職場情緒勒索、強迫性組織公民行為和組織挫折之關係—以多工時間觀及內疚傾向作為調節變項

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：28

、訪客IP：18.118.184.36

姓名

蔡秉宏(Ping-Hung Tsai) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

人力資源管理研究所

論文名稱

職場情緒勒索、強迫性組織公民行為和組織挫折之關係—以多工時間觀及內疚傾向作為調節變項
(The Relationship between workplace emotional blackmail, compulsory citizenship behavior, and organizational frustration: the moderating effects of polychronicity and guilt-proneness)

相關論文

★ 傳統食品業之轉型與品質升級策略探討-以P公司為例	★ 航空器維修訓練調整策略探討-以C公司為例
★ 企業社會責任ヽ內控內稽制度措施的探討-以T銀行為例	★ 主管管理職能評鑑與驗證-以A公司為例
★ 人力資源部門客戶服務代表角色與功能探討-以某科技公司為例	★ Ｅ公司員工品格教育與工作投入、工作壓力、員工幸福感關係之研究，知覺組織支持之中介效果
★ 工作要求、工作控制與工作生活平衡關係之研究：以主管家庭支持行為為調節變項	★ 如何打造正向的企業志工參與環境-以國內大型電子製造業為例
★ 如何塑造良好的企業志工投入與推薦-以國內大型電子製造業為例	★ 組織自尊、學習目標導向及尋求回饋行為對於員工自我學習之影響
★ 家長式領導與組織認同感之關聯性研究-以信任主管為調節變項	★ 影響在臺產業外籍移工的生活與工作適應程度：從組織及勞工本身之變數探討
★ 尋求更好的解決之道！以正向觀點探討企業進用身心障礙者之問題－以M公司身障進用經驗為例	★ 營業額意圖：組織和個人因素的影響以及企業家意圖在越南語境中的中介作用
★ 如何提升外派人員效能？知覺組織支持與配偶家庭支持對外派人員組織認同、工作投入、工作壓力之影響─以主管家庭支持行為為調節	★ 育嬰的代價?影響育嬰留職停薪復職後個人績效及勞動條件變更之因素分析

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

[檢視]

[下載]

本電子論文使用權限為同意立即開放。
已達開放權限電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的，進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。
請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定，切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送，以免觸法。

摘要(中)

近年來，職場情緒勒索已成為職場中常見的管理議題，主管與部屬間的互動關係為部屬是否離職的重要決定因素，主管不良的管理能力所造成的巨額成本，已成為組織無法再持續忽視下去的問題。而情緒勒索可分成「威脅導向」及「懇求導向」兩種類型，故本研究以職場情緒勒索為核心，探討此二種情緒勒索類型與強迫性組織公民行為和組織挫折彼此間之關係，並加入多工時間觀與內疚傾向作為調節變項，了解員工個人對工作方式的信念與人格特質將帶來何種影響。
本研究以「與直屬主管共事一年(含)以上的台灣企業正職員工」為研究對象，採取線上問卷形式進行資料蒐集，共回收384份有效問卷。研究結果顯示，(1)威脅導向及懇求導向情緒勒索皆與強迫性組織公民行為呈正向關係。(2)組織挫折分別與威脅導向、懇求導向情緒勒索和強迫性組織公民行為呈正向關係。(3)威脅導向情緒勒索對組織挫折、強迫性組織公民行為的正向影響皆大於懇求導向情緒勒索對組織挫折、強迫性組織公民行為的正向影響。(4)強迫性組織公民行為在威脅導向情緒勒索與組織挫折之間具中介作用。(5)強迫性組織公民行為在懇求導向情緒勒索與組織挫折之間亦具中介作用。(6)多工時間觀會正向調節強迫性組織公民行為與組織挫折間的正向關係。(7)內疚傾向在強迫性組織公民行為與組織挫折之間則不具有調節作用。因此，本研究將基於這些發現，提出相關實務意涵與建議，藉以降低員工於組織中的挫折感。

摘要(英)

