文本電腦輔助溝通對於團隊任務績效之影響研究

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：18

、訪客IP：3.141.28.249

姓名

林婉婷(Wan-Ting Lin) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

資訊管理學系

論文名稱

文本電腦輔助溝通對於團隊任務績效之影響研究
(Effects of Text-Based Computer-Mediated Communication on Team Task Performance)

相關論文

★ 以個案研究法探討機械式組織之資訊系統導入	★ 銀行企業內部網路導入TCP/IP通信協定之研究
★ 後金控時代臺灣地區金融服務業薪資決策支援系統之設計研究 --以一家中型證券商為例	★ 影響數位在職訓練之學習態度及行為意向研究
★ 台灣銀行業導入電子商務線上金流訊息標準之研究	★ 國防訓儲軍士官制度評估
★ 以關係承諾角度探討組織中軟體專案開發之個案研究	★ 企業工作流程再造之研究─以銀行發卡流程為例
★ 以個案研究法探討B2B電子商務導入之研究—以汽車售後服務件製造商為例	★ 以個案研討方法探討公文簽核流程再造之研究－以變更資訊部門服務為例
★ 醫療資訊系統之資訊安全危安因素探討以台北某醫學中心為例	★ 資訊部門專案經理派遣人員之個案研究
★ 綠色供應鏈管理資訊系統導入問題分析與探討-以A公司為例	★ 企業導入企業資源規劃(ERP)對作業流程之影響－以A公司為例
★ 客訴處理電子化流程管理－以飲料業為例	★ 以個案研究法探討企業垃圾郵件防堵

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

至系統瀏覽論文 ( 永不開放)

摘要(中)

團隊使用溝通媒介進行互動以利於資訊交換並提升任務績效。在以往的社會裡，人們多仰賴面對面溝通；隨著資訊與通訊科技之新興與進步，促進了電腦輔助溝通型態的發展，逐步顛覆傳統的溝通模式。
然而，過去有關電腦輔助溝通之相關研究主要偏重於媒介的選擇與適配上。本研究著重於媒介的實際使用與績效上，探討於文本電腦輔助溝通環境下，當團隊併用多項電子媒介時，是否真能促進其資訊分享溝通績效，進而達成其團隊任務績效。本研究以下列四項團隊互動元素：「資訊分享廣度」、「資訊分享深度」、「共同理解」、「認知負荷」以揭示文本電腦輔助溝通對於團隊任務績效表現上之間接影響。
本研究以大學生為樣本執行實地實驗法，並輔以問卷及成果評量以收集資料。研究結果發現：(1) 文本電腦輔助溝通對資訊分享廣度有正向影響。(2) 文本電腦輔助溝通對資訊分享的深度有負向影響。(3)資訊分享廣度對任務績效有正向影響。(4)共同理解對任務績效有正向影響。(5) 文本電腦輔助溝通會增加認知負荷。（6）認知負荷對共同理解有影響。(7) 資訊分享深度對任務績效的影響、認知負荷對任務績效的影響與文本電腦輔助溝通對共同理解的影響皆未達顯著標準。

摘要(英)

Team task performance depends on the level of interaction necessary to support information sharing facilitated by communication media. In the past, team members mainly communicate face to face. With advances of information and communication technologies, computer-mediated communication thrives leading a round change of daily communication pattern.
Past studies on computer-mediated communication emphasize media choices and fits with tasks. This study explores the relationship of media use and task performance. To open the black box surrounding the effects of text-based computer-mediated communication on task performance, the current work employs four group interactive mediating variables: breadth of information shared, depth of information shared, shared understanding, and cognitive load.
A field experiment is designed to examine the research model and posited effects with undergraduate students as subjects. The findings from our samples indicate that text-based computer-mediated communication has positive influences on breadth of information shared and cognitive load, yet negatively affects depth of information shared. It’s also found that both breadth of information shared and shared understanding have positive effects on task performance. Besides, no significant relationships are found between depth of information shared and task performance, cognitive load and task performance, and text-based computer-mediated communication and shared understanding.
Keywords: text-based computer-mediated communication, intersubjective interpretation, shared understanding, cognitive load, team task performance

關鍵字(中)

★ 文本電腦輔助溝通
★ 團隊任務績效
★ 認知負荷
★ 共同理解
★ 交互主體詮釋

關鍵字(英)

★ cognitive load
★ team task performance
★ shared understanding
★ intersubjective interpretation
★ text-based computer-mediated communication

