Fuzzy Multiple Criteria Decision Making Model for Risk Assessment of Enterprise Overseas Projects Investment

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：33

、訪客IP：18.223.23.30

姓名

呂世通(Shih-Tong Lu) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

企業管理學系

論文名稱

(Fuzzy Multiple Criteria Decision Making Model for Risk Assessment of Enterprise Overseas Projects Investment)

相關論文

★ 從生態共生觀點發展組織合作模式	★ 影響產業垂直分工因素之探討
★ 發展台籍專業管家的人力派遣模式	★ 影響軍事機關審計品質之關鍵性因素及其相對效率衡量
★ 台灣光碟片設備供應商競爭策略分析	★ 國防科技研發機構組織向心力之研究
★ 衡量半導體零組件通路商之相對經營績效	★ 衡量半導體晶圓代工廠商生產單位之營運績效
★ 商業銀行營運型態與組織調整對分行營運效率的影響	★ 發展行動條碼為基礎的隨傳隨用視訊平台之應用
★ 飛機引擎定子零件維修之訂價調整方式	★ 國際化、創新活動與公司績效：台灣上市公司董事會結構論析
★ 探討網際網路事件達成關鍵多數之影響因素	★ 生態循環農業產銷策略個案研究
★ 探討以政策規範高耗能產業參與再生能源開發之綜效－以太陽光電發電系統為例	★ 適地性服務(LBS)之顧客體驗整合性設計—以中華電信行動導遊為例

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

至系統瀏覽論文 ( 永不開放)

摘要(中)

在全球化的大趨勢下企業為了謀求永續發展，逐步開拓海外的機會是提高國際競爭力的必然選擇，而開拓海外的機會，可以由一些海外專案投資開始，例如，在海外設立工廠並遷移一部分的生產線，或者發現國外一些有利的資源而可以進行一項投資專案。然而，海外專案投資必須面對與國內不同的經濟條件和風險因素。因此，選擇合適的海外專案投資國家，應是海外專案投資成功的第一步。而在實施海外專案投資之前，必須進行風險評估過程，才能有助於該項專案投資成功的機會。本研究運用Fuzzy LinPreRa 和Fuzzy VIKOR方法，建立了以風險分析與評價為基礎的混合式模糊多準則決策(Fuzzy MCDM) 模型，來分析其風險因素影響程度和選擇合適的海外投資國家。本研究根據某科技公司的案例模擬，結果顯示5項風險層面的相對影響排序是「財務條件面風險」、「政治社會面風險」、「市場特性面風險」、「總體經濟面風險」和「營運作業面風險」;對於20項風險因素而言，「營業收入不如預期」在所有風險因素相對影響最大，其次是「投資國政府態度轉變」，第三名為「市場條件不穩定」。這結果反映出，想要投資海外專案的企業應具備一定的財務能力會比較穩當，並以獲得投資國較好的融資條件和租稅優惠為較可能的誘因，但也相當擔心投資國政府的政策轉彎，市場狀況不穩定而造成的營收下降是一大風險變數。本研究所建立的混合式Fuzzy MCDM模式使得風險評估方法比傳統的統計方法易於實務上之應用外，也具有相當可靠的理論基礎，並嘗試將一般用於正向值的績效評估之Fuzzy VIKOR方法應用於負向值的風險評估，期望本研究所建立的模式能協助有意進行海外專案投資的企業，提高決策的有效性。

摘要(英)

