探討使用GPT的Google評論概念圖促進EFL寫作

、線上人數：45

、訪客IP：18.218.108.8

姓名	江益愷(Yi-Kai Chiang) 查詢紙本館藏	畢業系所	網路學習科技研究所
論文名稱	探討使用GPT的Google評論概念圖促進EFL寫作 (Investigation of using Concept Map of Google Reviews with GPT for Facilitating EFL Writing)
檔案	[Endnote RIS 格式] [Bibtex 格式] [相關文章] [文章引用] [完整記錄] [館藏目錄] 至系統瀏覽論文 ( 永不開放)
摘要(中)	英文寫作對於 EFL 學生來說是一項重要的能力，學生需要寫出有意義的內容，以及對文章結構有清楚的觀念，才能確保論述的清晰與明確。此外，在真實語境中，學生必須能夠善用自身的經驗及周遭環境，來創作出更有意義的寫作內容。因此，我們開發了一個網頁應用程式，EFLMind，整合了 Google Place 評論、GPT 產生的概念圖以及英文例句，為了提升 EFL 學生在寫作的內容與組織的能力。本研究將 32 名參與者分成兩組，實驗組(EG)有 16 名學生，控制組(CG)有 16 名學生，實驗組使用了 GPT 基於 Google Place 評論，所產生的概念圖和英文例句輔助英文寫作，控制組則沒有概念圖和英文例句輔助英文寫作。本次實驗共進行了五週，並且採用定量分析。後測分析結果顯示，使用了 GPT 產生概念圖和英文例句的實驗組和沒有使用的控制組有明顯差異。實驗組在寫作中使用了更多的概念圖節點及英文例句，有助於激發更多的寫作靈感，使他們的寫作表現有所提升。我們還發現，實驗組學生使用廣度優先-上下文的方法組織文章，對寫作成績有正面的影響，這使他們可以理解寫作的上下文，確保他們不偏離主題。此外，概念圖的品質與學生的寫作成績有明顯的影響，高品質的概念圖可以有效組織和呈現資訊，有助於學生更好的組織自己的想法並在寫作時表達出來。因此，GPT 產生的概念圖與英文例句可以有效的促進 EFL 學生在真實情境中的寫作能力。
摘要(英)	English writing is essential for EFL (English as a Foreign Language) students. To ensure clarity and precision in their discourse, students need to produce meaningful content and clearly understand their essays′ structure. Additionally, in authentic contexts, students must be able to leverage their experiences and surroundings to create more meaningful writing content. To support this, we developed a web application called EFLMind. This application integrates Google Place reviews, concept maps generated by GPT, and English example sentences to enhance EFL students′ writing content and organizational skills. In this study, 32 participants were divided into the experimental group (EG) with 16 students and the control group (CG) with 16 students. The experimental group used concept maps and English example sentences generated by GPT based on Google Place reviews to improve their English writing. In contrast, the control group did not receive this assistance. The experiment lasted for five weeks and employed quantitative analysis. Post-test analysis revealed significant differences between the experimental group and the control group. The experimental group used more concept map nodes and English example sentences in their writing, which helped stimulate more writing ideas and improve their writing performance. We also found that students in the experimental group who used a breadth-first, contextual approach to organize their essays showed positive effects on their writing scores. This approach helped them understand the context of their writing, ensuring they stayed on topic. Furthermore, the quality of the concept maps significantly impacted the students′ writing scores. High-quality concept maps effectively organized and presented information, aiding students in better organizing their thoughts and expressing them in their writing. Therefore, concept maps and English example sentences generated by GPT can effectively enhance EFL students′ writing abilities in authentic contexts.
