發展一服務導向資訊系統以開發產品平台

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：38

、訪客IP：52.14.166.224

姓名

蔡世祺(Shih-chi Tsai) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

工業管理研究所

論文名稱

發展一服務導向資訊系統以開發產品平台
(A service-oriented information system for developing product platform)

相關論文

★ 應用MFM 與PPM 監控協同設計之執行流程	★ 應用DSM與DRFT於汽車電子之協同開發流程
★ 一協同設計專案團隊組成方法- 以安全監視器產品為例	★ 應用認知工程開發全球化光纖通訊系統
★ 羽絨產業策略規劃-應用品質機能展開分析法	★ 重電業協同專案管理績效之研究-以變電所統包工程為例
★ 以屬性導向新產品開發之流程塑模與分析– 以醫療器材產業為案例	★ 以品質機能展開法應用於主管管理職能之建構
★ 應用參考模型以及流程建模改善供應鏈績效-以投影機產業為例	★ 協同產品開發之流程管理 - 以汽車零件為例
★ 配電系統之高壓電纜接頭供應商評選	★ 應用品質機能展開於產品開發之流程分析-以刀鋒式伺服器為例
★ 實施精實六標準差改進製程良率－以機頂盒表面黏著技術為例	★ 太陽能模組產業之決策營運研究
★ 新產品開發階段導入替代料之流程建模及潛在風險分析	★ 應用實驗設計研發PET複合膜及改善厚膜翹曲問題

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

[檢視]

[下載]

本電子論文使用權限為同意立即開放。
已達開放權限電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的，進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。
請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定，切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送，以免觸法。

摘要(中)

面對全球化競爭，產品平台在開發多樣化產品上，扮演著不可或缺的角色。儘管此新方法能協助製造商更有效地鎖定目標市場，關於產品平台生命週期的資訊與各種專業知識仍必須分享整合在執行產品族開發專案的過程中。此外近年來隨著企業間協同合作，跨地域與跨組織的策略聯盟共同進行產品開發已儼然成為一種趨勢。
在分散式運算環境下，產品開發可視為密切合作溝通的知識分享流程，本研究目的在提出一個服務導向的產品平台開發資訊系統協助專案經理控管產品平台開發專案，並協同產品設計團隊完成產品平台生命週期各階段須面對的任務。此資訊系統採用物件導向方法與服務導向架構，針對產品平台開發情境，以物件導向方法分析系統模型，應用服務導向架構為資訊系統架構。最後以電子閱讀器產品為案例，展示此資訊系統操作情境。

摘要(英)

To compete in the global market, product platform development (PPD) plays a crucial role in developing multiple products. While this new approach benefits the manufacturer to target broader market more efficiently, a great amount of information and variety of expertise regarding the lifecycle of the product platform need to be shared and integrated along the PPD project implementation. In addition, as an emerging trend, PPD is often demands collaboration across business partners that are distributed geographically and organizationally.
Considering PPD as a knowledge sharing process with intensive cooperative communication in a distributed computing environment, this study proposes an information system to facilitate the project manager to control the PPD project and the design team to perform various tasks regarding the product platform’s lifecycle. To develop the information system, object-oriented methodology (OOM) and service-oriented architecture (SOA) are adopted and integrated in an analytical framework. Focusing on the PPD scenarios, OOM is to identify and classify businesses objects, and SOA is to prototype the information system. A case on electronic reading device development will be depicted to demonstrate proposed information system.

關鍵字(中)

★ 服務導向架構
★ 物件導向方法
★ 資訊平台
★ 產品平台

關鍵字(英)

★ object-oriented methodology
★ service-oriented architecture
★ information system
★ product platform

論文目次

中文摘要 i
Abstract ii
Table of Content iii
List of Figure v
List of Table vi
Chapter 1 Introduction 1
1.1 Background 1
1.2 Motivation 2
1.3 Research Objectives 3
1.4 Chapter Layout 4
Chapter 2 Literature Review 7
2.1 Product family design 7
2.1.1 Introduction 7
2.1.2 Product family Design Process 7
2.1.3 Challenge 8
2.2 Product Platform 8
2.2.1 Platform-based product family design 9
2.3 Service Oriented Architecture 10
2.3.1 Introduction 11
2.3.2 Basic service oriented architecture 12
2.3.3 Service-oriented computing 13
Chapter 3 Research Methodology 15
3.1 Introduction 15
3.2 Object Modeling Technique (OMT) 15
3.2 Research Methodology 16
Chapter 4 Modeling of the Proposed System 19
4-1 System Architecture 19
4-2 Modeling of proposed system 20
4-2-1 Object model 21
4-2-2 Dynamic model 22
4-2-3 Functional model 24
Chapter 5 The Implementation of the Proposed System 28
5-1 Example description 28
5-2 Implementation of service-oriented ERD Development Platform 29
Chapter 6 Conclusion and future research 33
6-1 Conclusion 33
6-2 Future research 34
Reference 35

