 |
|
以作者查詢圖書館館藏 、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士 、以作者查詢全國書目 、勘誤回報 、線上人數：21 、訪客IP：18.97.14.86
姓名 蔡宜儒(Yi-Ju Tsai) 查詢紙本館藏 畢業系所 人工智慧國際碩士學位學程 論文名稱 探討數位遊戲式學習結合人工智慧技術系統對雅思閱讀學習的學 習成效、遊戲成效、學習動機、學習觀感之影響
(The effects of Artificial Intelligence Assisted Digital Game-based Learning on Learning Performance, In-game Performance, Learning Motivation, and Perceptions of IELTS Reading)相關論文 檔案 [Endnote RIS 格式]
[相關文章]
[文章引用]
[完整記錄]
[館藏目錄]
至系統瀏覽論文 ( 永不開放)
摘要(中) 越來越多非英語系國家的大學推行將英文門檻納入學校的畢業門檻,不僅在中小學以及高等教育中更加著重英語教學,甚至出國念書與交換也日漸普及,為了提高出國念書與交換的機會,聽說讀寫能力缺一不可,因為聽、說、讀、寫是雅思(IELTS)和托福(TOEFL)這兩種英語檢定測試的四大方向,之前歐洲國家學校多採認雅思;美國學校多採認托福,現今歐美國家大部分學校都採認雅思成績為出國留學與交換的英語門檻,雅思對準備出國留學學生的重要性日漸升高,但一味學習的過程可能會感到枯燥乏味,缺乏互動性從而造成學生缺乏學習動機,甚至導致學習效果日漸下滑,因此不少研究將英語學習及數位遊戲式學習(DGBL)結合設計成系統,以提升學習成效及學習動機。在數位遊戲式學習環境中,引入故事情境、任務挑戰、學習策略與排
行榜等遊戲元素,以提升學習趣味性與參與度,激發學習者的學習動機,讓學習者有持續使用系統的動力,然而近期關於數位遊戲式學習的研究結果顯示,數位遊戲式學習仍存在個別化不足與學習歷程追蹤困難等問題,過去研究顯示,每位學習者皆具有個體差異,個性化回饋可能成為學習歷程中重要的成敗因素,過去研究顯示,人工智慧(AI)技術能解決學習者無法獲得即時、精準的回饋與引導等問題,生成式人工智慧(GenAI)模型,能利用過去積累的大量資料,以引導式的訓練生成方式,將其運用於問題的解析,達成強化學習行為分析、內容推薦與動態回饋功能等目標,從而提升學習適應性與成效。
本研究設計不同學習系統版本,包含傳統模擬、傳統模擬模式與 DGBL 結合、AI與 DGBL 結合模式,分別為傳統解析模式模擬系統、數位遊戲式學習的傳統解析模式、數位遊戲式學習的智能解析模式。研究對象共 77 位學習者,平均分配至三組不同學習策略的系統版本。本研究旨在不同學習策略的雅思閱讀學習環境中,探討不同學習策略對雅思閱讀學習的學習成效、遊戲成效、學習動機、學習觀感之影響及相關性,比較三種系統對高中生英語學習成效與學習動機之影響。結果顯示,AI 與 DGBL 整合系統在學習表現與動機提升方面皆顯著優於其他兩組,顯示智慧化遊戲式學習具高度教育潛力與發展價值。
本研究結果顯示,在不同學習策略的雅思閱讀學習環境下對學習者的影響。本研究成果分為以下三點:(1) 數位遊戲式學習的智能解析模式不僅雅思閱讀學習成效有良好的表現,在學習動機及學習觀感上也表現最好。(2)數位遊戲式學習的傳統解析模式有較好的英語學習成效及遊戲成效外,在學習動機及學習觀感上也表現較好。 (3)相關性的部分,三組不同學習策略的雅思閱讀學習成效與遊戲成效之間皆有較多的顯著相關,三組的學習動機與學習觀感皆有顯著相關,本研究更進一步的結果,發現三組不同學習策略下的遊戲成效、學習動機和學習觀感之間的相關性也有所不同。本研究的研究成果提供不同學習策略對學習者其影響,這些結果有助於未來研究及教學使用,提供未來的研究者一個以不同學習策略為主的學習系統的設計架構。摘要(英) More and more universities in non-English-speaking countries are incorporating English as a graduation threshold. Not only is English teaching emphasized in primary and secondary
schools as well as in higher education, but it is also becoming more and more popular to study and exchange abroad. In order to increase the chances of studying and exchanging abroad, the ability to speak, read and write is indispensable because listening, speaking, reading and writing are the four major directions of the English language tests of the International English Language
Testing System (IELTS) and the Test of English as a Foreign Language (TOEFL). The importance of IELTS to students preparing to study abroad is increasing, but the learning
