參考文獻 |
REFERENCES
Adaval, R. (2003). How Good Gets Better and Bad Gets Worse: Understanding the Impact of Affect on Evaluations of Known Brands. Journal of Consumer Research, 30, 352-367.
Arkes, H. R., Herren, L. T., and Isen, A. M. (1988). The role of potential loss in the influence of affect on decision making. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 47, 181–193.
Balint, M. (1968). The Basic Fault: Therapeutic Aspects of Regression, London: Tavistock Publications.
Benartzi, S. and Thaler, R.H. (2002). How Much Is Investor Autonomy Worth? Journal of Finance, 57, 1593-1616.
Berkowitz, L., Jaffee, S., Jo, E., and Troccoli, B. T. (2000). On the Correction of Feeling Induced Judgmental Biases, In J.P. Forgas (Ed.), Feeling and thinking: the role of affect in social cognition(pp.131-152). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Berlyne, D. E. (1960). Conflict, arousal, and curiosity, New York: McGraw Hill.
Bettman, J. R., Luce, M. F., and Payne, J. W. (1998). Constructive consumer choice process. Journal of Consumer Research, 25, 187–217.
Blattberg, R. C., and Neslin, S. A. (1990), Sales Promotion: Concept, methods, and strategies, Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.
Blattberg, R. C., and Wisniewski, K. J. (1989). Price-Induced patterns of competition, Marketing Science. 8, 291–309.
Bless, H. (2000). Mood and the use of general knowledge structures. In L.L. Martin & G.L.Clore, eds., Theories of mood and cognition: A user’s guidebook (pp. 9–26). Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Bower, G. H. (1981). Mood and memory. American Psychologist, 36, 129-148.
Chernev, A. (2004). Extremeness aversion and attribute balance effects in choice, Journal of Consumer Research, 31, 249-263.
Clore, G. L., Schwarz, N., and Conway, M. (1994). Affective causes and consequences of social information processing. In R.S. Wyer & T.K. Srull (Eds.), Handbook of social cognition (2nd ed., Vol. 1, pp.323-419). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Corbin, R. M. (1980). The secretary problem as a model of choice. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 21, 1-29.
Dhar, R., and Simonson, I. (2003). The effect of forced choice on choice. Journal of Marketing Research, 40, 146-160.
Dhar, R., Nowlis, S. M., and Sherman, S.J. (2000). Trying hard or hardly trying: An analysis of context effects in choice. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 9, 189–200.
Estrada, C. A. and. Isen, A. M. (1997). Positive affect facilitates integration of information and decrease anchoring in reasoning among physicians. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 72(1): 117-135.
Farquhar, P. H., and Rao, V. R. (1976). A balance model for evaluating subsets of multi-attribute items. Management Science, 5, 528-539.
Festinger, L. (1964). Conflict, decision and dissonance, Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press.
Fiedler, K. (1991). On the task, the measures and the mood in research on affect and social cognition. In J.P. Forgas (Ed.), Emotion and social judgments (pp.83-104). Elmsford, NY: Pergamon Press.
Fiedler, K. (2000). Towards an integrative account of affect and cognition phenomena using the BIAS computer algorithm. In J.P. Forgas (Ed.), Feelings and thinking: The role of affect in social cogition. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Fiske, D. W., and Madi, S. R. (1961). Functions of Varied Experience, Homewood, IL: Dorsey.
Forgas, J. P., and Ciarrochi, J. (2001). On being happy and possessive: The interactive effects of mood and personality on consumer judgments. Psychology & Marketing, 18, 239-260.
Forgas, J.P. (1995). Mood and judgment: The affect infusion model (AIM). Psychological Bulletin, 117 (1), 39-66.
Forgas, J.P. (1998). Happy and mistaken? Mood effects on the fundamental attribution error. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 318-331.
Forgas, J.P. (1998a). On feeling good and getting your way: Mood effects on negotiation strategies and outcomes, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 565-577.