Under the trend of globalization, enterprises, in order to seek sustainable development of their business, gradually explore overseas opportunities, is the inevitable choice for them to improve the international competitiveness. Explore overseas opportunities can start projects with some overseas investments. For example, set up the factory overseas and move a certain production line, or found some advantageous resources overseas can make an investment project. However, overseas investment must face different economic conditions and risk factors from domestic. Therefore, selecting the appropriate country for overseas project investment (OPI) should be the first step to success overseas investment and it is necessary to perform the risk assessment process before implementing an OPI. This paper constructs a hybrid fuzzy multiple criteria decision making (Fuzzy MCDM) model to analyze and select an appropriate overseas investment location based on the risk analysis and evaluation by the Fuzzy LinPreRa and Fuzzy VIKOR approach. According to the case simulation of a technology company, the results show that the ranking of the relative impact of 5 risk dimension is “Financial risk”, “Politics and social risk”, “Market characteristics risk”, “Macroeconomic risk” and “Operational risk”. For the 20 risk factors, “Operational revenue underperforming” have the greatest impact among all risk factors, the “Host government attitude adjusting” is the second impact of all risk factors and “Market conditions instability” ranking at all risk of the third. This result fully reflects that enterprises that want to invest in overseas projects should have a basic level of financial capacity and are likely to receive better financing conditions and tax concessions from investment countries. The hybrid Fuzzy MCDM model established in this research makes the risk assessment method easier to practice than the traditional statistical method, and also has a fairly reliable theoretical basis. Besides, attempting to apply the Fuzzy VIKOR approach, which is generally used for positive value performance evaluation, to risk assessment of negative value. It is expected that the model established in this study can assist enterprises interested in investing in overseas projects to improve the effectiveness of decision making.

關鍵字(中)

★ 海外專案投資
★ 風險評估
★ 投資國選擇
★ 模糊語意偏好關係法
★ 模糊多準則妥協解排序法

關鍵字(英)

★ Overseas Project Investment
★ Risk Assessment
★ Investment Country Selection
★ Fuzzy LinPreRa
★ Fuzzy VIKOR

論文目次

中文摘要 i
Abstract ii
謝誌 iii
Chapter 1 Introduction 1
1-1 Background and motivation 1
1-2 Research questions and purposes 2
1-3 Organization of the dissertation 4
Chapter 2 Literature Review 6
2-1 Risk 6
2-2 Risk of overseas project investment 7
2-3 Identification risk of overseas project investment 8
2-4 Brief descriptions for risk dimensions and factors 9
Chapter 3 Research Methodology 15
3-1 Fuzzy numbers 16
3-2 Linguistic variables 17
3-3 Defuzzification 20
3-4 Consistent Fuzzy Preference Relation (CFPR) 21
3-4-1 Multiplication preference relation 21
3-4-2 Fuzzy preference relation 22
3-4-3 Consistent fuzzy preference relation matrix 22
3-5 Fuzzy linguistic preference relation (Fuzzy LinPreRa) 23
3-6 Determination of aggregative weights 25
3-7 Fuzzy VIKOR 25
Chapter4 Case Simulation 31
4-1 Relative impact for risk dimensions and risk factors 32
4-2 Ranking for the comprehensive risk degree of investment countries 44
Chapter 5 Conclusion 50
5-1 Suggestions and management implications 51
5-2 Research limitations and further research 53
References 55
Appendix Questionnaire 61

