心情對消費者多樣化選擇的影響

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：136

、訪客IP：3.142.135.243

姓名

林鴻洲(Hung-Chou Lin) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

企業管理學系

論文名稱

心情對消費者多樣化選擇的影響
(Effects of mood states on consumers’ variety seeking behavior)

相關論文

★ 網頁背景圖片對消費者產品偏好的影響	★ 組合商品的定價模式對消費者的滿意度與價值知覺
★ KTV消費型態與消費者類型之關聯	★ 蘋果沉浸度研究
★ 女性業務人員的配飾、妝容、上衣對業務職能特質知覺之影響	★ 男性業務人員服飾配件對職能特質知覺之影響
★ 個人辦公桌擺設對員工工作投入與專業職能知覺之影響	★ 飯店房間內擺設對消費者知覺與金錢價值之影響 --- 以人格特質為干擾變數
★ 療癒著色本對情緒轉換與風險偏好的影響	★ 名片設計對業務人員的職能特質與工作績效之知覺影響
★ 美語補習班的創新服務	★ 台灣工具機製造商之策略構面、組織構面及財務績效之關係研究：五大廠商之個案分析
★ 服務花朵的創新與競爭優勢:以五家牙科診所的個案分析	★ 反向策略之廣告效果研究
★ 不同性刺激形式所引發的性幻想程度對廣告效果之影響	★ 情緒在消費者決策行為中的影響

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

至系統瀏覽論文 ( 永不開放)

摘要(中)

心情已經被學者證實會對消費者的多樣化選擇造成影響，但是過去的研究偏重於正面心情與多樣化選擇的關係，關於負面心情的探討卻是付之闕如。本論文主要在探討不同心情(快樂與悲傷)的消費者在面對商品選擇時，其多樣化傾向的不同。
本論文採用實驗設計，透過9個實驗來檢驗心情對消費者多樣化選擇的影響。結果證實，悲傷的人相較於快樂的人，其多樣化選擇的傾向會提高。此外，本論文也發現，最適刺激水準、自我監控與認知需求等人格特質，會調節心情與多樣化選擇的關係。
本論文同時發現，風險性資訊會調節心情與多樣化選擇的關係。當風險性資訊沒有呈現時，悲傷的人會比快樂的人選擇更多樣化的商品；但是當風險性資訊呈現時，悲傷的人與快樂的人，其多樣化選擇的傾向沒有差異。
另外，本論文也發現產品類別、產品熟悉度與價格促銷會調節心情與多樣化選擇的關係。當快樂的人面臨價格促銷時，其知覺的產品交易價值會提高，進而提高多樣化選擇的傾向，此時悲傷的人與快樂的人，其多樣化選擇的傾向沒有差異；反之，沒有價格促銷時，悲傷的人會比快樂的人選擇更多樣化的商品。

摘要(英)

Building upon previous research and in an attempt to better understand the influence of mood states on variety seeking (VS) tendency, this dissertation seeks to explore whether sad individuals incorporate more VS than happy ones and factors that moderate the relationship between mood states and VS. Nine experiments are investigated in this dissertation and specific emotional states (sadness and happiness) are manipulated. The results of Study 1 provide reliable evidence that sad individuals incorporate more VS than happy ones. Further, the results of Study 2 to 4 indicate that individuals’ personality, such as optimum stimulation level, self-monitoring and need for cognition, moderate the effects of mood states on VS.
Study 5 and Study 6 seek to explore the effect of risky information on the relationship of mood states and VS behavior. Health warnings and nutritional labeling are used to examine the moderating effects on this relationship. The results indicate the presence of risky information attenuates the influence of mood states on VS, so that happy and sad individuals tend to incline to similar levels of VS. However, in the absence of risky information, sad individuals tend to incorporate significantly more VS than happy individuals. The results provide evidence that making risky information more salient might be a good way to decrease individuals’ VS tendency for high-fat snacks.
Individuals are constantly making decisions among different product types (e.g., hedonic and utilitarian products). Study 7 examines these kinds of choices. The results demonstrate that sad individuals incorporate more VS than happy ones when they are offered hedonic products. However, contrary to expectations, sad and happy individuals do not demonstrate similar level of VS when they are offered utilitarian products.
Study 8 examines the effect of product familiarity on the relationship between mood states and VS behavior. The findings provide evidence that sad individuals incorporate more VS than happy ones when they are offered familiar products. However, contrary to expectations, sad and happy individuals do not demonstrate similar level of VS when they are offered unfamiliar products.
Price promotion is a common and effective strategy used in the retailing context. Study 9 aims at exploring the effect of price promotion on the relationship between mood states and VS behavior. Results indicate that price promotion mitigates the effect of affective states on VS. That is, individuals who are sad demonstrate more VS than those who are happy in the absence of price promotion. However, individuals in both mood states demonstrate similar level of VS in the presence of price promotion. Finally, implications and some suggestions for future research are discussed.

關鍵字(中)

★ 價格促銷
★ 產品熟悉度
★ 產品類別
★ 風險性資訊
★ 人格特質
★ 心情
★ 多樣化選擇

關鍵字(英)

★ price promotion.
★ product familiarity
★ product types
★ mood states
★ personality
★ risky information
★ variety seeking

論文目次

ABSTRACT Ⅰ
ACKNOWLEGEMENTS Ⅳ
TABLE OF CONTENTS Ⅴ
LIST OF TABLES Ⅶ
LIST OF FIGURES Ⅷ
CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION 1
1.1 Research Motivation 1
1.2 Research Purpose and Questions 4
CHAPTER 2: LITERATURE REVIEW 10
2.1 The effects of mood states on variety seeking 10
2.2 The effects of mood states on variety seeking: the moderating roles of personality 15
2.2.1 The interaction of mood states and optimum stimulation level on variety seeking 15
2.2.2 The interaction of mood states and self-monitoring on variety seeking 18
2.2.3 The interaction of mood states and need for cognition on
variety seeking 21
2.3 The effects of mood states on variety seeking: the moderating roles
of risky information 24
2.3.1 The moderating effect of risky information 24
2.4 The effects of mood states on variety seeking: the moderating roles of
product types 28
2.4.1 Hedonic products versus utilitarian products 28
2.5 The effects of mood states on variety seeking: the moderating roles of
product familiarity 32
2.5.1 The moderating effect of product familiarity 32
2.6 The effects of mood states on variety seeking: the moderating roles of
price promotion 36
2.6.1 The moderating effect of price promotion 36
CHAPTER 3: RESEARCH DESIGN AND RESULTS 38
3.1 Overview of Studies 38
3.2 Study design and results 41
3.2.1 Study 1 41
3.2.2 Study 2 45
3.2.3 Study 3 48
3.2.4 Study 4 52
3.2.5 Study 5 56
3.2.6 Study 6 60
3.2.7 Study 7 64
3.2.8 Study 8 68
3.2.9 Study 9 72
CHAPTER 4: CONCLUSION 76
4.1 Summary and General Discussion 76
4.2 Implications 83
4.3 Limitations and Future Research 88
REFERENCES 91
Appendix 1: Study 1-4 Questionnaire 102
Appendix 2: Optimum Stimulation Level Scale 103
Appendix 3: Self-monitoring Scale 107
Appendix 4: Need for Cognition Scale 108
Appendix 5: Study 5 Questionnaire 110
Appendix 6: Study 6 Questionnaire 112
Appendix 7: Study 7 Questionnaire 114
Appendix 8: Study 8 Questionnaire 116
Appendix 9: Study 9 Questionnaire 118
LIST OF TABLES
Table 1 ANOVA STATISTICS: STUDY 1 44
Table 2 MEAN BY CONDITION: STUDY 1 44
Table 3 ANOVA STATISTICS: STUDY 2 47
Table 4 MEAN BY CONDITION: STUDY 2 47
Table 5 ANOVA STATISTICS: STUDY 3 50
Table 6 MEAN BY CONDITION: STUDY 3 50
Table 7 ANOVA STATISTICS: STUDY 4 54
Table 8 MEAN BY CONDITION: STUDY 4 54
Table 9 ANOVA STATISTICS: STUDY 5 58
Table 10 MEAN BY CONDITION: STUDY 5 58
Table 11 ANOVA STATISTICS: STUDY 6 62
Table 12 MEAN BY CONDITION: STUDY 6 62
Table 13 ANOVA STATISTICS: STUDY 7 66
Table 14 MEAN BY CONDITION: STUDY 7 66
Table 15 ANOVA STATISTICS: STUDY 8 70
Table 16 MEAN BY CONDITION: STUDY 8 70
Table 17 ANOVA STATISTICS: STUDY 9 74
Table 18 MEAN BY CONDITION: STUDY 9 74
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 1 Research framework 40
Figure 2 The moderating effect of OSL on mood states and variety seeking 47
Figure 3 The moderating effect of self-monitoring on mood states and variety seeking 51
Figure 4 The moderating effect of NFC on mood states and variety seeking 55
Figure 5 The moderating effect of health warnings on mood states and variety seeking 59
Figure 6 The moderating effect of nutritional labeling on mood states and
variety seeking 63
Figure 7 The moderating effect of product types on mood states and variety seeking 67
Figure 8 The moderating effect of product familiarity on mood states and
variety seeking 71
Figure 9 The moderating effect of price promotion on mood states and variety seeking 75

