動態車輪載重對鋪面績效影響的評估

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：40

、訪客IP：3.135.214.175

姓名

王鈞平(Jun-Ping Wang) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

土木工程學系

論文名稱

動態車輪載重對鋪面績效影響的評估

相關論文

★ 高強度鋼筋加勁之超高性能纖維混凝土懸臂梁於反覆載重作用下之撓曲行為	★ 耦合結構牆受近斷層地震作用之行為
★ 高爐石高韌性纖維混凝土（ECC）之開發與自癒合研究	★ 混凝土修補試體之有限元素分析
★ 黏土層中併行潛盾隧道互制現象之有限元素分析	★ 降水引致單樁基礎行為之有限元素分析
★ 斷裂式有限元素法之網格策略與向量化/平行化加速運算	★ 潛盾隧道開挖沉陷之有限元素分析
★ 降水引致單椿基礎負摩擦力行為之有限元素分析	★ 緩衝材料熱傳導性質與放射性廢料處置場溫度效應
★ 黏土層中潛盾隧道開挖沉陷之有限元素分析	★ 柔性鋪面之績效評估與非均佈荷重效應
★ 用過核廢料深層地下處置設計之研究	★ 潛盾隧道開挖沉陷與襯砌行為之有限元素分析
★ 核廢料地下處置之熱傳導及初步熱應變分析	★ 柔性鋪面承載之非線性分析

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

[檢視]

[下載]

本電子論文使用權限為同意立即開放。
已達開放權限電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的，進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。
請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定，切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送，以免觸法。

摘要(中)

本研究採用三維有限元素分析鋪面結構，分成二部份，一是靜態非均佈載重，另一是探討動態均佈載重。分別說明如下：
在靜態非均佈載重方面，續用前人將輪胎模型模擬成輪胎與鋪面表面的接觸應力分佈，模擬車輛停止時對鋪面的影響。
在動態均佈載重方面，使用均佈車輪載重，並讓載重隨時間改變作用位置，模擬車輛等速移動時對鋪面的影響。
以上兩種情形，再針對路基土壤材料彈塑性、不同含水量、以及覆土應力作用下，分析不同胎壓與載重作用下鋪面的反應。研究結果顯示，載重型式相同時，動態對鋪面的影響比靜態小；但由於均佈載重和非均佈載重會隨載重和胎壓的增加而造成差異增大，導致表面撓度和應變會有所差異。

摘要(英)

In this study, 3-dimensional finite element model is used to analyze pavement response. Two parts are included in the analysis. On one hand, non-uniformly static contact stresses are considered; on the other hand, uniformly dynamic contact stresses are discussed.
In the condition of non-uniformly static contact stress, pavement structure effect of vehicle stop is simulated and the effect of tire pressure on pavement structure under traffic load was observed.
In the condition of uniformly dynamic contact stress, load positions are changed with time to simulate pavement structure effect of vehicle moving at uniform speed.
In the analysis, plastic material property, water content, and earth stress are used to analyze the pavement response under different loads and tire pressures. The results show that, when the loading type is the same, the dynamic influence is smaller than static. However, there are different between the results from uniform and non-uniform loads. Increasing load and tire pressure lead to different deflections of surface and strains.

關鍵字(中)

★ 靜態非均佈載重
★ 動態均佈載重
★ 彈塑性

關鍵字(英)

★ non-uniformly static contact stress
★ uniformly dynamic contact stress
★ static-plastic property

