使用者之自我揭露、隱私感受與社會資本關係之研究

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：43

、訪客IP：52.15.158.238

姓名

沈君叡(Chun-jui Shen) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

資訊管理學系

論文名稱

使用者之自我揭露、隱私感受與社會資本關係之研究

相關論文

★ 技術商品銷售之技術人員關鍵職能探討	★ 資訊委外之承包商能力、信任及溝通與委外成效關係之個案研究
★ 兵工技術軍官職能需求分析-以某軍事工廠為例	★ 不同楷模學習模式對VB程式語言學習之影響
★ 影響採購「網路資料中心產品」因素之探討	★ 資訊人員績效評估之研究—以陸軍某資訊單位為例
★ 高職資料處理科學生網路成癮相關因素及其影響之探討	★ 資訊服務委外對資訊部門及人員之衝擊-某大型外商公司之個案研究
★ 二次導入ERP系統之研究-以某個案公司為例	★ 資料倉儲於證券產業應用之個案研究
★ 影響消費者採用創新數位產品之因素---以整合式手機為例	★ 企業合併下資訊系統整合過程之個案研究
★ 資料倉儲系統建置之個案研究	★ 電子表單系統導入之探討 - 以 A 公司為例
★ 企業資訊安全機制導入與評估–以H公司為例	★ 從人力網站探討國內資訊人力現況–以104銀行資料為例

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

至系統瀏覽論文 ( 永不開放)

摘要(中)

本研究以Facebook使用者的自我揭露為主題，探討使用者的隱私顧慮及隱私設定是否會影響其Facebook上的自我揭露，並瞭解使用者心理的隱私需求及網路自我效能的不同是否會影響其隱私顧慮，另一方面本研究亦探討使用者自我揭露程度與其社會資本之關係。
本研究採用問卷調查法，共回收473份有效問卷，使用PLS方法進行資料分析後，結果如下：
1. 使用者心理的隱私需求越高則其隱私顧慮越高。
2. 使用者心理的隱私需求越高則其自我揭露程度越低。
3. 使用者隱私顧慮越高則其更改隱私設定的行為越頻繁。
4. 使用者隱私設定行為越頻繁則其自我揭露程度越高。
5. 使用者自我揭露程度越高則其社會資本越高。
根據發現，本研究建議往後社交網站提供者可加強隱私設定之功能，以提高使用者分享內容的意願。另外一方面，網路科技的發達使越來越多人運用網路與他人互動，使得人與人真實互動的時間減少，根據研究結果，使用者在Facebook上的自我揭露程度能夠正向影響其社會資本，表示在Facebook上的自我揭露程度越高除了能夠讓使用者維持與熟悉之人的關係，另一方面也可與原本不熟悉之人有所交集，促進彼此關係的發展。

摘要(英)

The purpose of this research is to show the effect of self-disclosure on Facebook users. The goal is to identify whether the self-disclosure behavior of Facebook users will vary on their privacy concern or private settings on Facebook, and to understand whether users’ privacy concern can be different from their own psychological need for privacy. Besides, this research also looks at the relationship between users’ social capital and their self-disclosure.
This has been done by screening 473 valid questionnaires through questionnaire method, and after the PLS analysis, it applies:
1. FB users who score higher in psychological needs for privacy will have more privacy concerns.
2. FB users who score higher in psychological needs for privacy will have lower degree of self-disclosure.
3. FB users who score higher in privacy concerns will have more frequent in privacy settings change.
4. FB users who change their privacy settings more frequently will have higher degree of self-disclosure.
5. FB users who score higher in degree of self-disclosure will have higher level of social capital.
With the help of advanced development in Internet technology, people can more efficiently interact with other people in social network sites (SNSs). According to the research findings, users’ self-disclosure has a positive relation with their social capital, which in turn results in higher degree of self-disclosure. The study finding suggests that the SNSs providers improve their SNSs privacy settings so as to encourage users’ willingness to share their contents with friends. Conclusion and implications of this study are discussed at the end of the thesis.