論文目次

中文摘要 I
英文摘要 II
目錄 III
圖目錄 IV
表目錄 V
第一章緒論 1
1.1 研究背景 1
1.2 研究動機 2
1.3 研究問題 3
第二章文獻探討 4
2.1 電腦輔助溝通 4
2.2 交互主體解釋與共同理解 13
2.3 認知負荷 17
第三章研究方法 26
3.1 研究架構與模型 26
3.2 研究假說 27
3.3 變數之操作化定義 32
3.4 實驗設計 35
第四章資料分析 43
4.1 資料分析方法 43
4.1 樣本基本資料分析 43
4.2 量表品質檢測 45
4.3 研究假說檢定 47
第五章結論與建議 50
5.1 研究結論與發現 50
5.2 管理意涵 53
5.3 研究限制與未來研究方向 54
參考文獻 56

參考文獻

中文文獻：
[1] 黃克文，「認知負荷與個人特質及學習成就之關聯」，國立台南師範學院國民教育研究所，碩士論文，民國85年。
英文文獻：
[2] Althaus, S. 1997. “Computer-Mediated Communication in the University Classroom: An Experiment with On-Line Discussions,” Communication Education (46:3), pp. 158-174.
[3] Atkinson, R. C., and Shiffrin, R. M. 1968. “Human Memory: A Proposed System and Its Control Processes,” in The Psychology of Learning and Motivation, K. W. Spence and J. T. Spence (eds.), New York: Academic Press, Vol. 2, pp. 89-195).
[4] Baddeley, A. 1992. “Working Memory,” Science (255), pp. 556-559.
[5] Baltes, B. B., Dickson, M. W., Sherman, M. P., Bauer, C. C., and LaGanke, J. S. 2002. “Computer-Mediated Communication and Group Decision Making: A Meta-Analysis,” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes (87:1), pp. 156-179.
[6] Barclay, D., Higgins, C., and Thompson, R. 1995. “The Partial Least Squares (PLS) Approach to Casual Modeling: Personal Computer Adoption and Use as an Illustration,” Technology Studies (2:2), pp. 285-309.
[7] Benbasat, I., and Lim L. 1993. “The Effects of Group, Task, Context, and Technology Variables on the Usefulness of Group Support Systems: A Meta-Analysis of Experimental Studies,” Small Group Research (24:4), pp. 430-462.
[8] Bennett, J. L. 1996. “Building Relationships for Technology Transfer,” Communications of the ACM (39:9), pp. 35-37.
[9] Berger, P. L., and Luckmann, T. 1966. The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge, Doubleday, New York, NY: Anchor.
[10] Bober, M. J., and Dennen, V. P. 2001. “Intersubjectivity: Facilitating Knowledge Construction in Online Environments,” Education Media International (38:4), pp. 241-250.
[11] Bordia, P. 1997. “Face-to-Face Versus Computer-Mediated Communication: a Synthesis of the Experimental Literature,” Journal of Business Communication (34:1), pp. 99-120.
[12] Bratfisch, O., Borg, G., and Dornic, S. 1972. “Perceived Item-Difficulty in Three Tests of Intellectual Performance Capacity,” Technical Report No. 29, Institute of Applied Psychology, Stockholm, Sweden.
[13] Burke, K., and Chidambaram, L. 1999. “How Much Bandwidth is Enough? A Longitudinal Examination of Media Characteristics and Group Outcomes,” MIS Quarterly (23:4), pp. 557-580.
[14] Burke, K., Aytes, K., Chidabaram, L., and Johnson, J. 1999. “A Study of Partially Distributed Work Groups: The Impact of Media, Location, and Time on Perceptions and Performance,” Small Group Research (30:4), pp. 453–490.
[15] Carifio, J. 1993. “Needed: A Standard Information Processing Model of Learning and Learning Processes,” paper presented at the meeting of the Eastern Educational Research Association, Clearwater, Florida.
[16] Carlson, J. R., and Zmud, R. W. 1999. “Channel Expansion Theory and the Experiential Nature of Media Richness Perceptions,” Academy of Management Journal (42:4), pp. 153-170.
[17] Chi, M., Bassok, M., Lewis, M., Reimann, P., and Glaser, R. 1989. “Self-Explanations: How Students Study and Use Examples in Problem Solving,” Cognitive Science (13), pp. 145-182.
[18] Chidambaram, L., and Jones, B. 1993. “Impact of Communication Medium and Computer Support on Group Perceptions and Performance: A Comparison of Face-to-Face and Dispersed Meetings,” MIS Quarterly (17:4), pp. 465-489.
[19] Chin, W. W, Marcolin B. L., and Newsted P. R. 2003. “A Partial Least Squares Latent Variable Modeling Approach for Measuring Interaction Effects: Results from a Monte Carlo Simulation Study and an Electronic-mail Emotion/Adoption Study,” Information Systems Research (14:2), pp. 189-217.
[20] Chin, W. W. 1998. “The Partial Least Squares Approach for Structural Equation Modeling,” Modern Methods for Business Research, pp. 295-336.
[21] Clark, H. H., and Brennan, S. E. 1991. “Grounding in Communication,” in Perspectives on Socially Shared Cognition, L. B. Resnick, J. M. Levine, and S. D. Teasley (eds.), Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, pp. 127-149.