process may be boring and lack of interactivity, resulting in a lack of motivation for students to learn, and even leading to a gradual decline in the learning effect. Therefore, many studies have been conducted to design systems that combine English language learning and digital game-based learning (DGBL) to enhance learning performance and motivation. In a DGBL environment, game elements such as story situations, task challenges, reward and punishment
mechanisms, and leaderboards are introduced to enhance the interest and participation in learning, stimulate learners′ motivation, and motivate learners to continue using the system. However, recent studies on DGBL have shown that there are still problems with the lack of individualization and difficulties in tracking the learning process. Past research has shown that each learner has individual differences, and personalized feedback can become an important success factor in the learning process. Past research has shown that artificial intelligence (AI)
technology can solve the problem of learners not being able to get immediate and accurate feedback and guidance, and generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) models can utilize the past to provide a more accurate feedback and guidance. GenAI models can make use of a large amount of data accumulated in the past to generate guided training and apply it to problem solving to achieve the goals of strengthening learning behavior analysis, content
recommendation, and dynamic feedback functions, thereby enhancing learning adaptability and effectiveness.
In this study, different versions of learning system are designed, including traditionalsimulation, traditional simulation mode combined with DGBL, and AI combined with DGBL, which are the Traditional Analytical Simulation Mode System (TASMS), the Digital Game-Based Learning with Traditional Analytical Mode System (DGBL-TAMS), and the Digital Game-Based Learning with Intelligent Analytical Mode System (DGBL-IAMS). A total of 77 learners were equally assigned to the three versions of the system with different learning system modes. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects and correlations of different
learning system modes on learning effectiveness, In-game performance, learning motivation, and learning perception of IELTS reading learning in an IELTS reading learning environment with different learning system modes, and to compare the effects of the three systems on the learning performance and learning motivation of senior high school students in English language learning. The results show that the AI and DGBL integration systems significantly
outperform the other two groups in terms of learning performance and motivation, indicating that intelligent game-based learning has high educational potential and developmental value.
