兩家廠商間價格與品質的競爭

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：11

、訪客IP：18.225.209.229

姓名

莊涴婷(Wan-Ting Chuang) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

工業管理研究所

論文名稱

兩家廠商間價格與品質的競爭
(Price and quality competition between two retailers)

相關論文

★ 二階段作業研究模式於立體化設施規劃應用之探討–以半導體製造廠X及Y公司為例	★ 推行TPM活動以改善設備總合效率並提昇企業競爭力...以U公司桃園工廠為例
★ 資訊系統整合業者行銷通路策略之研究	★ 以決策樹法歸納關鍵製程暨以群集法識別關鍵路徑
★ 關鍵績效指標(KPI)之建立與推行 - 在造紙業	★ 應用實驗計劃法- 提昇IC載板錫球斷面品質最佳化之研究
★ 如何從歷史鑽孔Cp值導出新設計規則進而達到兼顧品質與降低生產成本目標	★ 產品資料管理系統建立及導入-以半導體IC封裝廠C公司為例
★ 企業由設計代工轉型為自有品牌之營運管理	★ 運用六標準差步驟與FMEA於塑膠射出成型之冷料改善研究(以S公司為例)
★ 台灣地區輪胎產業經營績效之研究	★ 以方法時間衡量法訂定OLED面板蒸鍍有機材料更換作業之時間標準
★ 利用六標準差管理提升生產效率－以Ａ公司塗料充填流程改善為例	★ 依流程相似度對目標群組做群集分析- 以航空發動機維修廠之自修工件為例
★ 設計鏈績效衡量指標建立 —以電動巴士產業A公司為例	★ 應用資料探勘尋找影響太陽能模組製程良率之因子研究

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

至系統瀏覽論文 ( 永不開放)

摘要(中)

近年來，品質管理的領域出現各種理論，讓品質管理的內涵越來越豐富，對企業來說，做好品質管理將有助於提升利潤，再者顧客買一項產品除了顧及價格高低外，更去在乎品質的水準，我們可以發現訂價策略並非是唯一的決策，所以我們考慮以品質水準當成決策變數，因此在模型中，價格和品質水準會是我們的決策變數。在研究中，我們會先提出一個保留價格的概念，因為每個人對一項產品的認知價格不同，所以廠商只能知道保留價格的分配，這個保留價格分配會受到廠商的訂價與品質水準而變動；在這個架構下，我們將會先提出一個基本的模型，整個市場只有一家廠商，在沒有任何的競爭下，廠商如何訂價與品質水準會使得廠商的利潤會最大；之後再提出整個市場有兩家廠商彼此競爭，直到雙方達到Nash均衡訂出價格與品質水準使得雙方皆沒有再偏離該均衡的意願。最後，我們將設計一個數值例子與分析各個參數對模型的影響。

摘要(英)

In recent years, the literature in operations management has seen a dramatic surge in articles on quality management. It reflects the increased emphasis on quality which has been attributed largely to make a profit. Furthermore, consumers purchase a product based on not only its price but also its quality levels. We can find that pricing decisions for sellers are not only the most crucial factor in industries. Hence, we take quality levels into consideration in the model. In this study, we propose a reservation price distribution affected by the selling price and quality levels of the product. Under this structure, we show the basic model with one firm in determining its price and quality levels to maximize profits without any competition. Moreover, two firms compete in determining their price and quality levels to maximize their profits and find the decisions of price and quality levels in Nash equilibrium for both firms, respectively. Finally, we find some observations from the numerical examples and show the sensitivity analysis on parameters.

關鍵字(中)

★ 保留價格
★ 價格與品質的競爭
★ 非合作賽局

關鍵字(英)

★ Non-cooperative game
★ Price and quality competition
★ Reservation price

論文目次

Content
Abstract i
Content iii
List of Figures iv
List of Tables v
1.Introduction 1
1.1 Background/Motivation 1
1.2 Research objective 2
2. Literature Review 3
2.1 Reservation price 3
2.2 Non-cooperative game 4
2.3 Price and quality competition 6
3. The Model 8
3.1 Demand function and notation 8
3.2 The basic model with one firm 10
3.3 The model with a price and quality-based competition between two firms 11
4. Numerical Example 14
4.1 The numerical results of the basic model with one firm 14
4.2 The numerical results of the competition between two firms 15
4.3 Analysis of numerical example from one firm to two firms 15
4.4 Analysis of reservation price of customers 17
4.5 Analysis of cost of quality improvement 20
4.6 Substitutability and competitive level 23
4.7 Analysis of quality sensitivity 25
5. Conclusion and Future Research 29
References 31

參考文獻

References
1.Banker, A., 1998, “Quality and competition,” Management Science, Vol. 44, 1179-1192.
2.Crosby, N., 1979, “Quality is free: the art of making quality certain,” Marketing Science, Vol. 31, 352-378.
3.Cooper, S., 1984, “Prices, product qualities and asymmetric information,” Management Science, Vol. 51, 197-207.
4.Dixit, A., 1979, “Quality and quantity competition,” Review of Economic Studies, Vol. 46, 590-613.
5.Dixit, A., 1979, “A model of duopoly suggesting a theory of entry barriers,” Bell Journal of Economics, Vol. 10, 20-32.
6.Desai, C., 2001, “Quality segmentation in spatial markets: when does cannibalization affect product line design,” Marketing Science, Vol. 20, 265-283.
7.Friedman, M., 1967, “Quality and price considerations in rational consumer decision making,” Journal of Consumer Affairs, Vol. 1, 13-23.
8.Faulds, C., 1983, “Measuring price and quality competition in the kitchen appliance product category: preliminary results,” American Marketing Association, Vol. 20, 156-178.
9.Galor, E., 1982, “Price and quality competition with imperfect information,” Working Paper University of Pittsburgh, Vol. 10, 257-276.
10.Gaimon, D., 1996, “The price-production problem: an operations and marketing interface,” Operations Research: Methods, Models and Applications, Vol. 12, 247-362.
11.Hotelling, H., 1929, “Stability in competition,” Economic Journal, Vol. 39, 41-57.
12.Matsubayashi, N., 2007, “Price and quality competition: the effect of differentiation and vertical integration,” European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 180, 907-921.
13.Nelson, P., 1970, “Information and consumer behavior,” Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 78, 311-329.
14.Nobuo, M., and Yoshiyasu, Y., 2007, “A note on price and quality competition between asymmetric firms,” European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 187, 571-581.
15.Spence, A.M., 1975, “Monopoly, quality, and regulation,” Bell Journal of Economics, Vol. 6, 417-429.
16.Sheshinski, D.J., 1976, “Price, quality, and quantity regulation in monopoly situations,” Economica, Vol. 43, 127-137.
17.Smallwood, S.C., and R. Conlisk, 1979, “Product quality in markets where consumers are imperfectly informed,” Quarterly Journal of Econamics, Vol. 31, 1-23.
18.Singh, N., 1984, “Price and quantity competition in a differentiated duopoly,” Rand Journal of Economics, Vol. 15, 546-554.
19.Salinger, A., and R. Michael, 1985, “A graphical analysis of bundling,” Journal of Business, Vol. 3, 85-98.
20.Tellis, G., and D. Wemerfelt, 1987, “Competitive price and quality under asymmetric information,” Marketing Science, Vol. 6, 240-253.
21.Tyagi, R.K., 2000, “Sequential product positioning under differential costs,” Marketing Science, Vol. 46, 928-940.

指導教授

曾富祥(Fu-Shiang Tseng)

審核日期

2010-6-23

推文