入員工分紅股及心理擁有感

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：30

、訪客IP：18.217.10.200

姓名

林文惠(Ann Lin) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

人力資源管理研究所

論文名稱

入員工分紅股及心理擁有感
(Employee stock ownership incentive and employee psychological ownership: The moderating role of individual needs)

相關論文

★ 空服員之工作特性、工作壓力源與個人壓力反應	★ 人力資源管理活動對員工離職意願之影響- 以工作滿意度為中介變項
★ 直線主管之管理訓練與其參與人力資源管理活動之關聯	★ 直線經理參與人力資源管理活動之影響因素探討
★ 員工風險承擔對個人持股意願之影響	★ 人力資本投資、知識分享與組織績效之關聯
★ 人力資源部門跨界活動對企業採行高績效人力資源管理實務之影響	★ 賦權感知、工作滿意、組織承諾與服務行為之相關性研究―以某連鎖便利商店為例
★ 業務代表人格特質與核心職能對績效影響的探討 —以某藥廠為例	★ 實施利益分享制度對心理賦權感及工作滿意之影響
★ 員工股票獎酬對員工心理所有權之影響---以內外控人格特質為干擾變項	★ 組織氣候感知、組織承諾與組織公民行為之關聯
★ 人力資源高績效工作實務、創新氣候與組織績效之關聯－以IC設計產業為例	★ 高績效工作實務對員工知識分享行為之影響 -
★ 人格特質與工作績效之關係研究─以航空服務業空服人員為例	★ 員工對功能彈性氣候的感知對工作滿意度的影響以工作自主與工作要求為中介變項

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

至系統瀏覽論文 ( 永不開放)

摘要(中)

近年來員工分紅配股與股票選擇權相關論文的增加，引人注目；其焦點著重於員
工分紅配股何以激勵員工。本論文彙整過去相關文獻及研究，藉由問卷調查及統計分析的結果，驗證股票獎酬及心理所有權的相關性，並以個人需求特質為干擾變項進行探討。以及探討員工分紅制度下的高科技員工，其心理所有權及組織公民行為和離職傾向之效果及影響。
在資料的蒐集上，本研究以高科技產業具備股票制度公司員工為研究對象。本研究共發放1000份問卷，有效樣本數為438份，使用SPSS為驗證樣本的分析工具，並以相關分析及階層回歸分析檢驗各變項之間的關係

摘要(英)

As organizations world-wide implement strategies with the expectation that they will motivate employee and improve performance to sustain competitive advantage globally; there is an extensive interest of practice and research upon issue regarding employee stock ownership and psychological ownership in organization in the recent decade. Researches in the field have somewhat reach the consensus that in order to implement effective practice of employee ownership which in turn influences organizational competitiveness; employee psychological ownership is essential to be induced in this process (Pierce, Kostova and Dirks, 2001; Pierce, Rubenfeld, & Morgan, 1991; O’Reilly, 2002; and O’Driscoll, Pierce and Coghlan, 2006).
To further expand on the previous research, the purpose of this study is to foster a greater understanding of issues on employee psychological ownership within organizations that implements equity incentive compensation practice. It is the intention of this research to devote efforts to understand the dynamics of employee ownership by examining the individual psychological process as individual need characters that involve through out the formation of psychological ownership. Therefore, this study has uncovered the personal factors as individual need that influences the formation of the employee psychological ownership.
Key words: employee stock ownership, employee psychological ownership, personal characteristics

關鍵字(中)

★ 入員工分紅股
★ 心理擁有感

關鍵字(英)