參考文獻

Aaker J. L. (1999). The malleable self: The role of self-expression in persuasion. Journal of Marketing Research, 36 (1), 45-57.
Adaval, R. (2003). How good gets better and bad gets worse: Understanding the impact of affect on evaluations of known brands. Journal of Consumer Research, 30 (3), 352-367.
Andrade, E. B. (2005). Behavioral consequences of affect: Combining evaluative and regulatory mechanisms. Journal of Consumer Research, 32 (3), 355-362.
Argo, J., & Main, K. J. (2004). Meta-analyses of the effectiveness of warning labels. Journal of Public Policy and Marketing, 23 (2), 193-208.
Ariely, D., & Levav, J. (2000). Sequential choice in group settings: Taking the road less traveled and less enjoyed. Journal of Consumer Research, 27 (3), 279-290.
Bailey, J. R. (1997). Need for cognition and response mode in the active construction of an information domain. Journal of Economic Psychology, 18 (1), 69-85.
Balasubramanian, S. K., & Cole, C. (2002). Consumers' search and use of nutrition information: The challenge and promise of the Nutrition Labeling and Education Act. Journal of Marketing, 66 (3), 112-127.
Bawa, K. (1990). Modeling Inertia and Variety Seeking Tendencies in Brand Choice Behavior. Marketing Science, 9 (3), 263-78.
Beltramini, R. E. (1988). Perceived believability of warning label information presented in cigarette advertising. Journal of Advertising, 17 (2), 26-32.
Berlyne, D. E. (1960). Conflict, Arousal, and Curiosity. New York: McGraw Hill.
Block G., Dresser C. M., Hartman A. M., & Carroll M. D. (1985). Nutrient sources in the American diet: quantitative data from the NHANES II survey. American Journal of Epidemiology, 122 (1), 27-40.
Bower, G. H. (1981). Mood and memory. American Psychologist, 36 (2), 129-148
Cacioppo, J. T., & Petty, R. E. (1982). The need for cognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42 (1), 116–131.
Cacioppo, J. T., Petty, R. E., & Kao, C. F. (1984). The efficient assessment of need for cognition. Journal of Personality Assessment, 48 (3), 306–307.
Campbell M. C. & Keller K. L. (2003). Brand familiarity and advertising repetition effects. Journal of Consumer Research, 30 (2), 292-304.
Chandrashekaran, R. & Grewal, D. (2003). Assimilation of advertised reference prices: the moderating role of involvement. Journal of Retailing, 79(1), 53-62.
Chintagunta, P. (1998). Inertia and variety seeking in a model of brand-purchase
timing. Marketing Science, 17 (3), 253-270.
Choi, J. B., Kim, K., Choi, I & Yi, Y. (2006). Variety-seeking Tendency in Choice for
Others: Interpersonal and Intrapersonal Causes. Journal of Consumer Research,
32 (4), 590-595.
DeSteno, D., Petty, R. E., Wegener, D. T., & Rucker, D. D. (2000). Beyond Valence
in the Perception of Likelihood: The Role of Emotion Specificity. Journal of
Personality and Social Psychology, 78 (3), 397–416.
Drichoutis, A., Lazaridis, P., & Nayga, R. M. (2005). Nutrition knowledge and
consumer use of nutritional food labels. European Review of Agricultural
Economics, 32 (1), 93–118.
Fiske, D. W., & Maddi, S. R. (1961). Functions of Varied Experience. Homewood, IL:
Dorsey.
Forgas, J. P. (Ed.). (2000). Feeling and thinking: The role of affect in social cognition.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Friedman H. S, & Miller-Herringer, T. (1991). Nonverbal display of emotion in public and in private: self-monitoring, personality, and expressive cues. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61(5), 766–775.
Gangestad, S. W., & Snyder, M. (2000). Self-monitoring: Appraisal and reappraisal.
Psychological Bulletin, 126 (4), 530-555.
Garg, N., Inman, J. J., & Mittal, V. (2005). Incidental and Task-Related Affect: A
Re-Inquiry and Extension of the Influence of Affect on Choice. Journal of
Consumer Research, 32 (1), 154–59.
Garg N., Wansink B., & Inman J. J. (2007). The influence of incidental affect on
consumers' food intake. Journal of Marketing, 71 (1), 194-206.
Givon, M. (1984). Variety Seeking through Brand Switching. Marketing Science, 3 (1), 1-22.
Graziano W.G. & Bryant W.H.M. (1998). Self-monitoring and the self-attribution of