Forgas, J.P. (Ed.) (2000). Feeling and thinking: The role of affect in social cognition. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Heath, T. B., and Catterjee, S. (1995). Asymmetric decoy effects on lower-quality versus higher-quality brands: Meta-analytic and experimental evidence. Journal of Consumer Research, 22, 268–84.
Hockey, G. R. J., Maule, A. J., Clough, P. J., and Bdzola, L. (2000), Effects of negative mood states on risk in everyday decision making. Cognition and Emotion, 14, 823–55.
Howard, J. A., and Sheth, J. N. (1969). The Theory of Buyer Behavior, New York: Wiley.
Huber, J., and Puto, C. (1983). Market boundaries and product choice: Illustrating attraction and substitution effect, Journal of Consumer Research, 10, 31–44.
Huber, J., and Reibstein, K. (1978). The relationship between attitude measures and choice frequency, In Attitude Research Plays for High Stakes, ed. John C. Maloney, Chicago: American Marketing Association, 148–164.
Huteau, M. (1985). Les Conceptions Cognitives de la personalit’e (Cognitive Conceptions in Personality), Paris, Presses Universitaires de France.
Isen, A. M., and Patrick, R. (1983). The effects of positive affect on risk-taking: When the chips are down. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 31, 194–202.
Kahn, B. E. (1995). Consumer variety-seeking among goods and services. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Service, 2, 139-148.
Kahn, B. E. (1998). Variety: From the consumer perspective, in Research Advances in Variety Management, ed. Christopher S. Tang and Teck H. Ho, Boston: Kluwer, 19–37.
Kahn, B. E., and Lehmann, D. R. (1991). Modeling choice among assortments. Journal of Retailing, 67, 274-299.
Kahn, B. E., Ratner, R. K., and Kahneman, D. (1997). Patterns of hedonic consumption over time. Marketing Letters, 8, 85-96.
Kahneman, D. and miller, D.T. (1968). Norm theory: Comparing reality to its alternatives. Psychological Review, 93, 136-153.
Kahneman, D. and Tversky, A. (1982). The psychology of preferences. Scientific American, 246, 160-173.
Kahneman, D., and Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk, Econometrica, 47, 263-291.
Kahneman, D., Knetsch, J. L., and Thaler, R. H. (1991). The endowment effect, loss aversion, and status quo bias. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 5, 1325-1347.
Kivetz, R., Netzer, O., & Srinivasan, V. (2004). Extending compromise effect models to complex buying situations and other context effects. Journal of Marketing Research, 262-268.
Kuvaas, B., and Kaufmann, G. (2004). Impact of mood, framing, and need for cognition and decision makers’ recall and confidence, Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 17, 59–74.
Levenson, R. W., Ekman, P., and Friesen, W. V. (1990). Voluntary facial action generates emotion-Specific autonomic nervous system activity. Psycholophsiology, 6, 28–35.
Luce, M.F., Payne, J.W., and Bettman, J.R. (1999), Emotional trade-off difficulty and choice, Journal of Marketing Research, 32,149–159.
Luce, M.F., Payne, J.W., and Bettman, J.R. (2000), Coping with unfavorable Attribute values in choice. Organizational Behavior & Human Decision Processes, 81, 274–299.
Luce, R. D. (1959). Individual choice behavior: A theoretical analysis. New York: Wiley.
Mano, H. (1992). Judgment under distress: Assessing the role of unpleasantness and arousal in judgment formation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 52, 216–45.
Mano, H. (1994). Risk-taking, framing effect, and affect. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 57, 38–58.
Mayer, J.D., Gaschke, Y.N., Braverman, D.L., and Evans, T.W. (1992). Mood congruent judgment is a general effect. Journal of personality and Social Psychology, 63, 119-132.
McAlister, L., and Pessemier, G. (1982). Variety seeking behavior: An interdisciplinary review. Journal of Consumer Research, 9, 311-322.