★ psychological ownership
★ employee ownership

論文目次

CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION………………………………..……………………1
1.1 The background of the study………………………….……………………1
1.2 Statement of the problems………………………………………………….7
1.3 The objectives of the study………………………………………...……….8
CHAPTER 2: THEORETICAL FRAMEOWRK AND HYPOTHESIS…...…….….11
2.1 Construct and definition of psychological ownership ………….…….…..11
2.1.1 About ownership………………………………………...…………..11
2.1.2 Concept of psychological ownership………………………..………12
2.1.3 Psychological ownership as an attitude……………………...……….15
2.2 Employee ownership and employee psychological ownership…...….…….16
2.2.1 Employee stock ownership as compensation……….…….…………16
2.2.2 Different distribution forms of stock incentives……………...……...17
2.2.3 Researches on employee ownership……………………………..…..19
2.2.4 Employee ownership and psychological ownership- The Link……...20
2.2.5 Employee stock ownership as non-monetary incentive motivator.….24
2.3 Individual characteristic and psychological ownership……………………...25
2.3.1 Arguments on individual disposition influence in work…….….…….27
2.3.2 Underlying theories of motivation and need theory……….….……..28
2.3.3 Extrinsic and intrinsic motivation…………………….……….……..29
2.3.4 The moderating roles of personal needs……………………..….…………..31
2.4 Ownership and organizational citizenship behavior
2.5 Ownership and employee turnover
CHAPTER 3: METHOD........................................................................................................43
3.1 Participants……………………………………….………………..……………….43
3.2 Procedure...................................................................................................................44
3.3 Measures………………………………………….………………..………………44
3.3.1 The back ground questions………………………….………………………45
3.3.2 Scales………………………………………………………………………..45
3.4 Confirmatory Factor Analysis……………………………….…….……………….49
CHAPTER 4: ANALYSIS AND RESULT………………..………….……………………..51
4.1 Descriptive Statistics……………………………..………….……………………51
4.2 Correlations………………………………..………………….…………………..52
4.3 Hierarchical Regression- Test of Moderation………………...…………………..53
4.3. Summery Result on Moderating Variables………………....…………………….53
CHAPTER 5: DISCUSSSION………………………………………………………………68
CHAPTER 6: IMPLICATION AND FUTURE DIRECTION………...……………………76
6.1 Limitation and Future Direction………………...………………………………..76
6.2 Implication for practice………………………………………...…………………80
Supplemental Analysis………………………………………………..…………………….84
REFERENCES……………………………………………………………..……………….89
TABLES
APP.1a: Employee Satisfaction Under Employee Ownership…………………………...…85
APP.1b: Organizational Commitment/Identification Under Employee Ownership……..…86
APP.1c: Employee Motivation, ESOP Satisfaction, and Union Attitudes Under Employee Ownership………………………………………………………………….………….……87
1.d: Employee Behavior and Other Research on Employee Ownership……………..……88
2.1 Differentiating Psychological Ownership from Other Work-Related Attitudes….……14
2.2 Three Basic Human Motives of Psychological Ownership…...………………….…....16
3.1 Summary of Cronbach Alphas for the Scores on Key Measures……………….……...49
4.1 Profile of the Respondents…………………………………………………….……….51
4.2 Basic Demographic Statistics…………………………………………………….…….52
4.3 Education of the Respondents……………………………………………….…………52
4.4 Correlations matrix for major variables in the present study………………….……….53
4.5 Summary Table on Moderating Hypothesis………………………………….………...62
4.6 Regression of Psychological Ownership (feel) on Needs X EO………...........……….56
4.7 Regression of Psychological Ownership (Behavior) on Needs X EO………....………58
4.8 Regression of Psychological Ownership (cognition) on Needs X EO……………...…60
4.9 Mediating Result OCB...……………………………………………………….………65
4.10 Mediating Result- Turnover intention…..……………………………………………67
5.1 Summary Of Results for Hypothesis Testing……………………….…………….69
6.1- Regression of OCB on Needs X PO………………………………..…………….83
6.2- Regression of Turnover on Needs X PO…………….……………..…………….84
FIGURES
Figure 1.1 Overall Research Model…………………………………..…….….…10
Figure 2.1 Visualizes the Psychological Ownership Construct……….….…..….13
Figure 2 The Three Moderators……………………………………….…….…35
Figure: 3.4.1 CFA of all needs……………………………………….…….……….50
Figure: 3.4.1 CFA of all needs………………………………………….….……….50
Figure 4.1 The interaction effect between employee stock ownership and need of autonomy on psychological ownership cognition………………………. .58
Figure 4.2 The interaction effect between employee stock ownership and achievement on psychological ownership behavior…………...………....59

