線上市集買方認知公平的前置因素與其對信任和再購意願之影響

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：19

、訪客IP：18.222.32.191

姓名

邱順波(Shun-po Chiu) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

資訊管理學系

論文名稱

線上市集買方認知公平的前置因素與其對信任和再購意願之影響
(Buyers’ Perceived Justice in Online Markets: Its Antecedents and Effects on Trust and Repurchase Intention)

相關論文

★ 技術商品銷售之技術人員關鍵職能探討	★ 資訊委外之承包商能力、信任及溝通與委外成效關係之個案研究
★ 兵工技術軍官職能需求分析-以某軍事工廠為例	★ 不同楷模學習模式對VB程式語言學習之影響
★ 影響採購「網路資料中心產品」因素之探討	★ 資訊人員績效評估之研究—以陸軍某資訊單位為例
★ 高職資料處理科學生網路成癮相關因素及其影響之探討	★ 資訊服務委外對資訊部門及人員之衝擊-某大型外商公司之個案研究
★ 二次導入ERP系統之研究-以某個案公司為例	★ 資料倉儲於證券產業應用之個案研究
★ 影響消費者採用創新數位產品之因素---以整合式手機為例	★ 企業合併下資訊系統整合過程之個案研究
★ 資料倉儲系統建置之個案研究	★ 電子表單系統導入之探討 - 以 A 公司為例
★ 企業資訊安全機制導入與評估–以H公司為例	★ 從人力網站探討國內資訊人力現況–以104銀行資料為例

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

至系統瀏覽論文 ( 永不開放)

摘要(中)

顧客的再購意願是企業成功的關鍵，但是對於線上市集的賣家而言，卻是一項相當大的挑戰。缺乏信任是線上交易的一項非常大的阻礙因素。因此，了解在線上市集中如何建立信任是一個非常重要議題。雖然，近年來有關信任的一些研究，指出認知公平對於信任有重大的影響。但是，對於探討在線上市集中影響認知公平的前置因素的研究卻非常之少。有鑑於此，本研究提出了一組認知公平的前置因素，並探討這些前置因素對信任和再購意願之影響。研究結果能讓線上市集中的賣家，對於如何提昇交易的公平有更深刻的理解。
本研究採用問卷調查法，收集Yahoo! 奇摩拍賣中424位買家的資料，並使用結構方程模式來進行分析。研究結果顯示，認知公平的三個維度(分配公平、程序公平、互動公平)對於信任有正向的影響，而信任對於再購意願有正向影響。相較於程序公平對於信任的影響，分配公平和互動公平對於信任的影響較大。另外，在認知公平的前置因素部份，商品品質和送貨績效對於分配公平有正向的影響，其中商品品質的影響較大；資訊品質和溝通管道對於程序公平有正向的影響，其中資訊品質的影響較大；回應性對於互動公平有正向的影響。最後，依據本研究的研究結果除了提供討論意見外，並提供學術及實務上的建議。

摘要(英)

The success of a business largely depends upon customers’ intentions to continue to purchase, but this can be a challenge for vendors in online markets. Lack of trust is identified as one of the greatest barriers inhibiting online transactions. Thus, it is essential to understand how trust is created in online markets context. Further, recent studies on trust suggest that the justice dimensions have effects on trust. However, the antecedents of justice has received deficient attention in online markets context. Therefore, this study proposes a model which identifies an initial set of justice antecedents and evaluates the effect of perceived justice on trust and the intention to repurchase in online markets. It is expected to provide richer insight into what sellers can do to promote justice in online markets.
This study employs a survey method to examine the perceptions of buyers in online markets. The theoretical model is tested by using structural equation modeling on a dataset of 424 buyers in Yahoo! Kimo online auction market. The results demonstrate that three dimensions of justice (distributive, procedural, and interactional) are positively and significantly related to trust, which in turn, affects buyers’ intention to repurchase. Moreover, among of the three dimensions of justice judgments, distributive and interactional justice are relatively more important than procedural justice in influencing buyers’ trust in sellers. In terms of the antecedents of justice, this study provides evidence that, while both product quality and delivery performance are significantly related to distributive justice, product quality has a much stronger impact. While both the information quality and contact channel are important antecedents of procedural justice, information quality has a stronger effect. This study also finds that responsiveness is important in enhancing buyers’ judgments of interactional justice. The findings of this study provide academics and practitioners with knowledge of how these factors can be manipulated to improve justice. The implications for theory and practice are discussed.

