語言產出中音義訊息處理歷程─
以行為及事件相關腦電位之圖文干擾作業為例

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：17

、訪客IP：3.144.6.223

姓名

陳玎慧(Ting-Hui Chen) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

認知與神經科學研究所

論文名稱

語言產出中音義訊息處理歷程─ 以行為及事件相關腦電位之圖文干擾作業為例
(The Processes of Phonological and Semantic information in Speech Production– An behavioral and ERP study by using Picture-Word interference task )

相關論文

★ 英語為外國語學習者的英語字詞辨識歷程—以詞長效果及事件相關電位指標論證	★ 中文字詞辨識的組字規則處理
★ 中文字詞辨識的語音運作單位	★ 語音知覺與中文識字能力的關係

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

[檢視]

[下載]

本電子論文使用權限為同意立即開放。
已達開放權限電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的，進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。
請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定，切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送，以免觸法。

摘要(中)

摘要
這個研究的目的在探討語言產出歷程中語義及語音處理的時間以及深度。所使用的作業是圖文干擾作業。作業中藉由操弄圖文的呈現起始時間差引起的圖片唸名反應時間差異以及觀察在事件相關腦電位實驗中N400的指標來探討語義及語音訊息在處理上的時間序列問題；並且利用干擾效果的大小以及語義訊息的處理是否可延伸至語音的層次來討論語義干擾效果處理上深度的問題。
在實驗一中以區段方式呈現不同圖文起始時間差，獲得了顯著的語義干擾效果以及語音促進效果。實驗二則將實驗一中圖文起始時間差以完全隨機的方式呈現，以排除受試者運用認知策略或是習慣化而影響唸名反應時間的可能性。結果在語義干擾及語音促進效果中仍然獲得相似的反應模式。
實驗三之一及二則希望探討發生在詞彙選擇階段中的語義干擾效果是否可延伸至語義干擾字的語音訊息。
實驗四中，利用事件相關腦電位，觀察圖文語義干擾效應及圖文同音促進效應在N400腦電波前後段振輻大小的不同，來推論語言產出中，語義及語音訊息在處理時間上的序列性。
在這個研究中，經由SOA、以及從事件相關腦電位所獲得的結果，可推論語音以及語義訊息被處理的時間以及時間序列，同時也將基於Levelt等人提出的詞彙觸接理論對這些研究結果進行解釋。

摘要(英)

Abstract
The aim of this research is to explore the processing sequence between semantic and phonological processing and depth of them in speech production by a picture-word interference task. The processing sequence was indexed by SOA and by N400 amplitude in event-related potential. To address the issue of depth of semantic interference, the amount of interfere effect and the extensible association of semantic processing were indexed.
In experiment 1, different SOAs were in different blocks; a significant semantic interference and phonological facilitation effect were demonstrated. In experiment 2, the same pattern of results was demonstrated when SOAs were in complete randomization.
Experiment 3-1 and 3-2 were aimed at exploring the processing depth of semantic interference in a picture word interference task. Whether the semantic effect is extensible to the phonological level of semantic-related distractor words is the research question. The phenomenon also demonstrates the obligatory of phonological recoding of the distractor words.
Experiment 4 compares the amplitude of N400 in different time window. The semantic-related condition showed significant differences to control condition both in the first and second half of N400 amplitude index. The phonological-related distractor showed amplitude differences from the control condition only in the second half of the N400. The semantic processing was processed prior to the phonological processing was argued for the phenomena.

關鍵字(中)

★ 詞彙觸接模型
★ 圖片唸名
★ 語言產出
★ 圖文干擾作業

關鍵字(英)

★ speech production
★ picture naming
★ the theory of lexical access model
★ picture-word interference task