參考文獻

[1] CNN website, 2014, http://edition.cnn.com/2014/05/14/world/asia/south-china-sea-drill ing-duplicate-2/index.html
[2] Appledaily website, 2016, http://www.appledaily.com.tw/appledaily/article/finance/20160323/37123407/
[3] New York Times website, 2016, https://www.nytimes.com/2016/07/01/world/asia/vietnam-formosa-ha-tinh-steel.html? mcubz=3
[4] Dawood, N., 1998. Estimating Project and Activity Duration: A Risk Management Approach Using Network Analysis. Construction Management and Economics. 16(1), 41‒48.
[5] Elkjaer, M., 2000. Stochastic Budget Simulation. International Journal of Project Management. 18(2), 139‒147.
[6] Ye, S., Tiong, L.K.R., 2000. NPV-At-Risk Method in Infrastructure Project Investment Evaluation. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management. 126(3), 22733.
[7] Baccarini, D., Archer, R., 2001. The Risk Ranking of Projects: a Methodology. International Journal of Project Management. 19(3), 139145.
[8] Chapman, R.J., 2001. The Controlling Influences on Effective Risk Identification and Assessment for Construction Design Management. International Journal of Project Management. 19(3), 147160.
[9] Mak, S., Picken, D., 2000. Using Risk Analysis to Determine Construction Project Contingencies. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management. 126(2), 130136.
[10] Kangari, R., Riggs, L.S., 1989. Construction Risk Assessment by Linguistics. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management. 36(2), 126131.
[11] Paek, J.H., Lee, Y.W., Ock, J.H., 1993. Pricing Construction Risk: Fuzzy Set Application. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management. ASCE. 119(4), 743755.
[12] Tah, J.H.M., Carr, V., 2000. Information Modeling for Project Risk Analysis and Management Engineering. Construction and Architectural management. 17(2), 107119.
[13] Tah, J.H.M., Carr, V., 2001. Knowledge-Based Approach To Construction Project Risk Management. Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering. ASCE. 15(3), 170177.
[14] Zadeh, L.A., 1965. Fuzzy sets. Information and Control. 8(2), 33853.
[15] Chen, S.J., Hwang, C.L., 1992. Fuzzy Multiple Attribute Decision Making Method and Applications. Springer-Verlag, New York.
[16] Lu, S.T., Hsieh, T.Y., Lee, J.S., Tzeng, G..H., 2001. A Decision Support System for Planning and Design Tender Selection in Public Buildings. Proceedings of the First International Conference on Electronic Business (ICEB2001). Hong Kong, 215217.
[17] Lu, S. T., Tzeng, G.H., 2002. A Decision Support System for Construction Project Risk Assessment. Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Electronic Business (ICEB2002). Taipei, Taiwan, 255−257.
[18] Rebiasz, B., 2007. Fuzziness and randomness in investment project risk appraisal. Computers & Operations Research. 34(1), 199–210.
[19] Sadiq, R, Kleiner, Y. Rajani, B., 2007. Water Quality Failure in Distribution Networks- Risk Analysis Using Fuzzy Logic and Evidential Reasoning. Risk Analysis. 27(5), 1381‒1394.
[20] Wang, T. C. and Chen, Y. H., 2008. Applying fuzzy linguistic preference relations to the improvement of consistency of fuzzy AHP, Information Sciences, 178(19), 3755‒3765.
[21] Opricovic, S., Tzeng, G.H., 2002. Multicriteria planning of post-earthquake sustainable reconstruction. Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering. 17(3), 211‒220.
[22] Opricovic, S., Tzeng, G.H., 2004. Compromise solution by MCDM methods: A comparative analysis of VIKOR and TOPSIS. European Journal of Operational Research 156(2), 445‒455.
[23] Opricovic, S., Tzeng, G.H., 2007. Extended VIKOR method in comparison with outranking methods. European Journal of Operational Research. 178(2), 514-529.
[24] Sanayei, A., Mousavi, S. F., Yazdankhah, A., 2010, Group decision making process for supplier selection with VIKOR under fuzzy environment. Expert Systems with Applications. 37(1), 24‒30.
