| 摘要(英) |
Under the general teaching environment, to achieve the interaction between students and teachers relies on materials-teach and question –asking in class. As the Internet grows up, students don’t have to consider when or where they communicate with others, just by the learning web site. But the interaction between students and teachers is limited to active exploring by students.
With the help of short message, teachers don’t need to communication with students just by waiting them asking questions actively. Teachers could actively push learning-messages to those students who need by our mobile learning aided system. Students could receive learning-messages even in passive status.
After we get the function of short message, we have some problems about when to send and what to send is suitable. Our system gets the sending rules from the association rules trained by detecting what content they like and when to send they prefer. Besides some unexpected situation that the interval from the message we sent to the acknowledge students response we couldn’t accurately predict, we have about 70 percent accurate rate on predicting when to send, what content they like, and the level of nervous before/after they receive messages.
According to Lewin’s nervous system, it’s positive for someone on recall, memorization, or goal-approach by keeping one’s nervous status. Thus, we want to realize the relation between nervous status and other learning related attributes to improve learning performance. By getting students’ nervous level from affective detection module, we could change the message to become threatened or pressed while the students’ nervous level is below the threshold.
Though we didn’t find the factor affecting the changes on nervous, we found that the lowest-degree students’ nervous level grows up before the course test or the deadline of the homework according to observing the data. And we found 67 percent of the students who think that the message would make an effect on their nervous level, 74 percent of the students who would deal with the message if it levels up their nervous status, and 76 percent of the students who would deal with the message in 3 hours. |
| 參考文獻 |
[1]申荷永, 充滿張力的生活空間, 貓頭鷹出版社
[2]李?吟,張德榮,洪寶蓮. 大學生學習與讀書策略量表, 中國行為科學社
[3]詹志禹, 賴世培. 應用統計. 國立空中大學.
[4]Bing Liu, Wynne Hsu, Yiming Ma. Integrating Classification and Association Rule Mining, KDD ‘98
[5]BKD (Bayesian Knowledge Discoverer) developed by Knowledge Media Institute of The Open University at http://kmi.open.ac.uk/projects/bkd.
[6]Deutsch. Field theory in social psychology. In G. Lindzey & Aronson, The Handbook of Social Psychology. New York. Vol 1. 1968
[7]Ekman, Paul. Are there basic emtions?, Psychological Review, 99(3):550-553. 1992.
[8]Elliot Soloway. Center for Highly Interactive Computing in Education at the University of Michigan at http://www.handheld.hice-dev.org/index.htm
[9]Elliot Soloway, Cathleen Norris, Phyllis Blumenfeld, Barry Fishman, Joseph Krajcik, and Ron Marx. Handheld Devices are Ready-at-Hand. Communications of the ACM. Vol. 44, No. 6. June 2001.
[10]Elliot Soloway, Wayne Grant, Robert Tinker, Jeremy Roschelle, Mike Mills, Mitchell Resnick, Robbie Berg, and Michael Eisenberg. Science in the Palms of Their Hands. Communications of the ACM. Vol. 42, No. 8. Augest 1999.
[11]Fayyad, U.M., Gregory, P.S., Smyth, P. and Uthurusamy, R. A Statistical Perspective on Knowledge Discovery in Database. Advances in Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, 1996.
[12]Jeremy Roschelle and Roy Pea. A walk on the WILD side: How wireless handhelds may change CSCL, CSCL 2002
[13]Jiawei Han, Micheline Kamber. Data Mining: Concepts and Techniques. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers. USA. 2000.
[14]Lewin K. Field Theory in Social Science. (Ed. By D. Cartwright), New York: Harper & Brothor Publishers. 1951
[15]Lewin K. The Principles of Topological Psychology. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company, Inc. 1936
[16]Mealey, D.L. Test Review Learning and study strategiees Inventory. Journal of Reading V31 N4 P382-85.
[17]Leeper, R. Lewin’s Topological and Vector Psychology. New York: University of Oregon. 1943
[18]Leidelmeijer, K., Emotions: An Experimental Approach. Tilburg University Press, 1991.
[19]Norman W. Paton and Oscar Diaz. Active Database, ACM computing Surveys, Vol. 31, No. 1, March 1999.
[20]Picard, R. W., Affective Computing. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press 1977.
[21]Plutchik, R. ‘A general psychoevolutionary theory of emotion,’ in Emotion Theory, Research, and Experience(R. Plutchik and H. Kellerman, eds.), vol. 1, Theories of Emotion, Academic Press, 1980.
[22]Robert J.Sternberg. Thinking Styles, Cambridge University Press. 1997
[23]Rosalind Picard, Barry Kort, and Rob Reilly. Project Summary: Exploring the role of Emotion in Propelling the SMET Learning Process. 2002.
[24]Tom M. Mitchell, Machine Learing, McGRAW-Hill International Editions, 1997
[25]Weinsten, C.E. Learning and Study strategies Inventory (LASSI), User’s Manual, 1987. |
[Endnote RIS 格式]
[相關文章]
[文章引用]
[完整記錄]
[館藏目錄]
[檢視]
plurk
funp
live
udn
HD
myshare
netvibes
friend
youpush
delicious
baidu
Google bookmarks
del.icio.us
hemidemi
facebook
twitter
google
reddit