 |
|
|
|
以作者查詢圖書館館藏 、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士 、以作者查詢全國書目 、勘誤回報 、線上人數：61 、訪客IP：3.15.186.78
姓名 黃瀞儀(Ching-yi Huang) 查詢紙本館藏 畢業系所 資訊工程學系 論文名稱 追蹤學生的學習行為作為影片學習歷程以增強後設認知
(In time video tracking student's learning process to enhance metacognition)相關論文 檔案 [Endnote RIS 格式]
[相關文章]
[文章引用]
[完整記錄]
[館藏目錄]
[檢視]
- 本電子論文使用權限為同意立即開放。
- 已達開放權限電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的，進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。
- 請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定，切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送，以免觸法。
摘要(中) 求學占據人生的大部分時間，在學習的過程中應該真正理解所學內容，清楚的知道學習目標，主動了解自我學習的狀況，思考在不同的時候使用相對的策略，以達到良好的學習成效。而後設認知能力佳能夠良好反思自己的認知歷程並且計畫、調整及監督自己的學習活動。
為了提升學生的後設認知能力，以達良好的學習成效。本研究提出在情境式的教學活動中記錄學生的學習狀況，學生透過影片檢視自己實際的表現。進而達成讓學生可以具體觀看學習過程並反思自己學習中的表現。Learning Video Portfolio(LVP)讓學生有機會做複習及自我評量：透過模仿同儕、自我監控、專家參考系統和包含整體概念的故事書的功能，將以往用考試評量學習成效的被動學習，改成讓學生反思自己的學習優缺點，並且主動加強表現不佳的部分。
實驗結果顯示， LVP設計的評量及影片等功能對於提升後設認知裡的理解監測和評價是有效的。由訪談得知，沒有人有使用影片學習歷程觀看自己學習的經驗，學生表示使用LVP能夠讓回憶並改正自己的學習表現。另外，我們也研究LVP對於哪些學習風格的人比較有成效，發現深思型、感官型及循序型的人使用完LVP後提升後設認知的成效較顯著。
摘要(英) Studying occupies most of our life, and we should really understand what we learned in the learning process. Besides we need know the learning objectives clearly and understand the status of self-learning proactively, and think at different times to use relative strategy to achieve good learning effectiveness. People with good ability of metacognition can reflect on of their own cognitive processes well and do planning, adjustment and supervision on their own learning activities.
In order to promote the abilities of students’ metacognition to achieve well learning effectiveness. Our study proposes to record the learning condition of students in the situational teaching activities. Students view their own actual performance via films and thus reach the goal of watching the process of learning specifically and reflection on their own performances in learning. LVP lets students have opportunity to review and do self-assessment: via imitation of their peers, self-monitoring, and the systems of references of experts. The function of story book contained whole concept to change the passive learning by evaluation their learning effectiveness by exam into let students do reflection their own advantages and disadvantages when learn and to enhance the part of poor performance proactively.
The experimental results show that the LVP’’s function of assessment and the film can effectively enhance the Comprehension monitor and Evaluation. By interviews to understand, no one had experience to use the Video Portfolio to watch their own learning, students said that the use of LVP can make recall and correct their own learning performance.
In addition, we also investigated which learning style is more effective for the LVP, and found student of Reflective,Sensing and Sequential Significantly enhance the metacognition after using the LVP.
關鍵字(中) ★ 影片學習歷程 關鍵字(英) ★ metacognition
★ learning video portfolio論文目次 中文摘要 ................................................................. i
Abstract ................................................................ ii
誌謝 ................................................................... iii
圖目錄 .................................................................. vi
表目錄 ................................................................. vii
第一章 緒論 ............................................................. 1
1-1 研究背景 ......................................................... 1
1-2 研究動機 ......................................................... 2
1-3 研究目標 ......................................................... 3
1-4 論文架構 ......................................................... 3
第二章 相關理論與研究 ................................................... 4
2-1 後設認知(Metacognition) .......................................... 4
2-2 情境式學習 ....................................................... 5
2-3 學習歷程 ......................................................... 5
2-4 學習風格 ......................................................... 6
第三章 系統設計 ......................................................... 8
3-1 數位學習遊樂場 ................................................... 8
3-2 LVP與後設認知結合 ................................................ 9
3-3 教學設計 ........................................................ 11
3-4 系統架構 ........................................................ 12
3-5 系統實作 ........................................................ 15
第四章 實驗與結果 ...................................................... 20
4-1 實驗一 .......................................................... 20
4-1-1 假設 ........................................................ 20
4-1-2 實驗流程 .................................................... 20
4-1-3 結果分析 .................................................... 23
4-1-4 實驗一討論 .................................................. 28
4-2 實驗二 .......................................................... 28
4-2-1 假設 ........................................................ 28
4-2-2 實驗流程 .................................................... 29
4-2-3 結果分析 .................................................... 31
4-2-4 實驗二討論 .................................................. 34
第五章 結論與未來研究 .................................................. 41
5-1 結論 ............................................................ 41
5-2 未來研究 ........................................................ 41
參考文獻 ................................................................ 43
附錄一 .................................................................. 46
附錄二 .................................................................. 49
附錄三 .................................................................. 52
參考文獻 [1] Lodewyk, K. R. & Winne, P. H. (2005). Relations among the structure of learning tasks,achievement, and changes in self-efficacy in secondary students. Journal of educational psychology, 97(1), 3-12.
