博碩士論文 994301002 詳細資訊




以作者查詢圖書館館藏 以作者查詢臺灣博碩士 以作者查詢全國書目 勘誤回報 、線上人數:233 、訪客IP:18.219.168.245
姓名 林富鈞(Fu-chun Lin)  查詢紙本館藏   畢業系所 企業管理學系在職專班
論文名稱 深慮學習的實踐-以A個案公司專案管理部為例
相關論文
★ 以第四方物流經營模式分析博連資訊科技股份有限公司★ 探討虛擬環境下隱性協調在新產品導入之作用--以電子組裝業為例
★ 動態能力機會擷取機制之研究-以A公司為例★ 探討以價值驅動之商業模式創新-以D公司為例
★ 物聯網行動支付之探討-以Apple Pay與支付寶錢包為例★ 企業資訊方案行銷歷程之探討-以MES為例
★ B2C網路黏著度之探討-以博客來為例★ 組織機制與吸收能力關係之研究-以新產品開發專案為例
★ Revisit the Concept of Exploration and Exploitation★ 臺灣遠距醫療照護系統之發展及營運模式探討
★ 資訊系統與人力資訊科技資源對供應鏈績效影響之研究-買方依賴性的干擾效果★ 資訊科技對知識創造影響之研究-探討社會鑲嵌的中介效果
★ 資訊科技對公司吸收能力影響之研究-以新產品開發專案為例★ 探討買賣雙方鑲嵌關係影響交易績效之機制 ─新產品開發專案為例
★ 資訊技術運用與協調能力和即興能力 對新產品開發績效之影響★ 團隊組成多元性影響任務衝突機制之研究─ 以新產品開發專案團隊為例
檔案 [Endnote RIS 格式]    [Bibtex 格式]    [相關文章]   [文章引用]   [完整記錄]   [館藏目錄]   [檢視]  [下載]
  1. 本電子論文使用權限為同意立即開放。
  2. 已達開放權限電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。
  3. 請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。