[22] Cole, M. 1991. “Conclusion,” in Perspectives on Socially Shared Cognition, L. B. Resnick, J. M. Levine, & S. D. Teasley (eds.), Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, pp. 399-417.
[23] Cuieford, J. P. 1965. Fundamental Statistics in Psychology and Education (4th ed.), New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company.
[24] Culnan, M. J., and Markus ML. 1987. “Information Technologies,” in Handbook of Organizational Communication: An Interdisciplinary Perspective, F. M. Jablin (ed.), Newbury Park, CA: Sage, pp.420–443.
[25] Cutler, R. H. 1995. “Distributed Presence and Community in Cyberspace,” Interpersonal Computer and Technology (3:2), pp. 12-32.
[26] D’Ambra, J., Rice, R. E., and O’Connor, M. “Computer-mediated Communication and Media Preference: An Investigation of The Dimensionality of Perceived Task Equivocality and Media richness,” Behaviour and Information Technology (17:3), 1998, pp. 164-174.
[27] Daft, R. L. and Lengel, R. H. 1984. “Information Richness: A New Approach to Managerial Behaviour and Organization Design,” Research in Organizational Behavior (6), pp. 191-233.
[28] Daft, R. L., and Lengel, R. H. 1986. “Organizational Information Requirements, Media Richness and Structural Design,” Management Science (32:5), pp. 554-571.
[29] Daft, R. L., Lengel, R. H., and Trevino, L. K. 1987. “Message Equivocality, Media Selection, and Manager Performance: Implications for Information Systems,” MIS Quarterly, September (32:5), pp. 355-366.
[30] Davidson-Shivers, G. V., Muilenberg, L. Y., and Tanner, E. J. 2001. “How do Students Participate in Synchronous and Asynchronous Online Discussions?,” Journal of Educational Computing Research (25:4), pp. 351-366.
[31] DeLuca, D. C., Gasson, S., and Kock, N. 2006. “Adaptations that Virtual Teams Make So That Complex Tasks Can Be Performed Using Simple e-Collaboration Technologies,” International Journal of e-Collaboration (2:3), pp. 64-85.
[32] Dennen, V. P. 2005. “From Message Posting to Learning Dialogues: Factors Affecting Learner Participation in Online Discussion,” Distance Education (26:1), pp. 125–146.
[33] Dennen, V. P., and Wieland, K. 2007. “From Interaction to Intersubjectivity: Facilitating Online Group Discourse Processes,” Distance Education (28:3), pp. 281-297.
[34] Dennis, A. R. 1996. “Information Exchange and Use in Group Decision Making: You Can Lead a Group to Information, But You Can’t Make It Think,” MIS Quarterly (20:4), pp. 433-455.
[35] Dennis, A. R., and Kinney, S. T. 1998. “Testing Media Richness Theory in the New Media: The Effects of Cues, Feedback, and Task Equivocality,” Information Systems Research (9:3), pp. 256-274.
[36] Dennis, A. R., Fuller, R. M., and Valacich, J. S. 2008. “Media, Tasks, and Communication Processes: A Theory of Media Synchronicity,” MIS Quarterly (32:3), pp. 575-600.
[37] Dennis, A., and Valacich, J. 1999. “Rethinking Media Richness: Towards a Theory of Media Synchronicity,” in Proceedings of the 32th Hawaii International Conference on Systems Sciences, Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE Computer Society Press, Vol. 1.
[38] Dennis, A., Carte, T., and Kelly, G. 2003. “Breaking the rules: Lessons learned from groupware-supported BPR successes and failures,” Decision Support Systems (36:1), pp. 31-47.
[39] DeSanctis, G., and Gallupe, R. B. 1987. “A Foundation for the Study of Group Decision Support Systems,” Management Science (33:5), pp. 589-609.
[40] Dewey, J. 1966. Democracy and Education: An Introduction to the Philosophy of Education, New York: Free Press.
[41] Dickey, M. H., Wasko, M. M., Chudoba, K. M., and Thatcher, J. B. 2006. “Do You Know What I Know? A Shared Understandings Perspective on Text-Based Communication,” Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12(1), pp. 66-87.
[42] Fornell, C., and Larcker, D. F. 1981. “Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error,” Journal of Marketing Research (18:1), pp. 39-50.
[43] Fulk, J., and Boyd, B. 1991. “Emerging Theories of Communication in Organizations,” Journal of Management (17:2), pp.407-446.
[44] Fulk, J., Schmitz, J., and Steinfield, C. W. 1990. “A Social Influence Model of Technology Use,” in Organizations and Communication Technology, J. Fulk, and C.W. Steinfield (eds.), Newbury Park, CA: Sage, pp. 117-140.