參考文獻

REFERENCES
Ardrey, R. (1966). The territorial imperative: A personal inquiry into the animal origins of property and nations. New York: Dells.
Beggan, J. K. (1992). On the Social Nature of Nonsocial Perception: The Mere Ownership Effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62(2):229-237.
Belk, R. W. (1988). Possessions and the extended self. Journal of Consumer Research,15, 139-168.
Ben-Ner, A., & Jones, D. 1995. Employee participation, ownership, and productivity: A theoretical framework. Industrial Relations, 34: 532-554.
Blair, M. M. 1995. Wealth Creation and Wealth Sharing. Washington D.C.: The Brookings Institution.
Blasi, J., Conte, M. & Kruse, D. 1996. Employee stock ownership and corporate performance among public companies. Industrial & Labor Relations Review, 50(1): 60-79.
Blasi, J., Kruse, D., Sesil, J. & Kroumova, M. 2003. An assessment of employee ownership in the United States with implications for the EU. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 14: 893-919.
Blair, M. M., & Kruse, D. L. 1999. Worker capitalists? The Brookings Review, 17(4): 23-26.
Blau, G.. 1989. Testing the generalizability of a career commitment measure and its impact on employee turnover. Journal of Vocational Behavior 35: 88–103.
Blinder, A., Ed. 1990. Paying for Productivity. Washington DC, Brookings Institution.
Borman, W. C. & Motowidlo, S. J. 1997. “Task performance and contextual performance”, Human Performance, 10(2):99-109
Bradley, k. & Nejad, A. 1989. Managing Owners: the National Freight Consortium in Perspective. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Brief, A. & Motowidlo, S.1986. Prosocial organizational behaviors. Academy of Management Review. 11:710–725.
Caudron, S. 1995. Create an empowering environment. Personnel Journal. 9:28-35.
Conger, J.A. 1991. Inspiring others: the language of leadership. Academy of Management Executive . 5: 31–45.
Conger, J. A. & Kaungo, R. N. 1998. The empowerment process: Integrative Theory and Practice. Academy of Management Review. 13:471-482.
Cooke, W. 1992. Product quality improvement through employee participation: The effects of unionization and joint union-management administration. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 46: 119-134.
Cram, F., & Paton, H. (1993). Personal possessions and self identity: The experiences of elderly women in three residential settings. Australian Journal on Aging, 12, 19-24.
Dittmar, H. (1992) The Social Psychology of Material Possession:. To Have Is To Be. Harvester Wheatsheaf. New York.
Duncan, N. G. 1981. Home Ownership and Social Theory. London: Croom Helm.
Duncan, W. J. 2001. Stock ownership and work motivation. Organizational Dynamics, 30: 1-11.
Druskat, V. U., & Pescosolido, A. T. 2002. The content of effective teamwork mental models in self-managing teams: Ownership, learning, and heedful interrelating. Human Relations, 55: 283-314.
Eisenhardt, M. K. 1989. Agency theory: An assessment and review. Academy of Management Review, 14(1): 57.
Hambleton, A. J., Kalliath, T., Taylor, P. 2000. Criterion-related validity of a measure of person-job and person-organization fit. New Zealand Journal of Psychology. 29:80-85
Harrison, R. 1983. Strategies for a new age. Human Resource Management, 22: 209-235.
Ichniowski, C., Kochan, T. A., Levine, D., Olson, C., & Strauss, G. 1996. What works at work: Overview and assessment. Industrial Relations, 35: 299-333.
Isaacs, S. 1933. Social Development in Young Children. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul Limited.
Kandel, E., & E. P. Lazear. 1992. Peer Pressure in Partnerships. Journal of Political Economy, 100: 801-817.
Kelso, L.O., Kelso, P.H., 1986. Democracy and Economic Power Extending the ESOP Revolution. Ballinger Publishing Company, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Ketchum, D., Trist, E., 1992. All Teams Are Not Created Equal: How Employee Empowerment Really Works. Sage, Newberry Park, CA.
Klein, K. J. 1987. Employee stock ownership and employees attitudes: A test of three models. Journal of Applied Psychology, 72: 319-332.
Klein, k. J. 1991. A reexamination of autonomy in the light new manufacturing practices. Human Relations 44: 21–38.
Kruse, D. & Balasi, J. 1997. Employee Ownership, Employee Attitudes, and Firm Performance: A Review of the Evidence. NBER Working Paper No. W5277.
Kruse, D.L. 1996. Why do firms adopt profit-sharing and employee ownership plans? British Journal of Industrial Relations 34: 515–538
Kubzansky, P. E., & Druskat, V. U. 1995. Psychological sense of ownership: Conceptualization and measurement. Presented at the American Psychological Association, Toronto, Canada, August.
Kuvaas, B. 2003. Employee ownership and affective organizational commitment: employees' perceptions of fairness and their preference for company shares over cash, Scandinavian Journal of Management, 19 (2): 193–212.
Lawler, E.E. 1996. From the ground up: Six principles for building the new logic corporation. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Levine, D., & Tyson, L. 1990. Participation, productivity and the firm's environment. In A.S. Blinder (Ed.), Paying for productivity: 183-237. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