關鍵字(中)

★ 網路自我效能
★ 自我揭露
★ 社會資本
★ 心理的隱私需求
★ 隱私顧慮

關鍵字(英)

★ Social Capital
★ Privacy Concern
★ Internet Self-Efficacy
★ Psychological Need for Privacy
★ Self-Disclosure

論文目次

摘要 ii
ABSTRACT iii
表目錄 vii
圖目錄 viii
第一章緒論 1
第一節、研究背景與動機 1
第二節、研究問題與目的 2
第三節、研究貢獻 3
第四節、論文架構 4
第二章文獻探討 5
第一節、自我揭露 5
第二節、隱私顧慮 8
第三節、網路自我效能 10
第四節、社會資本 12
第三章研究方法 16
第一節、研究架構與研究假說 16
第二節、問卷設計及變數衡量 20
第三節、研究樣本及資料蒐集 22
第四節、資料分析方法 23
第四章資料分析 24
第一節、問卷量表之信度與效度檢驗 24
第二節、敘述性統計分析 28
第三節、研究模型與研究假說檢定 30
第四節、研究發現與討論 32
第五章研究結論與建議 35
第一節、研究結論 35
第二節、實務建議 36
第三節、研究限制與未來研究方向建議 37
參考文獻 38
附錄一　本研究問卷 43

