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (2010). Measuring situational interest in academic domains. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 70, 647-671. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164409355699
Liu, C. C., Liao, M. G., Chang, C. H., & Lin, H. M. (2022). An analysis of children? interaction with an AI chatbot and its impact on their interest in reading. Computers & Education, 189, Article 104576. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2022.104576
Lu, J. J., D’Angelo, K. A., & Willett, J. (2019). Learning Through Teaching: A Study of Social Work PhD Students in Their Roles as Educators and Learners of Research. Journal of Social Work Education, 55(1), 128-140. https://doi.org/10.1080/10437797.2018.1508390
Mahmood, K. (2004). Libraries and promotion of reading habits in the digital age. Pakistan Library and Information Science Journal, 35(3), 18-24.
McKenna, M. C., & Kear, D. J. (1990). Measuring attitude toward reading: A new tool for teachers. The reading teacher, 43(9), 626-639.
McKenna, M. C., Kear, D. J., & Ellsworth, R. A. (1995). Children′s attitudes toward reading: A national survey. Reading Research Quarterly, 934-956.
Nakamura, J., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2002). The concept of flow. In Handbook of positive psychology. (pp. 89-105). Oxford University Press.
Okonkwo, C. W., & Ade-Ibijola, A. (2020). Python-Bot: A chatbot for teaching python programming. Engineering Letters, 29(1).
Oktarina, P. S., Hari, N. P. L. S., & Ambarwati, N. M. W. (2020). The effectiveness of using picture book to motivate students especially young learners in reading. Yavana Bhasha: Journal of English Language Education, 1(1), 72-79.
OpenAI. (2022). ChatGPT: Optimizing Language Models for dialogue. http://openai.com/blog/chatgpt
Park, H. W., & Howard, A. M. (2015). Retrieving experience: Interactive instance-based learning methods for building robot companions. 2015 IEEE international conference on robotics and automation (ICRA),
Poskiparta, E., Niemi, P., Lepola, J., Ahtola, A., & Laine, P. (2003). Motivational‐emotional vulnerability and difficulties in learning to read and spell. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 73(2), 187-206.
Rajpurkar, P., Jia, R., & Liang, P. (2018). Know what you don′t know: Unanswerable questions for SQuAD. arXiv preprint arXiv:1806.03822.
Rajpurkar, P., Zhang, J., Lopyrev, K., & Liang, P. (2016). Squad: 100,000+ questions for machine comprehension of text. arXiv preprint arXiv:1606.05250.
Renkl, A. (1997). Learning from worked-out examples: A study on individual differences. Cognitive Science, 21(1), 1-29.
Renninger, K. A. (1992). Individual interest and development: Implications for theory and practice. The role of interest in learning and development, 26(3-4), 361-395.
Renninger, K. A., & Hidi, S. (2002). Student interest and achievement: Developmental issues raised by a case study. In Development of achievement motivation. (pp. 173-195). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012750053-9/50009-7
Rotgans, J. I., & Schmidt, H. G. (2014). Situational interest and learning: Thirst for knowledge. Learning and Instruction, 32, 37-50.
Sinha, S., Basak, S., Dey, Y., & Mondal, A. (2020). An educational Chatbot for answering queries. Emerging Technology in Modelling and Graphics: Proceedings of IEM Graph 2018,
Smutny, P., & Schreiberova, P. (2020). Chatbots for learning: A review of educational chatbots for the Facebook Messenger. Computers & Education, 151, 103862.
Stollhans, S. (2016). Learning by teaching. Developing transferable skills. Research-publishing. net.
Strauss, S., & Ziv, M. (2012). Teaching is a natural cognitive ability for humans. Mind, Brain, and Education, 6(4), 186-196.
Sung, Y. (2013). The effect of augmented reality based instruction on concept learning and the level of interests for elementary students. Master′s Thesis, Hanyang University.
Trevino, L. K., & Webster, J. (1992). Flow in computer-mediated communication: Electronic mail and voice mail evaluation and impacts. Communication Research, 19, 539-573. https://doi.org/10.1177/009365092019005001
Vaswani, A., Shazeer, N., Parmar, N., Uszkoreit, J., Jones, L., Gomez, A. N., Kaiser, Ł., & Polosukhin, I. (2017). Attention is all you need. Advances in neural information processing systems, 30.
Walgermo, B. R., Frijters, J. C., & Solheim, O. J. (2018). Literacy interest and reader self-concept when formal reading instruction begins. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 44, 90-100.
Wang, L., Lee, H., & Ju, D. Y. (2019). Impact of digital content on young children’s reading interest and concentration for books. Behaviour & Information Technology, 38(1), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2018.1502807
Weizenbaum, J. (1966). ELIZA—a computer program for the study of natural language communication between man and machine. Commun. ACM, 9, 36-45.
Wigfield, A., & Cambria, J. (2010). Students’ achievement values, goal orientations, and interest: Definitions, development, and relations to achievement outcomes. Developmental review, 30(1), 1-35.
Wigfield, A., Eccles, J. S., Yoon, K. S., Harold, R. D., Arbreton, A. J., Freedman-Doan, C., & Blumenfeld, P. C. (1997). Change in children′s competence beliefs and subjective task values across the elementary school years: A 3-year study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89(3), 451.
Winkler, R., & Söllner, M. (2018). Unleashing the Potential of Chatbots in Education: A State-Of-The-Art Analysis. Academy of Management Proceedings, 2018, 15903. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMBPP.2018.15903abstract
Wolf, M. J., Miller, K., & Grodzinsky, F. S. (2017). Why we should have seen that coming: comments on Microsoft′s tay" experiment," and wider implications. Acm Sigcas Computers and Society, 47(3), 54-64.
Wolf, T., Debut, L., Sanh, V., Chaumond, J., Delangue, C., Moi, A., Cistac, P., Rault, T., Louf, R., & Funtowicz, M. (2020). Transformers: State-of-the-art natural language processing. Proceedings of the 2020 conference on empirical methods in natural language processing: system demonstrations,
Xu, Y., Wang, D., Collins, P., Lee, H., & Warschauer, M. (2021). Same benefits, different communication patterns: Comparing Children′s reading with a conversational agent vs. a human partner. Computers & Education, 161, 104059.
Xu, Y., Wang, D., Yu, M., Ritchie, D., Yao, B., Wu, T. S., Zhang, Z., Li, T. J.-J., Bradford, N., Sun, B., Hoang, T. B., Sang, Y., Hou, Y., Ma, X., Yang, D., Peng, N., Yu, Z., & Warschauer, M. (2022). Fantastic Questions and Where to Find Them: FairytaleQA – An Authentic Dataset for Narrative Comprehension. Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics,

指導教授

劉晨鐘(Chen-Chung Liu)

審核日期

2023-7-26

推文