[25] Shemshadi, A., Shirazi, H., Toreihi, M., Tarokh, M.J., 2011, A fuzzy VIKOR method for supplier selection based on entropy measure for objective weighting. Expert Systems with Applications. 38(10), 12160–12167.
[26] Chang, T. H., 2014, Fuzzy VIKOR method: A case study of the hospital service evaluation in Taiwan. Information Sciences. 271(1), 196‒212.
[27] Willett A. H, The Economic Theory of Risk and Insurance, Published for THE S. S. Huebner Foundation for Insurance Education University of Pennsylvania by Richard D. Irwin, Inc., Homewood, Illinois, 1951. (first published in 1901 By The Columbia University Press)
[28] Knight, F. H., 1964, Risk, Uncertainty and Profit, Augustus M. Kelley, Bookseller. (first published in 1921 By Sentry Press, New York)
[29] Williams, C. A. Jr. and Heins, R. M., Risk Management and Insurance, McGraw-Hill Book Company, 1981. (first published January 1st 1971)
[30] Liu, H., Research on the risk management of overseas investment project. Master thesis of Liaoning University of Science and Technology, 2011.
[31] Cao, X., Research on Risk Assessment and Control of Overseas Investment Project, Master thesis of Institute of Systems Engineering, Southeast University, 2006
[32] Zhu, X., The risk of China′s foreign direct investment and its precaution system, Doctoral dissertation of Wuhan University, 2016.
[33] Lu, S.T., 2010. Using the fuzzy multiple criteria decision making approach for risk evaluation on investment of overseas project, Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Machine Learning and Cybernetics. 4, 20312036
[34] Wideman, R.M., 1986. Risk Management. Project Management Journal. 17(4), 2026.
[35] Raftery, J., 1994. Risk Analysis in Project Management. E&FN Spon, London.
[36] Zhi, H., 1995. Risk management for overseas construction project. International Journal of Project Management. 13(4), 23137.
[37] Jovanovic, P., 1999, Application of sensitivity analysis in investment project evaluation under uncertainty and risk. International Journal of Project Management. 17(4), 217‒222.
[38] Hastak, M., Shaked, A., 2000. ICRAM-1:Model for International Construction Risk Assessment. Journal of Management in Engineering. 16(1), 5969.
[39] Doumpos, M. and Zopounidis, C., 2001. Assessing financial risks using a multicriteria sorting procedure: the case of country risk assessment. Omega. 29(1), 97-109.
[40] Ahmed, Z. U., Mohamad, O., Tan, B., Johnson, J. P., 2002. International risk perceptions and mode of entry: a case study of Malaysian multinational firms. Journal of Business Research. 55(10), 805– 813.
[41] He, Y. and Long, F., 2003. Market expansion versus cost reduction: a financial analysis of foreign direct investment advantages for multinational enterprises. Japan and the World Economy. 15(4), 407–417.
[42] Haley, U.C.V., 2003. Assessing and controlling business risks in China. Journal of International Management. 9(3), 237–252.
[43] Oetzel, J., 2005. Smaller may be beautiful but is it more risky? Assessing and managing political and economic risk in Costa Rica. International Business Review. 14(6), 765–790.
[44] Fedderke, J. W. and Romm, A. T., 2006. Growth impact and determinants of foreign direct investment into South Africa. 1956-2003, Economic Modelling. 23(6), 738–760.
[45] Dikmen, I. Birgonul, M. T., 2006. An analytic hierarchy process based model for risk and opportunity assessment of international construction projects. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering. 33(1), 58–68.
[46] Shih, S., 2006, A Decision Model Regarding Foreign Direct Investment. Journal of Technology Management. 11(2), 127-154.(in Chinese)
[47] Busse, M., Hefeker, C., 2007. Political risk, institutions and foreign direct investment. European Journal of Political Economy. 23(2), 397–415.
[48] Hwang, C.L. and Yoon, K., 1981. Multiple Attribute Decision Making: Methods and Applications. Springer-Verlag, New York.
[49] Mon, D.L., Cheng, C.H., Lin, J.C., 1994. Evaluating weapon system using fuzzy analytic hierarchy process based on entropy weight. Fuzzy Sets and Systems. 62(2), 127134.