The results of this study show the effects of different learning system modes on learners in the IELTS reading learning environment. The results of this study are categorized into the following three Score: (1) The intelligent parsing model of digital game-based learning not only has good performance in IELTS reading learning outcomes, but also has the best performance in learning dynamics and learning perception. (2) The traditional parsing model of digital game-based learning not only has better English learning outcomes and game outcomes, but also performs better in learning dynamics and learning perception. (3) In the correlation part, there were more significant correlations between the IELTS reading learning outcomes and game outcomes in the three groups with different learning system modes, and there were significant
correlations between learning motivation and learning perception in the three groups. Further results of this study found that the correlations between game outcomes, learning motivation and learning perception in the three groups with different learning system modes were also
different. The results of this study provide information about the effects of different learning system modes on learners, which will be useful for future research and teaching, and provide future researchers with a framework for designing learning systems based on different learning
system modes.關鍵字(中) ★ 數位遊戲式學習
★ 人工智慧語言學習
★ 生成式人工智慧模型
★ 雅思閱讀學習成效
★ 遊戲成效
★ 學習動機
★ 學習觀感關鍵字(英) ★ Digital Game-based Learning
★ Artificial Intelligence Language Learning
★ Generative Artificial Intelligence Modeling
★ In-game performance
★ Learning Motivation
★ Learning Perception論文目次 中文摘要.....................................................................................................................................i
ABSTRACT ..............................................................................................................................iii
ACKNOWLEDGMENT ............................................................................................................v
TABLE OF CONTENTS ..........................................................................................................vi
LIST OF TABLES ....................................................................................................................ix
LIST OF FIGURES..................................................................................................................xii
CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION ...............................................................................................1
1.1 Background and Motivation .......................................................................................1
1.2 Objectives of the Study ..............................................................................................3
1.3 Research Questions ....................................................................................................4
1.4 Definitions of Key Terms...........................................................................................4
1.5 Scope and Limitations of the Study............................................................................6
CHAPTER II LITERATURE REVIEW....................................................................................7
2.1 IELTS Reading Learning............................................................................................7
2.2 Digital Game-Based Learning (DGBL) .....................................................................8
2.3 Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Language Learning .....................................................9
2.4 Integrating DGBL and AI in Language Learning ....................................................10
2.5 Summary of Literature Review ................................................................................11
CHAPTER III SYSTEM DESIGN AND IMPLEMENTATION ............................................13
3.1 System Introduction..................................................................................................13
3.1.1 Learning Content .....................................................................................................14
3.2 System Design Principles.........................................................................................16
3.2.1 Learning Strategies Design Principles.....................................................................17
3.2.2 Gamification Mechanics Design Principles ............................................................18
3.2.3 Intelligence Mode Design Principles.......................................................................20
3.3 System Implementation ............................................................................................22
3.3.1 Development Tools .................................................................................................23
3.3.2 System Architecture ................................................................................................24
3.3.3 Traditional Analytical Simulation Mode System (TASMS)...................................24
3.3.4 Digital Game-Based Learning with Traditional Analytical Mode System (DGBL-
TAMS)..............................................................................................................................39
3.3.5 Digital Game-Based Learning with Intelligent Analytical Mode System (DGBL-
IAMS)...............................................................................................................................54
3.4 Diverse Support Tools..............................................................................................74
3.5 System Operation Flow ............................................................................................78
vii
CHAPTER IV RESEARCH METHODOLOGY.....................................................................79
4.1 Research Design .......................................................................................................79
4.2 Participants...............................................................................................................81
4.3 Research Instruments................................................................................................83
4.3.1 Pre-Test and Post-Test of Learning Effectiveness ..................................................83
4.3.2 Learning Motivation Scale ......................................................................................84
4.3.3 Learning Perception Scale .......................................................................................86
4.3.4 System Log Files.....................................................................................................87
4.4 Experimental Procedure ...........................................................................................89
4.5 Data Collection and Analysis...................................................................................90
