公司分割策略對經營績效影響之研究 -以石油與天然氣產業為例

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：47

、訪客IP：18.224.63.87

姓名

林日凱(Jih-kai Lin) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

企業管理學系

論文名稱

公司分割策略對經營績效影響之研究 -以石油與天然氣產業為例
(Spins-off strategy on the company′s operating performance: A case of oil and gas industry)

相關論文

★ 二氧化鈦技術生命週期之研究	★ 整體後勤業參與同步工程於產品開發績效關係之研究—以中科院為例
★ 筆記型電腦之IFA/PIFA天線技術生命週期分析	★ 國籍航空公司經營績效分析－以資料包絡分析方法分析
★ 從專利分析看3D IC技術與市場發展	★ 影響企業導入電子發票系統成效之因素探討
★ 影響企業導入數位學習成功因素之探討-以個案公司為例	★ 產品生命週期管理系統導入成功要素之探討--以S科技公司為例--
★ 組織創新能力影響因素研究	★ 製造業閒置資產轉售平台製造業閒置資產轉售平台-以廣達電腦股份有限公司為例
★ 供應商先行者優勢探討-以宸鴻科技為例	★ 團隊領導者創新特質與開放式創新專案關係之研究
★ 從商業生態系統談樞紐者策略-以Apple 與Nokia 為例	★ 個人電腦的競爭與發展策略-以台灣電子產業為例
★ 應用兩階段資料包絡分析法評估高級職業學校之經營績效	★ ERP導入的促進因素:使用者觀點

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

至系統瀏覽論文 ( 永不開放)

摘要(中)

併購與分割同樣屬於公司層級的策略，併購的策略一向被媒體大眾所關注，不但併購案數量較多，而且相關的研究文獻也較多，分割策略相對的就沒那麼受到注目。過去的學者對於分割的研究多著重在個案的探討和異常報酬的發生，以單一產業內的分割公司經營效率的研究尚未有人進行探討。本研究試圖進行探索式研究，以石油與天然氣產業為研究對象，欲了解在同樣的產業下有分割的公司是否經營效率比未進行分割的公司更為優異。
　　在石油與天然氣產業裡，由於產業特性的關係，多是國際企業或是國營企業，這些公司規模龐大有進行分割的誘因。在本研究中最終觀察的樣本有分割公司8間，未分割公司56間。研究方法選用動態資料包絡分析法。實證結果顯示有分割過的公司在效率的表現上相對較差，有可能是因為經營不佳才希望透過分割的策略改善公司的經營效率，分割之後所帶來的效率提升會隨時間減少。此外在不同景氣下，景氣好的時候有分割的公司經營效率較佳，景氣差的時候則較差，因石油與天然氣產業屬於受景氣循環的產業，故這樣的現象可以視作是產業聚焦所造成的結果。

摘要(英)

M & A strategy and spin-off strategy also belonging to the company-level strategy, mergers and acquisitions strategy has always been of concern to the public media, not only the large number of mergers and acquisitions, but also more relevant research literature, spin-off strategies are not so opposed to the limelight. Past scholars study focuses on case studies and cumulative average abnormal return. Spin-off operating efficiency studies to explore yet someone within an industry. This study attempts to conduct exploratory research to the oil and gas industry as the research object, I want to know in the same industry have spun off over whether the company is not operating efficiently spin off the company more excellent.
　　In the oil and gas industry, due to(because of) the characteristics of the industry, mostly having international companies or state-owned enterprises. It is attractive for the large-scale company to spin off. In this research, the final samples are 8 spin-off companies and 56 companies which is not spin-off. Research method is data envelopment analysis. The empirical results show the spin-off company′s relatively poor performance in terms of efficiency. The result might be because the motivation for the companies to take spin-off strategy is trying to improve the poor management efficiency, and the gain of efficiency by taking the spin-off will reduce over time. Furthermore, it has different situation in the different business cycle. When the business cycle is prosperous, the spin-off companies have better operating efficiency. Otherwise, it have poorer efficiency in the economic depression. Oil and gas industry are subject to cyclical industries, the industry can be explained as the result of this focus.

