台灣自主遊民的生產：解構共同體

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：9

、訪客IP：18.188.252.203

姓名

范姜松伶(Sung-Lin FanChiang) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

英美語文學系

論文名稱

台灣自主遊民的生產：解構共同體
(The Production of Homeless by Choice in Taiwan: Inoperative Community)

相關論文

★ 獵巫：女性身/影之尋與馴	★ 製造貧窮: 台灣媒體對貧窮的社會建構—以2000年後的媒體文本為例
★ 自殺防治作為治理：解嚴後臺灣之自殺論述	★ 台灣化：後威權時代的情感政治

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

[檢視]

[下載]

本電子論文使用權限為同意立即開放。
已達開放權限電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的，進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。
請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定，切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送，以免觸法。

摘要(中)

自主遊民的爭議就是定義政治的爭議。個人問題與社會經濟問題向來主導主
流遊民研究的問題意識，而「權益」與「義務」則是主流遊民研究解決「遊民問
題」的路徑。上述路徑以社會吸納處理受到社會排斥的遊民，不過，自主遊民是
對社會吸納的否定。社會吸納同時意味複雜的社會關係以及對於內在集體認同的
強調，相反地，自主遊民強調簡單的社會關係以及對差異的尊重。對比國家建立
在集體複雜關係的再生產，自主遊民對於簡單關係的追求毫無疑問地挑戰國家的
延續。自主遊民對於國家的挑戰突顯自主遊民的生產在於解構共同體。最後，自
主遊民對於社會吸納的否定也就是對主流集體認同政治的反詰。

摘要(英)

The controversy of homelessness by choice centers upon the question of the
political. Debates on this issue are divided as individual problem view and
socio-economic problem view, both problematize the excluded status of the homeless.
Be it “homeless rights view” in Taiwan or “government responsibility view” in the US,
the remedies that dominant homeless studies come up with incline to include the
homeless into the collective. Nevertheless, homelessness by choice in Taiwan is a
reversal of social inclusion, a reversal initiated by an interrogation of the sociological
bond. In contrast with the sociological bond, which at once harbors complicated
relations and prioritizes the immanent collective, the ethical bond valuates simple
relations and differences. The ethical bond and its spatial counterpart, the floating
land bond, on the other hand, bring tension to the space of the State as the latter is
composed of the sociological bond and the fixed land bond. The ethical bond and
the floating land bond of homeless by choice, in terms of Henri Lefebvre and
Jean-Luc Nancy, is an effort to produce inoperative community that will lead to the
end of the State. The ethical bond of homeless by choice in Taiwan challenges the
dominant idea that the political is the power relation between the collectives.

關鍵字(中)

★ 差異
★ 解構共同體
★ 身體
★ 自主遊民
★ 空間的生產
★ 主權
★ 情感
★ 救助
★ 社會連帶
★ 關係
★ 現代性
★ 貧窮

關鍵字(英)

★ sociation
★ sovereignty
★ difference
★ assistance
★ poverty
★ inoperative community
★ homeless by choice
★ production of space
★ emotion
★ body
★ bond
★ modernity

論文目次

Abstract [i]
中文摘要(Chinese Abstract) [ii]
Acknowledgements [iii]
Chapter One: Introduction [1]
I. Problematic [1]
II. Methodology and Ethics of Research [4]
Chapter Two: “Homeless by Choice” and its Theoretical Ramifications [8]
I. Homelessness in the US: An Economic Problem [8]
II. Homelessness in Han Chinese Culture and Taiwan: A Problem of
Public Order [12]
III. The Political Turn: “Homeless Rights” in Taiwan [16]
Chapter Three: The Ethical Significance of Homelessness by Choice in Taiwan [24]
I. Family and Work: The Sociological Bond [24]
II. Homeless Life: The Ethical Bond [33]
III. Shelter and Housing: The Fixed Land Bond [44]
Chapter Four: The Political Significance of Homelessness by Choice in Taiwan [53]
I. The Production of Space [53]
II. The Inoperative Community [62]
Chapter Five: Conclusion [68]
I. The Production of Homeless by Choice in Taiwan: Inoperative
Community [68]
II. Space of Difference is Political [73]
Works Cited [75]
Appendix [82]