關鍵字(中)

★ 線上市集
★ 互動公平
★ 程序公平
★ 分配公平
★ 信任
★ 再購意願
★ 認知公平

關鍵字(英)

★ trust
★ repurchase intention
★ perceived justice
★ distributive justice
★ interactional justice
★ online market
★ procedural justice

論文目次

摘要. i
Abstract ii
誌謝辭 iv
Contents v
Tables viii
Figures ix
Chapter 1. Introduction 1
1.1 Research Background and Motivation 1
1.2 Research Questions and Scope of Research 2
1.3 Overview of this Study 3
Chapter 2.Theoretical Background 4
2.1 Trust 4
2.2 Justice Theory 7
2.3 Antecedents of Justice 12
Chapter 3. Research Model and Hypotheses 14
3.1 Research Model 14
3.2 Hypotheses 15
3.2.1 Trust 15
3.2.2 Distributive, Procedural, and Interactional Justice 16
3.2.3 Antecedents of Justice 18
3.3 Control Variables 21
Chapter 4. Research Methodology 22
4.1 Research Design and Data Collection 22
4.2 Instrument Development 22
4.3 Method of Data Analysis 25
Chapter 5. Data Analysis 27
5.1 Descriptive Statistics 27
5.2 Measurement Model 28
5.3 Structural Model 30
5.4 Discussion 32
Chapter 6. Conclusion 36
6.1 Summary and Conclusion 36
6.2 Implications for Theory 36
6.3 Implications for Practice 38
6.4 Limitations and Suggestions for Future Research 39
References 40
Appendix 47
Appendix 1. Questionnaire (English Version) 47
Appendix 2. Questionnaire (Chinese Version) 52
Appendix 3. Summary of Measurement Scales of Pilot Test 57
Appendix 4. Summary of Measurement Scales 61