關鍵字(中)

★ 石油產業
★ 動態資料包絡分析
★ 公司分割
★ 經營效率

關鍵字(英)

★ Oil industry
★ Dynamic DEA
★ Spin off
★ Corporation division
★ Operating efficiency

論文目次

中文摘要 i
英文摘要 ii
誌謝 iii
目錄 iv
圖目錄 vi
表目錄 vii
第一章緒論 1
1-1 研究背景與動機 1
1-2 研究目的與問題 3
1-3 研究流程 3
第二章文獻探討 5
2-1 公司分割 5
2-1-1 公司分割的定義與類型 5
2-1-2 公司分割的目的與動機 10
2-1-3 國外關於公司分割之實證文獻探討 12
2-2 資料包絡分析 14
2-2-1 DEA應用在石油與天然氣產業相關文獻整理 14
2-2-2 Dynamic DEA相關文獻整理 15
第三章研究設計與方法 17
3-1 動態績效評估架構 17
3-2 研究對象 20
3-3 資料選取 22
3-4 研究方法-動態資料包絡分析法 26
第四章實證分析 30
4-1 敘述性統計 30
4-2 有分割公司與未分割公司在2003~2012的經營績效分析 34
4-3 公司分割後績效追蹤分析 37
第五章結論與建議 40
5-1 研究結果 40
5-2 管理意涵 41
5-3 研究限制與未來方向 42
參考文獻 43

參考文獻

中文文獻
1. 李政娟 (2012)，「企業分割動機與經營績效之研究」，碩士論文，國立中央大學財務金融學系。
2. 林育廷、林靖揚、王致棠…等 (2002)，公司分割問題研究與實例探討，元照出版有限公司。
3. 柯芳枝 (2003)，公司法論，三民書局。
4. 高強、黃旭男、Toshiyuki Sueyoshi (2003)，管理績效評估 : 資料包絡分析法，華泰文化事業公司。
5. 高誌鴻 (2011)，「企業分割策略對股東價值之影響：華碩電腦個案研究」，碩士論文，國立台灣大學商學研究所。
6. 孫遜 (2004)，資料包絡分析法－理論與應用，揚智文化事業股份有限公司。
7. 富邦綜合證券公司 (2006)，企業併購案例解析與法律實務，富邦綜合證券公司股份有限公司。
8. 楊金發 (2007)，「筆記型電腦品牌策略—宏碁公司在歐洲推廣自有品牌為例」，國立交通大學高階主管管理學程未出版碩士論文。
9. 魏興海 (2006)，「公司分割之研究-以友訊科技為例」，國立交通大學高階主管管理學程未出版碩士論文。
英文文獻
1. Banker, R.D., Charnes, A. and Cooper, W.W. (1984). “Some models for estimating technical and scale efficiencies in data envelopment analysis.” Management Science 30: 1078-1092.
2. Barr, R.D., Seiford, L.M. and Siems, T.F. (1993). “An envelopment analysis approach to measuring the managerial efficiency of banks.” Annals of Operations Research 45: 1-19.
3. Charnes, A., Cooper, W.W. and Rhodes, E. (1978). “Measuring the efficiency of decision making units.” European Journal of Operational Research 2: 429-444.
4. Chemmanur, T.J. and Yan, A. (2004). “A theory of corporate Spin-offs.” Journal of Financial Economics 72: 259-290.