參考文獻

English Sources
Baum, Alice S., and Burnes, Donald W. A Nation in Denial. Boulder: Westview P,
1993.
Blau, Joel. The Visible Poor: Homelessness in the United States. New York:
Oxford U P, 1992.
Burleson, Bruce. “Lack of Affordable Housing Causes Homelessness.” The
Homeless: Opposing Viewpoints. San Diego: Greenhaven, 2002. 63-67.
Cisneros, Henry G. “Mental Illness Contributes to Homelessness.” The Homeless:
Opposing Viewpoints. San Diego: Greenhaven, 2002. 72-77.
Daly, Gerald. Homeless: Policies, Strategies, and Lives on the Street. London:
Routledge, 1996.
Foscarinis, Maria. “The Politics of Homelessness: A Call to Action.” American
Psychologist 46.11 (1991): 1232-1238.
Giddens, Anthony. The Consequences of Modernity. California: Stanford U P,
1991.
Jencks, Christopher. The Homeless. Cambridge: Harvard U P, 1994.
Klug, Bob. “Homelessness Is Often Voluntary.” The Homeless: Opposing
Viewpoints. San Diego: Greenhaven, 2002. 59-62.
Kyle, Ken. Contextualizing Homelessness: Critical theory, Homelessness, and
Federal Policy Addressing the Homeless. New York: Routledge, 2005.
Lefebvre, Henri. The Production of Space. Trans. Donald Nicholson-Smith.
Oxford: Blackwell, 1991.
Miller, Leslie. “Welfare Cuts Have Increased Homelessness.” The Homeless:
Opposing Viewpoints. San Diego: Greenhaven, 2002. 68-71.
Molloy, Aimee. “Low Wages and Limited Employment Opportunities Cause
Homelessness.” The Homeless: Opposing Viewpoints. San Diego:
Greenhaven, 2002. 54-58.
Nancy, Jean-Luc. The Inoperative Community. Trans. Connor & L. Garbus.
Minneapolis: U of Minnesota P, 1991.
National Coalition for the Homeless. “Domestic Violence Contributes to
Homelessness.” The Homeless: Opposing Viewpoints. San Diego:
Greenhaven, 2002. 84-87.
O'Flaherty, Brendan. Making Room: The Economics of Homelessness. Cambridge:
Harvard U P, 1996.
Pascale, Celine-Marie. “There’s No Place Like Home: The Discursive Creation of
Homelessness.” Cultural Studies <=> Critical Methodologies 5 (2005):
250-268.
Ropers, Richard H. The Invisible Homeless: A New Urban Ecology. New York:
Insight Books, 1988.
San Diego Regional Task Force on the Homeless. “Substance Abuse Is a Cause of
Homelessness.” The Homeless: Opposing Viewpoints. San Diego:
Greenhaven, 2002. 78-83.
Simmel, Georg. “Fundamental Problems of Sociology.” In ed. Kurt H. Wolff.
The Sociology of Georg Simmel. London: Free P, 1950. 3-39.
---. “Faithfulness and Gratitude.” In ed. Kurt H. Wolff. The Sociology of Georg
Simmel. London: Free P, 1950. 379-395.
---. “How is Society Possible?” In ed. Donald N. Levine. On Individuality and
