參考文獻 |
1. Bakos, J.Y. Dependent variables for the study of firm and industry-level impacts of information technology. Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Information Systems, (December 1987), 10–23.
2. Bharadwaj, A.; Bharadwaj, S. G.; and Konsynski, B. R. Information technology effects on firm performance as measured by Tobin’s q. Management Science, 45, 7 (July 1999), 1008–1024.
3. Brynjolfsson, E. The productivity paradox of information technology. Communication of the ACM, 36, 12 (December 1993), 67–77.
4. Brynjolfsson, E. The IT productivity gap. Optimize, 21, (July 2003). Available at: http://www.optimizemag.com/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=17700941.
5. Brynjolfsson, E. VII pillars of productivity. Optimize, 43, (May 2005). Available at: http://www.optimizemag.com/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=161501533.
6. Brynjolfsson, E.; and Hitt, L. Is information systems spending productive? New evidence and new results. Proceedings of the Fourteenth International Conference on Information Systems, (December 1993), 47–64.
7. Brynjolfsson, E.; and Hitt, L. Paradox lost? Firm-level evidence on the returns to information systems spending. Management Science, 42, 4 (April 1996), 499–515.
8. Brynjolfsson, E.; and Hitt, L. Computing Productivity: Firm-level evidence. Review of Economics & Statistics, 85, 4 (November 2003), 793–808.
9. Brynjolfsson, E.; and Yang, S. Information technology and productivity: A review of the literature. Advances in Computers, 43, (July 1996), 179–214.
10. Carmeron, K. S.; and Whetten, D. A., eds. Organizational Effectiveness: A Comparison of Multiple Models. New York: Academic Press, (1983).
11. Cash, J.I.; and Konsynski, B.R. IS redraws competitive boundaries. Harvard Business Review, 63, 2 (March/April 1985), 134–142.
12. Chan, Y. E. IT value: The great divide between qualitative and quantitative and individual and organizational measures. Journal of Management Information Systems, 16, 4 (March 2000), 225–261.
13. Davern, M. J.; and Kauffman, R. J. Discovering potential and realizing value from information technology investments. Journal of Management Information Systems, 16, 4 (Spring 2000), 121–143.
14. David, P. A. The dynamo and the computer: An historical perspective on the modern productivity paradox. The American Economic Review, 80, 2 (May 1990), 355–361.
15. Dehning, B.; and Richardson, V. Returns on investments in information technology: A research synthesis. Journal of Information Systems, 16, 1 (Spring 2002), 7–30.
16. Hitt, L.; and Brynjolfsson, E. The three faces of IT value: Theory and evidence. Proceedings of the Fifteenth International Conference on Information Systems, (December 1994), 263–277.
17. Hitt, L.; Wu, D.; and Zhou, X. Investment in enterprise resource planning: Business impact and productivity measures. Journal of Management Information Systems, 19, 1 (Summer 2002), 71–98.
18. Hong, I. B. A new frame work for interorganizational systems based on the linkage of participants’ roles. Information & Management, 39, 4 (January 2002), 261–270.
19. King, M.; and Mcaulay L. Information technology investment evaluation: evidence and interpretations. Journal of Information Technology, 12, 2 (June 1997), 131–143.
20. Kraemer, K. L.; Dedrick, J.; and Yamashiro, S. Refining and extending the business model with information technology: Dell Computer Corporation. The Information Society, 16, 1 (Jan-Mar 2000), 5–21.
21. Laudon, K. C.; and Laudon, J. P. Management Information Systems 8e. Prentice Hall, NJ, (2004).
22. Lippitt, G. L.; Langseth, P.; and Mossop, J., eds. Implementing Organizational Change: A Practical Guide to Managing Change Effort. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, (1985).
23. Mahmood, M.A.; and Mann, G.J. Measuring the organizational impact of information technology investment: an exploratory study. Journal of Management Information Systems, 10, 1 (Summer 1993), 97–122.
24. Melville, N.; Kraemer, K.; and Gurbaxani, V. Review: Information technology and organizational performance: an integrative model of IT business value. MIS Quarterly, 28, 2 (June 2004), 283–322.
25. National Research Council (NRC) Committee to Study the Impact of Information Technology on the Performance of Service Activities. Information Technology in the Service Sector: A Twenty-First Century Lever. National Academy Press, 2101 Constitution Ave., NW, Washington, DC, 20418, (1994).
26. Parasuraman, A.; Zeithaml, V. A.; and Berry, L. L. A conceptual model of service quality and its implications for future research. Journal of Marketing, 49, 4 (Autumn 1985), 41–50.
27. Phelps, B. Electronic information systems and organizational boundaries. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 19, 1 (January 2007), 17–29.
28. Seddon, P. B.; Staples, S.; Patnayakuni, R.; and Bowtell, M. J. Dimensions of information systems success. Communications of the AIS, 2, 3es (November 1999). Available at: http://cais.aisnet.org/articles/2-20/article.htm.
29. Segars, A. H.; and Grover, V. Strategic information systems planning success: An investigation of the construct and its measurement. MIS Quarterly, 22, 2 (June 1998), 139–163.
30. Sircar, S.; Turnbow, J. L.; and Bordoloi, B. A framework for assessing the relationship between information technology investments and firm performance. Journal of Management Information Systems, 16, 4 (March 2000), 69–97.
31. Tallon, P. P.; Kraemer, K. L.; and Gurbaxani, V. Executives’ perceptions of the business value of information technology: A process-oriented approach. Journal of Management Information Systems, 16, 4 (Spring 2000), 145–173.
32. Weill, P. The relationship between investment in information technology and firm performance: A study of the value manufacturing sector. Information Systems Research, 3, 4 (December 1992), 307–333. |