In recent years, workplace emotional blackmail has become a common management issue, with the interaction between supervisors and subordinates being a critical factor influencing employees′ decisions to leave their jobs. The substantial costs resulting from poor management capabilities of supervisors have become a pressing issue that organizations can no longer ignore. Emotional blackmail can be categorized into "intimidation oriented" and "appealing oriented" types. Therefore, this study focuses on these two types of emotional blackmail and explores their relationships with compulsory citizenship behavior (CCB) and organizational frustration, incorporating polychronicity and guilt-proneness as moderating variables to understand how employees′ beliefs about work methods and personality traits influence these relationships.
This study targeted full-time employees in Taiwanese enterprises who have worked with their supervisors for at least one year, collecting data through an online survey, with a total of 384 valid responses. The results show that (1) both intimidation oriented and appealing oriented emotional blackmail are positively related to CCB. (2) Organizational frustration is positively related to intimidation oriented emotional blackmail, appealing oriented emotional blackmail, and CCB. (3) The positive impact of intimidation oriented emotional blackmail on organizational frustration and CCB is greater than the positive impact of appealing oriented emotional blackmail on organizational frustration and CCB. (4) CCB mediates the relationship between intimidation oriented emotional blackmail and organizational frustration. (5) CCB also mediates the relationship between appealing oriented emotional blackmail and organizational frustration. (6) Polychronicity positively moderates the relationship between CCB and organizational frustration. (7) Guilt-proneness does not moderate the relationship between CCB and organizational frustration. Based on these findings, this study proposes relevant practical implications and recommendations to reduce employees′ frustration within organizations.

關鍵字(中)

★ 職場情緒勒索
★ 強迫性組織公民行為
★ 組織挫折
★ 多工時間觀
★ 內疚傾向

關鍵字(英)

★ workplace emotional blackmail
★ compulsory citizenship behavior
★ organizational frustration
★ polychronicity
★ guilt-proneness

論文目次

摘要 i
Abstract ii
目錄 iv
一、緒論 1
1-1 研究背景與動機 1
1-2 研究目的 5
二、文獻探討 6
2-1 職場情緒勒索 6
2-2 強迫性組織公民行為 10
2-3 組織挫折 13
2-4 多工時間觀 15
2-5 內疚傾向 17
2-6 CCB在職場情緒勒索與組織挫折間之中介效果 19
2-7 多工時間觀在CCB與組織挫折之調節效果 22
2-8 內疚傾向在CCB與組織挫折之調節效果 24
三、研究方法 26
3-1 研究架構 26
3-2 研究假設 27
3-3 研究工具 28
3-4 研究對象與程序 34
3-5 資料分析 36
四、研究結果 37
4-1 描述性統計與相關分析 37
4-2 信度分析 39
4-3 效度分析 40
4-4 假設檢驗 44
4-4-1 CCB在威脅/懇求導向情緒勒索與組織挫折的中介效果 44
4-4-2 多工時間觀的調節效果 47
4-4-3 內疚傾向的調節效果 49
五、結論與建議 51
5-1 研究發現與理論貢獻 51
5-2 實務意涵與建議 57
5-3 研究限制與未來研究方向 60
六、參考文獻 61
附錄：研究問卷 73

參考文獻

中文
CakeResume（2023）。職場PUA是什麼？遇到職場PUA該怎麼辦？CakeResume職場專欄。取自：https://www.cakeresume.com/resources/pua?locale=zh-TW
王翊安、吳守從（2017）。負向情感特質與身心健康、偏差行為關係之探討：以不當督導為中介變項。觀光與休閒管理期刊，5（2），1-12。
王嘉伶（2017）。職場情緒勒索對第一線員工服務破壞行為之影響。〔碩士論文。真理大學〕臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/s88qyx
任庭儀（2018）。隱形的束縛：談華人社會之情緒勒索。諮商與輔導，389，30-33。
朱志傑、周麗芳、曾春榮（2017）。當員工覺得不得不從事公民行為的結果:一項心理抗拒觀點的探討。人力資源管理學報，17（1），59-86。
吳佩諭(2023)。上班族請假為難調查。1111產經新聞網。取自：https://www.1111.com.tw/news/jobns/153659
呂佳璇（2019）。內疚型人格特質、組織利他導向與員工效能之關係：組織公平與同事能力之情境調節效果。〔碩士論文。元智大學〕臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/xacpc7
李怡青（2012）。權力基礎理論：權力定義與權力增生性。中華心理學刊，54（2），203-217。
李庭閣、嚴國晉、余宗憲（2023）。新進菜鳥工作不適配與離職傾向之關聯性：組織挫折之中介角色與威權領導之調節角色。管理學報，40（1），1-29。
杜玉蓉（譯）（2017）。情緒勒索（原作者：S. Forward & D. Frazier）。台北：究竟。
林姿葶（2021）。一心多用抑或一心一意：組織中的多工時間觀研究回顧。人力資源管理學報，21（2），1-31。
林姿葶、廖元希、黃雅娟、楊建銘（2023）。魚與熊掌必然不可兼得？多工時間觀對工作壓力、工作與生活平衡、身心健康間耗損關係的緩減效果。中華心理衛生學刊，36（2），121-156。https://doi.org/10.30074/FJMH.202306_36(2).0001
林鉦棽、賴鳳儀、黃紹慶、運蕙韶、鍾潤富（2011）。組織公民行為與工作家庭衝突之關聯分析：好士兵症候群？。管理學報，28（1），31-47。https://doi.org/10.6504/JOM.2011.28.01.02
柯小萍（2009）。職場情緒勒索與社會支持對工作績效影響之探索性研究-以中部五金產業為例。〔碩士論文。國立中正大學〕臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/aq5bcb。
唐敏貞（2023）。預期組織變革不確定感、組織挫折、個人成長主動性與工作投入之關係研究－組織溝通調節作用。〔碩士論文。國立聯合大學〕臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/e2n3qn
康正男、陳亮君、黃渼茜、林姿葶（2023）。運動場館業員工多工時間觀對顧客不文明行為負向影響之緩衝效果。體育學報，56（3），353-373。https://doi.org/10.6222/pej.202309_56(3).0008
張珈進、費吳琛、藍烈廷（2016）。同時多工適配、敬業貢獻與工作績效之研究：個人環境適配觀點。管理學報，33（3），419-441。https://doi.org/10.6504/JOM.2016.33.03.02
張緯良、羅新興、梁成明（1998）。國軍志願役軍官退伍原因之研究。第六屆國防管理學術暨實務研討會，臺北：國防管理學院主辦。
莊淇銘、林靜芳、周志隆、林佑昇（2021）。遊戲化員工訓練活動之企業導入。休閒研究，11（1），136-156。
許宥伸（2023）。探討主管情緒勒索與主管支持對工作績效與組織公民行為之影響—以LMX為中介變項再以組織文化作為調節變項。〔碩士論文。國立聯合大學〕華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6840/cycu202301643
郭建志、蔡育菁（2012）。組織挫折與職場退縮：主管不當督導與工作內外控之研究。中華心理學刊，54（3），293-313。https://doi.org/10.6129/CJP.2012.5403.02
陳怡伶、劉仲矩、方國榮（2005），職場情緒勒索來源內容分析之研究。東吳經濟商學學報，51，157-180。
陳思婷（2020）。仁慈領導下的情緒勒索現象－以軍隊為例。〔碩士論文。國防大學〕臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/rm2pm9
陳殷哲、余雅晴（2017）。組織政治知覺對組織依附影響之研究－以情緒智力為調節變項。科技與人力教育季刊，4（2），21-48。https://doi.org/10.6587/JTHRE.2017.4(2).2
陳國泰（2018）。Erikson的心理社會發展論在負向人格特質的中小學生輔導之應用。臺灣教育評論月刊，7（12），124-131。https://www-airitilibrary-com.ezproxy.lib.ncu.edu.tw/Article/Detail?DocID=P20130114001-201812-201812130017-201812130017-124-131
陳燕諭、胡昌亞、黃瑞傑、陳玉芬（2023）。職場情緒勒索量表之發展與驗證。人力資源管理學報，23（1），1-26。https://doi.org/10.6147/JHRM.202306_23(1).0001
彭台光、高月慈、林鉦棽（2006）。管理研究中的共同方法變異：問題本質、影響、測試和補救。管理學報，23（1），77-98。https://doi.org/10.6504/JOM.2006.23.01.05
彭玉樹、陳重志（2005）。購併企業員工期望落差、知覺組織支持、組織承諾與工作壓力反應之關係探討。商管科技季刊，6（1），19-46。
曾苑玲（2011）。員工正、負向情感特質與創造力間關係之干擾效應研究。〔碩士論文。國立臺北科技大學〕華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6841/NTUT.2011.00004
楊士杰（2014）。主管不當督導與情緒勞動之關係研究：以情緒勒索知覺為中介因素〔碩士論文，國立中正大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0033-2110201613582041
楊君皓（2020）。內疚傾向、工作績效與職業倦怠之關係：轉換型領導與組織認同之情境調節效果。〔碩士論文，元智大學〕臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統。 https://hdl.handle.net/11296/62fquv。
楊婷雅（2012）。部屬面對主管情緒勒索與工作壓力之關係研究。〔碩士論文，國立中正大學〕華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0033-2110201613504490
楊錦登（2020）。正向情緒與心理幸福感關係之研究。通識教育實踐與研究，（28），71-132。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=P20190103001-202012-202101290010-202101290010-71-132
詹絜琋(2023)。蓋洛普調查：安靜離職還不夠！為什麼近20%員工更想要「大聲離職」？經理人。取自：https://www.managertoday.com.tw/articles/view/67183
劉仲矩（2012）。顧客知覺員工服務破壞行為之研究：情緒勒索觀點。美容科技學刊，9（2），5-23。https://doi.org/10.30001/JIES.201206.0001
劉娜婷、蔡秉毅、陳淑貞、王政文（2018）。不當督導與強迫性組織公民行為之關係：心理安全感與組織政治知覺所扮演的角色。人力資源管理學報，18（1），57-84。
蔡育菁（2008）。組織中的挫折經驗：偏差管理與退縮行為之研究。〔碩士論文，中原大學〕臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/hytm72
蔡佩宜（2023）。工作內容型停滯對主動生涯行為之影響：工作要求—資源模式的觀點。〔碩士論文，國立中山大學〕臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/j5ytj8
鄧亞菁（2020）。當善良不再是種選擇-強迫性的組織公民行為之回顧性研究。科技與人力教育季刊，7（2），45-63。
蕭婉鎔（2014）。員工每日工作情緒及其對工作結果之影響。人力資源管理學報，14（2），81-109。https://doi.org/10.6147/JHRM.2014.1402.04
駱重鳴（2007），撥開心中的情緒迷霧—情緒勒索。嘉南療養院院訊，12（3），13-28。
魏鸞瑩、趙峻浩（2018）。工作遊戲化×全體共治制度的變革實踐－覺旅咖啡。科技與人力教育季刊，5（1），89-111。https://doi.org/10.6587/JTHRE.201809_5(1).0005

