摘要(英) |
The purpose of this study is to use two methods, physical information neural network and BI-GreenNet, to train the Green function to solve Poisson equation. The solution of Poisson’s equation can be expressed by the integral form of Green’s function, so we use these two methods to train Green’s function. Green’s function can be divided into an explicit singular part and a smooth part through the basic solution. The physical information neural network method trains the Green’s function by defining a loss function that includes the residual and boundary condition parts of the Laplace equation term. In the BI-GreenNet method, the single-layer potential and the double-layer potential are first defined, and they are used to automatically satisfy
the properties of the Laplace equation terms, so the loss function only contains the boundary condition part. Numerical results show that whether it is the physical information neural network or the BI-GreenNet method, when the point source of the Green’s function approaches the boundary, the accuracy of the results decreases. However, BI-GreenNet can reduce errors and improve the accuracy of results by increasing the number of boundary segmentations by numerical integration or using a more refined method to process near-singular integrals. |
參考文獻 |
[1] J. C. Strikwerda, Finite Difference Schemes and Partial Differential Equations, Second Edition. Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, 2004.
[2] J. R. Nagel, “Solving the generalized poisson equation using the finite-difference method (fdm),” 2009.
[3] A. Averbuch, M. Israeli, and L. Vozovoi, “A fast poisson solver of arbitrary order accuracy in rectangular regions,” SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing, vol. 19, no. 3, pp.933–952, 1998.
[4] G. Lin, F. Chen, P. Hu, et al., Bi-greennet: Learning green’s functions by boundary integral network, 2022. arXiv: 2204.13247 [cs.LG].
[5] M. Raissi, P. Perdikaris, and G. E. Karniadakis, Physics informed deep learning (part i): Data-driven solutions of nonlinear partial differential equations, 2017. arXiv: 1711.
10561 [cs.AI].
[6] M. Raissi, P. Perdikaris, and G. E. Karniadakis, Physics informed deep learning (part ii): Data-driven discovery of nonlinear partial differential equations, 2017. arXiv: 1711.
10566 [cs.AI].
[7] C. Pozrikidis, A Practical Guide to Boundary Element Methods with the Software Library BEMLIB, 1st. CRC Press, 2002.
[8] G. Lin, P. Hu, F. Chen, et al., Binet: Learning to solve partial differential equations with boundary integral networks, 2021. arXiv: 2110.00352 [math.NA].
[9] D. W. Marquardt, “An algorithm for least-squares estimation of nonlinear parameters,” Journal of the Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 431–441, 1963.
[10] C. Carvalho, S. Khatri, and A. D. Kim, “Asymptotic analysis for close evaluation of layer potentials,” Journal of Computational Physics, vol. 355, pp. 327–341, Feb. 2018. |