參考文獻

1. Adams, J. S. (1965). Inequity in social exchange, in: Berkowitz, L. (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, New York: Academic Press.
2. Aryee, S., Budhwar, P. S. & Chen, Z. X. (2002). Trust as a mediator of the relationship between organizational justice and work outcomes: test of a social exchange model. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 23(3), 267-285.
3. Aurier, P. & Siadou-Martin, B. (2007). Perceived justice and consumption experience evaluations a qualitative and experimental investigation. International Journal of Service Industry Management, 18( 5), 450-471.
4. Ba, S. & Pavlou, P. A. (2002). Evidence of the effect of trust building technology in electronic markets: price premiums and buyer behavior. MIS Quarterly, 26(3), 243-268.
5. Bakos, J. Y. (1997). Reducing buyer search costs: implications for electronic marketplaces. Management Science, 43(12), 1676-1692.
6. Bei, L. T. & Chiao, Y. C. (2001). An integrated model for the effects of perceived product, perceived service quality, and perceived price fairness on consumer satisfaction and loyalty. Journal of Consumer Satisfaction, Dissatisfaction and Complaining Behavior, 14(1), 125-140.
7. Bhattacherjee, A. (2002). Individual trust in online firms: scale development and initial test. Journal of Management Information Systems, 19(1), 221-241.
8. Blodgett, J. G., Hill, D. J. & Tax, S. S. (1997). The effects of distributive, procedural, and interactional justice on post complaint behavior. Journal of Retailing, 73(2), 185–210.
9. Chebat, J. C. & Slusarczyk, W. (2005). How emotions mediate the effects of perceived justice on loyalty in service recovery situations: an empirical study. Journal of Business Research, 58(5), 664-673.
10. Chen, Q. & Wells, W.D. (1999). Attitude toward the site. Journal of Advertising Research, 39(5), 27-37.
11. Chiu, C. M., Huang, H. Y. & Yen, C. H. (2010). Antecedents of trust in online auctions. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 9(2), 148-159.
12. Chiu, C. M., Lin, H. Y., Sun, S. Y. & Hsu, M. H. (2009). Understanding customers’ loyalty intentions towards online shopping: an integration of technology acceptance model and fairness theory. Behaviour & Information Technology, 28(4), 347-360.
13. Clemmer, E. C. & Schneider, B. (1996). Fair service, in: Swartz, T. A., Bowen, D. E., & Brown, S. W. (Eds.), Advances in Services Marketing and Management. JAI Press, Greenwich, CT.
14. Colquitt, J. A., Conlon, D. E., Wesson, M. J., Porter, C. O. L. H. & Ng, K. Y. (2001). Justice at the millennium: a meta-analytic review of 25 years of organizational justice research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(3), 425-445.
15. Cronin, J. J., Brady, M. K. & Hult, G. T. M. (2000). Assessing the effects of quality, value, and customer satisfaction on consumer behavioral intentions in service environments. Journal of Retailing, 76(2), 193-218.
16. Delone, W. & Mclean, E. R. (2003). The Delone and Mclean model of information systems success: a ten-year update. Journal of Management Information Systems, 19(4), 9-30.
17. Dodds, W.B., Monroe, K.B. & Grewal, D. (1991). Effects of price, brand and store information on buyers’ product evaluations. Journal of Marketing Research, 28(3), 307–319.
18. Doll, W. J., Xia, W. & Torkzadeh G. (1994). A confirmatory factor analysis of the end-user computing satisfaction instrument. MIS Quarterly, 18(4), 453-461.
19. Doney, P. M. & Cannon, J. P. (1997). An examination of the nature of trust in buyer-seller relationships. Journal of Marketing, 61(2), 35-51.
20. Flavian, C., Guinaliu, M. & Gurrea R. (2006). The role played by perceived usability, satisfaction and consumer trust on website loyalty. Information & Management, 43(1), 1-14.
21. Folger, R. & Konovsky, M. K. (1989). Effects of procedural and distributive justice on reactions to pay raise decisions. Academy of Management Journal, 32(1), 115-130.
22. Fornell, C. & Larcker, D.F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18 (1), 39–50.
23. Frazier, G. L., Spekman, R. E. & O’Neal, C. R. (1988). Just-in-time exchange relationships in industrial markets. Journal of Marketing, 52(4), 52-67.
24. Gefen, D. (2000). E-commerce: the role of familiarity and trust. The International Journal of Management Science, 28(6), 725-737.
25. Gefen, D. (2002). Customer loyalty in e-commerce. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 3(1), 27-51.
26. Gefen, D., Karahanna, E. & Straub, D. W. (2003). Trust and TAM in online shopping: an integrated model. MIS Quarterly, 27(1), 51-90.
27. Gefen, D., Ragowsky, A. & Ridings, C. (2008). Leadership and justice: increasing non participating users’ assessment of an IT through passive participation. Information & Management, 45(8), 507-512.
28. Gregg, D. G. & Scott, J. E. (2008). A typology of complaints about eBay sellers. Communications of the ACM, 51(4), 69-74.
29. Gupta, S. & Kim, H. W. (2007). The moderating effect of transaction experience on the decision calculus in on-line repurchase. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 12(1), 127-158.
30. Harris, L. C. & Goode, M. M. H. (2004). The four levels of loyalty and the pivotal role of trust: a study of online service dynamics. Journal of Retailing, 80(2), 139-158.
31. Jarvenpaa, S. L., Tractinsky, N. & Vitale, M. (2000). Consumer trust in an internet store. Information Technology and Management, 1(1), 45-71.
32. Jones, G. R. & George, J. M. (1998). The experience and evolution of trust: implications for cooperation and teamwork. Academy of Management Review, 23(3), 531-546.
33. Kau, A. K. & Loh, E. W. Y. (2006). The effects of service recovery on consumer satisfaction: a comparison between complainants and non-complainants. Journal of Service Marketing, 20(2), 101-111.
34. Koehn, D. (1996). Should we trust in trust? American Business Law Journal, 34(2), 183-203.