論文目次

摘要………….…………………………………………………I
目錄……………………………………………………….……….......IV
表目錄……………………………………………..……………..…..VII
圖目錄……………………………………………………....………VIII
第一章緒論 1
1.1前言 1
1.2研究動機及目的 2
1.3研究方法 2
1.4論文架構 3
第二章文獻回顧 4
2.1 多層彈性理論 4
2.1.1 Boussinesq理論 4
2.1.2 多層系統 5
2.1.3多層彈性理論鋪面設計程式KENLAYER 6
2.2 路面結構強度指數 8
2.3有限元素法應用於三維柔性鋪面結構研究分析 9
2.3.1 有限元素程式 9
2.3.2邊界條件 10
2.3.3 車輪荷重 10
2.3.4 鋪面幾何模擬 12
2.4材料回彈系統 13
2.4.1回彈模數設計法 13
2.4.2 回彈模數組成模式 14
2.4.3 路基土壤之回彈模數組成模式 16
2.5 鋪面破壞形式 17
2.5.1 疲勞破壞準則 17
2.5.2 車轍破壞準則 18
2.6輪胎載重模擬 20
2.7 輪胎與鋪面間接觸應力分佈之相關研究 21
2.8 材料塑性行為 23
第三章鋪面模型的建立及驗證 24
3.1三維有限元素柔性鋪面模型建立 24
3.1.1 ABAQUS/CAE簡介 24
3.1.2幾何模擬 24
3.1.3邊界條件 25
3.1.4車輪載重 25
3.1.5 材料性質 26
3.1.6有效路基深度的分析 26
3.2 柔性鋪面模型的驗証 27
3.2.1均質半空間網格數驗証 27
3.2.2 載重作用處網格劃分驗證 28
第四章路基土壤使用彈性與塑性模式之分析 38
4.1 路基土壤材料性質 38
4.1.1 路基土壤含水量變化對材料性質影響 38
4.1.2 在不同含水量下之 Mohr-Coulomb 塑性模式參數 40
4.1.3 土壤性質及試驗結果 41
4.1.4 大地應力與側向土壓力係數 42
4.2 路基土壤在不同含水量下彈性與塑性模式分析比較 43
4.2.1表面撓度分析比較 43
4.2.2 水平應變分析比較 44
4.2.3 垂直應變分析比較 45
4.2.4 綜合討論 46
第五章移動載重對柔性鋪面績效之影響 58
5.1 鋪面模型 58
5.1.1 模型驗證 58
5.1.2 邊界條件 59
5.1.3 增量控制 59
5.1.4 車速選擇 59
5.1.5 分析方法比較 59
5.2 均佈移載重非均佈靜態載重比較 60
5.3 鋪面疲勞破壞與車轍損壞分析 60
5.3.1 鋪面疲勞破壞經驗準則 61
5.3.2 鋪面車轍損壞經驗準則 62
5.4 路基土壤彈性與彈塑性模式對鋪面損壞分析之比較 63
5.4.1 瀝青層疲勞龜裂分析 63
5.4.2 路基土壤車轍變形分析 63
第六章結論與建議 75
6.1 結論 75
6.2 建議 76
參考文獻 77