論文目次

目錄
摘要　 …………………… Ⅰ
Abstract 　 …………………… Ⅱ
誌謝 ……………………. Ⅲ
緒論　 …………………… Ⅳ
目錄 Ⅴ
圖目錄　 …………………… Ⅵ
表目錄　 …………………… Ⅶ
文獻探討　 …………………… 1
　詞彙觸接模型 …………………… 2
　圖文干擾作業 …………………… 7
　中文文字特性及認知處理 …………………… 18
　中文圖文干擾作業 …………………… 20
研究目的　 …………………… 23
實驗一　 …………………… 24
　研究方法 …………………… 24
　結果 …………………… 26
　討論 …………………… 30
實驗二　　 …………………… 34
　研究方法 …………………… 34
　結果 …………………… 34
　討論 …………………… 38
實驗三之一　 …………………… 40
　研究方法 …………………… 41
　結果與討論 …………………… 43
實驗三之二　 …………………… 50
　研究方法 …………………… 50
　結果 …………………… 51
　討論 …………………… 53
實驗四　 …………………… 56
　研究方法 …………………… 57
　結果 …………………… 60
　討論 …………………… 66
綜合討論與建議　 …………………… 68
參考文獻　 …………………… 73
附錄　　 …………………… 78

參考文獻

參考文獻
中文部分
米勒（Miller G. A. 著，洪蘭譯：1996/民91）詞的學問（The science of word）。台北：遠流出版社。
郭為藩（民國66），我國學童閱讀缺陷問題的初步調查及其檢討。「教育研究所集刊」，20：57-77。
馬偉成（民91年）。「王筠〈說文解字句讀〉「聲符兼義」探析」。逢甲中文所碩士論文。
黃啟鑫（民87年）。「干擾字的字形與字音對於字圖干擾作業中語義效果的影響」。政大心理所87年碩論。
英文部分
Alorio, F.-X., Segui Juan, & Ferrand, L. (2000). Semantic and associative priming in picture naming. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 53A, 741-764.
Bajo, M. T., Puerta-Melguizo, M. C., & Macizo, P. (2003). The locus of semantic interference in picture naming. Psicologica, 24, 31-55.
Bloem, I. & La Heij, W. (2003). Semantic facilitation and semantic interference in word translation: Implications for models of lexical access in language production. Journal of Memory and Language., 48, 468-488.
Coltheart, M., Rastle, K., Perry, C., & Ziegler, J. (2001). DRC: A dual route cascaded model of visual word recognition and reading aloud. Psychological Review, 108, 204-256.
Damian, M. F. & Bowers, J. S. (2003). Locus of semantic interference in picture-word interference tasks. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 10, 111-117.
Damian, M. F. & Martin, R. C. (1998). Is visual lexical access based on phonological codes? Evidence from a picture-word interference task. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review., 5, 91-96.
Damian, M. F. & Martin, R. C. (1999). Semantic and phonological codes interact in single word production. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 25, 345-361.
Damian, M. F., Vigliocco, G., & Levelt, W. J. M. (2001). Effects of semantic context in the naming ofpictures and words. Cognition, 81, B77-B86.
Glaser, W. R. & Dungelhoff, F.-J. (1984). The time course of picture-word interference. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 10, 640-654.
Greenham, S. L., Stelmack, R. M., & Campbell, K. B. (2000). Effects of attention and semantic relation on event-related potentials in a picture-word naming task. Biological Psychology, 50, 79-104.
Hung, D. L. & Tzeng, O. L. (1981). Orthographic variations and visual information processing. Psychological Bulletin, 90, 377-414.
Hung, D. L., Tzeng, O. L., & Tzeng, A. K. Y. (1992). Automatic activatin of linguistic information in Chinese character recognition. In R.Frost & L. Katz (Eds.), Orthography, phonology, morphology, and meaning (pp. 35-46).
Indefrey, P. & Levelt, W. J. (2004). The spatial and temporal signatures of word production components. Cognition, 92, 101-144.
Jescheniak, J. D. & Levelt, W. J. M. (1994). Word frequency effects in speech production: retrieval of syntactic information and of phonological form. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20, 824-843.
Jescheniak, J. D., Schriefers, H., Garrett, M. F., & Friederici, A. D. (2002). Exploring the activation of semantic and phonological codes during speech planning with event-related brain potentials. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 14, 951-964.
Johnson, C. J., Paivio, A., & Clark, J. M. (1996). Cognitive components of picture naming. Psychological Bulletin, 120, 113-139.
Kutas, M. & Hillyard, S. A. (1980). Reading senseless sentences: brain potentials reflect semantic incongruity. Science, 207, 203-205.
La Heij, W., Dirkx, J., & Kramer, P. (1990). Categorical interference and associative priming in picture naming. British Journal of Psychology, 81, 511-525.
La Heij, W., Heikoop, K. W., Akerboom, S., & Bloem, I. (2003). Picture naming in picture context: Semantic interference or semantic facilitation? Psychology Science., 45, 49-62.