[45] Fulk, J., Steinfield, C. W., Schmitz, J., and Power, J. G. 1987. “A Social Information Processing Model of Media Use in Organizations,” Communication Research (14:5), pp. 529-552.
[46] Fullan, M. 1993. Change Forces: Probing the Depth of Educational Reform, London: Falmer Press.
[47] Gerwin, D., and Moffat, L. 1997. “Withdrawal of Team Autonomy During Concurrent Engineering,” Management Science (43:9), pp. 1275-1287.
[48] Gimino, A. 2002. “Students’ Investment of Mental Effort,” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.
[49] Gopal, A., Prasad, P. 2000. “Understanding GDSS in Symbolic Context: Shifting the Focus from Technology to Interaction,” MIS Quarterly (24:3), pp. 509-546.
[50] Griffith, T. L., Sawyer, J. E., and Neale, M. A. 2003. “Virtualness and Knowledge in Teams: Managing the Love Triangle of Organizations, Individuals, and Teams,” MIS Quarterly (27:3), pp.265-287.
[51] Hall, E. T. 1959. The Silent Language, New York: Doubleday.
[52] Hansen, M. T. 1999. “The Search-Transfer Problem: The Role of Weak Ties in Sharing Knowledge Across Organization Subunits,” Administrative Science Quarterly (44:1), pp. 82-111.
[53] Hara, N., Bonk, C. J., & Angeli, C. 2000. “Content analysis of online discussion in an applied educational psychology course,” Instructional Science (28), pp. 115–152.
[54] Hart, S. G., and Staveland, L. E. 1988. “Development of the NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): Results of the Empirical and Theoretical Research,” in Human Mental Workload, P. A. Hancock and N. Meshkati (eds.), North-Holland: Elsevier Science, pp. 139-184.
[55] Hedlund, J., Ilgen, D. R., and Hollenbeck, J. R. 1998. “Decision Accuracy in Computer-Mediated versus Face-to-Face Decision-Making Teams,” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes (76:1), pp. 30-47.
[56] Heninger, W. G., Dennis, A. R., and Hilmer, K. M. 2006. “Individual Cognition and Dual Task Interference in Group Support Systems,” Information Systems Research (17:4), pp. 415-424.
[57] Hewitt, J. 2003. “How Habitual Online Practices Affect the Development of Asynchronous Discussion Threads,” Journal of Educational Computing Research (28:1), pp. 31-45.
[58] Hightower, R., and Hagmann, C. 1995. “Social Influence Effects on Remote Group Interactions.” Journal of International Information Management (4:2), pp. 17-32.
[59] Hinds, P., and Weisband, S. 2003. “Knowledge Sharing and Shared Understanding in Virtual Teams,” in Creating Conditions for Effective Virtual Teams, C. Gibsonm, and S. Cohen (eds.), San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, pp. 21-36.
[60] Hollingshead, A. B. 2001. “Cognitive Interdependence and Convergent Expectations in Transactive Memory,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (81:6), 2001, pp. 1080-1089.
[61] Huber, G. P. 1991. “Organizational Learning: The Contributing Processes and the Literatures,” Organization Science (2), pp. 88-115.
[62] Im, Y., and Lee, O. 2004. “Pedagogical Implications of Online Discussion for Preservice Teacher Training,” Journal of Research on Technology in Education (36:2), pp. 155–170.
[63] Janz, B. D., Colquitt, J. A., and Noe, R. A. 1997. “Knowledge Worker Team Effectiveness: The Role of Autonomy, Interdependence, Team Development, and Contextual Support Variables,” Personnel Psychology (50:4), pp. 877-904.
[64] Johnson, D. W., and Johnson, R. T. 1989. Cooperation and Competition: Theory and Research, Edina, MN: Interaction Book.
[65] Jonassen, D., Davidson, M., Collins, M., Campbell, J., and Haag, B. 1995. “Constructivism and Computer-Mediated Communication in Distance Education,” The Amjohnan Journal of Distance Education (9:2), pp. 7-26.
[66] Kahai, S. S., and Cooper, R. B. 2003. “Exploring the Core Concepts of Media Richness Theory: The Impact of Cue Multiplicity and Feedback Immediacy on Decision Quality,” Journal of Management Information Systems (20:1), pp. 263-299.
[67] Kahneman, D. 1973. Attention and Effort. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
[68] Kalyuga, S., Chandler, P., and Sweller, J. 1999. “Managing Split-Attention and Redundancy in Multimedia Instruction,” Applied Cognitive Psychology (13), pp. 351-371.
[69] Kalyuga, S., Chandler, P., and Sweller, J. 2000. “Incorporating Learner Experience into the Design of Multimedia Instruction,” Journal of Educational Psychology (92), pp. 126-136.