參考文獻

[1].de Beer, M., C. Fisher, and F. Jooste. “Determination of Pneumatic Tyre/Pavement Interface Contact Stresses Under Moving Loads and Some Effects on Pavement With Thin Asphalt Surfacing Layer,” Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Asphalt Pavements, Seattle, Washington, 1997, pp. 179-226.
[2].Huang, Y. H., Pavement Analysis And Design, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N. J., (1993).
[3].Hudson, S. W., and Seeds, S.B., “Evaluation of increased pavement loading and tire pressures ”, Transportation Research Record 1207, pp. 197-206 (1988).
[4].Sebaaly, P. E., and Tabatabaee, N., “Effect of tire parameters on pavement damage and load-equivalency factors ,” Journal of Transportation Engineering, ASCE, Vol. 118, No. 6, pp. 805-819 (1993).
[5].Kim, O. K., Bell, C. A., and Wilson, J. E., “Effect of increased truck tire pressure on asphalt concrete pavement,” Journal of Transportation Engineering, ASCE, Vol. 115, No. 4, pp. 329-350 (1989).
[6].Jones, A., “Tables of Stresses in Three-Layer Elastic Systems,” Buletin 342, Highway Research Board, pp. 176-214 (1962).
[7].廖溪坤，「材料對石膠泥瀝青混凝土成效特性影響之研究」，碩士論文，國立中央大學土木工程研究所，桃園(1999)。
[8].吳俊杰，「礦物添加物對石膠泥瀝青混凝土疲勞行為之影響」，碩士論文，國立中興大學土木工程研究所，臺中(1999)。
[9].AI, Research and Development of the Asphalt Institute’s Thickness Design Manual (MS-1), 9th edition, Research Report 82-2, Asphalt Institute (1982).
[10].Shell, Shell Pavement Design Manual- Asphalt pavements and Overlays for Road Traffic, Shell International Petroleum, London (1978).
[11].Barker, W.R. and Brabston W.N., Development of a Structural Design Procedure for Flexible Airport Pavement, FAA Report No. FAA-RD-74-199, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Waterways Experiment Station, Federal Aviation Administration (1974).
[12].Zaghloul S. and T.White, Use of Three-Dimensional, Dynamic Finite Element Program for Analysis of Flexible Pavement, TRR1388, Transportation Research Record, 1992, pp.60-69.
[13].PCA, Thickness Design for Concrete Highway and Street Pavements, Portland Cement Association (1984).
[14].陳式毅，「公路局瀝青路面R值設計法討論」，臺灣公路工程月刊，第11卷，第7期，第36~54頁(1985)。
[15].林志棟，「路基土壤阻力值之工程特性及其在路面工程上之應用」，台灣省公路局材料試驗所，(1981)。
[16].吳鳳儀，「由美國日本之瀝青路面設計方法探討本局路面設計法（一）」，臺灣公路工程月刊，第10卷，第9期，第31~48頁。
[17].林志棟、黃偉慶，「臺灣地區柔性路面厚度手冊研擬」，國立中央大學土木工程研究所(1996)。
[18].AASHTO ，American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Guide for Design of Pavement Structures (Volume1)
(1986,1993).
[19].Lee, W., Bohra N. C., Altschaeffl, A. G., and White, T. D. (1997). “Resilient Modulus of cohesive soils.” Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, ASCE, 123(2), 131-136.
[20].Salem, H. M., Bayomy, F. M., and Al-Taher, M. G. (2003). “Prediction of seasonal variation of subgrade resilient modulus using LTPP data.” TRB 2003 Annual Meeting CD-ROM, TRB 2003-001642.
[21].Puppala, A. J., Mohammad, L. N., and Allen, A. (1999). “Permanent deformation characterization of subgrade soils from RLT test.” Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 11(4), 274-282.
[22].Muhanna, A. S., Rahman, M. S., and Lambe, P. C. (1998). “Model for resilient modulus and permanent strain of subgrade soils.” Transportation Research Record,No.1619,85-93.
[23].Gerritsen, A.H., van Gurp, C.A.P.M., van der Heide, J.P.J., Molenaar, A.A.A., andPronk, A.C., “Prediction and Prevention of Surface Cracking in Asphaltic Pavements,” 6 th International Conference Structural Design of Asphalt Pavements,The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, July 1987, p.378-391.
[24].Dauzats, M. and Rampal, A., “Mechanism of Surface Cracking in Wearing Courses,” Proceedings 6th International Conference Structural Design of Asphalt Pavements,The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, July 1987, p. 232-247.
[25].Nunn, M., “Design of Long-Life Roads for Heavy Traffic,” Proceedings, Industry Conference, Australian Asphalt Pavement Association, Surfers Paradise, Queensland, Australia, 1998.
[26].Myers, L.A., Roque, R., and Ruth B.E., “Mechanisms of Surface-Initiated Longitudinal Wheel Path Cracks in High-Type Bituminous Pavements,” Proceedings, Volume 67, Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists, 1998.
[27].Myers, L., Roque, R., Ruth, B., and C. Drakos. “Measurement of Contact Stresses for Different Truck Tire Types to Evaluate Their Influence on Near-Surface Cracking and Rutting,” Transportation Research Record No. 1655, Transportation Research Board (TRB), National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1999, pp. 175-184.
[28].Himeno, K., Ikeda, T., Kamijima, T., and Abe, T., “Distribution of Tire Contact Pressure of Vehicles and Its Influence on Pavement Distress,” Proceedings, 8th International Conference on Asphalt Pavements, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, August 1997, p. 129-139.
[29].Weissman, S.L., “The Influence of Tire-Pavement Contact Stress Distribution on the Development of Distress Mechanisms in Pavements,” Symplectic Engineering Corporation, Transportation Research Record No. 510 (1999).
[30].Southgate H. F. and Deen R. C., “Effects of Load Distribution and Axle and Tire Configurations on Pavement Fatigue,” UKTRP-85-13, May 1985, Kentucky Transportation Research Program, University of Kentucky.
[31].張永生，「柔性鋪面之績效評估與非均佈荷重效應」，國立中央大學土木工程研究所，碩士論文，桃園(2002)。
[32].ABAQUS Example Problems Manual (VolumeⅡ), Version 6.1-1, Hibbitt, Karlsson & Sorensen, Inc. (2000).
[33].Finn, F., C. Saraf, R. Kulkarni, K. Nair, W. Smith and A. Abdullah. , “The Use of Distress Prediction Subsystems for the Design of Pavement Structures.” Proceedings, 4th International Conference on the Structural Design of Asphalt Concrete Pavement Structures, Vol. 1. 1977. pp. 3-3
[34].Zhang, Z., Leidy, J.P., Kawa, I. and Hudson, W. R.(2000), “Impact of Changing Traffic Characteristics and Environmental Conditions on Flexible Pavement.” Transportation Research Record 1730, pp.125-131.
[35].Harichandran, R.S., Buch, N. and Baladi, G. T. (2001), “Flexible Pavement desigen in Michigan – Transition form Empirical to Mechanistic Methods.” Transportation Research Record 1778, pp.100-106.
[36].Brown S. F. “Material Characteristics for Analytical Pavement Design.” Developments in Highway Pavement Engineering, Chapter II. P.S. Pell ed. Applied Science Publishers Ltd. 1978.
[37].黃琇雯，「路基土壤含水量變化對鋪面永久變形分析之探討」，國立中央大學土木工程研究所，碩士論文，桃園(2003)。
[38].李勝雄，「鋪面材料回彈行為於車轍與疲勞破壞之影響評估」，國立中央大學土木工程研究所，碩士論文，桃園(2004)。
[39].楊樹榮，「路基土壤反覆載重下之回彈與塑性行為及模式建構」，國立中央大學土木工程研究所，碩士論文，桃園(2002)。
[40].Sameh Zaghloul and Thomas White “Use of a Three- Dimensional,Dynamic Finite Element Program for Analysis of Flexible Pavement” Transportation research record1338（1993）

指導教授

張瑞宏(Jui-Hung Chang)

審核日期

2007-1-20

推文