電腦輔助面對面同儕互教活動於一對一數位教室環境

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：33

、訪客IP：18.116.23.59

姓名

陳枝地(Chih-Ti Chen) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

資訊工程學系

論文名稱

電腦輔助面對面同儕互教活動於一對一數位教室環境
(Computer Supported Face-to-Face Interaction in 1:1 Digital Classroom Environment for Peer Tutoring Activities)

相關論文

★ 一個適用於解題領域的模擬多重學習同伴之方法	★ 亞卓市全民學校系統設計與初步使用成果
★ 網路學習資訊護照系統	★ 全民學校之團隊教學與團隊學習設計
★ 電腦支援問答競爭學習遊戲設計之探索	★ 亞卓期刊系統之設計與實作
★ 網路上目標設定環境的建置網路上目標設定環境的建置以閱讀網站為例	★ 亞卓合作觀察實驗站之研究
★ 使用 EduClick 當作遠端遙控互動評量系統	★ 出題與同儕評題支援系統之設計及評估
★ 支援不同解題練習遊戲活動之雙人學習系統	★ 亞卓市多重學習系統之黏合機制
★ 激發使用動機之網路個人學習平台	★ 一個設計結構化網路學習社群之方法
★ 線上社群系統上可客製化機制之設計與實作	★ 無線環境下支援高互動學習之通訊伺服器設計

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

[檢視]

[下載]

本電子論文使用權限為同意立即開放。
已達開放權限電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的，進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。
請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定，切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送，以免觸法。

摘要(中)

同儕教學是一種學生彼此間互相教學的學習模式，許多研究已經證實同儕教學可以讓學生有效率的學習，且不管學生身為教學者或者受教者，學生在認知與情感上都可以藉由同儕教學獲得益處，因此課堂老師便有更多時間來監看全班學生的學習狀況，評估學生的學習過程，並且適時的給予學生協助。
同儕教學是行之有年的研究，只是在傳統教室環境內只能進行簡單任務，因此本研究在一對一數位教室環境下設計了一個豐富的同儕互教活動，從本研究的實驗結果可得知，學生透過面對面同儕互教活動可以提升他們學習成效，且使用電腦輔助方式進行同儕互教活動，比傳統用紙筆方式進行來得更流暢，並且經由系統的對個人的學習歷程分析，可讓學生得到立即的回饋，達到反省檢討的效果，能讓課堂老師透過系統的輔助，更容易監看所有同學在同儕互教活動的學習狀態。

摘要(英)

Peer tutoring is a kind of learning mode for students to teach each other. Peer tutoring has been proved to be effective for students’ learning. Whether students are tutors or tutees, they could gain benefits from peer tutoring cognitively and affectively. Therefore, class teachers have more time to supervise the study situation of the whole class, assess students’ learning procedure and assist them timely.
Peer tutoring is an old-fashioned but useful research approach, which are carried out with simple tasks in traditional classroom environments. Therefore, this research is to design peer tutoring activities in 1:1 digital classroom environments. From experiment results, students enhance their effect on learning through face-to-face peer tutoring activities. Computer-supported peer tutoring runs more smoothly than that of traditional one. By analyzing personal learning procedure, students gain instant feedback/response from the system, and let class teachers supervise the study situation of the whole class easily.

關鍵字(中)

★ 一對一數位教室環境
★ 面對面同儕互教活動
★ 同儕教學

關鍵字(英)

★ face-to-face peer tutoring activities
★ 1:1 digital classroom environment
★ peer tutoring

論文目次

摘要 I
Abstract II
誌謝 III
目錄 IV
圖目錄 VI
表目錄 IX
第1章緒論 -1-
1.1 研究背景 -1-
1.2 研究動機與目的 -2-
1.3 文獻探討 -4-
1.3.1 同儕教學的相關概念 -4-
1.3.2 同儕教學的教學模式 -5-
1.3.3 同儕教學的實證研究 -7-
1.4 論文架構 -8-
第2章同儕互教活動之設計 -9-
2.1 同儕互教活動流程 -9-
2.1.1 準備時期 -11-
2.1.2 同儕教學時期 -13-
2.1.3 老師帶領討論時期 -17-
第3章系統架構與實作 -18-
3.1 系統架構 -18-
3.2 系統模組介紹 -19-
3.3 系統使用及功能說明 -24-
第4章系統實驗與評估 -46-
4.1 第一次試驗 -46-
4.2 第二次試驗 -52-
4.3 系統實驗 -55-
第5章結論與未來工作 -69-
5.1 結論 -69-
5.2 未來工作 -70-
參考文獻 -71-
附錄、問卷內容 -75-