[70] Kanawattanachai, P., and Yoo, Y. 2007. “The Impact of Knowledge Coordination on Virtual Team Performance Over Time,” MIS Quarterly (31:4), pp. 783-808.
[71] Katz, D., and Kahn, R. 1978. The Social Psychology of Organizations (2nd ed.), New York: John Wiley and Sons.
[72] Kaye, A. R. 1992. “Learning Together Apart,” in Collaborative Learning through Computer Conferencing, A.R. Kaye (ed.), London: Springer-Verlag, pp. 1-24.
[73] Kerlinger, F. N. 1986. Foundations of Behavioral Research (3rd), New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, Inc.
[74] Kerr, E. B., and Hiltz, S. R. 1982. Computer-Mediated Communication Systems: Status and Evaluation, New York: Academic Press.
[75] Kettinger, W. J., and Grover, V. 1997. “The Use of Computer-Mediated Communication in an Interorganizational Context,” Decision Sciences (28:3), pp. 513-555.
[76] Kiesler, S. 1986. “The Hidden Message in Computer Networks,” Harvard Business Review (64:1), pp.46–60.
[77] Kiesler, S., and Sproull, L. S. 1986. “Response Effects in the Electronic Survey,” Public Opinion Quarterly (50:3), pp. 401-413.
[78] Kiesler, S., Siegel, J., McGuire, T. W. 1984. “Social Psychological Aspects of Computer-Mediated Communication,” American Psychologist (39:10), pp.1123–1134.
[79] King, R. C., and Xia, W. D. 1997. “Media Appropriateness-Effects of Experience on Communication Media Choice,” Decision Sciences (28:4), pp. 877-910.
[80] Kirschner, F., Paas, F., and Kirschner, P. A. 2008. “Individual Versus Group Learning as a Function of Task Complexity: An Exploration into the Measurement of Group Cognitive Load,” in Beyond knowledge: The legacy of competence, J. Zumbach, N. Schwartz, T. Seufert, and L. Kester (eds.), Springer, pp. 21-28.
[81] Kirschner, F., Paas, F., and Kirschner, P. A. 2009. “Individual and Group-Based Learning from Complex Cognitive Tasks: Effects on Retention and Transfer Efficiency,” Computers in Human Behavior (25), pp. 306-314.
[82] Knapp, M. L., and Hall, J. A. 2002. Nonverbal Communication in Human Interaction, Boston: Thomson Learning.
[83] Ko, D., Kirsch, J. L., and King, W. R. 2005. “Antecedents of Knowledge Transfer from Consultants to Clients in Enterprise System Implementations,” MIS Quarterly (29:1), pp. 59-85.
[84] Kock, N. 1998. “Can Communication Medium Limitations Foster Better Group Outcomes? An Action Research Study Information and Management,” Information and Management (34:5), pp. 295-305.
[85] Kock, N. 2004. “The Psychobiological Model: Towards a New Theory of Computer-Mediated Communication Based on Darwinian Evolution,” Organizational Science (15:3), pp. 327–358.
[86] Krauss, R., and Fussell, S. 1990. “Mutual Knowledge and Communications Effectiveness,” in Intellectual Teamwork: Social and Technological Foundations of Cooperative Work, J. Calegher, R. Kraut, and C. Egido (eds.), Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Eribaum and Associates, pp. 111-145.
[87] Leahey, T., and Harris, R. 1985. Human Learning, Prentice-Hall.
[88] Lee, A. S. 1994. “Electronic Mail as a Medium for Rich Communication: An Empirical Investigation Using Hermeneutic Interpretation,” MIS Quarterly (18:2), pp. 143-157.
[89] Lemke, J. L. 1995. Textual politics: Discourse and social dynamics, London, Bristol, PA: Taylor & Francis.
[90] Lim, L., and Benbasal, I. 1992. “A Theoretical Perspective of Negotiation Support Systems,” Journal of Management Inforrmitian Systems (9:3), pp. 21-44.
[91] Lipnack, J. and Stamps, J. 1997. Virtual Teams: Reaching Across Space, Time and Organizations with Technology, NY: Wiley.
[92] Malhotra, A., Majchrzak, A., Carman, R., and Lott, V. 2001. “Radical Innovation Without Collocation: A Case Study at Boeing-Rocketdyne,” MIS Quarterly (25:2), pp. 229-249.
[93] Markus, M. L. 1994. “Electronic Mail as Medium of Managerial Choice,” Organization Science (5:4), pp. 502-527.
[94] Massey, A. P., and Montoya-Weiss, M. M. 2006. “Unraveling the Temporal Fabric of Knowledge Conversion: A Model of Media Selection and Use,” MIS Quarterly (30:1), pp 99-114.
[95] Matusov, E. 1996. “Intersubjectivity Without Agreement,” Mind, Culture, and Activity (3:1), pp. 25-47.
[96] Mayer, R. E., and Moreno, R. 2003. “Nine Ways to Reduce Cognitive Load in Multimedia Learning,” Educational Psychologist (38:1), pp. 43–52.