Meloy, M. G. (2000). Mood-Driven distortion of product information. Journal of Consumer Research, 27, 345-359.
Menon, S., and Kahn, B. E. (1995). The impact of context on variety seeking in product choices. Journal of Consumer Research, 22, 285-295.
Mittal, V., and Ross Jr., W. T. (1998). The impact of positive and negative affect and issue framing on issue interpretation and risk taking. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 76, 298–324.
Myers, J. H., and Reynolds, W. H. (1967), Consumer Behavior and Marketing Management, Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
Pessemier, E. (1978). Stochastic properties of changing preferences, American Economic Review, 68, 380-385.
Raju, P. S. (1980). Optimal stimulation level: Its relationships to personality, demographics and exploratory behavior. Journal of Consumer Research, 7, 272-282.
Ratner, R. K., and Kahn, B. E. (2002). The impact of private versus public consumption on variety-seeking behavior. Journal of Consumer Research, 29, 246-257.
Ratner, R. K., Kahn, B. E., and Kahneman, D. (1999). Choosing less-preferred experiences for the sake of variety. Journal of Consumer Research, 26, 272-282.
Read, D., and Loewenstein, G. (1995). Diversification bias: Explaining the discrepancy in variety seeking between combined and separated choices. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 1, 34-49.
Rusting, C.L. (1998), Personality, mood and cognitive processing of emotional information: Three conceptual frameworks. Psychological Bulletin, 124, 165-196.
Samuelson, W., and Zeckhauser, R. (1988). Status quo bias in decision making. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 1, 7-59.
Seale, D.A. and Rapoport, A. (1997). Sequential decision making with relative ranks: An experimental investigation of the secretary problem. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 69, 221-236.
Sedikides, C. (1995). Central and Peripheral self-conceptions are differentially influenced by mood: Tests of differential sensitivity hypothesis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 759-777.
Simonson, I. (1989). Choosing based on reason: The case of attraction and compromise effects. Journal of Consumer Research, 16, 158-174.
Simonson, I., and Nowlis, S. M. (2000). The role of explanations and need for uniqueness in consumer decision making: unconventional choice based on reasons. Journal of Consumer Research, 27, 49-68.
Simonson, I., and Tversky, A. (1992). Choice in context: Tradeoff contrast and extremeness aversion, Journal of Marketing Research, 29, 281-295.
Sitkin, S. B., and Weingart, L. R. (1995). Determinants of risky decision making behavior: A test of the mediating role of risk perceptions and propensity. Academy of Management Journal, 38, 1573-1592.
Steenkamp, J. E. M., and Baumgartner, H. (1992). The role of optimum stimulation level in exploratory consumer behavior. Journal of Consumer Research, 19, 434-448.
Stuteville, J. R. (1968). The buyer as a salesman. Journal of Marketing, 32, 14-18.
Thaler, R. H., and Johnson, E. J. (1990). Gambling with the house money and trying to break even: The effects of prior outcomes on risky choice. Management Science, 36, 643-660.
Tversky, A. and Kahneman, D. (1991). Loss aversion in riskless choice: A reference-dependent Model. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 106, 1039-1061.
Von Winterfeld, D. (1986). Decision Analysis and Behavioral Research, New-York: Cambridge University Press.
Wilde, G. J. S. (1988). Risk homeostasis theory and traffic accidents: Propositions, deductions, and discussion in recent reactions, Ergonomics, 31, 441-468.
Zaleski, Z. (1984). Sensation seeking and risk-taking behaviour, Personality and Individual Difference, 5, 607-608.
Zuckerman, M. (1979). Sensation Seeking: Beyond the Optimal Level of Arousal, Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Zuckerman, M., Buchsbaum, M.S., and Murphy, D.L. (1980). Sensation seeking and its biological correlates, Psychological Bulletin, 88, 187-210. |