參考文獻

Derr, K. W. (1995) Apply OMT: A Practical Step-by-step Guide to Using the Object Modeling Technique. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Du, X., Jiao, J., & Tseng, M. M. (2001) Architecture of Product Family: Fundamentals and Methodology, Concurrent Engineering , Vol.9, No 4, pp. 309-325.
Ericsson, A., & Erixon, G. (1999) Controlling Design Variants: Modular Product Platforms, New York: Society of Manufacturing Engineers.
Freek, E., & K., V. (1997) Architectures for product families, Computers in Industry , Vol.33, No 2-3, pp. 165-178.
Guner, S. (2005) Service Oriented Architecture, Hamburg-Harburg: TU.
Ho, T. H., & Tang, C. S. (1998) Product Variety Management: Research Advances. Springer.
Lit, P. D., & Delchambre, A. (2003) Integrated Design of a Product Family and Its Assembly System, Springer.
Lublinsky, B. (2007) Defining SOA as an architectural style, Retrieved from IBM: http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/architecture/library/ar-soastyle/
MacKenzie, C. M., Laskey, K., McCabe, F., Brown, P. F., & Metz, R. (2007) Reference Model for Service Oriented Architecture 1.0. OASIS.
Meyer, M. H., & Lehnerd, A. (1997) The power of product platforms : building value and cost leadership, Free Press.
Meyer, M. H., & Utterback, J. M. (1992) The product family and the dynamics of core capability. Sloan School of Management , Vol.77, No 92, pp. 15-18.
N., S. (1999) Introducing interface management in product family development. Journal of Production Innovation Management , Vol.16, No 1, pp. 40–51.
Papazoglou, M. P. (2003) Service-oriented computing: concepts, characteristics and directions, Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on (pp. 3-12). Web Information Systems Engineering.
Papazoglou, M. P., Traverso, P., Dustdar, S., & Leymann, F. (2007) Service-Oriented Computing: State of the Art and Research Challenges, Computer , Vol.40, No 11, pp. 38-45.
Robertson, D., & Ulrich, K. (1998) Planning product platforms, Sloan Management Review , Vol. 39, No.4, pp. 19–31.
Rungtusanatham, M., & Forza, C. (2005) Coordinating product design, process design, and supply chain design decisions: Part A: Topic motivation, performance implications, and article review process. Journal of Operations Management , Vol.23, No. 3-4, pp. 257 - 265.
Sanderson, S., & Uzumeri, M. (1995). Managing product families: The case of the Sony walkman. Research Policy , Vol. 24, No.5, pp. 761–782.
Simpson, T. W. (2004) Product platform design and customization: Status and promise, Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing , Vol.18, No.1, pp. 3–20.
Simpson, T. W., & D’Souza, B. (2004) Assessing variable levels of platform commonality within a product family using a multiobjective genetic algorithm, Concurrent Engineering: Research and Applications, pp. 119–130.
Simpson, T. W., Maier, J. R., & Mistree, F. (2001a) Product platform design: Method and application, Research in Engineering Design , pp. 2-22.
Suh, N. P. (2001) Axiomatic design: Advances and applications, New York: Oxford University Press.
Thevenot, H. J., & Simpson, T. W. (2005) Commonality indices for assessing product families, In T. W. Simpson, Z. Siddique, & J. Jiao, Product platform and product family design: Methods and applications (pp. 107–129), New York: Springer.
TSENG, M. M., JIAO, J., & MERCHANT, M. E. (1996) Design for mass customization, CIRP Annals , Vol.45, No.1, pp. 153–156.
Ulrich, K. (1995) The role of product architecture in the manufacturing firm, Research Policy , Vol.24, No.3, pp. 419–440.
Wilhelm, B. (1997) Platform and modular concepts at Volkswagen– their effects on the assembly process, In U. J. K. Shimokawa, Transforming automobile assembly, Berlin Heidelberg: Springer.

指導教授

高信培(Hsing-pei Kao)

審核日期

2009-7-2

推文