參考文獻 |
[1]Hvorslev, M. J., Time lag and soil permeability in ground-water observations., U. S. Army Corps of Engineers, Waterways Experiment Station Bulletin No.36, Mississippi, USA, 1951.
[2]Bouwer, H., and R. C. Rice, “A slug test for determining hydraulic conductivity of unconfined aquifers with completely or partially penetrating wells”, Water Resour. Res., 12(3), 423-428, 1976.
[3]Dagan, G., “A note on packer, slug, and recovery tests in unconfined aquifers”, Water Resour. Res., 14(5), 929-934, 1978.
[4]Widdowson, M. A., F. J. Molz, and J. G. Melville, “An analysis technique for multilevel and partially penetrating slug test data”, Ground Water, 28(6), 937-945, 1990.
[5]Melville, J. G., F. J. Molz, O. Guven, and M. A. Widdowson, “Multi- level slug tests with comparisons to tracer data”, Ground Water, 29(8), 897-907, 1991.
[6]Hinsby, K., P. L. Bjerg, L. J. Andersen, B. Skov, and E. V. Clausen, “A mini slug test method for determination of a local hydraulic conductivity of an unconfined sandy aquifer”, J. Hydrol., 136, 87-106, 1992.
[7]Butler, J. J. Jr., G. C. Bohling, Z. Hyder, and C. D. McElwee, “The use of slug test to describe vertical variations in hydraulic conductivity”, J. Hydrol., 156, 137-162, 1994.
[8]Ross, H. C. and C. D. McElwee, “Multi-level slug tests to measure 3-D hydraulic conductivity distributions”, Nat. Resour. Res., 16(1), 67-79, 2007.
[9]van der Kamp, G., “Determining aquifer transmissivity by memans of well response tests: The underdamped case”, Water Resour. Res., 12(1), 71-77, 1976.
[10]Kipp, K. L. Jr., “Tyoe curve analysis of inertial effects in the response of
a well to a slug test”, Water Resour. Res., 21(9), 1397-1408, 1985.
[11]Springer, R. K., and L. W. Gelhar, Characterization of large-scale aquifer heterogeneity in glacial outwash by analysis of slug tests with oscillatory response., Cape Cod, Massachusetts. U.S. Geological Survey Water-Resources Investigations Report 91-4034, 36-40, 1991.
[12]Zlotnik, V. A., and V. L. McGuire, “Multi-level slug tests in highly permeable formations: 1. Modification of the Springer-Gelhar (SG) model”, J. Hydrol., 204, 271-282, 1998.
[13]Zlotnik, V. A., and V. L. McGuire, “Multi-level slug tests in highly permeable formations: 2. Hydraulic conductivity identification, method verification, and field applications”, J. Hydrol., 204, 283-296, 1998.
[14]Zurbuchen, B. R., V. A. Zlotnik, and J. J. Butler Jr., “Dynamic interpretation of slug test in highly permeable aquifers”, Water Resour. Res., 38(3), 1025, doi: 10.1029/2001WR000354, 2002.
[15]Butler, J. J. Jr., E. J. Garnett and J. M. Healey, “Analysis of slug tests in formations of high hydraulic conductivity”, Ground Water, 41(5), 620-630, 2003.
[16]Butler, J. J. Jr. and X. Zhan, 2004. “Hydraulic tests in highly permeable aquifers”, Water Resour. Res., 40, doi: 10.1029/2003 WR002998, 2004.
[17]Chen, C. S., and C. R. Wu, “Analysis of depth-dependent pressure head of slug tests in highly permeable aquifers”, Ground Water, 44(3), 472-477, 2006.
[18]Chen, C. S., “An analytic data analysis method for oscillatory slug tests”, Ground Water, 44(4), 604-608, 2006.
[19]Butler, J. J. Jr., The Design, Performance, and Analysis of Slug Tests., Boca Raton, Florida: Lewis Publishers, 1998.
[20]Chen, C. S., Y. C. Sie and Y. T. Lin, “A Review of the Multilevel Slug Test for Characterizing Aquifer Heterogeneity”, Terr. Atmos. Ocean. Sci., 23(2), 131-143, doi: 10.3319/TAO.2011.10.03.01(Hy), 2012.
[21]van Everdingen, A. F., “The skin effect and its influence on the productive capacity of a well”, Trans. AIME, 198, 171-176, 1953.
[22]Hurst, W., “Establishment of the skin effect and its impediment to fluid flow into a well bore”, Pet. Eng., 25(10), B-6, 1953.
[23]Hawkins Jr, M., “A note on the skin effect”, J. Pet. Tech., 8(12), 65-66, 1956.
[24]Brons, F., and W.C., Miller, “A simple method for correcting spot pressure readings”, J. Pet. Tech., 13(8), 803-805, 1961.
