 |
|
|
|
以作者查詢圖書館館藏 、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士 、以作者查詢全國書目 、勘誤回報 、線上人數：32 、訪客IP：3.143.218.146
姓名 陳玟伶(Wen-Lin Chen) 查詢紙本館藏 畢業系所 網路學習科技研究所 論文名稱 探討不同註釋方式及個體差異在數位遊戲式學習環境中對英語單字成效、動機與自我效能之影響
(Effects of Gloss and Individual Differences on English Vocabulary Performance, Motivation and Self-efficacy in a DGBL Environment)相關論文 檔案 [Endnote RIS 格式]
[相關文章]
[文章引用]
[完整記錄]
[館藏目錄]
[檢視]
- 本電子論文使用權限為同意立即開放。
- 已達開放權限電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的，進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。
- 請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定，切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送，以免觸法。
摘要(中) 隨著科技的進步，遊戲式學習已經成為教育中很重要的一個部分，透過遊戲
的方式融入語言教學已成為發展趨勢，而在語言學習當中，單字學習佔據了很重
要的一部分，過去文獻指出註釋可以有效的提升單字學習成效，但不同註釋方式
對於學習成效的結果較不一致，也較少關於註釋的文獻是透過遊戲式學習的方式
呈現，過去研究大多是以紙本或者是電腦螢幕呈現，因此本研究透過遊戲式學習
環境，探討三種不同註釋方式(Inference gloss 組：Inference – Gloss-Gloss、Retrieval
gloss 組：Gloss- Retrieval- