博碩士論文 111427020 詳細資訊




以作者查詢圖書館館藏 以作者查詢臺灣博碩士 以作者查詢全國書目 勘誤回報 、線上人數:35 、訪客IP:3.145.88.104
姓名 楊家綺(Chia-Chi Yang)  查詢紙本館藏   畢業系所 人力資源管理研究所
論文名稱 僕人與威權領導、職涯適應力以及任務性績效的關聯性—一項元悖論觀點的探討
(The Relationship Between Servant Leadership, Authoritarian Leadership, Career Adaptability, and Task Performance: An Exploration of the Meta-Paradoxical Perspective)
相關論文
★ 組織精簡與員工態度探討 - 以A公司人力重整計劃為例。★ 訓練成效評估及影響訓練移轉之因素探討----一項時間管理訓練之研究
★ 主管領導風格、業務員工作習慣及專業證照對組織承諾與工作績效之相關研究★ 研發專業人員職能需求之研究-以某研究機構為例
★ 人力資本、創新資本與組織財務績效關聯性之研究★ 企業人力資源跨部門服務HR人員之角色、工作任務及所需職能之研究
★ 新進保全人員訓練成效之評估★ 人力資源專業人員職能之研究-一項追蹤性的研究
★ 影響企業實施接班人計劃的成功因素★ 主管管理能力、工作動機與工作績效之關聯性探討─以A公司為例
★ 影響安全氣候因子之探討-以汽車製造業為例★ 台電公司不同世代員工工作價值觀差異及對激勵措施偏好之研究
★ 不同的激勵措施對員工工作滿足及工作投入之影響性分析★ 工作價值觀、工作滿足對組織承諾之影響(以A通訊公司研發人員為例)
★ 薪資公平知覺與組織承諾關係之探討-以內外控人格特質為干擾變項★ 改善活動訓練成效評量之研究
檔案 [Endnote RIS 格式]    [Bibtex 格式]    [相關文章]   [文章引用]   [完整記錄]   [館藏目錄]   [檢視]  [下載]
  1. 本電子論文使用權限為同意立即開放。
  2. 已達開放權限電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。
  3. 請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。

摘要(中) Whetstone(2002)指出,僕人式領導理論有過度理想化的傾向,而在1970年僕人式領導的概念出現以來,近50年所累積的學術文獻仍大多討論僕人式領導的有利影響,也有少數幾篇聚焦討論僕人式領導的雙面刃影響。本研究藉用悖論領導與元悖論之觀點,選擇加入與僕人式領導近乎對立、且是華人文化較為熟知的領導風格—威權式領導納入討論範疇。
本研究採用多項式回歸與反應曲面法,開創性地討論並分析當主管是否同時具備僕人式領導與威權式領導與否,或是僅採用上述單一領導風格時,這兩種迥異的領導風格將會對部屬的職涯適應力與任務性績效帶來的影響為何。經回收並採用台灣本土企業共257份主管—部屬配對問卷後,研究結果發現,當主管同時存在「僕人式—威權式」元悖論領導時,比起採用單一風格或完全不具備這兩種領導風格時,將能使其職涯適應力達到最佳的效果。此外,若僅使用僕人式領導或威權式領導風格時,兩者之間對職涯適應力的差異性並不大;若兩種風格皆不採用,則會使部屬有最低的職涯適應力效果,同時也發現職涯適應力會在「僕人式—威權式」元悖論領導與任務性績效之間存在中介效果。最後,本研究也依據上述研究結果提出討論,並提供管理上、實務上與未來學術研究上的建議。
摘要(英) Whetstone(2002)pointed out that servant leadership theory tends to be overly idealized. Despite nearly 50 years of accumulated academic literature since the emergence of servant leadership concept in the 1970s, the majority of studies have focused on the beneficial effects of servant leadership, with only a few discussing its double-edged impact. Based on the perspectives of paradoxical leadership and meta-paradoxical leadership, this study chooses to include authoritarian leadership, a leadership style almost diametrically opposed to servant leadership and more familiar in Chinese culture, for discussion.
Using polynomial regression and response surface methodology, this study innovatively explores and analyzes how the contrasting leadership styles of servant leadership and authoritarian leadership, or the use of either style alone, affect subordinates′ career adaptability and task performance. After collecting and analyzing data from 257 supervisor-subordinate paired questionnaires in Taiwanese local companies, the results reveal that when supervisors exhibit both servant and authoritarian leadership styles simultaneously, it leads to the optimal enhancement of subordinates′ career adaptability. Additionally, there is not a significant difference in career adaptability when only one leadership style (either servant or authoritarian) is employed. However, the absence of both leadership styles results in the lowest levels of career adaptability for subordinates. Furthermore, it is found that career adaptability mediates the relationship between servant-authoritarian leadership styles and task performance. Finally, based on these findings, this study provides discussions and practical implications for management and future academic research.
關鍵字(中) ★ 僕人式領導
★ 威權式領導
★ 元悖論
★ 職涯適應力
★ 任務性績效
關鍵字(英) ★ Servant Leadership
★ Authoritarian Leadership
★ Meta-Paradoxical Leadership
★ Career Adaptability
★ Task Performance
論文目次 摘要 i
ABSTRACT ii
誌謝 iii
目錄 iv
圖目錄 vi
表目錄 vii
第一章 緒論 1
1-1 研究背景與動機 1
1-2 研究目的與預期貢獻 4
第二章 文獻探討 6
2-1 僕人式領導 6
2-2 威權式領導 7
2-3 悖論領導與元悖論 10
2-4 僕人式領導與威權式領導 12
2-5 職涯適應力 16
2-6 任務性績效 17
2-7 各變項之關係 19
2-7-1 僕人式領導、威權式領導與職涯適應力 19
2-7-2 職涯適應力於僕人式領導、威權式領導與任務性績效間的中介效果 21
第三章 研究方法 25
3-1 研究架構與研究假設 25
3-2 研究樣本與資料蒐集程序 26
3-3 研究工具 26
3-3-1 僕人式領導 27
3-3-2 威權式領導 27
3-3-3 職涯適應力 28
3-3-4 任務性績效 28
3-3-5 控制變項 28
3-4 資料分析與統計方法 28
第四章 研究結果 30
4-1 資料來源與樣本結構 30
4-2 信度分析 32
4-3 效度分析 32
4-3-1 收斂效度 33
4-3-2 區辨效度 35
4-4 驗證性因素分析 35
4-5 Harman’s單一因子檢定 36
4-6 平均數、標準差與相關分析 36
4-7 顯著差異樣本比例 37
4-8 假說檢定 38
4-8-1 僕人式領導與威權式領導對職涯適應力之影響 38
4-8-2 職涯適應力之中介效果 42
第五章 結論與建議 44
5-1 研究結論與討論 44
5-2 研究貢獻 46
5-3 管理意涵與實務建議 47
5-4 研究限制與未來建議 49
參考文獻 51
參考文獻 吳宗祐、周麗芳、鄭伯壎 (2008). 主管的權威取向及其對部屬順從與畏懼的知覺對威權領導的預測效果。本土心理學研究,30期,65-115。TSSCI
李庭閣, 嚴國晉, & 余宗憲. (2023). 新進菜鳥工作不適配與離職傾向之關聯性: 組織挫折之中介角色與威權領導之調節角色. Journal of Management & Business Research (2521-4306), 40.
周俊三(2014)。家長式領導行為對賽前狀態性焦慮與團隊滿意度關係之研究。屏東科大體育學刊,(3),41-55。
周婉茹、鄭伯壎、連玉輝(2014)。威權領導:概念源起、現況檢討及未來方向。中華心理學刊,56(2),165-189。TSSCI
林姿葶、鄭伯壎(2012)。華人領導者的噓寒問暖與提攜教育:仁慈領導之雙構面模式。本土心理學研究,(37),253-302。doi:10.6254/2012.37.253
黃芳銘.(2015).結構方程模式-理論與應用. 台灣五南圖書出版股份有限公司.
黃增添、林淑慧、范智昇、黃英忠、許建彬(2022)。家長式仁慈與威權領導的雙元模式對部屬情緒勞動與建言行為之探討:多項式迴歸的運用。勞資關係論叢,24(2),1-36。
樊景立、鄭伯壎(2000)。家長式領導:再一次思考。本土心理學研究,13卷,219-227。TSSCI
樊景立、鄭伯壎(2000)。華人組織的家長式領導:一項文化觀點的分析。本土心理學研究,13卷,127-180。TSSCI
鄭伯壎(1990)。組織文化價值觀的數量衡鑑。中華心理學刊,32 卷,31-49。TSSCI
鄭伯壎、周麗芳、樊景立(2000)。家長式領導量表:三元模式的建構與測量。本土心理學研究,14卷,3-64。TSSCI
鄭伯壎、劉怡君(1995)。義利之辨與企業間的交易歷程:台灣組織間網絡的個案分析。本土心理學研究,4 卷,36-92。TSSCI
Aiken, L. S., West, S. G., & Reno, R. R. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. sage.
Al-Ghazali, B. M. (2020). Transformational leadership, career adaptability, job embeddedness and perceived career success: a serial mediation model. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 41(8), 993-1013.
Ali Chughtai, A. (2016). Can ethical leaders enhance their followers’ creativity?. Leadership, 12(2), 230-249.
Andriopoulos, C., & Lewis, M. W. (2009). Exploitation-exploration tensions and organizational ambidexterity: Managing paradoxes of innovation. Organization science, 20(4), 696-717.
Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. Prentice-Hall.
Barbuto Jr, J. E., & Wheeler, D. W. (2006). Scale development and construct clarification of servant leadership. Group & organization management, 31(3), 300-326.
Bass & Bass (2008). The Bass handbook of leadership: Theory, research, and managerial applications (4th ed.). New York: Free Press.
Bass, B. M., & Stogdill, R. M. (1990). Bass & Stogdill′s handbook of leadership: Theory, research, and managerial applications. Simon and Schuster.Blau, P.M. (1964) Justice in Social Exchange. Sociological Inquiry, 34, 193-206.
Bentler, P. M. (1995). EQS structural equations program manual (Vol. 6). Encino, CA: Multivariate software.
Blau, P.M. (1964) Justice in Social Exchange. Sociological Inquiry, 34, 193-206.
Block, P. (1993). Stewardship: Choosing service over self-interest. Berrett-Koehler Publishers.
Borman, W.C. and Motowidlo, S.J. (1993) Expanding the Criterion Domain to Include Elements of Contextual Perfor- mance. In: Schmitt, N. and Borman, W.C., Eds., Personnel Selection in Organizations, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, 71- 98.
Brief, A. P., & Motowidlo, S. J. (1986). Prosocial organizational behaviors. Academy of management Review, 11(4), 710-725.
Brown, A., Bimrose, J., Barnes, S. A., & Hughes, D. (2012). The role of career adaptabilities for mid-career changers. Journal of vocational behavior, 80(3), 754-761.
Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1992). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. Sociological methods & research, 21(2), 230-258.
Cameron, K. S., & Quinn, R. E. (1988). Organizational paradox and transformation.
Campbell, J. P. (1990). Modeling the performance prediction problem in industrial and organizational psychology.
Chan, S. C. (2014). Paternalistic leadership and employee voice: Does information sharing matter?. Human relations, 67(6), 667-693.
Chan, S. C., Huang, X. U., Snape, E. D., & Lam, C. K. (2013). The Janus face of paternalistic leaders: Authoritarianism, benevolence, subordinates′ organization‐based self‐esteem, and performance. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 34(1), 108-128.
Chan, S. H. J., & Mai, X. (2015). The relation of career adaptability to satisfaction and turnover intentions. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 89, 130-139.
Chan, S. H., Mai, X., Kuok, O. M., & Kong, S. H. (2016). The influence of satisfaction and promotability on the relation between career adaptability and turnover intentions. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 92, 167-175.
Chang, T. Z., Chen, S. J., & Polsa, P. (2003). Manufacturer channel management behavior and retailers’ performance: an empirical investigation of automotive channel. Supply chain management: an international journal, 8(2), 132-139.
Chen, C., Ma, L., Chen, Z., & Wen, P. (2022). Gratitude expression to supervisors and subjective career success of civil servants: Evidence from China. Public Personnel Management, 51(1), 48-70.
Chen, M. J. (2002). Transcending paradox: The Chinese “middle way” perspective. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 19, 179-199.
Cheng, M. Y., Wang, L., 2015, The mediating effect of ethical climate on the relationship between paternalistic leadership and team identification: A team-level analysis in the Chinese context, Journal of Business Ethics, 129(3): 639-654.
Chiang, J. T. J., Chen, X. P., Liu, H., Akutsu, S., & Wang, Z. (2021). We have emotions but can’t show them! Authoritarian leadership, emotion suppression climate, and team performance. Human Relations, 74(7), 1082-1111.
Chiniara, M., & Bentein, K. (2016). Linking servant leadership to individual performance: Differentiating the mediating role of autonomy, competence and relatedness need satisfaction. The leadership quarterly, 27(1), 124-141.
Chiniara, M., & Bentein, K. (2018). The servant leadership advantage: When perceiving low differentiation in leader-member relationship quality influences team cohesion, team task performance and service OCB. The Leadership Quarterly, 29(2), 333-345.
Chughtai, A. (2019). Servant leadership and perceived employability: proactive career behaviours as mediators. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 40(2), 213-229.
Chughtai, A. A. (2016). Servant leadership and follower outcomes: Mediating effects of organizational identification and psychological safety. The Journal of Psychology: Interdisciplinary and Applied, 150(7), 866–880.
Chughtai, M. S., Khalid, Y., Guan, R., & Razzaq, T. (2023). When Does Leadership Humility Nurture Career Success: A Moderated Mediation Model of Career Adaptability and Proactive Personality. Journal of Innovative Research in Management Sciences, 4(1), 35-53.
Clegg, S. R., da Cunha, J. V., & e Cunha, M. P. (2002). Management paradoxes: A relational view. Human relations, 55(5), 483-503.
Coetzee, M., & Stoltz, E. (2015). Employees′ satisfaction with retention factors: Exploring the role of career adaptability. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 89, 83-91.
Cole, M., Lindeque, P., Fileman, E., Halsband, C., Goodhead, R., Moger, J., & Galloway, T. S. (2013). Microplastic ingestion by zooplankton. Environmental science & technology, 47(12), 6646-6655.
De Cremer, D. (2006). Affective and motivational consequences of leader self-sacrifice: The moderating effect of autocratic leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 17(1), 79-93.
De Hoogh, A. H., & Den Hartog, D. N. (2008). Ethical and despotic leadership, relationships with leader′s social responsibility, top management team effectiveness and subordinates′ optimism: A multi-method study. The leadership quarterly, 19(3), 297-311.
De Hoogh, A. H., & Den Hartog, D. N. (2009). Neuroticism and locus of control as moderators of the relationships of charismatic and autocra
De Hoogh, A. H., Greer, L. L., & Den Hartog, D. N. (2015). Diabolical dictators or capable commanders? An investigation of the differential effects of autocratic leadership on team performance. The Leadership Quarterly, 26(5), 687-701.
De Jong, A., De Ruyter, K., & Lemmink, J. (2004). Antecedents and consequences of the service climate in boundary-spanning self-managing service teams. Journal of Marketing, 68(2), 18-35.
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2008). Self-determination theory: A macrotheory of human motivation, development, and health. Canadian psychology/Psychologie canadienne, 49(3), 182.
Delle, E., & Searle, B. (2022). Career adaptability: The role of developmental leadership and career optimism. Journal of Career Development, 49(2), 269-281.
DeRue, D. S., & Ashford, S. J. (2010). Who will lead and who will follow? A social process of leadership identity construction in organizations. Academy of management review, 35(4), 627-647.
Deyo, F. C. (1978). Local foremen in multinational enterprise: A comparative case study of supervisory roletensions in Western and Chinese factories of Singapore. Journal of Management Studies, 15, 308-317.
Deyo, F. C. (1983). Chinese management practices and work commitment in comparative perspective. In L. A. P. Gosling & L. Y. C. Lim (Eds.), The Chinese in Southeast Asia: Identity, culture and politics (Vol. 2, pp. 215-230). Singapore: Maruzen Asia.
Doll, W. J., Xia, W., & Torkzadeh, G. (1994). A confirmatory factor analysis of the end-user computing satisfaction instrument. MIS quarterly, 453-461.
Dorfman, P. W., & Howell, J. P. (1988). Dimensions of National Culture and Effective Leadership Patterns: Hofstede Revisited. Advances in International Comparative Management, 3, 127-150.
Dorfman, P., Howell, J., Hibino, S., Lee, J., Tate, U., & Bautista, A. (1997). Leadership in Western and Asian countries: Commonalities and differences in effective leadership processes across cultures. The Leadership Quarterly, 8, 233–274.
Duan, J., Kwan, H. K., & Ling, B. (2014). The role of voice efficacy in the formation of voice behaviour: A cross-level examination. Journal of Management & Organization, 20(4), 526-543.
Edwards, J. R. (2002). Alternatives to difference scores: Polynomial regression and response surface methodology. Advances in measurement and data analysis, 350-400.
Edwards, J. R., & Cable, D. M. (2009). The value of value congruence. Journal of applied psychology, 94(3), 654.
Edwards, J. R., & Parry, M. E. (1993). On the use of polynomial regression equations as an alternative to difference scores in organizational research. Academy of Management journal, 36(6), 1577-1613.
Einarsen, S., Aasland, M. S., & Skogstad, A. (2007). Destructive leadership behaviour: A definition and conceptual model. The leadership quarterly, 18(3), 207-216.
Eva, N., Robin, M., Sendjaya, S., van Dierendonck, D., & Liden, R. C. (2019). Servant Leadership: A systematic review and call for future research. The Leadership Quarterly, 30(1), 111–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2018.07.004
Fairhurst, G. T., Smith, W. K., Banghart, S. G., Lewis, M. W., Putnam, L. L., Raisch, S., & Schad, J. (2016). Diverging and converging: Integrative insights on a paradox meta-perspective. Academy of Management Annals, 10(1), 173-182.
Farh, J. L., & Cheng, B. S. (2000). A cultural analysis of paternalistic leadership in Chinese organizations. In Management and organizations in the Chinese context (pp. 84-127). London: Palgrave Macmillan UK.
Farling, M. L., Stone, A. G., & Winston, B. E. (1999). Servant leadership: Setting the stage for empirical research. Journal of leadership studies, 6(1-2), 49-72.
Fatima, T., Majeed, M., Jahanzeb, S., Gul, S., & Irshad, M. (2021). Servant leadership and Machiavellian followers: A moderated mediation model. Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 37(3), 215–229.
Flynn, C. B., Smither, J. W., & Walker, A. G. (2016). Exploring the relationship between leaders’ core self-evaluations and subordinates’ perceptions of servant leadership: A field study. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 23(3), 260-271.
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of marketing research, 18(1), 39-50.
George, J. M., & Brief, A. P. (1992). Feeling good-doing good: A conceptual analysis of the mood at work-organizational spontaneity relationship. Psychological bulletin, 112(2), 310.
Giampetro-Meyer, A., Brown, T., Browne, S.J.M.N. and Kubasek, N. (1998), “Do we really want more leaders in business”, Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 17 No. 15, pp. 1727-36.
Gill, M. J., Roulet, T. J., & Kerridge, S. P. (2018). Mentoring for mental health: A mixed-method study of the benefits of formal mentoring programmes in the English police force. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 108, 201-213.
Graham, J. W. (1991). Servant-leadership in organizations: Inspirational and moral. The Leadership Quarterly, 2(2), 105–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/1048-9843(91)90025-W
Greenleaf, R. (1991) The Servant as Leader ([Rev. ed.). Robert K. Greenleaf Center, Indianapolis, IN.
Greenleaf, R. K. (1970). The servant as leader. Robert K. Greenleaf Publishing Center.
Greenleaf, R.K. (1977) Servant Leadership: A Journey into the Nature of Legitimate Power and Greatness. Paulist Press, New York.
Griffin, M. A., Neal, A., & Parker, S. K. (2007). A new model of work role performance: Positive behavior in uncertain and interdependent contexts. Academy of management journal, 50(2), 327-347.
Hair, J., Anderson, R., Tatham, R. and Black, W. (1998) Multivariate data analysis. 5th Edition, Prentice Hall, New Jersey.
Hale, J. R., & Fields, D. L. (2007). Exploring Servant Leadership across Cultures: A Study of Followers in Ghana and the USA. Leadership, 3(4), 397–417. https://doi.org/10.1177/1742715007082964
Harms, P. D., Wood, D., Landay, K., Lester, P. B., & Lester, G. V. (2018). Autocratic leaders and authoritarian followers revisited: A review and agenda for the future. The Leadership Quarterly, 29(1), 105-122.
Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture and organizations. International studies of management & organization, 10(4), 15-41.
Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural equation modeling: a multidisciplinary journal, 6(1), 1-55.
Hughes, D. J., Lee, A., Tian, A. W., Newman, A., & Legood, A. (2018). Leadership, creativity, and innovation: A critical review and practical recommendations. LEADERSHIP QUARTERLY, 29(5), 549–569. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2018.03.001
Hunter, E. M., Neubert, M. J., Perry, S. J., Witt, L. A., Penney, L. M., & Weinberger, E. (2013). Servant leaders inspire servant followers: Antecedents and outcomes for employees and the organization. The Leadership Quarterly, 24(2), 316-331.
Ito, J. K., & Brotheridge, C. M. (2005). Does supporting employees′ career adaptability lead to commitment, turnover, or both?. Human resource management, 44(1), 5-19.
Johnson, R. W. (2001). An introduction to the bootstrap. Teaching statistics, 23(2), 49-54.
Judge, T. A., Thoresen, C. J., Bono, J. E., & Patton, G. K. (2001). The job satisfaction–job performance relationship: A qualitative and quantitative review. Psychological bulletin, 127(3), 376.
Kahai, S. S., Sosik, J. J., & Avolio, B. J. (2004). Effects of participative and directive leadership in electronic groups. Group & Organization Management, 29(1), 67-105.
Katz, D. (1964). The motivational basis of organizational behavior. Behavioral science, 9(2), 131-146.
Katz, D., & Kahn, R. L. (1978). The social psychology of organizations. New York: Wiley.
Kemmelmeier, M., Burnstein, E., Krumov, K., Genkova, P., Kanagawa, C., Hirshberg, M., ... Noels, K. (2003). Individualism, collectivism, and authoritarianism in seven societies. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 34, 304–322.
Kerr, S., Schriesheim, C. A., Murphy, C. J., & Stogdill, R. M. (1974). Toward a contingency theory of leadership based upon the consideration and initiating structure literature. Organizational behavior and human performance, 12(1), 62-82.
Kiechel, W. (1992). The leader as servant. Fortune, 125, 121-122.
Kim, N. (2016). Servant Leadership Style: What is it and What are the Benefits and Contrasts to Other Leadership Styles?
Klasmeier, K. N., Schleu, J. E., Millhoff, C., Poethke, U., & Bormann, K. C. (2022). On the destructiveness of laissez-faire versus abusive supervision: A comparative, multilevel investigation of destructive forms of leadership. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 31(3), 406-420.
Koopman, P. L., Den Hartog, D. N., & Konrad, E. (1999). National culture and leadership profiles in Europe: Some results from the GLOBE study. European journal of work and organizational psychology, 8(4), 503-520.
Kram, K. E. (1985). Mentoring at work: Developmental relationships in organizational life. Glenview, IL: Scott Foresman.
Krog, C. L., & Govender, K. (2015). The relationship between servant leadership and employee empowerment, commitment, trust and innovative behaviour: A project management perspective. SA Journal of Human Resource Management, 13(1), 1-12.
Laub, J. A. (1999). Assessing the servant organization. Development of the servant organizational leadership (SOLA) instrument.
Laub, J. H. (2004). The life course of criminology in the United States: The American Society of Criminology 2003 presidential address. Criminology, 42(1), 1-26.
Lavine, M. (2014). Paradoxical leadership and the competing values framework. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 50(2), 189-205.
Lee A, Legood A, Hughes D, Tian AW, Newman A, Knight C (2019) Leadership, creativity and innovation: a meta-analytic review. Eur J Work Organ Psychol 29:1–35. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432x.2019. 1661837
Lewis, M. W. (2000). Exploring paradox: Toward a more comprehensive guide. Academy of Management review, 25(4), 760-776.
Lewis, M. W., & Smith, W. K. (2014). Paradox as a metatheoretical perspective: Sharpening the focus and widening the scope. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 50(2), 127-149.
Li, Q., She, Z., & Yang, B. (2018). Promoting innovative performance in multidisciplinary teams: The roles of paradoxical leadership and team perspective taking. Frontiers in psychology, 9, 1083.
Liao, C., Lee, H. W., Johnson, R. E., & Lin, S.-H. (Joanna). (2021). Serving You Depletes Me? A Leader-Centric Examination of Servant Leadership Behaviors. Journal of Management, 47(5), 1185–1218. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206320906883
Liden, R. C., Wayne, S. J., Liao, C., & Meuser, J. D. (2014). Servant leadership and serving culture: Influence on individual and unit performance. Academy of management journal, 57(5), 1434-1452.
Liden, R. C., Wayne, S. J., Meuser, J. D., Hu, J., Wu, J., & Liao, C. (2015). Servant leadership: Validation of a short form of the SL-28. The leadership quarterly, 26(2), 254-269.
Liden, R. C., Wayne, S. J., Zhao, H., & Henderson, D. (2008). Servant leadership: Development of a multidimensional measure and multi-level assessment. The leadership quarterly, 19(2), 161-177.
Ling Q., Zhang Z., & Qiu X. (2022). The negative effects of servant leadership and its buffer mechanism. Advances in Psychological Science, 30(4), 922–940. https://doi.org/10.3724/SP.J.1042.2022.00922
Ling, Q., Liu, F., & Wu, X. (2017). Servant versus authentic leadership: Assessing effectiveness in China′s hospitality industry. Cornell Hospitality Quarterly, 58,53–68.
Lorinkova, N. M., Pearsall, M. J., & Sims Jr, H. P. (2013). Examining the differential longitudinal performance of directive versus empowering leadership in teams. Academy of Management Journal, 56(2), 573-596.
Lu, L., Zhou, K., Wang, Y., & Zhu, S. (2022). Relationship between paternalistic leadership and employee innovation: a meta-analysis among chinese samples. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 920006.
Mammassis, C. S., & Schmid, P. C. (2018). The role of power asymmetry and paradoxical leadership in software development team agility. In Cognition and Innovation (pp. 125-139). Emerald Publishing Limited.
Martinez, S.-A., & Leija, N. (2023). Distinguishing Servant Leadership from Transactional and Transformational Leadership. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 25(3), 141–188. https://doi.org/10.1177/15234223231175845
Martin-Harris, B., Brodsky, M. B., Michel, Y., Castell, D. O., Schleicher, M., Sandidge, J., ... & Blair, J. (2008). MBS measurement tool for swallow impairment—MBSImp: establishing a standard. Dysphagia, 23, 392-405.
Mathieu, J. E., & Farr, J. L. (1991). Further evidence for the discriminant validity of measures of organizational commitment, job involvement, and job satisfaction. Journal of applied psychology, 76(1), 127.
Meng, W., Xu, Z., Abuliezi, Z., Lyu, Y., & Zhang, Q. (2023). Paradoxical leadership, team adaptation and team performance: The mediating role of inclusive climate. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1052732.
Merino-Tejedor, E., Hontangas, P. M., & Boada-Grau, J. (2016). Career adaptability and its relation to self-regulation, career construction, and academic engagement among Spanish university students. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 93, 92-102.
Miron-Spektor, E., Ingram, A., Keller, J., Smith, W. K., & Lewis, M. W. (2018). Microfoundations of organizational paradox: The problem is how we think about the problem. Academy of management journal, 61(1), 26-45.
Mom, T. J., Van Den Bosch, F. A., & Volberda, H. W. (2007). Investigating managers′ exploration and exploitation activities: The influence of top‐down, bottom‐up, and horizontal knowledge inflows. Journal of management studies, 44(6), 910-931.
Motowidlo, S. J., & Van Scotter, J. R. (1994). Evidence that task performance should be distinguished from contextual performance. Journal of Applied psychology, 79(4), 475.
Mulaik, S. A., James, L. R., Van Alstine, J., Bennett, N., Lind, S., & Stilwell, C. D. (1989). Evaluation of goodness-of-fit indices for structural equation models. Psychological bulletin, 105(3), 430.
Muller, E. N. (1985). Income inequality, regime repressiveness, and political violence. American sociological review, 47-61.
Murphy, K. R. (1989). Is the relationship between cognitive ability and job performance stable over time?. Human performance, 2(3), 183-200.
Neubert, M. J., Hunter, E. M., & Tolentino, R. C. (2016). A servant leader and their stakeholders: When does organizational structure enhance a leader′s influence?. The Leadership Quarterly, 27(6), 896-910.
Neubert, M. J., Kacmar, K. M., Carlson, D. S., Chonko, L. B., & Roberts, J. A. (2008). Regulatory focus as a mediator of the influence of initiating structure and servant leadership on employee behavior. Journal of applied psychology, 93(6), 1220.
Nielsen, M. B., Skogstad, A., Matthiesen, S. B., & Einarsen, S. (2016). The importance of a multidimensional and temporal design in research on leadership and workplace safety. The Leadership Quarterly, 27, 142–155.
Northouse, P. G. (2007). Leadership theory and practice (4th ed.). Sage Publications, Inc.
Nunnally, J. and Bernstein, I. (1978) Psychometric Theory. Tata McGraw-Hill Ed., New Delhi.
Nystedt, L. (1997). Who should rule? Does personality matter? European Journal of Personality, 11(1), 1-14.
Ohme, M., & Zacher, H. (2015). Job performance ratings: The relative importance of mental ability, conscientiousness, and career adaptability. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 87, 161-170.
Organ, D. W. (1988). Organizational citizenship behavior: The good soldier syndrome. Lexington books/DC heath and com.
Othman, N., & Nasurdin, A. M. (2013). Social support and work engagement: a study of Malaysian nurses. Journal of nursing management, 21(8), 1083-1090.
P.J. Dowling, R.S. Schuler and D.E. Welch (1994) International Dimensions of Human Resource Management, 2nd edn Belmont: Wadsworth. Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources, 33(2), 145-146
Padilla, A., Hogan, R., & Kaiser, R. (2007). The toxic triangle: Destructive leaders, susceptible followers, and conducive environments. The Leadership Quarterly, 18, 176–194.
Panaccio, A., Donia, M., Saint-Michel, S., & Liden, R. C. (2015). 16. Servant leadership and wellbeing. Flourishing in life, work and careers: Individual wellbeing and career experiences, 334.
Pearce, C. L., Wassenaar, C. L., Berson, Y., & Tuval-Mashiach, R. (2019). Toward a theory of meta-paradoxical leadership. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 155, 31-41.
Peng, K., & Nisbett, R. E. (1999). Culture, dialectics, and reasoning about contradiction. American psychologist, 54(9), 741.
Peterson, S.J., Galvin, B.M. and Lange, D. (2012) CEO Servant Leadership: Exploring Executive Characteristics and Firm Performance. Personnel Psychology, 65, 565-596.
Pizzolitto, E., Verna, I., & Venditti, M. (2023). Authoritarian leadership styles and performance: a systematic literature review and research agenda. Management Review Quarterly, 73(2), 841-871.
Putnam, L. L., Fairhurst, G. T., & Banghart, S. (2016). Contradictions, dialectics, and paradoxes in organizations: A constitutive approach. Academy of Management Annals, 10(1), 65-171.
Pye, L. W. (1985). Asia power and politics: The cultural dimensions of authority. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Rasheed, A., Lodhi, R. N., & Habiba, U. (2016). An empirical study of the impact of servant leadership on employee innovative work behavior with the mediating effect of work engagement: Evidence from banking sector of Pakistan. Global Management Journal for Academic & Corporate Studies, 6(2), 177.
Rasheed, M. I., Weng, Q., Umrani, W. A., & Moin, M. F. (2021). Abusive supervision and career adaptability: The role of self-efficacy and coworker support. Human Performance, 34(4), 239-256.
Redding, S. G., & Hsiao, M. (1990). An empirical study of overseas Chinese managerial ideology. International Journal of Psychology, 25(3-6), 629-641.
Rico, R., Uitdewilligen, S. G., & Dorta, D. (2022). Patterns of team adaptation: The effects of behavioural interaction patterns on team adaptation and the antecedent effect of empowering versus directive leadership. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, 30(4), 365-378.
Riordan, C. M., Griffith, R. W., & Weatherly, E. W. (2003). Age and work‐related outcomes: the moderating effects of status characteristics. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 33(1), 37-57.
Robert, V., & Vandenberghe, C. (2020). Locus of control and leader–member exchange: a dimensional, contextualized, and prospective analysis. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 537917.
Rottinghaus, P. J., Day, S. X., & Borgen, F. H. (2005). The Career Futures Inventory: A measure of career-related adaptability and optimism. Journal of career assessment, 13(1), 3-24.
Rudolph, C. W., Lavigne, K. N., & Zacher, H. (2017). Career adaptability: A meta-analysis of relationships with measures of adaptivity, adapting responses, and adaptation results. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 98, 17-34.
Rudy, D., & Grusec, J. E. (2001). Correlates of authoritarian parenting in individualist and collectivist cultures and implications for understanding the transmission of values. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 32(2), 202-212.
Russell, R. F., & Stone, A. G. (2002). A review of servant leadership attributes: Developing a practical model. Leadership & organization development journal, 23(3), 145-157.
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American psychologist, 55(1), 68.
Saeed, T., Almas, S., Anis-ul-Haq, M., & Niazi, G. S. K. (2014). Leadership styles: relationship with conflict management styles. International journal of conflict management, 25(3), 214-225.
Safavi, H. P., & Bouzari, M. (2019). The association of psychological capital, career adaptability and career competency among hotel frontline employees. Tourism management perspectives, 30, 65-74.
Sagie A (1996) Effects of leader’s communication style and participative goal setting on performance and attitudes. Hum Perform 9:51–64. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327043hup0901_3
Savickas, M. L. (1997). Career adaptability: An integrative construct for life‐span, life‐space theory. The career development quarterly, 45(3), 247-259.
Savickas, M. L. (2002). Career construction. Career choice and development, 149(205), 14-38.
Savickas, M. L. (2005). The theory and practice of career construction. Career development and counseling: Putting theory and research to work, 1, 42-70.
Savickas, M. L., & Porfeli, E. J. (2012). Career Adapt-Abilities Scale: Construction, reliability, and measurement equivalence across 13 countries. Journal of vocational behavior, 80(3), 661-673.
Savickas, M. L., Nota, L., Rossier, J., Dauwalder, J. P., Duarte, M. E., Guichard, J., ... & Van Vianen, A. E. (2009). Life designing: A paradigm for career construction in the 21st century. Journal of vocational behavior, 75(3), 239-250.
Scandura, T. A., & Ragins, B. R. (1993). The effects of sex and gender role orientation on mentorship in male-dominated occupations. Journal of vocational behavior, 43(3), 251-265.
Schad, J., Lewis, M. W., Raisch, S., & Smith, W. K. (2016). Paradox research in management science: Looking back to move forward. Academy of Management Annals, 10(1), 5-64.
Schaubroeck, J. M., Shen, Y., & Chong, S. (2017). A dual-stage moderated mediation model linking authoritarian leadership to follower outcomes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 102(2), 203.
Schneider, S. K., & George, W. M. (2011). Servant leadership versus transformational leadership in voluntary service organizations. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 32(1), 60-77.
Scully, J., Sims, H., Olian, J., Schnell, E., & Smith, K. (1994). Tough times make tough bosses: A meso-analysis of CEO leader behavior. The Leadership Quarterly, 5,59–83.
Sendjaya, S., & Pekerti, A. (2010). Servant leadership as antecedent of trust in organizations. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 31(7), 643-663.
Sendjaya, S., & Sarros, J. C. (2002). Servant leadership: Its origin, development, and application in organizations. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 9(2), 57-64.
Sendjaya, S., & Sendjaya, S. (2015). Servant leadership research. Personal and Organizational Excellence through Servant Leadership: Learning to Serve, Serving to Lead, Leading to Transform, 15-38.
Senge, P. (1990). The fifth discipline: The art and practice of the learning organization. New York: Doubleday/Currency Publishing, 213-218.
Shanock, L. R., Baran, B. E., Gentry, W. A., Pattison, S. C., & Heggestad, E. D. (2010). Polynomial regression with response surface analysis: A powerful approach for examining moderation and overcoming limitations of difference scores. Journal of Business and Psychology, 25, 543-554.
Shen, Y., Chou, W. J., & Schaubroeck, J. M. (2019). The roles of relational identification and workgroup cultural values in linking authoritarian leadership to employee performance. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 28(4), 498-509.
Shi, S., & Zhou, M. (2023). Servant leadership, transformational leadership, and customer satisfaction: An implicit leadership theories perspective. Business Ethics, the Environment & Responsibility, 32(1), 371–383. https://doi.org/10.1111/beer.12489
Silin, R. H. (1976). Leadership and values: The organization of large-scale Taiwanese enterprises (No. 62). Harvard Univ Asia Center.
Skogstad, A., Einarsen, S., Torsheim, T., Aasland, M. S., & Hetland, H. (2007). The destructiveness of laissez-faire leadership behavior. Journal of occupational health psychology, 12(1), 80.
Smith, W. K., & Lewis, M. W. (2011). Toward a theory of paradox: A dynamic equilibrium model of organizing. Academy of management Review, 36(2), 381-403.
Spears, L. C. (1995). Reflections on leadership: How Robert K. Greenleaf’s theory of servant-leadership influenced today’s top management thinkers. New York: Wiley.
Spears, L. C. (1998). Introduction: Tracing the Growing Impact of Servant Leadership. In L. C. Spears (Ed.). Insights on Leadership: Service, Stewardship, Spirit, and Servant-Leadership (pp. 1-12). New York: Wiley & Sons.
Steers, R. M., & Black, J. S. (1994). Organizational behavior. New York: Harper Collins College Publisher.
Stewart, G. L., Courtright, S. H., & Manz, C. C. (2019). Self-leadership: A paradoxical core of organizational behavior. Annual review of organizational psychology and organizational behavior, 6, 47-67.
Stoltz, K. B., & Young, T. L. (2013). Applications of motivational interviewing in career counseling: Facilitating career transition. Journal of Career Development, 40(4), 329-346.
Sun, J., Liden, R. C., & Ouyang, L. (2019). Are servant leaders appreciated? An investigation of how relational attributions influence employee feelings of gratitude and prosocial behaviors. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 40(5), 528-540.
Super, D. E., & Knasel, E. G. (1981). Career development in adulthood: Some theoretical problems and a possible solution. British journal of guidance and counselling, 9(2), 194-201.
Taylor, W. C. (1991). The logic of global business: An interview with ABB’s Percy Barnevik. Harvard Business Review, March-April.
Thoroughgood, C., Padilla, A., Hunter, S., & Tate, B. (2012). The susceptible circle: A taxonomy of followers associated with destructive leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 23, 897–917.
Tolentino, L. R., Garcia, P. R. J. M., Restubog, S. L. D., Bordia, P., & Tang, R. L. (2013). Validation of the Career Adapt-Abilities Scale and an examination of a model of career adaptation in the Philippine context. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 83(3), 410-418.
Van Dierendonck, D. (2011). Servant Leadership: A Review and Synthesis. Journal of Management, 37(4), 1228–1261. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206310380462
Van Dierendonck, D., Stam, D., Boersma, P., De Windt, N., & Alkema, J. (2014). Same difference? Exploring the differential mechanisms linking servant leadership and transformational leadership to follower outcomes. The Leadership Quarterly, 25(3), 544-562.
Verdorfer, A. P. (2016). Examining mindfulness and its relations to humility, motivation to lead, and actual servant leadership behaviors. Mindfulness, 7, 950-961.
Wagner, J. A., & Hollenbeck, J. R. (2005). Organizational behavior: Securing competitive advantage (5th ed.). Orlando, FL: Harcourt. 
Waldman, D. A., & Bowen, D. E. (2016). Learning to be a paradox-savvy leader. Academy of Management Perspectives, 30(3), 316-327.
Walumbwa, F. O., Peterson, S. J., Avolio, B. J., & Hartnell, C. A. (2010). An investigation of the relationships among leader and follower psychological capital, service climate, and job performance. Personnel psychology, 63(4), 937-963.
Wang, H., & Guan, B. (2018). The positive effect of authoritarian leadership on employee performance: The moderating role of power distance. Frontiers in psychology, 357.
Wang, Z., Liu, Y., & Liu, S. (2019). Authoritarian leadership and task performance: the effects of leader-member exchange and dependence on leader. Frontiers of Business Research in China, 13, 1-15.
Wang, Z., Yu, K., Xi, R., & Zhang, X. (2019). Servant leadership and career success: The effects of career skills and proactive personality. Career Development International, 24(7), 717-730.
Westwood, R. (1997). Harmony and patriarchy: The cultural basis for′paternalistic headship′among the overseas Chinese. Organization studies, 18(3), 445-480.
Wheaton, B. (1987). Assessment of fit in overidentified models with latent variables. Sociological Methods & Research, 16(1), 118-154.
Whetstone, J. T. (2002). Personalism and moral leadership: The servant leader with a transforming vision. Business Ethics: A European Review, 11(4), 385-392.
Whitley, R. (1992). Business systems in East Asia: Firms, markets and societies. Sage.
Williams, L. J., & Anderson, S. E. (1991). Job satisfaction and organizational commitment as predictors of organizational citizenship and in-role behaviors. Journal of management, 17(3), 601-617.
Wong, S. L. (1988). Emigrant entrepreneurs: Shanghai industrialists in Hong Kong. Hong Kong: Oxford University Press.
Xie, B., Xia, M., Xin, X., & Zhou, W. (2016). Linking calling to work engagement and subjective career success: The perspective of career construction theory. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 94, 70-78.
Yang, J., Liu, H., & Gu, J. (2017). A multi-level study of servant leadership on creativity: The roles of self-efficacy and power distance. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 38(5), 610-629.
Zacher, H. (2014). Career adaptability predicts subjective career success above and beyond personality traits and core self-evaluations. Journal of vocational behavior, 84(1), 21-30.
Zhang, Y., Waldman, D. A., Han, Y.-L., & Li, X.-B. (2015). Paradoxical Leader Behaviors in People Management: Antecedents and Consequences. Academy of Management Journal, 58(2), 538–566. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2012.0995
Zou, W. C., Tian, Q., & Liu, J. (2015). Servant leadership, social exchange relationships, and follower′s helping behavior: Positive reciprocity belief matters. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 51, 147-156.
指導教授 林文政 審核日期 2024-7-22
推文 facebook   plurk   twitter   funp   google   live   udn   HD   myshare   reddit   netvibes   friend   youpush   delicious   baidu   
網路書籤 Google bookmarks   del.icio.us   hemidemi   myshare   

若有論文相關問題,請聯絡國立中央大學圖書館推廣服務組 TEL:(03)422-7151轉57407,或E-mail聯絡  - 隱私權政策聲明