CHAPTER V RESULT & DISCUSSION ...............................................................................92
5.1 Effects of Different learning system modes on Learners′ IELTS Reading Learning
Effectiveness, In-game performance, Learning Motivation and Perceptions ......................92
5.1.1 Effects of Different learning system modes on Learners′ IELTS Learning
Effectiveness.....................................................................................................................92
5.1.2 Effects of Different learning system modes on Learners′ In-game performance ....95
5.1.3 Effects of Different learning system modes on Learners′ Motivation...................113
5.1.4 The Effect of Different learning system modes on Learners′ Perceptions of
Learning..........................................................................................................................116
5.2 Correlation between different learning system modes on learners′ IELTS reading
learning effectiveness, In-game performance, learning motivation and perception of
learning ...............................................................................................................................118
5.2.1 The Effect of Different learning system modes on Learners′ Perceptions of
Learning..........................................................................................................................118
5.2.2 The Effect of Different learning system modes on Learners′ Perceptions of
Learning..........................................................................................................................126
5.2.3 Correlation Analysis between Perceptions of Learning and In-game performance
........................................................................................................................................133
5.2.4 Summary of correlation between different learning system modes on learners′
IELTS reading learning effectiveness, In-game performance, learning motivation and
perception of learning.....................................................................................................138
5.3 General Discussion.................................................................................................144
5.3.1 The Effect of Different learning system modes on Learners′ Perceptions of
Learning..........................................................................................................................144
5.3.2 Effects of Different learning system modes on Learners′ In-game performance ..144
5.3.3 Effects of Different learning system modes on Learners′ In-game performance ..145
5.3.4 Correlation between IELTS Reading Learning Effectiveness, In-game
performance, Learning Motivation and Learning Perceptions of Learners under Different
learning system modes ...................................................................................................146
5.3.5 Effects of Different learning system modes on Learners′ Perceptions of Learning
........................................................................................................................................147
viii
CHAPTER VI CONCLUSIONS & SUGGESTIONS ...........................................................148
6.1 Conclusions ............................................................................................................148
6.1.1 Impact of Different learning system modes on Learners ......................................148
6.1.2 Impact of Different learning system modes on Learners ......................................149
6.2 Contributions of the Study......................................................................................151
6.3 Future Work............................................................................................................152
6.3.1 Improvement of Research Design .........................................................................152
6.3.2 System Development Recommendations..............................................................153
REFERENCES.......................................................................................................................154
Appendix 1. Pre-test questions...............................................................................................162
Appendix 2. Post-test questions .............................................................................................167
Appendix 3. Questionnaires of Learning Motivation.............................................................172
Appendix 4. Questionnaires of Learning Perception .............................................................174參考文獻 Alderson, J. C. (2000). Assessing reading. Cambridge University Press.
Almamoori, O. J. (2024). Investigating the impact of leaderboards, badges, and eBucks on high school English language learners’ cognitive engagement, self-efficacy and intrinsic motivation toward reading in English (Publication No. 45) [Doctoral dissertation, University of Kentucky]. Theses andDissertations--Curriculum and Instruction. https://doi.org/10.13023/etd.2024.53
Alsadoon, E., Alkhawajah, A., & Bin Suhaim, A. (2022). Effects of a gamified learning environment on students’ achievement, motivations, and satisfaction. Heliyon, 8(2), e10249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e10249
Annamalai, N. (2024). Investigating the use of AI tools in English language learning: A phenomenological approach. Contemporary Engineering and Technology, 15(1), 110. https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARPED/v11-i4/15634
Asad, M. M., Younas, S., & Sherwani, F. (2024). Enhancing inquiry-based pedagogical practices in digital game-based learning with artificial intelligence-driven natural language processing: Challenges and implementation strategies from a global perspective. In Digital transformation in higher education, Part A: Best practices and challenges (Chap. 4). Emerald Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1108/978-183549-480-620241004
Baek, Y., & Whitton, N. (Eds.). (2013). Cases on digital game based learning: Methods, models, and strategies. IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-1939-5
Bjork, E. L., & Bjork, R. A. (2011). Making things hard on yourself, but in a good way: Creating desirable difficulties to enhance learning. In M. A. Gernsbacher, R. W. Pew, L. M. Hough, & J. R. Pomerantz (Eds.), Psychology and the real world: Essays illustrating fundamental contributions to society (pp. 56–64). Worth Publishers.
Bouzaiane, B. A., & Youzbashi, A. (2024). The role of digital-game based language learning in EFL vocabulary learning and retention: A case study at a higher educational institute in Oman. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 15(5), 1660–1669. https://doi.org/10.17507/jltr.1505.27
Caponetto, I., Earp, J., & Ott, M. (2014). Gamification and education: A literature review. In European Conference on Games Based Learning (Vol. 1, pp. 50–57).
Chen, C. (2020). The role of vocabulary breadth and depth in IELTS academic reading tests. Reading in a Foreign Language, 32(1), 1–27.