關鍵字(中)	★ EFL 寫作 ★ 真實情境 ★ 概念圖 ★ 組織寫作風格 ★ GPT	關鍵字(英)	★ EFL writing ★ Authentic context ★ Concept maps ★ Organizational writing style ★ GPT
論文目次	中文摘要 .................................................................................................................................... i Abstract..................................................................................................................................... ii List of Contents ....................................................................................................................... iii List of Figures............................................................................................................................v List of Tables ........................................................................................................................... vi Chapter 1 Introduction ............................................................................................................1 1.1 Research Background and Motivation..............................................................................1 1.2 Research Question ............................................................................................................3 Chapter 2 Literature Review ...................................................................................................4 2.1 EFL Writing Criteria.........................................................................................................4 2.2 EFL Writing with Authentic Context ...............................................................................6 2.3 AI-generated Concept Map for EFL Writing....................................................................7 2.4 Scaffolding Helps EFL Students English Writing ..........................................................11 Chapter 3 System Design and Implementation....................................................................12 3.1 System Design ................................................................................................................12 3.2 System Implementation ..................................................................................................14 Chapter 4 Methodology..........................................................................................................20 4.1 Participants......................................................................................................................20 4.2 Research Framework ......................................................................................................20 4.2.1 Independent Variables .............................................................................................21 4.2.2 Control Variables.....................................................................................................22 4.2.3 Dependent Variables................................................................................................22 4.3 Experimental Procedure..................................................................................................29 4.4 Experimental Instruments ...............................................................................................31 4.5 Data Analysis Approach .................................................................................................32 iii Chapter 5 Results....................................................................................................................33 5.1 Analysis of Learning Achievements...............................................................................33 5.1.1 Cohen′s Kappa Coefficient of Each Activity and Test ............................................33 5.1.2 Writing Performance of Each Test Between Two Groups ......................................34 5.2 Comparison of Learning Behaviors between Two Groups.............................................35 5.2.1 Comparison between Two Groups in Learning Behaviors in Pretest......................35 5.2.2 Comparison of learning behaviors in the writing activities between two groups....37 5.2.3 Comparison of learning behaviors in the posttest between Two Groups ................39 5.3 Analysis of Concept Map Quality and Influence on EFL Writing .................................40 5.4 Relationship between Learning Behaviors and Learning Achievements in EG.............44 5.4.1 Correlation of Concept Map Used and Learning Achievements in EG...................44 5.4.2 Correlation of Example Sentence Used and Learning Achievements in EG...........47 5.5 Relationship between Organizational Style and Learning Achievements in EG ...........50 5.5.1 Correlation of Writing Style and Learning Achievements in EG............................50 5.5.2 Analysis of Students Used the Scaffolding..............................................................51 5.6 Prediction of the Dependent Variables to Learning Achievements................................53 5.7 Perception of EG Students Toward Our Proposed System.............................................55 5.8 Suggestion and Implication.............................................................................................60 Chapter 6 