Long, R. J. 1978. The effects of employee ownership on organization identification, job attitudes and organizational performance: Tentative framework ad empirical findings. Human Relations, 31: 29-48.
Long, R.J. 1982. Worker ownership and job attitudes: a field study, Industrial Relations, 21 (2): 196–215
Maslow, 1943 A.H. Maslow, A theory of human motivation, Psychological Review 50 (1943), pp. 370–396.
Maslow, A.H., 1954. Motivation and Personality, Harper & Row, New York.
Manz, C., Keating, D. and Donnellon, A., 1990. Preparing for an organizational change to self-management: the managerial transition. Organizational Dynamics , 49: 15–26.
McGregor, D. 1960. The Human side of Enterprise, McGraw Hill, New York.
O’Reilly, C.E. 2002. The wrong kind of ownership. Across the Board, Sept, 19-20.
Pendleton, A. 2001. Employee ownership, participation and governance: a study of ESOPs in the UK, Routledge, London, New York.
Pendleton, A. 2005. Sellers or keepers? Stock retentions in stock option plans Human Resource Management, 44(3): 319-36.
Pendleton, A ., Wilson N. and Wright, M., 1998. The perception and effects of share ownership: empirical evidence from employee buy-outs, British Journal of Industrial Relations 36 (1): pp. 99–123.
Pierce, J. L., Gardner, D. G., Dunham, R. B., and Cummings, L. L. 1993. Moderation by organization-based self-esteem of role condition- Employee response relationships. Academy of Management Journal, 36: 271-288.
Pierce, J. L., Kostova, T., & Dirks K.T. 2001. Toward a theory of psychological
ownership in organizations, Academy of Management Review, 26(2), 298-310.
Pierce, J.L., Kostova, T., & Dirks, K.T. 2003. The state of psychological ownership:
Integrating and extending a century of research. Review of General Psychology, 7(1), 84-107.
Pierce, J.L., O’Driscoll, M.P., & Coghlan, A.M. 2004. Work environment structure and psychological ownership: The mediating effects of control. Journal of Social Psychology 144(5), 507-534.
Pierce, J.L., Rubenfeld, S. A., & Morgan, S. 1991. Employee ownership: A conceptual model of process and effects. Academy of Management Review, 16: 121-144.
Podsakoff, P., Ahearne, M., MacKenzie, 1997. Organizational citizenship behavior and the quantity and quality of work performance. Journal of Applied Psychology 82 : 262–270.
Richardson, R. & Nejad, A. 1986. Employee Share Ownership Schemes in the UK -- An Evaluation. British Journal of Industrial Relations, 24(2): 233-244.
Quarrey, M. 1986. Employee Ownership and Corporate Performance. National Centre for Employee Ownership: Arlington, Virgina.
Rousseau, D.M. 1998. Why workers still identify with organizations. Journal of
Organizational Behavior, 19, 217-233.
Rousseau, D. M. & Shperling, Z. 2003. Pieces of the action: Ownership and the changing employment relationship, Academy of Management Review, 28: 553-570.
Sansone, C., & Harackiewicz, J. M. 1996. “I don’t feel like it”: The function
of interest in self-regulation. In L. L. Martin & A. Tesser (Eds.), Striving and feeling: Interactions among goals, affect and self-regulation. Mahwah, NJ: awrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
Sesil, J.C. 2000. Decentralized decision-making and group incentives in British manufacturing establishments 1992-1995 and a retail Firm 1998: Recent econometric and case study evidence. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, London School of Economics and Political Science.
Spreitzer, G. M. 1995. Psychological empowerment in the workplace: Dimensions, measurement, and validation. Academy of Management Journal, 38: 1442-1465.
Susman, G., 1976. Autonomy at Work: A Socio-Technical Analysis of Participative Management. Praeger, New York.
Tajfel H. &Turner, J. 1986. The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. Psychology of Intergroup Relations. 7-24.
Tannenbaum, A. S. 1983. Employee-Owned Companies. Greenwich, CT: lAI Press.
Thomas, K. W., & Velthouse, B. A. 1990. Cognitive elements of empowerment: An “interpretive” model of intrinsic task motivation. Academy of Management Review, 15: 666–681.
Van Dyne, & Pierce, J. L. 2004. Psychological ownership and feelings of possession: Three field studies predicting employee attitudes and organizational citizenship behavior. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25: 439-459.
Vroom, V.H. 1964. Work and Motivation, Wiley, New York.
Walton, R. E. 1985. From control to commitment in the workplace. Harvard Business Review, 63(2): 77-84.
Wagner, S. H., Parker, C. P. & Cristiansen, N. D. 2003. Employee that think and act like owners: Effects of ownership beliefs and behaviors on organizational effectiveness. Personnel Psychology, 56: 847-871.
Wellins, R., Byham, W., Wilson, J. 1991. Empowered Teams: Creating Self-Directed Work Groups That Improve Quality, Productivity and Participation. Jossey-Bass,
San Francisco.

指導教授

劉念琪(Nien-Chi Liu)

審核日期

2009-1-20

推文