35. Konovsky, M. A. & Pugh, S. D. (1994). Citizenship behavior and social exchange. Academy of Management Journal, 37(3), 656-669.
36. Koyuncu, C. & Bhattacharya, G. (2004). The impacts of quickness, price, payment risk, and delivery issues on on-line shopping. Journal of Socio-Economics, 33(2), 241-251.
37. Kumar, N., Scheer, L. K. & Steenkamp, J. E. (1995). The effects of supplier fairness on vulnerable resellers. Journal of Marketing Research, 32(1), 54–65.
38. Lee, M. K. O. & Turban, E. (2001). A trust model for consumer Internet shopping. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 6(1), 75-91.
39. Lind, E. A., Kulik, C. T., Ambrose, M. & de Vera Park, M. V. (1993). Individual and corporate dispute resolution: using procedural fairness as a decision heuristic. Administrative Science Quarterly, 38(2), 224–251.
40. Liu, C. & Arnett, K. P. (2000). Exploring the factors associated with web site success in the context of electronic commerce. Information & Management, 38(1), 23–33.
41. Mattila, A., Cho, W. & Ro, H. (2011). The role of self-service technologies in restoring justice. Journal of Business Research, 64(4), 348-355.
42. Mayer, R. C., Davis, J. H. & Schoorman, F. D. (1995). An integrative model of organizational trust. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 709-734.
43. Maxham, J. G. & Netemeyer, R. G. (2002). Modeling customer perceptions of complaint handling over time: the effects of perceived justice on satisfaction and intent. Journal of Retailing, 78(4), 239-252.
44. McCollough, M. A., Berry, L. L. &Yadav, M. S. (2000). An empirical investigation of customer satisfaction after service failure and recovery. Journal of Service Research, 3(2), 121–137.
45. McKinney, V., Yoon, K. & Zahedi, F. M. (2002). The measure of web-customer satisfaction: an expectation and disconfirmation approach. Information Systems Research, 13(3), 296-315.
46. McKnight, D. H., Choudhury, V. & Kacmar, C. (2002). The impact of initial consumer trust on intentions to transact with a web site: a trust building model. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 11(4), 2002, 297-323.
47. Neale, L. & Murphy, J. (2007). Perceived justice and email service recovery. Australasian Marketing Journal, 15(3), 5-20.
48. Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric Theory, McGraw-Hill, New York.
49. Patterson, P. G., Cowley, E. & Prasongsukarn, K. (2006). Service failure recovery: the moderating impact of individual-level cultural value orientation on perceptions of justice. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 23(3), 263-277.
50. Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V. A. & Berry, L. L. (1988). SERVQUAL: a multiple-item scale for measuring consumer perceptions of service quality. Journal of Retailing, 64(1), 12-40.
51. Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V. A. & Berry, L. L. (1994). Alternative scales for measuring service quality: a comparative assessment based on psychometric and diagnostic criteria. Journal of Retailing, 70(3), 201-230.
52. Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V. A. & Malhotra, A. (2005). E-S-QUAL: a multiple item scale for assessing electronic service quality. Journal of Service Research, 7(3), 213-233.
53. Pavlou, P. A. & Gefen, D. (2004). Building effective online marketplaces with institution-based trust. Information Systems Research, 15(1), 37-59.
54. Pavlou, P. A. & Gefen, D. (2005). Psychologic contract violation in online marketplaces : antecedents, consequences, and moderating roles. Information System Research, 16(4), 372-399.
55. Pennington, R., Wilcox, H. D. & Grover V. (2003). The role of system trust in business-to-consumer transactions. Journal of Management Information Systems, 20(3). 197-226.
56. Podsakoff, P. M. & Organ, D. W. (1986). Self-reports in organizational research: problem and prospects. Journal of Management, 12(2), 531-544.
57. Ramaswami, S. N. & Singh, J. (2003). Antecedents and consequences of merit pay fairness for industrial salespeople. Journal of Marketing, 67(4), 46-66.
58. Reichheld, F. F. & Schefter, P. (2000). E-loyalty your secret weapon on the web. Harvard Business Review, 78(4), 105-113.
59. Río-Lanza, A.B., Vázquez-Casielles, R., Díaz-Martín, A.M. (2009). Satisfaction with service recovery: perceived justice and emotional responses. Journal of Business Research, 62(8), 775-781.
60. Seiders, K. & Berry, L. L. (1998). Service fairness: what it is and why it matters. Academy of Management Executive, 12(2), 8–20.
61. Smith, A. K., Bolton, R. N. & Wagner, J. (1999). A model of customer satisfaction with service encounters involving failure and recovery. Journal of Marketing Research, 36(3), 356–372.
62. Strub, D. W. (1989). Validating instruments in MIS research. MIS Quarterly, 12(2), 147-169.
63. Straub, D. W., Limayem, M. & Karahanna, E. (1995). Measuring system usage: implications for is theory testing. Management Science, 41(8), 1328-1342.
64. Tax, S.S. & Brown, S.W. (1998). Recovering and learning from service failure. Sloan Management Review, 40(1), 75–88.
65. Tax, S. S., Brown, S. W. & Chandrashekaran, M. (1998). Customer evaluations of service complaint experiences: implications for relationship marketing. Journal of Marketing, 62(2), 60–76.
66. Turel, O., Yuan, Y. & Connely, C. (2008). In justice we trust: predicting user acceptance of e-customer services. Journal of Management Information Systems, 24(4), 123-151.
67. Yilmaz, C., Sezen, B. & Kabaday, E. T. (2004). Supplier fairness as a mediating factor in the supply performance-reseller satisfaction relationship. Journal of Business Research, 57(8), 854-863.
68. Zeithaml, V. A. (1988). Consumer perceptions of price, quality and value: a means-end model and synthesis of evidence. Journal of Marketing, 52(3), 2-22.

指導教授

周惠文(Huey-wen Chou)

審核日期

2011-7-28

推文