5. Copeland, T.E., Lemgruber, E.F., Mayers, D. (1987). “Corporate spinoffs: Multiple announcement and exdate abnormal performance.” Modern Finance and Industrial Economics: Papers in honor of J. Fred Weston. Basil Blackwell Inc., Oxford, pp. 114–137.
6. Daley, L., Mehrotra, V.and Sivakumar, R. (1997). “Corporate focus and value creation: Evidence from spinoffs.” Journal of Financial Economics 45: 257-281
7. Desai, H. and Jain, PC. (1999). “Firm performance and focus: long-run stock market performance following spinoffs.” Journal of Financial Economics 54: 75-101
8. Farrell, M. J. (1957). “The Measurement of Productive Efficiency” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, A 120: 253-290.
9. Feroz, E.H., Kim, S. and Raab, RL. (2003). “Financial statement analysis: A data envelopment analysis approach.” Journal of the Operational Research Society 54: 48-58.
10. Hite, G.L., Owers, J.E. (1983). “Security price reactions around corporate spin-off announcements.” Journal of Financial Economics 12: 409-436.
11. Hung, S.W., He, D.S. and Lu, W.M. (2014). “Evaluating the dynamic performances of business groups from the carry-over perspective: A case study of Taiwan′s semiconductor industry.” Omega 46: 1-10.
12. Kao, C. (2013). “Dynamic data envelopment analysis: A relational analysis” European Journal of Operational Research 227: 325-330.
13. Krishnaswami, S. and Subramaniam, V. (1999). “Information asymmetry, valuation, and the corporate spin-off decision” Journal of Financial Economics 53: 73-112.
14. La porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., Shleifer, A. and Vishny, R. (2000). “Investor protection and corporate governance.” Journal of Financial Economics 58: 3-27.
15. Lu, W.M., Wang, W.K. and Lee, H.L. (2013). “The relationship between corporate social responsibility and corporate performance: evidence from the US semiconductor industry.” International Journal of Production Research 51(19): 5683-5695.
16. Miles, J.A., Rosenfeld, J.D. (1983). “The effect of voluntary spin-off announcements on shareholder wealth.” The Journal of Finance 38: 1597-1606
17. Moreno, P., Lozano, S. and, E. (2013). “Dynamic performance analysis of U.S. wireline telecommunication companies” Telecommunications Policy 37: 469-482.

18. Schipper, K. and Smith, A. (1983). “Effects of recontracting on shareholder wealth: The case of voluntary spin-offs.” Journal of Financial Economics 12: 437-467.
19. Schipper, K. and Smith, A. (1986). “A Comparison of Equity Carve-outs and Seasoned Equity Offerings.” Journal of Financial Economics 15: 153-186.
20. Seiford, L.M. and Zhu, J. (1999). “Profitability and Marketability of the Top 55 U.S. Commercial Banks.” European Journal of Operational Research 216(3): 668-678.
21. Seth, A. (1990). “Value creation in acquisitions: A re-examination of performance issues.” Strategic Management Journal 11: 99-115.
22. Sueyoshi, T. and Goto, M. (2012). “Data envelopment analysis for environmental assessment: Comparison between public and private ownership in petroleum industry.” European Journal of Operational Research 216(3): 668-678.
23. Thompson, R.G., Dharmapala, P.S., Rothenberg, L.S. and Thrall, R.M. (1996). “DEA/AR efficiency and profitability of 14 major oil companies in U.S. exploration and production.” Computers and Operations Research 23: 357-373
24. Trautwein, F. (1990). “Merger motives and merger prescriptions.” Strategic Management Journal 11: 283-295.
25. Tone, K. (2001). “A slacks-based measure of efficiency in data envelopment analysis.” European Journal of Operational Research 130: 498-509.
26. Tone, K. and Tsutsui, M. (2010). “Dynamic DEA: A slacks-based measure approach.” Omega 38: 145-156.
27. Veld, C. and Veld-Merkoulova, Y. V. (2004). “Do spin-offs really create value? The European case.” Journal of Banking and Finance 28: 1111-1135.
28. Wang, K., Yu, S. and Zhang, W. (2013). “China’s regional energy and environmental efficiency: A DEA window analysis based dynamic evaluation.” Mathematical and Computer Modelling 58: 1117-1127.
29. Williamson, OE. (1979). “Transaction-cost economics: The governance of contractual relations.” Journal of Law and Economics 22: 233-261.
30. Woo, C.Y. and Willard, G.E. and Daellenbach, Urs.S. (2006). “Spin-off performance: A case of overstated expectations?” Strategic Management Journal 13: 433-447.
31. Zaman, D.F.M.M. (1998). Splitsing: Juridisch En Fiscaal. Kluwer Juridische
Uitgevers, Deventer, The Netherlands.

32. Zhu, J. (1996). “DEA/AR analysis of the 1988-1989 performance of the Nanjing Textile Corporation.” Annals of Operations Research 66: 311-35.
33. Zhu, J. (2000). “Multi-factor performance measure model with an application to Fortune 500 companies” European Journal of Operational Research 123: 105-124.
34. Zubaidah, I., Jie, C.T., Keen, K.K., Kim, H.L., Sharif, M.S. and Ramlee, K. (2013). “Using data envelopment analysis in comparing the environmental performance and technical efficiency of selected companies in their global petroleum operations” Measurement 46: 3401-3413.

指導教授

洪秀婉(Shiu-wan Hung)

審核日期

2014-7-15

推文