[2] Elliott, E. S. and Dweck, C. S. 1988. Goals: An Approach to Motivation and Achievement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(1): 5-12.
[3] Ames, C. and Archer, J. 1998. Achievement Goals in the Classrooms: Student’s Learning Strategies and Motivational Processes, Journal of Educational Psychology, 80(3):260-267.
[4] Lewin, K. (1951). Field theory in the social sciences: Selected Theoretical papers. New York: Harper.
[5] Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman
[6] Bandura,A .(1982).Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency.American Psychologist,37,122-147.
[7] Krashen, S. D. (1982). Principles and practice in second language acquisition.Oxford, England: Pergamon Press.
[8] Flavell,J.H., “Metacognition aspects of problem-soving,”. In L.B.Resnick(Eds),The nature of intelligence.Hillsdale,NJ：LawrenceErlbaum, 1976.,pp231-235
[9] Schraw, G. & Dennison, R.S. (1994). Assessing metacognitive awareness. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 19(4), 460–475.
[10] Isaacson, R. M., & Was, C. A. (2010). Believing You’re Correct vs. Knowing You’re Correct: A Significant difference? The Researcher, 23, 1-12.
[11] Turner, G. Y. “ Promoting learning autonomy: helping students become independent learners, ” Reading Horizons, 1989, 29(2), 110-116
[12] Suchmon, “Plans and Situated Actions,” In The Problem of Human-Machine Communication. New York: Cambrige University Press., 1987
[13] Lave, J & Wenger, E, “Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation,”, CambridgeNJ: Cambridge University Press., 1991
[14] Brown, J.S., Collins, A., and Duguid. P , “Situated Cognition and the Culture of Learning,” Educational Researcher, 18(l), 1989,pp.32-42.
[15] Geralyn M. Jacobs, “A Classroom Investigation of the Growth of Metacognitive Awareness in Kindergarten Children through the Writing Process,” Early Childhood Education Journal, vol. 32,Num 2004, pp.17-23
[16] Lazear David , “Multiple intelligence approaches to assessment: Solving the assessment Conundrum.” Zephyr Press, 1994
[17] Paulson F Leon and Paulson, Pearl R, “Assessing Portfolios Using the Constructivist Paradigm,” Apr 1994.
[18] Angelo Collins, “Portfolios for science education: Issues in purpose, structure, and authenticity” Science Education, vol. 76, July 1992, pp.451-463.
[19] F.Leon Paulson,Pear. R. Paulson, and Carol A Mayer, “What makes a portfolio a portfolio” Educational leadership,Feb 1991, pp.60-63.
[20] Fischer, Cheryl Fulton and King, Rita M, “Authentic Assessment: A Guide to Implementation. The Practicing Administrator’’s Leadership Series.” Corwin Press, 1995.
[21] Carpenter, C. Dale and Others, “Portfolio Assessment: Opportunities and Challenges,” Intervention in School and Clinic, vol. 31,Sep 1995, pp.34-41.
[22] Lambdin, Diana V.and Walker, Vicki L, “Planning for Classroom Portfolio Assessment,” Arithmetic Teacher, vol. 41, Feb 1994, p318-24
[23] Pamela A. Moss, “Shifting Conceptions of Validity in Educational Measurement: Implications for Performance Assessment” Review Of Educational Research, vol. 62, Fall 1992, pp.229-258.
[24] Victor Nolet, “Classroom-Based Measurement and Portfolio Assessment,” Assessment for Effective Intervention, vol. 18, Fall 1992, pp.5-26.
[25] Luca, J., & McMahon, M, “Developing multidisciplinary teams through self-assessment, supported with online tools,” Proceedings of World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications, 2006, pp.2357-2363
[26] Chang, C. C, “A study on the evaluation and effectiveness analysis of web-based learning portfolio” British Journal of Educational Technology, vol.32 , Sep 2001, pp.435-458.
[27] Dunn, R., & Dunn K.(1992). Teaching elementary students through their individual learning styles. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
[28] Messick, S. (1976). Individuality in learning. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
[29] Renzulli, J. S. (1994). Schools for talent development. Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press.
[30] Felder R.M. & Brent R. (2005). Understanding student differences, Journal of Engineering Education, 94(1), pp. 57-72.
[31] Felder, F.M. and Soloman, B.A. (1991), Index of Learning Styles. North Carolina State University.
指導教授 陳國棟(Gwo-dong Cheng) 審核日期 2012-7-30 推文 plurk
funp
live
udn
HD
myshare
netvibes
friend
youpush
delicious
baidu
網路書籤 Google bookmarks
del.icio.us
hemidemi
facebook
twitter
google
reddit