外文
Ahmadian, S., Sesen, H., & Soran, S. (2017). Expanding the boundaries of compulsory citizenship behavior: its impact on some organizational outputs. Business and Economic Horizons, 13, 110-118.
Allen, T. D., & Rush, M. C. (1998). The effects of organizational citizenship behavior on performance judgments: a field study and a laboratory experiment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83(2), 247-260.
Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2014). Job demands–resources theory. Wellbeing: A Complete Reference Guide, 1-28.
Bakker, A. B., Hakanen, J. J., Demerouti, E., & Xanthopoulou, D. (2007). Job resources boost work engagement, particularly when job demands are high. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99(2), 274-284.
Barker, R. G. (1938). The effect of frustration upon cognitive ability. Journal of Personality, 7(2), 145-150.
Bateman, T. S., & Organ, D. W. (1983). Job satisfaction and the good soldier: the
relationship between affect and employee “citizenship”. Academy of Management Journal, 26(4), 587-595.
Bergeron, D. M. (2007). The potential paradox of organizational citizenship behavior: good citizens at what cost?. Academy of Management Review, 32(4), 1078-1095.
Bies, R. J. (1986). Interactional justice: communication criteria of fairness. Research on Negotiation in Organizations, 1, 43-55.
Bluedorn, A. C. (2002). The human organization of time: temporal realities and experience. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Bluedorn, A. C., Kalliath, T. J., Strube, M. J., & Martin, G. D. (1999). Polychronicity and the inventory of polychronic values (IPV): the development of an instrument to measure a fundamental dimension of organizational culture. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 14, 205-231.
Bluedorn, A. C., Kaufman, C. F., & Lane, P. M. (1992). How many things do you like to do at once? an introduction to monochronic and polychronic time. The Executive, 6(4), 17-26.
Bolino, M. C., Klotz, A. C., Turnley, W. H., & Harvey, J. (2013). Exploring the dark side of organizational citizenship behavior. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 34(4), 542-559.
Bonanno, G. A. (2004). Loss, trauma, and human resilience- have we underestimated the human capacity to thrive after extremely aversive events? American Psychologist, 59(1), 20-28.
Burnett, M. S., & Lunsford, D. A. (1994). Conceptualizing guilt in the consumer decision‐making process. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 11(3), 33-43.
Chen, J. (2022). A juggling act: CEO polychronicity and firm innovation. The Leadership Quarterly, 33(3), 101380.
Circella, G., Mokhtarian, P. L., & Poff, L. K. (2012). A conceptual typology of multitasking behavior and polychronicity preferences. Electronic International Journal of Time Use Research, 9(1), 59-107.
Cohen, T. R., Wolf, S. T., Panter, A. T., & Insko, C. A. (2011). Introducing the GASP scale: a new measure of guilt and shame proneness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100(5), 947-966.
Conte, J. M., & Gintoft, J. N. (2005). Polychronicity, big five personality dimensions, and sales performance. Human Performance, 18, 427-444.
Davis, J. M., Lee, L. S., & Yi, M. Y. (2009). Time-user preference and technology acceptance: measure development of computer polychronicity. American Journal of Business, 24, 23-32.
Demerouti, E., Bakker, A. B., Nachreiner, F., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2001). The job demands-resources model of burnout. Journal of Applied psychology, 86(3), 499-512.
English, H. B., & English, A. C. (1958). A comprehensive dictionary of psychological and psychoanalytical terms: a guide to usage. McKay.
Erikson, E. (1963). Childhood and society. Toronto.CA: George J. McLeod Limited.
Flynn, F. J., & Schaumberg, R. L. (2012). When feeling bad leads to feeling good: Guilt-proneness and affective organizational commitment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97(1), 124-133.
Forward, S., & Frazier, D. (1997). Emotional blackmail. HarperCollins.
Fox, S., & Spector, P. E. (1999). A model of work frustration–aggression. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 20(6), 915-931.
French, J. R., Raven, B., & Cartwright, D. (1959). The bases of social power. Classics of Organization Theory, 7(1), 311-320.
Hall, E. T. (1959). The silent language. New York: Anchor Books.
Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: a regression-based approach. Guilford Press.
Hobfoll, S. E., Johnson, R. J., Ennis, N., & Jackson, A. P. (2003). Resource loss, resource gain, and emotional outcomes among inner city women. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(3), 632-643.
Hochschild, A. R. (1983). The managed heart: commercialization of human feeling. Berkeley, CA: University of California.
Hoffman, M. L. (1982). Development of prosocial motivation: empathy and guilt. The Development of Prosocial Behavior, 281-313.
Karatepe, O. M., Karadas, G., Azar, A. K., & Naderiadib, N. (2013). Does work engagement mediate the effect of polychronicity on performance outcomes? A study in the hospitality industry in Northern Cyprus. Journal of Human Resources in Hospitality & Tourism, 12(1), 52-70.
Karnani, S. R., & Zelman, D. C. (2019). Measurement of emotional blackmail in couple relationships in Hong Kong. Couple and Family Psychology: Research and Practice, 8(3), 165-180.
Kaufman, C. F., Lane, P. M., & Lindquist, J. D. (1991). Exploring more than 24 hours a day: A preliminary investigation of polychronic time use. Journal of Consumer Research, 18(3), 392-401.