positive emotions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74 (1),
250–261.
Grewal, D., Monroe, K. B., & Krishnan, R. (1998). The Effects of Price-comparison
Advertising on Buyers’ Perceptions of Acquisition Value, Transaction Value, and
Behavioral Intentions. Journal of Marketing, 62 (2), 46-59.
Gross, J. J. (1998). The Emerging Field of Emotion Regulation: An Integrative Review. Review of General Psychology, 2 (3), 271-299.
Gupta, S. (1988). Impact of Sales Promotions on When, What, and How Much to Buy. Journal of Marketing Research, 25 (4), 342-355.
Haugtvedt, C. P., Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1992). Need for cognition and advertising: Understanding the role of personality variables in consumer behavior. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 1 (3), 239–260.
Hebb, D. O. (1955). Drives, and the C.N.S. (Conceptual Nervous System). Psychological Review, 62 (4), 243-254.
Heppner, P. P., Reeder, B. L. & Larson, L. M. (1983). Cognitive variables associated with personal problem solving appraisal: Implications for counseling. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 30 (4), 537–545.
Herrnstein, R. J., & Prelec, D. (1991). Melioration: A Theory of Distributed Choice. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 5 (3), 137–156.
Holbrook, M. B., & Hirschman, E. C. (1982). The Experiential Aspects of Consumption: Consumer Fantasies, Feelings and Fun. Journal of Consumer Research, 9 (2). 132-140.
Hoyer, W. D., & Ridgway, N. M. (1984). Variety Seeking as an Explanation for Exploratory Purchase Behavior. Advances in Consumer Research, 11 (1), 114-119.
Hsu, C. & Liu, B. S. (1998). The role of mood in price promotions. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 7(2), 150-160.
Isen, A. M., & Simmonds, S. F. (1978). The Effect of Feeling Good on a Helping Task That Is Incompatible with Good Mood. Social Psychology, 41 (4), 346-349.
Isen, A. M., Shalker, T. E., Clark, M., & Karp, L. (1978). Affect, Accessibility of Material in Memory, and Behavior: A Cognitive Loop?” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36 (1), 1-12.
Isen, A. M., & Patrick, R. (1983). The effects of positive feelings on risk-taking: When the chips are down. Organizational Behavior and Human performance, 31 (2), 194–202.
Isen, A. M., Johnson, M. M., Mertz, E., & Robinson, G. F. (1985). The Influence of Positive Affect on the Unusualness of Word Association. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48 (6), 1413-1426.
Kahn, B. E., Kalwani, M. U., & Morrison, D. G.. (1986). Measuring Variety-Seeking and Reinforcement Behaviors Using Panel Data. Journal of Marketing Research, 23 (2), 89-100.
Kanh, B. E., & Lehmann, D. R. (1991). Modeling Choice Among Assortments. Journal of Retailing, 67 (3), 274-299
Kahn, B. E., & Isen, A. M. (1993). The influence of positive affect on variety seeking among safe, enjoyable products. Journal of Consumer Research, 20 (2), 257-270.
Kahn, B. E. (1998). Variety: From the Consumer Perspective. In C. S. Tang & T. H. Ho (Eds.), Research Advances in Variety Management (pp. 19-37).Boston: Kluwer.
Kahn, B. E., & Wansink, B. (2004). The Influence of Assortment Structure on Perceived Variety and Consumption Quantities. Journal of Consumer Research, 30 (4), 519–533.
Kim, S. Y., Nayga, R. M., & Capps, O. (2001). Health knowledge and consumer use of nutritional labels: the issue revisited. Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, 30 (1), 10–19.
Kozup, J. C., Creyer, E. H., & Burton, S. (2003). Making healthful food choices: The influence of health claims and nutrition information on consumers' evaluations of packaged food products and restaurant menu items. Journal of Marketing, 67 (2), 19-34.
Kuvaas, B., & Kaufmann, G. (2004). Impact of mood, framing, and need for cognition and decision makers’ recall and confidence. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 17 (1), 59–74.
Lattin, J. M. (1987). A Model of Balanced Choice Behavior. Marketing Science, 6 (1), 48-65.
Levy, M., Grewal, D., Kopalle, P. & Hess, J. (2004). Emerging trends in retail pricing practice: implications for research. Journal of Retailing, 80(3), 13-31.