Social Forms. Chicago: Chicago U P, 1971. 6-22.
---. “The Poor.” In ed. Donald N. Levine. In ed. Donald N. Levine. On
Individuality and Social Forms. Chicago: Chicago U P, 1971. 150-178.
---. “The Problem of Sociology.” In ed. Donald N. Levine. On Individuality and
Social Forms. Chicago: Chicago U P, 1971. 23-35.
---. “The Stranger.” In ed. Donald N. Levine. On Individuality and Social Forms.
Chicago: Chicago U P, 1971. 143-149.
---. “The Sociology of Space.” In eds. David Frisby and Mike Featherstone.
Simmel on Culture. London: SAGE, 1997. 137-170.
Wright, James D. Address Unknown: The Homeless in America. New York:
Aldine de Gruyter, 1989.
Wright, Talmadge. “Resisting Homelessness: Global, National, and Local
Solutions.” Contemporary Sociology 29.1 (2000): 27-43.
Chinese Sources
方孝鼎《台灣底層階級研究：以台中市遊民、拾荒者、原住民勞工、外籍勞工
為例》。東海大學社會學研究所博士論文，2001。Fang, Xiao-Ding. Studies of
the Underclass in Taiwan: A Study of the Homeless, Vagrants, Aboriginal labors
and Migrant labors in Taichung City. Unpublished Diss. U of Tunghai, 2001.
王泰升《台灣日治時期的法律改革》。台北：聯經。1999。Wang, Tay-Sheng. The
Juridical Reform of Taiwan during Japanese Occupation. Taipei: Linkingbooks,
1999.
王偉忠《臺灣地區遊民服務網絡的初步分析—以國內的四個機構為例》。國立
中正大學社會福利研究所碩士論文，1998。 Wang, Wei-Zhong. Analysis of
Homeless Service Network in Taiwan. MA Thesis, U of Chung Cheng, 1988.
王學泰《遊民文化與中國社會：增修版上冊》。北京：同心，2007。Wang, Xue-Tai.
Homeless Culture and Chinese Society (Volume I, Supplementary Edition).
Beijing: Tong Xin, 2007.
江瑩《從大台北地區之遊民服務網絡探討遊民賦權之可行性》。世新大學社會
發展研究所碩士論文，2001。 Jiang, Ying. Exploring the Empowerment of
the Homeless: From the Service Institutes to the Alternative Workshops. MA
thesis, U of Shih Hsin, 2001.
吳秀琪《底層的社會建構與自我認同：以台北市遊民為例》。清華大學社會人
類學研究所碩士論文，1995。Wu, Shiow-Chyi. The Social Construction and
Self-Identity of Underclass: A Study of Taipei’s Homeless. MA thesis, U of
Tsing Hua, 1995.
吳欽仁《社會救助體系下的遊民現況及業務問題探討－以臺北縣為例》。東吳
大學社會工作學系碩士論文，2007。Wu, Chin-Jen. The Current Conditions of
the Homeless Under The Existing Social Rescue System, As Well As An
Exploration of Issues of Practice – A Case Study on Taipei County. MA thesis,
U of Soochow, 2007.
吳瑾嫣《女性遊民研究：家的意義與城市生活經驗》。臺灣大學建築與城鄉研
究所碩士論文，1999。Wu, Chin-Yen Anne. Research on Homeless Women:
The Meanings of Home and Experiences of Living in Taipei City. MA thesis, U
of Taiwan, 1999.
林丁國《清代台灣游民研究：以羅漢腳為中心的探討(1684-1874)》。東海大學
歷史學研究所碩士論文，1999。Lin, Ting-Kuo. Research on the Vagabonds of
Ch'ing Dynasty in Taiwan: Focus on Lohan-Jiao (1684-1874). MA thesis, U of
Tunghai, 1999.
林勝偉《政治算術：戰後台灣的國家統治與人口管理》。政治大學社會學研究
所博士論文，2005。Lin, Shung-Wei. Political Mathematics: State Governance