參考文獻

英文部份
Altman, I., & Taylor, D. A. (1973). Social penetration: The development of interpersonal relationships, Oxford, England: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
Attractiveness, P. (1997). Romance in cyberspace: Understanding online attraction. Journal of Sex Education and Therapy, 22(1), 7-14.
Awad, N. F., & Krishnan, M. (2006). The personalization privacy paradox: An empirical evaluation of information transparency and the willingness to be profiled online for personalization. MIS Quarterly, 30(1), 13-28.
Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191-215.
Barak, A., & Gluck-Ofri, O. (2007). Degree and reciprocity of self-disclosure in online forums. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 10(3), 407-417.
Bargh, J. A., & McKenna, K. Y. A. (2004). The internet and social life. Annual Review Psychology, 55, 573-590.
Bartel Sheehan, K. (1999). An investigation of gender differences in on‐line privacy concerns and resultant behaviors. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 13(4), 24-38.
Bonebrake, K. (2002). College students’’ internet use, relationship formation, and personality correlate. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 5(6), 551-557.
Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital, Oxford, UK: Wiley Online Library.
Buss, A. (2001). Psychological dimensions of the self. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Campbell, A. J. (1997). Relationship marketing in consumer markets: A comparison of managerial and consumer attitudes about information privacy. Journal of Direct Marketing, 11(3), 44-57.
Chellappa, R. K., & Sin, R. G. (2005). Personalization versus privacy: An empirical examination of the online consumer’s dilemma. Information Technology and Management, 6(2), 181-202.
Chelune, J. G. (1979). Measuring Openness in Interpersonal Communication. In J. G. Chelune (Ed.), Self Disclosure: Origins, patterns and implications of openness in interpersonal relationship (pp. 14-30). San Francisco, CA: Jossy- Bass.
Compeau, D. R., & Higgins, C. A. (1995). Computer self-efficacy: Development of a measure and initial test. MIS Quarterly, 19(2), 189-211.
Cozby, P. (1973). Self-disclosure: A literature review. Psychological Bulletin, 79(2), 73-91.
Debatin, B., Lovejoy, J. P., Horn, A.-K. and Hughes, B. N. (2009). Facebook and online privacy: Attitudes, behaviors, and unintended consequences. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 15(1), 83-108.
Dinev, T., & Hart, P. (2006). An extended privacy calculus model for e-commerce transactions. Information Systems Research, 17(1), 61-80.
Donaldson, T., & Dunfee, T. W. (1994). Toward a unified conception of business ethics: Integrative social contracts theory. The Academy of Management Review, 19(2), 252-284.
Donath, J., & Boyd, D. (2004). Public displays of connection. BT Technology Journal, 22(4), 71-82.
Ellison, N., Heino, R., & Gibbs, J. (2006). Managing impressions online: Self‐presentation processes in the online dating environment. Journal of Computer‐Mediated Communication, 11(2), 415-441.
Ellison, N. B., Steinfield, C., & Lampe, C. (2007). The benefits of facebook “friends:” social capital and college students’ use of online social network sites. Journal of Computer‐Mediated Communication, 12(4), 1143-1168.
Fogel, J., & Nehmad, E. (2009). Internet social network communities: Risk taking, trust, and privacy concerns. Computers in Human Behavior, 25(1), 153-160.
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 39-50.
Fried, C. (1968). Privacy. Yale Law Journal, 77, 475-493
Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., Babin, B. J., & Black, W. C. (2006). Multivariate Data Analysis Prentice. New Jersey: Hall Englewood Cliffs.
Helliwell, J. F., & Putnam, R. D. (2004). The social context of well-being. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal society, 359(1449), 1435-1446.
Halmos, P. (1953). Solitude and privacy: A study of social isolation, its causes and therapy. New York: Philosophical Library.
Hogben, G. (2007). Security issues and recommendations for online social networks. Position paper European Network and Information Aecurity Agency, 80211(1), 36-56.
Homans, G. C. (1958). Social behavior as exchange. American Journal of Sociology, 63(6), 597-606.
Introna, L. D. (1997). Privacy and the computer: Why we need privacy in the information society. Metaphilosophy, 28(3), 259-275.
Ittelson, W. H., Proshansky, H. M., Rivlin, L. G., & Winkel, G. H. (1974). An introduction to environmental psychology, Oxford, England: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
Jourard, S. M. (1971). Self-disclosure: An experimental analysis of the transparent self. New York: Wiley Online Library.
Jerusalem, M., & Schwarzer, R. (1992). Self-efficacy as a resource factor in stress appraisal processes. In R. Schwarzer (Ed.), Self-efficacy: Thought control of action (pp. 195-213). Washington, DC: Hemisphere.
Kaiser, H. F. (1974). An index of factorial simplicity. Psychometrika, 39(1), 31-36.
Klopfer, P. H., & Rubenstein, D. I. (1977). The concept privacy and its biological basis. Journal of Social Issues, 33(3), 52-65.