Chen, C.-H., & Chang, C.-L. (2024). Effectiveness of AI-assisted game-based learning on science learning outcomes, intrinsic motivation, cognitive load, and learning behavior. Education and Information Technologies, 29, 18621–18642. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12553-x
Coney, N., & Isbell, D. (2024). Where the lines are drawn: English language proficiency tests in international student admissions at U.S. research intensive universities [Preprint]. OSF Preprints. https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/tyn92
DaCosta, B. (2025). Dynamic narratives: Exploring language acquisition through AI-driven text-based games. In R. Jake Cohen (Ed.), Proceedings of Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 611–616). Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).
https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/225574/
Daffern, T., & Mackenzie, N. (2020). Theoretical perspectives and strategies for teaching and learning writing. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003117834-2
Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008 MIS
Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340.
Daweli, T., & Mahyoub, R. A. (2024). Exploring EFL learners′ perspectives on using AI tools and their impacts in reading instruction: An exploratory study. Arab World English Journal, 160–171.
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227–268. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01
Deterding, S., Dixon, D., Khaled, R., & Nacke, L. (2011). From game design elements to gamefulness: Defining “gamification.” In Proceedings of the 15th International Academic MindTrek Conference: Envisioning Future Media Environments (pp. 915). https://doi.org/10.1145/2181037.2181040
Dichev, C., & Dicheva, D. (2017). Gamifying education: What is known, what is believed and what remains uncertain: A critical review. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 14, Article 9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-0170042-5
Dicheva, D., Dichev, C., Agre, G., & Angelova, G. (2015). Gamification in education: A systematic mapping study. Educational Technology & Society, 18(3), 75–88. https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2307/23612863
Devlin, J., Chang, M. W., Lee, K., & Toutanova, K. (2019). BERT: Pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding. In Proceedings of the 2019 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies (Vol. 1, pp. 4171–4186). https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1810.04805
Elliot, A. J., & Hulleman, C. S. (2017). Achievement goals. In A. J. Elliot, C. S. Dweck, & D. S. Yeager (Eds.), Handbook of competence and motivation: Theory and application. The Guilford Press.
Espiritu, J. G. M., & Buaraphan, K. (2023). Innovative approach to teaching EFL through a game-based speaking mobile application. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 14(10), 1421–1432. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs3459646/v1
Fadzil, N. I. M., & Sulaiman, N. A. (2022). Online game-based learning enhance ESL learners’ vocabulary learning: Benefits and challenges. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 11(4), 833–843. https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARPED/v11-i4/15634
Farhan, H. (2025). The impact of AI-powered writing tools on students′ writing
performance: A content analysis and future prospects. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.22893.09445
Fitria, T. N. (2024). Teaching IELTS reading skills: What students should know and prepare when taking the test. Journal of Language and Literature, 94–111.
https://doi.org/10.36841/pioneer.v16i1.3991
Gee, J. P. (2003). What video games have to teach us about learning and literacy. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 1(1), 20–20.
https://doi.org/10.1145/950566.950595
Graddol, D. (2006). English Next: Why global English may mean the end of “English as a
foreign language”. British Council.
Grabe, W., & Stoller, F. L. (2011). Teaching and researching reading (2nd ed.). Routledge.
Green, A. (2007). IELTS washback in context: Preparation for academic writing in higher
education. Cambridge University Press.
Grenander, M., Belfer, R., Kochmar, E., Serban, I. V., St-Hilaire, F., & Cheung, J. C. K.