[25]Hurst, W., J. D. Clark, and E. B. Brauer, “The skin effect in producing wells”, J. Pet. Tech., 246, 1483-1489, 1969.
[26]Standing, M. B., “Calculating damage effects in well flow problem”, unpubl. notes, Standford Univ., 20 p., 1979.
[27]Streltsova, T. D., Well Testing in Heterogeneous Formations., John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York, 1988.
[28]Novakowski, K. S., “A composite analytical model for analysis of pumping tests affected by well bore storage and finite thickness skin”, Water Resour. Res., 251(10), 1937-1946, 1989.
[29]Onyekonwu, M. O., “Program for designing pressure transient tests”, Computers and Geosciences, 15(7), 1067-1088, 1989.
[30]Ruud, N. C., and Z. J. Kabala, “Numerical evaluation of the flowmeter test in a layered aquifer with s skin zone”, J. Hydrol., 203, 101-108, 1997.
[31]Chen, C. S. and C. C. Chang, “Use of cumulative volume of constant-head injection test to estimate aquifer parameters with skin effect: Field experiment and data analysis”, Water Resour. Res., 38(5), 1056, doi: 10. 1029/2001WR000300, 2002.
[32]Chen C. S., and C. C. Chang, “Theoretical evaluation of non-uniform skin effect on aquifer response under constant rate pumping”, J. Hydrol., 317, 190-201, 2006.
[33]Faust , C. F. and J. M. Mercer, “Evaluation of slug tests in wells containing a finite-thickness skin”, Water Resour. Res., 20(4), 504-506, 1984.
[34]Moench, A. F. and P. A. Hsieh, “Comment on “Evaluation of slug tests in wells containing a finite-thickness skin” by C. R. Faust and J. W. Mercer”, Water Resour. Res., 21(9), 1459-1461, 1985.
[35]Yang, Y. J. and T. M. Gates, “Wellbore skin effect in slug-test data analysis for low-permeability geologic materials”, Ground Water, 35(6), 931-937, 1997.
[36]Yeh, H. D. and S. Y. Yang, “A novel analytical solution for a slug test conducted in a well with a finite thickness skin”, Water Resour. Res., 29(10), 1479-1489, 2006.
[37]Hyder, Z., J. J. Butler, Jr., C. D. McElwee, and W. Liu, “Slug test in partially penetrating well”, Water Resour. Res., 30(11), 2945 -2957, 1994.
[38]Malama, B., K. L. Kuhlman, W. Barrash, M. Cardiff, and M. Thoma, “Modelingslug tests in unconfined aquifers taking into account water table kinematics, wellbore skin and inertial effects”, J. Hydrol., 408, 113-126, 2011.
[39]Cooper, H. H., Jr., J. D. Bredehodft and I. S. Papadopulos, “Response of a finite-diameter well to an instantaneous charge of water”, Water Resour. Res., 3(1), 263-269, 1967.
[40]Chen, C. S. and C. G. Lan, “A simple data analysis method for a pumping test with the skin and wellbore storage effects”, Terr. Atmos. Ocean. Sci., 20(3), 557-562, June, 2009.
[41]Ramey, H. J., Jr., and R. G. Agarwal, “Annulus unloading rates as influenced by wellbore storage and skin”, Soc. Pet. Engr. J., 12(5), 453, 1972.
[42]Ramey, H. J., Jr., R. G. Agarwal,and I. Martin, ““Analysis of “slug test”
or DST flow period data”, J. Pet. Tech., 4(3), 37-47, 1975.
[43]Sageev, A., “Slug test analysis”, Water Resour. Res., 22(8), 1323-1333, 1986.
[44]Peres, A. M. M., M. Onur and A.C. Reynolds, “A new analysis procedure for determing aquifer properties from slug test data”, Water Resour. Res., 25(7), 1591-1602, 1989.
[45]Dougherty, D. E., and D. K. Babu, “Flow to a partially penetrating well in a double-porosity reservoir”, Water Resour. Res., 20(8), 1116-1122, 1984.
[46]Cooper, H. H., Jr., J. D. Bredehodft, I. S. Papadopulos and R. R. Bennett, “The response of well-aquifer systems to seismic waves”, J. Geophys. Res., 70, 3915-3926, 1965.
[47]Kreyszig, E., Advanced Engineering Mathematics., 8th Edition, John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York, Oct. 23,1998.
[48]Churchill, R. V., Operational Mathematics, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1972.
[49]Haberman, R., Elementary Applied Partial Differential Equations, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, 1987.
[50]de Hoog, F.R., J. H. Knight and A. N. Stokes, “An improved method for numerical inversion of Laplace transforms”, SIAM. J. Sci. and Stat. Comput., 3(3), 357-366, 1982. |