Leith, K. P., & Baumeister, R. F. (1996). Why do bad moods increase self-defeating behavior? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71 (6), 1250–1267.
Lenahan, R. J., Thomas, J. A., Taylor, D. A., Call, D. L., & Padberg, D. I.
(1973). Consumer Reaction to Nutritional Labels on Food Products. Journal of Consumer Affairs, 7 (1), 1-12.
Levine, S. P, & Feldman, R. S. (1997). Self-presentational goals, self-monitoring, and nonverbal behavior. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 19(4),505–518.
Lin, C. H., Yen, H. R.,& Chuang, S. C. (2006). The effects of emotion and need for cognition on consumer choice involving risk. Marketing Letters, 17 (1), 47-60.
Luomala, H. T., & Laaksonen, M. (2000). Contributions from mood research. Psychology & Marketing, 17 (3), 195–233.
Machleit, K. A., Allen, C. T., & Madden, T. J. (1993). The mature brand and brand
interest - an alternative consequence of ad-evoked affect. Journal of Marketing,
57 (4), 72-82.
Machleit, K. A., & Wilson, R. D. (1988). Emotional Feelings and Attitude Toward the
Ad: The Roles of Brand Familiarity and Repetition. Journal of Advertising, 17 (3), 27-35.
MacInnis, D. J., & Jaworski, B. J. (1989). Information processing from advertisements: Towards an integrative framework. Journal of Marketing, 53 (4), 1-23.
Mahajan, V., & Wind, Y. (2002). Got emotional product positioning? Marketing Management, 11 (3), 36-41.
Mano, H. (1994). Risk-taking, framing effect, and affect. Organizational Behavior
and Human Decision Processes, 57 (11), 38–58.
Martin, B. A.S., Bodo L. & Stephanie W. (2003). Conclusion Explicitness in
Advertising: The Moderating Role of Need for Cognition (NFC) and Argument
Quality (AQ) on Persuasion. Journal of Advertising, 32 (4), 57–65.
Martin, L. L. (2000). Moods don’t convey information: Moods in context do. In J. P. Forgas (Ed.), Feeling and thinking: The role of affect in social cognition (pp. 153-177). New York: Cambridge University Press.
McAlister, L. (1982). A Dynamic Attribute Satiation Model of Variety-Seeking Behavior. Journal of Consumer Research, 9 (2), 141–50.
McAlister, L., & Pessemier, E. A. (1982). Variety Seeking Behavior: An Interdisciplinary Review. Journal of Consumer Research, 9 (3), 311-322.
Menon, S., & Kahn, B. E. (1995). The impact of context on variety seeking in product
choices. Journal of Consumer Research, 22 (3), 285-295.
Miller, D. L., Castellanos, V. H., Shide, D.J., Peters, J.C., & Rolls, B.J. (1998). Effect of fat-free potato chips with and without nutrition labels on fat and energy intakes. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 68 (2), 282-290.
Mittal, V., & Ross, W. T. Jr. (1998). The impact of positive and negative affect and issue framing on issue interpretation and risk taking. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 76 (3), 298–324.
Moorman, C. (1990). The effects of stimulus and consumer characteristics on the utilization of nutrition information. Journal of Consumer Research, 17 (3), 362-374.
Moorman, C. (1996). A quasi-experiment to assess the consumer and informational determinants of nutrition information processing activities: The case of the nutrition labeling and education act. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 15 (1), 28-44.
Nayga, R. M. (1996). Determinants of consumers’ use of nutritional information on food packages. Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, 28 (2), 303–312.
Orwin, R. G., Schucker, R. E., & Stokes, R. C. (1984). Evaluating the Life Cycle of a Product Warning: Saccharin and Diet: Soft Drinks. Evaluation Review, 8 (4), 801-822.
Pham, M. T. (1998). Representativeness, relevance and the use of feelings in decision making. Journal of Consumer Research, 25 (2), 144–159.
Raghunathan, R., & Pham, M. T. (1999). All negative moods are not equal: Motivational influences of anxiety and sadness on decision making. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 79 (1), 56–77.
Raju, P. S. (1980). Optimum Stimulation Level: Its Relationship to Personality, Demographics and Exploratory Behavior. Journal of Consumer Research, 7 (3), 272-282.
