摘要(英) |
The most important spirits of community empowerment projects are citizen participation and one’s commitment to building community in a neighborhood. However, due to the lack of related knowledge, the majority of the people in Taiwan do not take an active role in community participation. Unfortunately, planning and execution are led only by a few. In reflection to this phenomenon, Beitou introduce the consensus conference into community problem, and hope it can lead more discussion, let more people concern his own homeland. Besides, the process of consensus conference is series of conflict and negotiation, how to stimulate and control the conflict situation is this research’s purpose.
This research collected record of Beitou consensus conference and arrange related data, interview some related people. At last, put the conflict theory into consensus conference,and found appropriate conflict can stimulate limitless creativity, it indeed brings lots of new ideas to the community. Though it may need to improve in the future, it put the spirit of citizen participation into practice. |
參考文獻 |
1.江明修(1997),公共行政學-理論與社會的實踐
2.江明修、陳定銘(2001),非營利組織與公民社會之建構-以社區大學運動為例,社會文化學報第十二期,p15-31。
3.周齊譜(2000),非營利組織推動社區總體營造之機制研究-以夢想社區文教基金會為例,銘傳大學公共管理與社區發展研究所在職專班。
4.林振豐(2002),苗栗社區總體營造在社區主義過程中的瓶頸與對策,空大行政學報第12期,p293-336。
5.林祐聖(2004),北投溫泉博物館何去何從社造協定公民會議全記錄,北投文化雜誌季刊第八期,p28-29
6.林國明、陳東升(2003),公民會議與審議民主:全民健保的公民參與經驗,台灣社會學第六期,p61-118。
7.帥韻儀(2003),以問題解決為導向之衝突問題解決模式建立之研究,中原大學企業管理學系碩士論文。
8.張英陣(1995),「第三部門與社會福利政策」,『社會福利政策策略原則研討會』,內政部,p135-140。
9.莊孟榮(2000),探討北投溫泉博物館的形塑過程與民眾參與機制,國立雲林科技大學工業設計學系碩士論文。
10.許文傑(2000),公民參與公共行政之理論與實踐-「公民性政府」的理想型建構,政治大學公共行政學系博士論文。
11.陳淑遙(2003),國中教師師生衝突經驗及化解歷程之研究,中正大學犯罪防治研究所碩士論文。
12.黃世輝,宮崎清(1996),奠基於地方資源的採集、平價之社區總體營造,台灣手工業第59期,p25-40。
13.黃秉德(1997),決策類型與功能,非營利組織碁管理研修粹要,p103-118
14.楊志彬,北投溫泉博物館何去何從社造協定公民會議,北投文化雜誌季刊第七期,p6-7
15.蔡宗霖(2004),電子會議系統中衝突協調管理協調機制之研究,中華大學資訊管理學系碩士論文。
16.鄭人豪(2003),「公民會議」在北投,北市社區大學第一屆台北學學術研討會。
17.鄧東濱,(1996)。接受衝突,管理衝突。世界經理文摘,121 期,p44-55
18.鐘冠群(2004),部門內人際衝突與員工效能-調節變項之研究,中原大學心理學系碩士論文。
19.顧忠華(1999),社會學理論與社會實踐
20.Amason, Allen C. ( 1996). Distinguishing the effects of functional and dysfunctional conflict on strategic decision making: Resolving a paradox for top management teams. Academy of Management Journal, 39,p123-149.
21.Bohman, James ,and William Regh, eds(1997)Introduction , in Deliberative Democracy,edited by James Bohman and William Rehg.
22.Chambers, Simone (1996) Reasonable Democracy: Jurgen Hambermas and the Politics of Discourse. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
23.Christiano, Tomas (1997) the Significance of Public Deliberation. P243-277 in Deliberative Democracy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
24.Cooper, Terry L.(1991). An Ethics of Citizenship for Public Administration.
25.Elster(1998),Introduction. Pp1-18 in Deliberative Democracy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
26.Fearon, James D(1998), Deliberation as Discussion. Pp44-68 in Deliberative Democracy, Cambridge University Press
27.Guston, David H.(1999) Evaluating the FIRST U.S. Consensus Conference: The Impacts of Citizen’s Panel on Telecommunication and the Future of Democracy. Science, Technology and Human Value24, P451-482
28.Habermas(1996) Between Facts and Norms: Contribution to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy. p361-360.
29.Jehn, Karen A. &Chatman, Jennifer A. (2000). The influence of proportional and perceptual conflict composition on team performance. International Journal of Conflict Management, 11(1), p56-73.
30.Jehn, Karen A. (1995). A multimethod examination of the benefits and detriments of intragroup conflict. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40, p256-283.
31.Laue. J. (1987). The emergence and institutionalization of third party roles in conflict. In Sandole, D. J. D. & Sandole-Staroste, I.(eds.),Conflict management and problem solving.
32.O’Connel, Brain(2000). ”Cilil Society: Definitions and Descriptions.” Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly. no3. P471-478.
33.Oldfield, Adrian(1990). Citizenship and Community: Civil Republicanism and the Modern World.
34.Peterson, R. S. (1997). A directive leadership style in group decision making can be both virtue and vice: Evidence from elite and experimental groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, p1107-1121.
35.Robbins, S. P. (1998). Organizational Behavior. Prentice Hall International, Inc., Upper Saddle River, New Jersey. P434-P445
36.Schwenk, Charles. & Joseph S. Valacich. (1994). Effect of devil’s advocacy and dialectial inquiry on individuals versus groups. Organizational behavior and human decision processes, 55, p210-222.
37.Scolve, Richard(2000) Town Meetings on Technoogy: Consensus Conference as Democratic Particpation. P33-48
38.Soltan, Karol Edward(1999) Introduction: Civic Competence, Democracy and Good Society. Pp1-16. The Pennsylvania State Univeristy Press.
39.Thomas, K. W. (1995), “Conflict Management,” In Dunnette, M.D.(ed),The Dynamic of change, N.Y.: McGraw Hill, 11.
40.Thomas, K.W. (1992), “Conflict and negotiation process in organizations,” In Dunnette, M.D. and Hough, L. M.(ed), Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology,p 651-717.
41.Waldo, D.(1980). The Enterprise of Public Administration |