Conclusion .............................................................................................................62 Reference .................................................................................................................................65 Appendix A: Pretest................................................................................................................69 Appendix B: Posttest ..............................................................................................................71 Appendix C: Student used concept maps in their writing ..................................................74 Appendix D: The prompt of GPT generates concept map..................................................77 Appendix E: Writing Scoring Rubrics..................................................................................80 Appendix F: Scoring rubrics for Quality of Concept map .................................................83 Appendix G: TAM Questionnaire.........................................................................................84 Appendix H: Interview Question...........................................................................................87
參考文獻	Ahmed, B. S. (2020). The Effect of Using Concept Mapping on Developing EFL Students′ Writing Skills. Journal of Garmian University, 7(1), 222-256. Al-Shaer, I. M. R. (2014). Employing Concept Mapping as a Pre-writing Strategy to Help EFL Learners Better Generate Argumentative Compositions. The International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 8, 10. Astiantih, S., & Akfan, S. (2023). Utilizing Concept Maps to Enhance Students’ Writing Skills. Journal of Languages and Language Teaching, 11, 433. https://doi.org/10.33394/jollt.v11i3.7993 Baskara, F. R. (2023). Integrating ChatGPT into EFL writing instruction: Benefits and challenges. International Journal of Education and Learning. Belet Boyacı, Ş. D., & Güner, M. (2018). The Impact of Authentic Material Use on Development of the Reading Comprehension, Writing Skills and Motivation in Language Course. International Journal of Instruction, 11(2), 351-368. https://doi.org/10.12973/iji.2018.11224a Birjandi, P., & Derakhshan, A. (2010). Teachers’ Perceptions of the Present and Optimum Status of the In-Service EFL Teacher Preparation Programs. English Language Teaching, 3. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v3n4p47 Brown, T., Mann, B., Ryder, N., Subbiah, M., Kaplan, J. D., Dhariwal, P., Neelakantan, A., Shyam, P., Sastry, G., & Askell, A. (2020). Language models are few-shot learners. Advances in neural information processing systems, 33, 1877-1901. Celce-Murcia, M., Larsen-Freeman, D., & Williams, H. A. (1999). The Grammar Book: An ESL/EFL Teacher′s Course. Heinle & Heinle. https://books.google.com.tw/books?id=ovTtAAAAMAAJ Chagas, L. (2023). Chat GPT in Foreign Language Learning: A Short Experiment With Tourism Students. International Research in Higher Education. Chamba, M., Reinoso, M., & Rengifo, E. (2019). Authentic Materials to Foster Writing Skills in College EFL Learners. English Language Teaching, 12(6). https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v12n6p112 Chan, C., Cheng, J., Wang, W., Jiang, Y., Fang, T., Liu, X., & Song, Y. (2023). ChatGPT Evaluation on Sentence Level Relations: A Focus on Temporal, Causal, and Discourse Relations. Chang, K., Sung, Y.-T., & Chen, I.-D. (2002). The Effect of Concept Mapping to Enhance Text Comprehension and Summarization. The Journal of Experimental Education, 71, 5-23. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220970209602054 65 Chen, M.-R. A., & Hwang, G.-j. (2020). Effects of a concept mapping-based flipped learning approach on EFL students′ English speaking performance, critical thinking awareness and speaking anxiety. Br. J. Educ. Technol., 51, 817-834. Coutinho, E. (2014). Concept Maps: Evaluation Models for Educators. Journal of Business and Management Sciences, 2(5), 111-117. https://doi.org/10.12691/jbms-2-5-4 Cronin, P. J., Dekhers, J., & Dunn, J. G. (1982). A procedure for using and evaluating concept maps. Research in Science Education, 12(1), 17-24. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02357009 Davis, F., & Davis, F. (1989). Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology. MIS Quarterly, 13, 319. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008 Devunuri, S., Qiam, S., & Lehe, L. (2023). ChatGPT for GTFS: From Words to Information. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2308.02618 ETS. (2019). TOEFL iBT® Independent Writing Rubrics. https://www.ets.org/pdfs/toefl/toefl- ibt-writing-rubrics.pdf Faraj, A. K. A. (2015). Scaffolding EFL Students′ Writing through the Writing Process Approach. Journal of Education and Practice, 6, 131-141. Galloway, N., & Rose, H. (2015). Introducing Global Englishes. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315734347 Herrington, J., & Oliver, R. (2000). An instructional design framework for authentic environments. Educational Technology Research and Development, 48, 23-48. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02319856 Hsing, I. L. (2023). Explicit Interactive Writing Instruction: Scaffolding for EFL Students. The International Journal of Humanities & Social Studies. https://doi.org/10.24940/theijhss/2023/v11/i7/HS2307-036 Hunt, K. W. (1965). Grammatical structures written at three grade levels. Hussain, H. (2019). USING CONCEPT MAPS IN ENGLISH TEACHING. International Journal of English Learning & Teaching Skills. Hwang, W.-Y., & Nurtantyana, R. (2022). X-Education: Education of All Things with AI and Edge Computing—One Case Study for EFL Learning. Sustainability, 14(19), 12533. https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/19/12533 Hyland, K. (2003). Second Language Writing. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511667251 Kim, Y.-S. G., Otaiba, S. A., Sidler, J. F., & Gruelich, L. (2013). Language, literacy, attentional behaviors, and instructional quality predictors of written composition for first graders. Early childhood research quarterly, 28 3, 461-469. Kyle, K. (2016). Measuring Syntactic Development in L2 Writing: Fine Grained Indices of Syntactic Complexity and Usage-Based Indices of Syntactic Sophistication. 66 Dissertation, Georgia State University. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.57709/8501051 Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33 1, 159-174. Liu, P.-L. (2011). A study on the use of computerized concept mapping to assist ESL learners’ writing. Computers & Education, 57(4), 2548-2558. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.03.015 Lu, X. (2010). Automatic analysis of syntactic complexity in second language writing. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 15, 474-496. Ma, Z., & Shi, L. (2016). Application of Visual Interactive Concept Map in College English Writing Teaching. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET), 11(11). https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v11i11.6248 Maristy, H., & Margana. (2020). Contextualization to Enhance Students’ Writing Ability. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.200804.038 McCarthy, P. M., & Jarvis, S. (2010). MTLD, vocd-D, and HD-D: a validation study of sophisticated approaches to lexical diversity assessment. Behav Res Methods, 42(2), 381-392. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.42.2.381 McNamara, D. S., Crossley, S. A., & McCarthy, P. M. (2010). Linguistic Features of Writing Quality. Written Communication, 27, 57 - 86. Nguyen, T.-H., Hwang, W.-Y., Pham, X.-L., & Pham, T. (2020). Self-experienced storytelling in an authentic context to facilitate EFL writing. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 35(4), 666-695. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2020.1744665 Novak, J. D., & Gowin, D. B. (1984). Learning How to Learn. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/DOI: 10.1017/CBO9781139173469 O′Donnell, A., Dansereau, D., & Hall, R. (2002). Knowledge Maps as Scaffolds for Cognitive Processing. Educational Psychology Review, 14, 71-86. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013132527007 Olmo, A., Sreedharan, S., & Kambhampati, S. (2021). GPT3-to-plan: Extracting plans from text using GPT-3. Oshima, A., & Hogue, A. (2006). Writing academic english. Pearson. Redmond, S. M., Ash, A. C., Christopulos, T. T., & Pfaff, T. (2019). Diagnostic Accuracy of Sentence Recall and Past Tense Measures for Identifying Children′s Language Impairments. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research : JSLHR, 62, 2438 - 2454. Riazi, A. M., & Rezaii, M. (2011). Teacher- and peer-scaffolding behaviors : effects on EFL students′ writing improvement. Salehpour, S., HadidiTamjid, N., & Behnam, B. (2014). Scaffolding Advanced Writing through Writing Frames. Applied Linguistics, 7, 146-169. 67 Satriani, I., Emilia, E., & Gunawan, H. (2012). CONTEXTUAL TEACHING AND LEARNING APPROACH TO TEACHING WRITING. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 2, 10-22. Shakoori, M., Kadivar, P., & Sarami, R. (2017). The Effect of Concept Mapping Strategy as a Graphical Tool in Writing Achievement among EFL Learners. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 7(5), 357-360. https://doi.org/10.18178/ijiet.2017.7.5.894 Sousa, H., Guimaraes, N., Jorge, A., & Campos, R. (2023, 26-29 October 2023). GPT Struct Me: Probing GPT Models on Narrative Entity Extraction. 2023 IEEE International Conference on Web Intelligence and Intelligent Agent Technology (WI-IAT), Tomlinson, B. (2012). Materials development for language learning and teaching. Language Teaching, 45(2), 143-179. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0261444811000528 Weigle, S. C. (2002). Assessing Writing. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511732997 Windi, W., & Suryaman, M. (2022). Improving Students’ Ability in Writing Descriptive Text Through Contextual Teaching and Learning Approach. Jurnal Ilmiah Profesi Pendidikan. Zenker, F. (2021). Investigating minimum text lengths for lexical diversity indices. Assessing Writing, 47, 100505.
指導教授	黃武元魯里歐(Wu-Yuin Hwang Rio Nurtantyana)	審核日期	2024-7-26
推文	facebook plurk twitter funp google live udn HD myshare reddit netvibes friend youpush delicious baidu
網路書籤	Google bookmarks del.icio.us hemidemi myshare

博碩士論文 111524007 詳細資訊