(2021). Deep discourse analysis for generating personalized feedback in intelligent
tutor systems. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence,
35(17), 15534–15544. https://doi.org/10.1609/aaai.v35i17.17829
Gunel, E., & Top, E. (2022). Effects of educational video games on English vocabulary
learning and retention. International Journal of Technology in Education (IJTE),
5(2), 333- 350. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijte.225
Gupta, P., & Goyal, P. (2022). Is game-based pedagogy just a fad? A self-determination
theory approach to gamification in higher education. International Journal of
Educational Management, 36(3), 341–356. http://doi.org/10.1108/IJEM-04-2021
0126
Habgood, M. P. J., & Ainsworth, S. E. (2011). Motivating children to learn effectively:
Exploring the value of intrinsic integration in educational games. Journal of the
Learning Sciences, 20(2), 169–206. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2010.508029
Hamari, J., Koivisto, J., & Sarsa, H. (2014). Does gamification work? – A literature review
of empirical studies on gamification. In Proceedings of the 47th Hawaii
157
International
Conference
on
System
Sciences
(pp.
3025–3034).
https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2014.377
Hamari, J., Shernoff, D. J., Rowe, E., Coller, B., Asbell-Clarke, J., & Edwards, T. (2016).
Challenging games help students learn: An empirical study on engagement, flow
and immersion in game-based learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 54, 170
179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.07.045
Hanus, M. D., & Fox, J. (2015). Assessing the effects of gamification in the classroom: A
longitudinal study on intrinsic motivation, social comparison, satisfaction, effort,
and
academic performance. Computers & Education, 80, 152–161.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.08.019
Hochreiter, S., & Schmidhuber, J. (1997). Long short-term memory. Neural Computation,
9(8), 1735–1780. https://doi.org/10.1162/neco.1997.9.8.1735
Huang, A. (2023). The effect of digital game-based learning on motivation for EFL. Journal
of
Education
Humanities
and
https://doi.org/10.54097/ehss.v23i.12726
Social
Sciences,
23,
18–22.
Huang, W. H.-Y., & Soman, D. (2013). A practitioner′s guide to gamification of education.
University of Toronto, Rotman School of Management.
Huang, Y.-M., Silitonga, L. M., Murti, A. T., & Wu, T.-T. (2022). Learner engagement in
a business simulation game: Impact on higher-order thinking skills. Journal of
Educational Computing Research, 61(9), Article 07356331221106918.
https://doi.org/10.1177/07356331221106918
Hwang, G. J., & Wu, P. H. (2012). Advancements and trends in digital game-based learning
research: A review of publications in selected journals from 2001 to 2010. British
Journal of Educational Technology, 43(1), E6–E10. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467
8535.2011.01242.x
Jacob, S., Tate, T., & Warschauer, M. (2023). Emergent AI-assisted discourse: Case study
of a second language writer authoring with ChatGPT. Journal of China Computer
Assisted
Language
Learning,
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2310.10903
5(1),
1–22.
158
Jia, W., Zhang, L., Pack, A. C., Guan, Y., & Zou, B. (2024). Digital game-based learning’s
effectiveness on EFL learners’ receptive and productive vocabulary knowledge.
Language Learning & Technology, 28(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.125/73554
Jenkins, J. (2014). World Englishes: A resource book for students (3rd ed.). Routledge.
https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315761596
Kholili, A. (2023). Investigating factors underlying boredom in learning English: The case
of
secondary
school.
Al
Lisan:
https://doi.org/10.30603/al.v8i1.3185
Jurnal
Bahasa,
8(1),
13–32.
Knoch, U., & Macqueen, S. (2020). Assessing English for professional purposes. Routledge.
Lampropoulos, G. (2023). Investigating the effects of badges and leaderboards on
secondary
school
students′
English
https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.18180.74881
language
learning.
Lee, J., & Hammer, J. (2011). Gamification in education: What, how, why bother?
Academic Exchange Quarterly, 15(2), 1–5.
Lei, Y., & Guo, L. (2023). Combine DGBL with AI system: A technical guidance to reduce
teacher’s burden in digital game-based learning. In P. Felicia (Ed.), Proceedings of
the 17th European Conference on Games-Based Learning (ECGBL 2023) (Vol. 17,
No.
1,
pp.