Ratner, R. K., Kahn, B. E., & Kahneman, D.(1999). Choosing less-preferred experiences for the sake of variety. Journal of Consumer Research, 26 (1), 1-15.
Ratner, R. K., & Kahn, B. E. (2002). The impact of private versus public consumption
on variety-seeking behavior. Journal of Consumer Research, 29 (2), 246-257.
Read, D., & Loewnstein (1995). Diversification Bias: Explaining the Discrepancy in Variety Seeking Between Combined and Separated Choices. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 1(1), 34-49.
Roehm, H. A., & Roehm, M. L. (2004). Variety-Seeking and Time of Day: Why Leader Brands Hope Young Adults Shop in the Afternoon, but Follower Brands Hope for Morning. Marketing Letters, 15 (4), 213-221.
Roehm, H. A., & Roehm, M. L. (2005). Revisiting the effect of positive mood on variety seeking. Journal of Consumer Research, 32 (2), 330-336.
Rolls, B. J., van Duijvenvoorde, P. M., & Rolls, E. T. (1984). Pleasantness Changes and Food Intake in a Varied Four-Course Meal. Appetite, 5 (4), 337–348.
Russo, J. E., Staelin, R., Nolan, C. A., Russell, G. J., & Metcalf, B. L. (1986). Nutrition information in the supermarket. Journal of Consumer Research, 13 (1), 48-70.
Schwarz, N., & Clore, G. L. (1983). Mood, misattribution, and judgment of well-being: information and directive functions of affective states. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45 (3), 513-523
Simonson, I. (1990). The effect of purchase quantity and timing on variety-seeking behavior. Journal of Marketing Research, 27 (2), 150-162.
Simonson, I., & Winer, R. S. (1992). The influence of purchase quantity and display format on consumer preference for variety. Journal of Consumer Research, 19 (1), 133-138.
Snyder, M. (1974). Self-monitoring of expressive behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 30(4), 526–537.
Snyder, M. (1987). Public appearances/private realities: The psychology of self-monitoring. New York: Freeman.
Stayman, D. M., & Kardes, F. R. (1992). Spontaneous inference processes in advertising: Effects of need for cognition and self-monitoring on inference generation and utilization. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 1 (2), 125-142.
Steenkamp, J., & Baumgartner, H. (1992). The role of optimum stimulation level in exploratory consumer-behavior. Journal of Consumer Research, 19 (3), 434-448.
Stewart, D. W., & Martin, I. M. (1994). Intended and Unintended Consequences of Warning Messages: A Review and Synthesis of Empirical Research. Journal of Public Policy and Marketing, 13 (1), 1-19.
Szykman, L. R., Bloom, P. N., & Levy, A. S. (1997). A proposed model of the use of package claims and nutrition labels. Journal of Public Policy and Marketing, 16 (2), 228-241.
van Heerde, H. J., Leeflang, P. S. H. & Wittink, D. R. (2001). Semiparametric analysis to estimate the deal effect curve. Journal of Marketing Research, 38(2), 197-215.
van Trijp, H. C. M., Hoyer, W. D., & Inman, J. J. (1996). Why switch? Product category-level explanations for true variety-seeking behavior. Journal of Marketing Research, 33 (3), 281-293.
Venkatesan, M. (1973). Cognitive consistency and novelty seeking. In S. Ward & T. S. Robertson (Eds.), Consumer Behavior: Theoretical Sources (pp. 355-384). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Wansink, B., Cheney, M. M., & Chan, N. (2003). Exploring Comfort Food Preferences across Age and Gender. Physiology and Behavior, 79 (4), 739-747.
Wegener, D. T., Petty, R. E., & Smith, S. M. (1995) Positive Mood Can Increase or Decrease Message Scrutiny: The Hedonic Contingency View of Mood and Message Processing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69 (1), 5-15.
Zuckerman, M. (1979). Sensation Seeking: Beyond the Optimal Level of Arousa., Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Zuckerman, M. (1991). One Person's Stress Is Another Person's Pleasure. In C. D. Spielberger & I. G. Sarason (Eds), Stress and Emotion, Anxiety, Anger, and Curiosity (pp. 31-45). New York: Hemisphere Publishing Company.

指導教授

林建煌(Chien-Huang Lin)

審核日期

2010-1-22

推文