and Administration of Population in Post-War Taiwan. Unpublished Diss. U
of Chengchi, 2005.
林萬億《遊民問題之調查分析》。台北：行政院研考會，1995。Lin,Wan-Yi.
Survey and Analysis of the Problems of the Homeless. Taipei: Executive Yuan,
1995.
高召恩《性別、勞動與公民權：以國家建構的遊民公民狀態為例》。東海大學
社會學研究所碩士論文，2003。Kao, Shaoen. Sex, Labor and Citizenship: The
Civil Condition of Homeless Constructed by Nation-State. MA Thesis, U of
Tunghai, 2003.
許智偉《都市遊民研究：台北市遊民與環境的共生機制初探》。臺灣大學建築
與城鄉研究所碩士論文，2004。Hsu, Chin-Wei. A Study of the Urban
Homeless—A Preliminary Investigation into the Coexistence between the
Homeless and the Environment in Taipei. MA thesis, U of Taiwan, 2004.
陳大衛《臺灣遊民問題的結構分析》。世新大學社會發展研究所碩士論文，
2000。Chen, Tai-Wai. Structural Analysis of the Homeless in Taiwan. MA
thesis, U of Shih Hsin, 2000.
---. 《現代羅賓漢：誰是下一個遊民? 》。台灣立報遊民版(2001 年8 月~2003
年9 月)，未出版。Chen, Tai-Wai. “The Modern Robin hood: Who is the Next
Homeless?” Unpublished Collection of Comments on Homelessness on
Taiwan Lihpao (August 2001~September 2003).
陳自昌《遊民的社區生活與遊民服務：台北市萬華區的遊民研究》。台大社會
學研究所碩士論文，1995。Chen, Zi-Chang. Homeless Life in community and
Homeless Services: A Study on the Homeless in Wanhua District of Taipei City.
MA thesis, U of Taiwan, 1995.
鄭玄《禮記鄭注》。陸費逵總勘。台北：中華書局。Zheng, Xuan. Book of
Confucian Li: Zheng’s Annotation. In ed. Lu, FeiKui. Taipei: Zhonghua
Book.
郭慧明《我要活下去！遊民的生存策略和生活世界》。世新大學社會發展研究
所碩士論文，2004。Guo, Hui-Ming. Live on! Survival Strategies and Life
World of the Homeless. MA thesis, U of Shih Hsin, 2004.
黃玫玲《台北市遊民生活適應問題之研究》。台大社會學研究所碩士，1995。
Huang, Mei-Ling. A Study on the Daily Problems of the Homeless in Taipei.
MA thesis, U of Taiwan, 1995.
黃囇莉《人際和諧與衝突：本土化的理論與研究》。台北：桂冠，1999。Huang,
Li-Li. Interpersonal Harmony and Conflict: Indigenous Theory and Research.
Taipei: Laurel, 1999.
翟學偉〈人情、面子與權力的再生產---情理社會中的社會交换方式〉，《社會
學研究》2004 年第5 期：48-57.Zhai, Xuewei. “Favor, Face and Reproduction
of Power: Social Exchange in the Society of Reasonableness”. Sociological
Research 5 (2004): 48-57.
鄭麗珍、張宏哲《遊民問題調查、分析與對策研究》。台北：行政院內政部社
會司委託研究報告，2004。Cheng, Li-Chen and Zhang, Hong-Zhe. Survey,
Analysis and Countermeasure Studies on Homeless Problems. Taipei:
Executive Yuan, 2004.
蘇碩斌《看不見與看得見的臺北---清末至日治時期臺北空間與權力模式的轉
變》。台北：左岸文化，2005。Su, Shuo-Bin. Visible and Invisible Taipei: The
Transformation of the Modes of Space and of Power in Taipei from the Late
Ching Government to Japanese Government. Taipei: Left Bank Culture, 2005.
Databases
全國法規資料庫(Database of Legislations in Taiwan)
http://law.moj.gov.tw/fl.asp
知識贏家：中時報系資料庫(Database of China Times)
http://kmw.ctgin.com/
聯合知識庫(Database of United News)
http://udndata.com/

指導教授

何春蕤(Josephine Ho)

審核日期

2009-7-17

推文