826–831).
Academic
https://doi.org/10.34190/ecgbl.17.1.1892
Conferences
International.
Li, C., Fryer, L. K., & Shum, A. (2024). Investigating the effects of badges and leaderboards
on
secondary
school
students′
https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.18180.74881
English
language
learning.
Lin, C. (2022). Applying digital games in English vocabulary teaching: A case study.
International Journal of TESOL Studies, 4(3), 71–80.
Liu, M., & Li, H. (2024). The effect of gamification on EFL learners’ vocabulary acquisition.
Journal of Language Learning and Teaching, 12(2), 45–56.
159
O′Loughlin, K. (2011). The use of IELTS for university selection in Australia: A case study.
In L. Taylor (Ed.), Examining speaking: Research and practice in assessing second
language speaking (pp. 147–165). Cambridge University Press.
Pavlopoulou, M., & Alifierakis, S. (2025). GenAI powered digital game based learning and
GlossaplAI: Revolutionizing language education [Poster]. Greeks in AI 2025. CC
BY 4.0.
Pintrich, P. R., Smith, D. A. F., Duncan, T., & Mckeachie, W. J. (1991). A manual for the
use of the motivated strategies for learning questionnaire (MSLQ). National Center
for Research to Improve Postsecondary Teaching and Learning.
Roll, I., Aleven, V., McLaren, B. M., & Koedinger, K. R. (2011). Improving students’ help
seeking skills using metacognitive feedback in an intelligent tutoring system.
Learning
and
Instruction,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2010.07.004
21(2),
267–280.
Romero, M., Lameras, P., & Arnab, S. (2024). Affordances for AI enhanced digital game
based learning. In A. Urmeneta & M. Romero (Eds.), Creative applications of
artificial intelligence in education (1st ed., pp. 117–128). Palgrave Macmillan.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-55272-4_9
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2017). Self-determination theory: Basic psychological needs in
motivation, development, and wellness. Guilford Publications.
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic
motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68
78. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68
Sailer, M., Hense, J. U., Mayr, S., & Mandl, H. (2017). How gamification motivates: An
experimental study of the effects of specific game design elements on psychological
need
satisfaction.
Computers
in
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.12.033
Human Behavior, 69, 371–380.
Salmanova, S. (2025). Gamification and AI in language learning – A new era of digital
education. Acta Globalis Humanitatis et Linguarum, 2(1), 262–269.
https://doi.org/10.69760/aghel.02500134
160
Shute, V. J. (2008). Focus on formative feedback. Review of Educational Research, 78(1),
153–189. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654307313795
Shute, V. J., & Ventura, M. (2013). Stealth assessment: Measuring and supporting learning
in video games. MIT Press.
Sung, Y.-T., Chang, K.-E., & Liu, T.-C. (2017). The effects of integrating mobile devices
with teaching and learning on students’ learning performance: A meta-analysis and
research synthesis. Computers & Education, 94, 252-275.
Van Eck, R. (2006). Digital game-based learning: It’s not just the digital natives who are
restless. EDUCAUSE Review, 41(2), 16-30.
Wang, Y. L., Huang, F. W., & Zhang, L. J. (2025). Modelling the interaction between
perceived teachers’ enthusiasm and EFL learners’ flow experience: The mediation
role of learning emotions. Journal of Foreign Languages Bimonthly, 47(3), 59–68.
Weir, C. J., Hawkey, R., Green, A., & Devi, S. (2009). The relationship between the
academic reading construct as measured by IELTS and the reading experiences of
students in their first year of study in the UK. IELTS Research Reports, 9, 1–84.
IELTS Australia and British Council.指導教授 楊接期(Jie-Chi Yang) 審核日期 2025-7-31 推文 plurk
funp
live
udn
HD
myshare
netvibes
friend
youpush
delicious
baidu
網路書籤 Google bookmarks
del.icio.us
hemidemi
facebook
twitter
google
reddit