[97] McGrath, J. E. 1984. Groups: Interaction and Performance, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
[98] McGrath, J. E. 1991. “Time, Interaction, and Performance (TIP): A Theory of Groups,” Small Group Research (22:2), pp. 147-174.
[99] McGuire, E. G. 1996. “Knowledge Representation and Onstruction in Hypermedia Environments,” Telematics and Informatics (13:4), pp. 251-260.
[100] McLeod, P., and Liker, J. 1992 “Electronic Meeting Systems: Evidence from a Low Structure Environment,” Information Systems Research (3:3), pp. 195-223.
[101] Mennecke, B. E., and Wheeler, B. C. 1993. “An Essay and Resource Guide for Dyadic and Group Task Selection and Usage,” Institute for research on the management of information systems working paper #9309, Indiana University, Bloomington.
[102] Mennecke, B. E., Valacich J. S. 1998. “Information is What You Make of It: the Influence of Group History and Computer Support on Information Sharing, Decision Quality, and Member Perceptions,” Journal of Management Information Systems (15:2), pp.173-197.
[103] Meyer, D. E., and Kieras. D. E. 1997. “A Computational Theory of Executive Cognitive Processes and Multiple Task Performance: Part 1. Basic mechanism,” Psychological Review (104:1), pp. 3-65.
[104] Miller, G. A. 1956. “The Magical Number Seven, Plus or Minus Two: Some Limits on Our Capacity for Processing Information,” Psychological Review (63), pp. 81-97.
[105] Miranda, S. M., and Saunders, C. S. 2003. “The Social Construction of Meaning: An Alternative Perspective on Information Sharing,” Information Systems Research (14:1), pp.87-106.
[106] Mortimer, E. F., and Wertsch, J. V. 2003. “The Architecture and Dynamics of Intersubjectivity in Science Classrooms.” Mind, Culture, and Activity (10), pp. 230–244.
[107] Mulder, L., Swaak, J., and Kessels, J. 2002. “Assessing Group Learning and Shared Understanding in Technology-Mediated Interaction,” Educational Technology and Society (5:1), pp. 35-47.
[108] Nelson, K., and Cooprider, J. 1996. “The Contribution of Shared Knowledge to IS Group Performance,” MIS Quarterly (20:4), pp. 409-429.
[109] Newhagen, J. E., and Rafaeli, S. 1996. “Why Communication Researchers Should Study the Internet: A Dialogue,” Journal of Communication (46:1), pp. 4-13.
[110] Nunamaker, J. F., Dennis, A. R., Valacich, J. S., Vogel, D. R., and George, J. F. 1991. “Electronic Meeting Systems to Support Group Work,” Communications of the ACM (34:7), pp. 40-61.
[111] Nunnally, J. C. 1978. Psychometric Theory, New York, McGraw Hill.
[112] Paas, F. G. W. C. 1992. “Training Strategies for Attaining Transfer of Problem-Solving Skill in Statistics: A Cognitive Load Approach,” Journal of Educational Psychology (84:4), pp. 429-434.
[113] Paas, F. G. W. C., and Van Merri?nboer, J. J. G. 1994. “Variability of Worked Examples and Transfer of Geometrical Problem-Solving Skills: A Cognitive-Load Approach,” Journal of Educational Psychology (86:1), pp. 122-133.
[114] Paas, F., Renkl, A., and Sweller, J. 2003. “Cognitive Load Theory and Instructional Design: Recent Developments,” Educational Psychologist (38:1), pp. 1–4.
[115] Pashler, H. 1994. “Dual-Task Interference in Simple Tasks: Data and Theory,” Psychological Bulletin (116:2), pp. 220–244.
[116] Pena-Shaﬀ, J. B., and Nicholls, C. 2004. “Analyzing student interactions and meaning construction in computer bulletin board discussions,” Computers and Education (42), pp. 243–265.
[117] Pinsonneault, A., and Kdraemer, K. L. 1989. “The Impact of Technological Support on Groups: An Assessment of the Empirical Research,” Decision Support Systems (5:2), pp. 197-216.
[118] Pinsonneault, A., and Kraemer, K. 1990. “The Effects of Electronic Meetings on Group Processes and Outcomes: An Assessment of the Empirical Research,” European Journal of Operational Research (46), pp. 143-161.
[119] Pinsonneault, A., Barki H., Gallupe R. B., and Hoppen, N. 1999. “The Illusion of Electronic Brainstorming Productivity: Theoretical and Empirical Issues,” Information Systems Research (10:2), pp. 378-380.
[120] Rafaeli, S. 1988. “Interactivity: From New Media to Communication,” in Advancing Communication Science: Merging Mass and Interpersonal Processes, Hawkins, R., Wiemann, J., & Pingree, S. (eds.), CA: Sage, pp.110-134.