La Heij, W. & van den Hof, E. (1995). Picture-Word interference increases with target-set size. Psychological Research, 58, 119-133.
Levelt, W. J. M., Roelofs. Ardi. & Meyer. Antje S. Meyer (1999). A theory of lexical access in speech production. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 1-75.
Levelt, W. J. M. & Praamstra (1998). An MEG study of picture naming. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 10, 553-567.
Lupker, S. J. (1979). The semantic nature of response competition in the picture-word interference task. Memory & Cognition, 7, 485-495.
Lupker, S. J. (1982). The role of phonetic and orthographic similarity in picture-word interference. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 36, 349-367.
Morsella, E. & Miozzo, M. (2002). Evidence for a cascade model of lexical access in speech production. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 28, 555-563.
Perfetti, C. A. & Tan, L. H. (1998). The time course of graphic, phonological, and semantic activation in Chinese character identification. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 24, 101-118.
Roelofs, A. (1992). A spreading-activation theory of lemma retrieval in speaking. Cognition, 42, 107-142.
Roelofs, A., Meyer, A. S., & Levelt, W. J. (1996). Interaction between semantic and orthographic factors in conceptually driven naming: comment on Starreveld and La Heij (1995). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22, 246-251.
Rosinski, R. R. (1977). Picture-word interference is semantically based. Child Development, 48, 643-647.
Rosinski, R. R., Golinkoff, R. M., & Kukish, K. S. (1975). Automatic semantic processing in picture-word interference task. Child Development, 46, 247-253.
Coles, M. G. H. & Rugg, M. D. (1995). Event-related Brain Potentials: An Introduction. In M.D.Rugg & M. G. H. Coles (Eds.), Electrophysiology of Mind: Event-Related Brain Potentials and Cognition (pp. 1-26). London: Oxford University Press.
Rugg, M. D. & Barrett, S. E. (1987). Event-related potentials and the interaction between orthographic and phonological information in a rhyme-judgment task. Brain and Language, 32, 336-361.
Schmitt, B. M., Schiltz, K., Zaake, W., Kutas, M., & Munte, T. F. (2001). An electrophysiological analysis of the time course of conceptual and syntactic encoding during tacit picture naming. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 13, 510-522.
Schriefers, H., Meyer, A. S., & Levelt, W. J. (1990). Exploring the time course of lexical access in language production: picture-word interference studies. Journal of Memory and Language, 29, 86-102.
Snodgrass, J. G. & Vanderwart, M. (1980). Standarized set of 260 pictures: Norms of name agreement, usage agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 174-215.
Starreveld, P. A. & La Heij, W. (1995). Semantic interference, orthographic facilitation, and their interaction in naming tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 686-698.
Starreveld, P. A. & La Heij, W. (1996). Time-course analysis of semantic and orthographic context effects in picture naming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22, 896-918.
Sternberg, S. (1969). The discovery of processing stages: Extensions of Donders' method. Acta Psychologica, 30, 276-315.
Tan, L. H. & Perfetti, C. A. (1997). Visual Chinese character recognition: Does phonological information mediate access to meaning? Journal of Memory and Language., 37, 41-57.
Thorpe, S., Fize, D., & Marlot, C. (1996). Speed of processing in the human visual system. Nature, 381, 520-522.
van Turennout, M., Hagoort, P., & Brown, P. (1997). Electrophysiological evidence on the time course of semantic and phonological processes in speech production. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 23, 787-806.
van Turennout, M., Hagoort, P., & Brown, C. M. (1998). Brain Activity During Speaking: From Syntax to Phonology in 40 Milliseconds. Science, 280, 572-574.
Weekes, B. S., Davies, R. A., & Chen, M.-J. (2002). Picture-word interference effects on naming in Chinese. In Cognitive Neuroscience Studies of the Chinese Language (pp. 101-127).

指導教授

李俊仁(Jun-Ren Lee)

審核日期

2005-7-20

推文