[50] Saaty, T.L., 1977. A Scaling Method for Priorities in Hierarchical Structures. Journal of Mathematical Psychology. 15(3), 234281.
[51] Saaty, T.L., 1980. The Analytic Hierarchy Process. McGraw-Hill, New York.
[52] Buckley, J.J., 1985. Fuzzy Hierarchical Analysis. Fuzzy Sets and Systems. 17(1), 233247.
[53] Zeng, J.; An, M.; Smith, N. J. 2007. Application of a fuzzy based decision making methodology to construction project risk assessment. International Journal of Project Management. 25(6), 589–600.
[54] Zayed, T.; Amer, M.; Pan, J. 2008. Assessing risk and uncertainty inherent in Chinese highway projects using AHP. International Journal of Project Managemen.t 26(4): 408–419.
[55] Zolfani, S.H., Sedaghat, M., Zavadskas, E.K., 2012. Performance Evaluating of Rural ICT Centers (Telecenters), Applying Fuzzy AHP, SAW-G and TOPSIS Grey, A Case Study in Iran. Technological and Economic Development of Economy. 18(2), 364–387.
[56] Zavadskas, E. K.; Vainiūnas, P.; Turskis, Z.; Tamošaitienė, J. 2012. Multiple criteria decision support system for assessment of projects managers in construction. International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making. 11(2), 501–520.
[57] Herrera-Viedma, E., Herrera, E., Chiclana, F. and Luque, M., 2004. Some issues on consistency of fuzzy preference relations. European Journal of Operational Research. 154(1), 98-109.
[58] Zadeh, L.A., 1975. Concept of A Linguistic Variable and Its Application to Approximate Reasoning, Parts 1, 2 and 3. Information Sciences. 8(2), 199-49; 8(3), 30157, 9(1), 43-80.
[59] Chen, L.Y., Wang, T.C., 2009. Optimizing partners′ choice in IS/IT outsourcing projects: The strategic decision of fuzzy. VIKOR. International Journal of Production Economics. 120(1), 233-242.
[60] Shiu, J. Y., Lu, S. T., Chang, D. S. and Wu, K. W., 2016, Fuzzy multicriteria decision-making tools for selecting a professional property management company. International Transactions in Operational Research. Article in press, 2016.10.21 online. DOI: 10.1111/itor.12356.
[61] Lu, S. T., Yu, S. H. and Chang, D. S., 2014. Using Fuzzy Multiple Criteria Decision Making Approach for Assessing the Risk of Railway Reconstruction Project in Taiwan. The Scientific World Journal. Volume 2014, Article ID 239793.
[62] Duckstein, L., Opricovic, S., 1980. Multiobjective optimization in river basin development. Water Resources Research. 16 (1), 14–20.
[63] Saaty, T.L., 1996, Decision Making with Dependence and Feedback: The Analytic Network Process. 1st, Pittsburgh, PA: RWS Publications.
[64] Wu, W. W. and Lee, Y. T., 2007, Selecting knowledge management strategies by using the analytic network process. Expert Systems with Applications. 32(3), 841‒847.
[65] Wu, W. Y., Sukoco, B. M., Li, C. Y., and Chen, S. H., 2009. An integrated multi-objective decision-making process for supplier selection with bundling problem. Expert Systems with Applications. 36(2), 2327‒2337.
[66] Tzeng, G. H., Chiang, C. H., and Li, C. W., 2007. Evaluating intertwined effects in e-learning programs: a novel hybrid MCDM model based on factor analysis and DEMATEL. Expert Systems with Applications. 32(4), 1028-1044.
[67] Liou, J. J. H., Tzeng, G. H., and Chang, H. C., 2007. Airline safety measurement using a hybrid model. Air Transport Management. 13(4), 243‒249.
[68] Verma, R. K., 2014. Implementation of Interpretive Structural Model and Topsis in Manufacturing Industries for Supplier Selection. Industrial Engineering Letters. 4(5), 1‒8.
[69] Tsui, C.W. and Wen, U.P., 2014. A Hybrid Multiple Criteria Group Decision-Making Approach for Green Supplier Selection in the TFT-LCD Industry. Mathematical Problems in Engineering. Volume 2014, Article ID 709872.
[70] Brans, J.-P., Vincke, P. and Mareschal, B., 1986, How to select and how to rank projects: the PROMETHEE method. European Journal of Operational Research. 24(2), 228-38.

指導教授

張東生(Dong-Shang Chang)

審核日期

2018-1-11

推文