[121] Raykov, T., and Shrout, P. E. 2002. “Reliability of Scales With General Structure: Point and Interval Estimation Using a Structural Equation Modeling Approach,” Structural Equation Modeling (9:2), pp. 195-212.
[122] Reagans, R., and McEvily, B. 2003. “Network Structure and Knowledg Transfer: The Effects of Cohesion and Range,” Administrative Science Quarterly (48:2), pp. 240-267.
[123] Rice, R. E. 1992. “Task Analyzability, Use of New Media, And Effectiveness: A Multi-Site Exploration of Media Richness,” Organization Science (3:4), pp. 475-500.
[124] Rice, R. E., and Gattiker, U. E. 2001. “New Media and Organizational Structuring,” in The New Handbook of Organizational Communication, F. M. Jablin, and L. L. Putnam (eds.), Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, pp. 544-581.
[125] Rice, R. E., and Love, G. 1987. “Electronic Emotion: Socio-Emotional Content in a Computer-Mediated Communication Network,” Communication Research (14:1), pp. 85-108.
[126] Rice, R. E., and Shook, D. 1990. “Relationships of Job Categories and Organizational Levels to Use of Communication Channels, Including Electronic Mail: A Meta-Analysis and Extension,” Journal of Management Studies (27:2), pp. 195-229.
[127] Ricoeur, P. 1991. From Text to Action, Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.
[128] Ringle, C., Wende, S., and Will, A. 2005, “Smart-PLS Version 2.0 M2,” (available online: www.smartpls.de).
[129] Roberto, M. A. 2005. Why Great Leaders Don't Take Yes for an Answer: Managing for Conflict and Consensus, Wharton School Publishing.
[130] Roberts, T., Lowry, P., and Sweeney, P., 2006 “An Evaluation of the Impact of Social Presence through Group Size and the Use of Collaborative Software on Group Member “Voice” in Face-to-Face and Computer-Mediated Task Groups,” IEEE Transaction on Professional Communication (49:1), pp. 28-43.
[131] Rogers, E. M. 1986. Communication Technology: The New Media in Society, New York: The Free Press.
[132] Rommetveit, R. 1985. “Language Acquisition as Increasing Linguistic Structuring of Experience and Symbolic Behavior Control,” in Culture, Communication, and Cognition: Vygotskian perspectives, J. V. Wertsch (ed.), pp. 183–204. New York: Cambridge University Press.
[133] Sambamurthy, V., and Chin, W. W. 1994. “The Effects of Group Attitudes Toward Alternative GDSS Designs on the Decision-marking Performance of Computer-Supported Groups,” Decision Sciences (25), pp.215-241.
[134] Schegloff, E. A. 1992. “Repair after Next Turn: The Last Structurally Provided Defense of Intersubjectivity in Conversation,” American Journal of Sociology (97:5), pp. 1295–1345.
[135] Schultze, U., Vandenbosch, B. 1998. “Information Overload in a Groupware Environment: Now You See It, Now You Don’t,” Jounal of Organizational Computing and Electronic Commerce (8:2), pp. 127-148.
[136] Shaft, T. M., and Vessey, I. 2006. “The Role of Cognitive Fit in the Relationship Between Software Comprehension and Modiﬁcation,” MIS Quarterly (30:1), pp. 29-55.
[137] Shiffrin, R. M., and Schneider, W. 1977. “Controlled and Automatic Human Information Processing: II. Perceptual Learning, Automatic Attending, and a General Theory,” Psychological Review (84:1), pp. 127-190.
[138] Short, J. A., Williams, F., and Christie, B. 1976. The Social Psychology of Telecommunications, New York: Wiley.
[139] Simon, H. A. 1974. “How Big Is a Chunk?,” Science (183), pp. 482-488.
[140] Smolka, A. L., de Goes, M. C., and Pino, A. 1995. “The Constitution of the Subject: A Persistent Question,” in Sociocultural Studies of Mind, J. Wertsch, P. del Rio, and A. Alvarez (eds.), New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 165-184.
[141] Sproull, L, and Kiesler, S. 1986. “Reducing Social Context Cues: Electronic Mail in Organizational Communication,” Management Science (32:11), pp. 1492–1512.
[142] Sproull, L., and Kiesler, S. 1991. Connections: New Ways of Working in the Networked Organization, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
[143] Stasser, G., and Stewart, D. 1992. “Discovery of Hidden Profiles by Decision-Making Groups: Solving a Problem Versus Making a Judgment,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (63), pp. 426-434.
[144] Steffe, L. P., and Thompson, P. W. 2000. “Interaction or Intersubjectivity? A Reply to Lerman,” Journal for Research in Mathematics Education (31:2), pp. 191–209.