摘要(中) 公司是否能夠維持其競爭優勢,是企業主與策略管理學者一直想要探討的議題。1997年Teece提出的動態能力理論,為公司如何能持續不斷的維持競爭優勢提出一個解釋。說明動態能力,是一種公司能不斷的更新自己能力的能力,以應付外在環境的劇烈變化。既然動態能力如此重要,要如何在公司或組織內產生這樣的能力,成為組織策略管理的一個重要問題。Zollo and Winter 2002年以例規的觀點來解釋動態能力,同時也說明了動態能力的起源是來自於學習機制,而且是一種深慮的學習機制(Deliberate learning)。這種組織有目的、意識的去學習,是組織產生動態能力的起源。本研究探討A個案公司專案管理部在面臨組織欲發展自有品牌、拓展新產品線,並脫離舊有的代工模式的狀況下,是否有一些深慮的學習具體做法可以實踐,藉此可以產生組織的動態能力。
摘要(英) The company that is able to maintain its competitive advantage is always the major topic for business owners and strategy scholars. In 1997, Teece proposed a Dynamic Capabilities Theory explained how the company can continuously maintain its competitive advantage. And it is a capability for a company to renew their abilities constantly to cope with the dramatic changes of the external environment. Since the dynamic capability is that important, then with no doubt how a company or an organization generates this kind of capabilities will become a critical task for the strategic management. Zollo and Winter 2002 explained the dynamic capability by using the routine perspective. It also argued that the origin of the dynamic capabilities comes from the learning mechanism as known as deliberate learning. The organization learns on purpose and conscious, and this is the origins of the organization to generate dynamic capability. A case study is discussed here if the Project Management Department of A Company is able to develop some practices to realize the deliberate learning for developing its own brand and extending its new product lines from the old foundry OEM model and take this opportunity to generate dynamic capabilities.
關鍵字(中) ★ 動態能力
★ 學習機制
★ 例規
關鍵字(英) ★ Dynamic capability
★ Learning mechanism
★ Routine
論文目次 中文摘要 I
Abstract II
致謝 III
目錄 IV
圖目錄 V
第一章 研究動機與目的 1
第一節 研究動機 1
第二節 研究目的 3
第三節 研究流程 3
第二章 文獻探討 5
第一節 策略典範的演進 5
第二節 組織學習機制與動態能力 8
第三節 組織學習的類型: 開創式與盡用式 17
第四節 知識的特性: 隱性知識與顯性知識 19
第三章 個案公司簡介 21
第一節 個案公司概述: 21
第二節 發展藍圖 22
第三節 專案管理部簡介 23
第四章 實踐深慮學習的建議作法 25
第五章 結論與討論 32
參考文獻 34
參考文獻 1. Amit, R. and Schoemaker, P.J.H. (1993). Strategic assets and organizational rent. Strategic Management Journal, 14, 33–46.
2. Aoki, M. (1990). ’The participatory generation of information rents and the theory of the firm’. In M. Aoki, B. Gustafsson and O. E. Williamson (eds.), The Firm as a Nexus of Treaties. Sage, London, pp. 2652.
3. Argyris, C. and D. Schon (1978). Organizational Learning. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA.
4. Barney, J. B., “Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage”, Journal of Management, 17, 1991.
5. Barney, J. B., “Strategic factor markets: Expectations, luck, and business strategy”, Management Science, Vol 32, No l0, pp. 123 1 -124 1, 1986.
6. Catherine L. Wang1 and Pervaiz K. Ahmed, “Dynamic capabilities: A review and research agenda,” International Journal of Management Reviews, Vol. 9, Issue 1, pp. 31-51, 2007.
7. Campbell DT. 1965. Variation and selective retention in socio-cultural evolution. In Social Change in Developing Areas, Barringer HR, Blanksten GE, Mack RW (eds). Schenkman: Cambridge, MA; 19–49.
8. Camp, R. (1989). Benchmarking: The Search for Industry Best practices that Lead to Superior Performance. Quality Press, Milwaukee, WI.
9. Clark, K. and T. Fujimoto (1991). Product Development Performance: Strategy, Organization and Management in the World Auto Industries. Harvard Business School Press, Cambridge, MA.
10. Collis DJ. 1994. How valuable are organizational capabilities? Strategic Management Journal, Winter Special Issue 15: 143–152.
11. Cowan, R. and D. Foray (1997), The Economics of Codification and the Diffusion of Knowledge, Industrial and Corporate Change, 6, 595-622.
12. Duncan, R. B., & Weiss, A. (1979) Organizational learning: Implications for organizational design. In B. Staw (Ed.), Research in organizational behavior (pp.75-123). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
13. Eisenhardt KM, Martin JA. 2000. Dynamic capabilities: what are they? Strategic Management Journal, Special Issue 21(10–11): 1105–1122.
14. Garvin, D. (1988). Managing Quality. Free Press, New York.
15. Gavetti G, Levinthal D. 2000. Looking forward and looking backward: cognitive and experiential search. Administrative Science Quarterly 45: 113–137.
16. Hamel G. 1991. Competition for competence and interpartner learning within international strategic alliances. Strategic Management Journal, Summer Special Issue 12: 83-103.
17. Henderson RM, Clark K. 1990. Architectural innovation: the reconfiguration of existing product technologies and the failure of established firms. Administrative Science Quarterly 35: 9–30.
18. Helfat CE, Raubitschek RS. 2000. Product sequencing: co-evolution of knowledge, capabilities and products. Strategic Management Journal, Special Issue 21(10–11): 961–979.
19. Kale, Dyer and Singh 2002 Kale, P., Dyer, J., & Singh, H. (2002). Alliance capability, stock market response and long-term alliance success: The role of the alliance function. Strategic Management Journal, 23(8), 747–767.
20. Kogut B, Zander U. 1992. Knowledge of the enterprise, combinative capabilities and the replication of technology. Organizational Science 3(3): 383–397.
21. Leonard-Barton D, Wellsprings of Knowledge-Building and Sustaining the Sources of Innovation. Harvard Business School Press., Boston, 1995.
22. Langlois R. 1992. Transactions-cost economics in real-time. Industrial and Corporate Change 1(1): 99–127.
23. March JG. 1991. Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science 2: 1–13.
24. Mahoney, J.T. and Pandian, J.R. (1992). The resource-based view within the conversation of strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 13, 363–380.
25. Nelson R, Winter S. 1982. An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change. Belknap Press of Harvard University Press: Cambridge, MA.
26. Penrose E. 1959. The Theory of Growth of the Firm. Basil Blackwell: London.
27. Porter M. 1985. Competitive Strategy. Free Press: New York.
28. Powell, Walter W., Kenneth W. Koput, and Laurel Smith-Doerr. 1996. "Interorganizational Collaboration and the Locus of Innovation: Networks of Learning in Biotechnology." Administrative Science Quarterly 41: 116-45.
29. Prahalad, C. K. and G. Hamel, “The Core Competence of the Corporation”, Harvard Business Review, Vol 68, No 3, 1990.
30. Quinn, J.; Andersen, P.; and Finkelstein, S. (1996) Managing Professional Intellect: Making the most of the best. Harvard Business Review. March-April.
31. Teece D, Pisano G, Shuen A. 1997. Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal 18(7): 509–533.
32. Wernerfelt B. 1984. A resource-based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal 5(2): 171–180.
33. Winter, S. G. (1987). Knowledge and competence as strategic assets. In D. J. Teece (Ed.), The competitive challenge: Strategies for industrial innovation and renewal. New York: Harper Collins.
34. Winter, S. 2003. Understanding dynamic capabilities. Strategic Management Journal 24 991–995.
35. Zollo M, Winter S. 2002. Deliberate learning and the evolution of dynamic capabilities. Organization Science 13: 339–351.
36. Zollo, M. and Winter, S.G. 1999 From organizational routines to dynamic capabilities, R&D Working Papers: 99/48/SM, INSEAD.
37. Zott, C. (2003). Dynamic capabilities and the emergence of intraindustry differential firm performance: insights from a simulation study. Strategic Management Journal, 24, 97–125.
指導教授 陳炫碩(Shiuann-shuoh Chen) 審核日期 2013-1-17
推文 facebook   plurk   twitter   funp   google   live   udn   HD   myshare   reddit   netvibes   friend   youpush   delicious   baidu   
網路書籤 Google bookmarks   del.icio.us   hemidemi   myshare   

若有論文相關問題,請聯絡國立中央大學圖書館推廣服務組 TEL:(03)422-7151轉57407,或E-mail聯絡  - 隱私權政策聲明