König, C. J., & Waller, M. J. (2010). Time for reflection: A critical examination of polychronicity. Human Performance, 23, 173-190.
Lazar, J., Jones, A., & Shneiderman, B. (2006). Workplace user frustration with computers: an exploratory investigation of the causes and severity. Behaviour & Information Technology, 25(3), 239-251.
Lewis, H. B. (1971). Shame and guilt in neurosis. Psychoanalytic review, 58(3), 419-438.
Lindquist, J. D., & Kaufman-Scarborough, C. (2007). The polychronic—Monochronic tendency model: pmts scale development and validation. Time & Society, 16(2-3), 253-285.
Luthans, F., & Youssef, C. M. (2007). Emerging positive organizational behavior. Journal of Management, 33(3), 321-349.
Mäkikangas, A., & Kinnunen, U. (2003). Psychosocial work stressors and well-being: self-esteem and optimism as moderators in a one-year longitudinal sample. Personality and Individual Differences, 35, 537-557.
Maslach, C., & Jackson, S. E. (1984). Burnout in organizational settings. Applied Social Psychology Annual, 5, 133-153.
Meijman, T. F., & Mulder, G. (1998). Psychological aspects of workload. W: Drenth PJD, Thierry H.(red.), Handbook of Work and Organizational Psychology, 2, 5-33.
Mohammed, S., & Harrison, D. A. (2013). The clocks that time us are not the same: a theory of temporal diversity, task characteristics, and performance in teams. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 122, 244-256.
Organ, D. W. (1988). Organizational citizenship behavior: the good soldier 　syndrome. Lexington Books/DC Heath and Com.
Organ, D. W., & Ryan, K. (1995). A meta‐analytic review of attitudinal and dispositional predictors of organizational citizenship behavior. Personnel Psychology, 48(4), 775-802.
Peters, L. H., & O’Connor, E. J. (1980). Situational constraints and work outcomes: the influences of a frequently overlooked construct. Academy of Management Review, 5(3), 391-397.
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Paine, J. B., & Bachrach, D. G. (2000). Organizational citizenship behaviors: a critical review of the theoretical and empirical literature and suggestions for future research. Journal of Management, 26(3), 513-563.
Poposki, E. M., & Oswald, F. L. (2010). The multitasking preference inventory: toward an improved measure of individual differences in polychronicity. Human Performance, 23, 247-264.
Pratto, F., Lee, I., Tan, J., & Pitpitan, E. (2011). Power basis theory: A psycho-ecological approach to power. Social Motivation, 191-222.
Schaumberg, R. L., & Flynn, F. J. (2012). Uneasy lies the head that wears the crown: the link between guilt proneness and leadership. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103(2), 327-342.
Slocombe, T. E. (1999). Applying the theory of reasoned action to the analysis of an individual’s polychronicity. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 14, 313-324.
Slocombe, T. E., & Bluedorn, A. C. (1999). Organizational behavior implications of the congruence between preferred polychronicity and experienced work‐unit polychronicity. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 20, 75-99.
Spector, P. E. (1975). Relationships of organizational frustration with reported behavioral reactions of employees. Journal of Applied Psychology, 60(5), 635-637.
Spector, P. E. (1978). Organizational frustration: A model and review of the literature. Personnel Psychology, 31(4), 815-829.
Staw, B. M. (1974). Attitudinal and behavioral consequences of changing a major organizational reward: A natural field experiment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 29(6), 742-751.
Stein, E. V. (1968). Guilt-theory and therapy. Philadelphia: The Westminster Press
Storms, P. L., & Spector, P. E. (1987). Relationships of organizational frustration with reported behavioural reactions: The moderating effect of locus of control. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 60(3), 227-234.
Tangney, J. P., & Dearing, R. L. (2002). Gender differences in morality. The Psychodynamics of Gender and Gender Role, 251-269.
Tangney, J. P., Dearing, R. L., Wagner, P. E., & Gramzow, R. (2000). Test of Self-Conscious Affect–3 (TOSCA-3). George Mason University.
Van Yperen, N. W., & Snijders, T. A. B. (2000). A multilevel analysis of the demands-control model: is stress at work determined by factors at the group level or the individual level? Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 5, 182-190.
Vigoda-Gadot, E. (2006). Compulsory citizenship behavior: theorizing some dark sides of the good soldier syndrome in organizations. Journal for the Theory of Social Behavior, 36, 77-93.
Vigoda-Gadot, E. (2007). Redrawing the boundaries of OCB? An empirical examination of compulsory extrarole behavior in the workplace. Journal of Business and Psychology, 21, 377-405.
Wiltermuth, S. S., & Cohen, T. R. (2014). “I’d only let you down”: guilt proneness and the avoidance of harmful interdependence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 107(5), 925-942.
Xanthopoulou, D., Bakker, A. B., Demerouti, E., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2007). The role of personal resources in the job demands-resources model. International Journal of Stress Management, 14(2), 121-141.
Zhao, H., Peng, Z., & Chen, H. K. (2014). Compulsory citizenship behavior and organizational citizenship behavior: The role of organizational identification and perceived interactional justice. The Journal of Psychology, 148(2), 177-196.

指導教授

王群孝(Chun-Hsiao Wang)

審核日期

2024-7-10

推文