[145] Swaab, R. I., Postmes, T., Neijens, P., Kiers, M. H., and Dumay, A. C. M. 2002. “Muitiparty Negotiation Support: The Role of Visualization’s Influence on the Development of Shared Mental Models,” Journal of Management Information Systems (19:1), pp. 129-150.
[146] Sweller, J. 1988. “Cognitive Load During Problem Solving: Effects on Learning,” Cognitive Science (12), pp. 257-285.
[147] Sweller, J. 2005. “Implications of Cognitive Load Theory for Multimedia Learning,” in The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning, R. E. Mayer (ed.), New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 19-30.
[148] Sweller, J., van Merrierboer, J. J. G., and Pass, F. 1998. “Cognitive Architecture and Instructional Design,” Educational Psychology Review (10:3), pp. 251-296.
[149] Temme, D., Kreis, H., and Hildebrandt, L. 2006. “PLS Path Modeling – A Software Review,” Institute of Marketing, Humboldt University Berlin. (available online: http://edoc.hu-berlin.de/series/sfb-649-papers/2006-84/PDF/84.pdf).
[150] Tschan, F., and von Cranach, M. 1996. “Group Structure, Process and Outcome,” in Handbook of Work Group Psychology, M. E. West (ed.), New York: John Wiley and Sons, pp. 95-121.
[151] Tulving, E. 1972. “Episodic and Semantic Memory,” in Organization of Memory, E. Tulving and W. Donaldson (eds.), New York: Academic Press.
[152] Vygotsky, L.S. 1978. Mind and Society: The Development of Higher Mental Processes, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
[153] Waller, M. J., Zellmer-Bruhn, M. E., and Giambatista, R. C. 2002. “Watching the Clock: Group Pacing Behavior Under Dynamic Deadlines,” The Academy of Management Journal (45:5), pp. 1046-1055.
[154] Walther, J. 1996. “Computer-Mediated Communication: Impersonal, Interpersonal, and Hyperpersonal Interaction,” Communication Research (23:1), pp. 3-43.
[155] Walther, J. B., and Burgoon, J. 1992. “Relational Communication in Computer-Mediated Interaction,” Human Communication Research (19:1), pp. 50-88
[156] Walther, J. B., and D’addario, K. P. 2001. “The Impacts of Emoticons on Message Interpretation in Computer-Mediated Communication,” Social Science Computer Review (19:3), pp.324-347.
[157] Walther, J. B., and Tidwell, L. C. 1995. “Nonverbal Cues in Computer-Mediated Communication, and the Effect of Chronemics on Relational Communication,” Journal of Organizational Computing (5:4), pp. 355-378.
[158] Warschauer, M. 1997. “Computer-Mediated Collaborative Learning: Theory and Practice,” The Modern Language Journal (81:4), pp. 470-480.
[159] Weick, K. E. 1979. The Social Psychology of Organizing, Reading, MA: Addison Wesley.
[160] Weinstein, C. S. 1996. Secondary Classroom Management: Lessons from Research and Practice, New York: McGraw-Hill.
[161] Weisband, S. P. 1992. “Group Discussion and First Advocacy Effects in Computer-Mediated and Face-to-Face Decision Making Groups,” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes (55:3), pp. 352-380.
[162] Wertsch, J. V. 1985. Vygotsky and the Social Formation of Mind, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
[163] Wickens, C. D. 1984. Processing Resources in Attention. New York: Academic.
[164] Wierwille, W. W., and Eggmeier, F. L. 1993. “Recommendations for Mental Workload Measurement in a Test and Evaluation Environment,” Human Factor (35), pp. 263-281.
[165] Wold, H. 1985. “Systems Analysis by Partial Least Squares,” in Measuring the Unmeasurable, P. Nijkamp, H. Leitner, and N. Wrigley (eds.), Boston, MA: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, pp. 221-251.
[166] Yoo, Y., and Alavi M. 2001. “Media and Group Cohesion: Relative Influences on Social Presence, Task Participation, and Group Consensus,” MIS Quarterly (25:3), pp.371-390.
[167] Zakaria, N., Amelinckx, A., and Wilemon, D. 2004. “Working Together Apart? Building a Knowledge-Sharing Culture for Global Virtual Teams,” Creativity and Innovation Management (13:1), pp. 15-29.
[168] Zigurs, I., and Buckland, B. K. 1998. “A Theory of Task/Technology Fit and Group Support Systems Effectiveness,” MIS Quarterly (22:3), pp.313-334.
網路資料：
[169] 資策會(MIC)資訊市場情報中心：九十八年度台灣寬頻網路使用調查報告，2009年5月12日，取自http://mic.iii.org.tw/intelligence/。
[170] 財團法人台灣網路資訊中心(TWNIC)：九十八年台灣寬頻網路使用調查，2009年5月12日，取自http://www.twnic.net.tw/NEWS4/85.doc。

指導教授

范懿文(Yi-Wen Fan)

審核日期

2009-6-23

推文