Ko, H. C., & Kuo, F. Y. (2009). Can blogging enhance subjective well-being through self-disclosure? CyberPsychology & Behavior, 12(1), 75-79.
Krasnova, H., Kolesnikova, E., & Guenther, O. (2009). It won’’t happen to me: Self-disclosure in online social networks. Proceedings of the Americas Conference on Information Systems 2009, Paper 343.
LaRose, R., Mastro, D. A., & Eastin, M. S. (2001). Understanding internet usage: A social cognitive approach to uses and gratifications. Social Science Computer Review, 19(4), 395-413.
LaRose, R., & Rifon, N. J. (2007). Promoting i‐safety: Effects of privacy warnings and privacy seals on risk assessment and online privacy behavior. Journal of Consumer Affairs, 41(1), 127-149.
Laufer, R. S., & Wolfe, M. (1977). Privacy as a concept and a social issue: A multidimensional developmental theory. Journal of Social Issues, 33(3), 22-42.
Milne, G. R., Rohm, A. J., & Bahl, S. (2004). Consumers’ protection of online privacy and identity. Journal of Consumer Affairs, 38(2), 217-232.
Moscardelli, D. M., & Divine, R. (2007). Adolescents’’ concern for privacy when using the internet: an empirical analysis of predictors and relationships with privacy‐protecting behaviors. Family and Consumer Sciences Research Journal, 35(3), 232-252.
Nie, N. H. (2001). Sociability, interpersonal relations, and the Internet. American Behavioral Scientist, 45(3), 420-435.
Nosko, A., Wood, E., & Molema, S. (2010). All about me: Disclosure in online social networking profiles: the case of facebook. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(3), 406-418.
Parker, R. B. (1973). Definition of privacy. Rutgers L. Rev., 27, 275-300.
Petronio, S. (1991). Communication boundary management: A theoretical model of managing disclosure of private information between marital couples. Communication Theory, 1(4), 311-335.
Pike, J. C., Bateman, P. J., & Butler, B. S. (2009). I didn’’t know you could see that: The effect of social networking environment characteristics on publicness and self-disclosure. Proceedings of the Americas Conference on Information Systems 2009, Paper 421.
Putnam, R. D. (2001). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York: Simon and Schuster.
Rogers, R. W. (1983). Cognitive and physiological processes in fear appeals and attitude change: A revised theory of protection motivation. Social Psychophysiology, 153-176.
Sherif, M. (1988). The robbers cave experiment: Intergroup conflict and cooperation. Scranton,PA: Wesleyan University Press.
Schunk, D. H. (1996). Self-evaluation and self-regulated learning. Retrieved from ERIC database.(ED403233)
Stutzman, F., Capra, R., & Thompson, J. (2011). Factors mediating disclosure in social network sites. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(1), 590-598.
Subrahmanyam, K., Reich, S. M., Waechter, N., & Espinoza, G. (2008). Online and offline social networks: use of social networking sites by emerging adults. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 29(6), 420-433.
Taylor, D. A., & Altman, I. (1987). Communication in interpersonal relationships: Social penetration processes. In M. E. Roloff & G. R. Miller (Eds.), Interpersonal Processes: New Directions in Communication Research (pp. 257-277). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Torkzadeh, G., & Van Dyke, T. P. (2001). Development and validation of an Internet self-efficacy scale. Behaviour & Information Technology, 20(4), 275-280.
Tsai, M. J., & Tsai, C. C. (2003). Information searching strategies in web-based science learning: the role of Internet self-efficacy. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 40(1), 43-50.
Wallace, P. M. (1999). The psychology of the internet. Canadian Journal of Communication, 26(2). Retrieved Feb 15 2012, from http://www.cjc-online.ca/index.php/journal/article/view/1230/1204
Westin, A. F. (1968). Privacy and freedom. Washington and Lee Law Review, 25(1), 166-171.
Wheeless, L. R., & Grotz, J. (1976). Conceptualization and measurement of reported self‐disclosure. Human Communication Research, 2(4), 338-346.
Williams, D. (2006). On and off the’net: Scales for social capital in an online era. Journal of Computer‐Mediated Communication, 11(2), 593-628.
Yao, M. Z., Rice, R. E., & Wallis, K. (2007). Predicting user concerns about online privacy. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58(5), 710-722.
網路文獻
Alexa (2012), Retrieved May 23, 2012, from http://www.alexa.com/
Boase, J., Horrigan, J. B., Wellman, B., & Rainie, L. (2006). The strength of Internet ties. Pew Internet and American Life Project. Retrieved May 20, 2012 from http://www.pewinternet.org/pdfs/PIP_Internet_ties.pdf
Checkfacebook (2012), Retrieved May 23, 2012, form http://www.checkfacebook.com/
Facebook. (2012), Retrieved May 23, 2012, form Http://www.facebook.com.tw/
Socialbakers (2012), Retrieved May 23, 2012, from http://www.socialbakers.com/
Website-monitoring (2012), Retrieved May 23, 2012, from http://www.website-monitoring.com/
創市際市場研究顧問（2010年7月）。ARO觀察-社群服務發展概況。線上檢索日期：2012年2月20日，取自：http://www.iama.org.tw/upload/ResourceReport/20110830105124836.pdf
創市際市場研究顧問（2012年2月），創市際月刊報告書。線上檢索日期：2012年3月20日，取自http://news.ixresearch.com/?p=5212

指導教授

周惠文(Huey-wen Chou)

審核日期

2012-7-12

推文