參考文獻

Annis, L. F. (1983). The processes and effects of peer tutoring. Human Learning, 2(1), 39-47.
Bargh, John A., & Schul Yaakov. (1980). On the cognitive benefits of teaching. Journal of Educational Psychology, 72(5), 593-604.
Chang, L. J., Yang, J. C., Deng, Y. C., & Chan, T. W. (2003). EduXs: Multilayer educational services platforms. Computers & Education, 41, 1-18.
Cohen, P.A.; Kulik, J. A.; & Kulik, C. L. C. (1982). Educational outcomes of tutoring: a meta-analysis of findings. American Educational Research Journal, 19, 237-248.
Delquadri, J.C., Greenwood, C.R., Whorton, D., Carta, J.J., & Hall, R.V. (1986). Classwide peer tutoring. Exceptional Children, 52, 535-542.
Dill, E. M., & Boykin, A. W. (2000). The comparative influence of individual, Peer tutoring, and communal learning contexts on the text recall of African American children . Journal of Black Psychology, l, 65-78.
Ehly, S., & Larsen, S. (1980). Peer tutoring for individualized instruction. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Falchikov, N. (2001). Learning together: Peer tutoring in higher education. London: RoutledgeFalmer.
Fantuzzo, J. W., Davis, G. Y., & Ginsburg, M. D. (1995). Effects of parent involvement in isolation or in combination with peer tutoring on student concept and mathematics achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 87, 272-281.
Gartner, A., Kohler, M., & Riessmann, F. (1971). Children teach children: learning by teaching. New York: Harper and Row.
Greenwood, C.R., Delquardri, J.C., & Hall, V. (1989). Longitudinal effects of classwide peer tutoring, Journal of Educational Psychology, 81(3). 371-383.
Greenwood, C.R., & Delquadri, C. (1995). Classwide peer tutoring and the prevention of school failure, Preventing School Failure, 39, 22-24.
Gyanani, T. C., & Pahuja, P. (1995). Brief research report: Effects of peer tutoring on abilities and achievement. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 20(4), pp. 469-475.
Hall, R.V., Delquardri, J., Greenwood, C.R., & Thurston, L. (1982). The importance of opportunity to respond to children’s academic success. In E. Edgar, N. Haring, J. Jenkins, & C. Pious (Eds.), Serving young handicapped children: Issues and research, (pp. 107-140). Baltimore, MD: University Park Press.
Heward, W. L., Herron, T. E., & Cooke, N. L. (1982). Tutor huddle: Key element in a classwide peer tutoring system. Elementary School Journal, 82, 115-123.
Keith Topping (1998). Peer assessment between students in colleges and universities. Review of Educational Research, 68, 249-276.
Liang, J. K., Liu, T. C., Wang, H. Y., Chang, B., Deng Y. C., Yang, J. C., Chou, C. Y., Ko, H. W., Yang, S., & Chan, T. W. (2005). A few design perspectives on one-on-one digital classroom environment. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 21, 181-189.
Liu, T. C., Wang, J. K., Liang, J. K., Chan, T. W., Ko, H.W., & Yang, J. C. (2003). Wireless and mobile technologies to enhance teaching and learning. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 19, 371-382.
Lo, C. N. (2005). The study of peer tutoring in small groups to fourth graders' nature and life technology in the elementary school. Unpublished master thesis, Natural Sciences Education National University of Tainan, Taiwan.
Lovitt, T. (1992) TRIP: Translating research into practice. University of Washington, Sopris West.
Maheady, L., Sacca, M. K., & Harper, G. F. (1986). Classwide student tutoring teams (CSTT): Teacher’s training manual. Ann Arbor, MI: Michigan State University, Department of Counseling, Educational Psychology and Special Education.
Maheady, L. (1998). Advantages and disadvantages of peer-assisted learning strategies. In Topping, K. & Ehly, S. (Eds.), Peer-assisted learning (pp. 45-65). Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Good.
Rohrbeck, C. A., Ginsburg-Block, M. D., Fantuzzo, J. W., & Miller, T. R. (2003). Peer-assisted learning interventions with elementary school students: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(2), 240-257.
Topping, K., & Ehly, S. (1998). Introduction to peer-assisted learning. In Topping, K. & Ehly, S. (Eds.), Peer-assisted learning (pp. 1-23). Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Wang, H. Y. (2004). A model of 1:1 educational computing in classroom using wireless technology. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Department of Computer Science & Information Engineering National Central University, Taiwan.
Whiteman, N. A. (1988). Peer teaching: to teach is to learn twice. Washington, DC: Association for the Study of Higher Education.

指導教授

陳德懷(Tak-Wai Chan)

審核日期

2005-7-13

推文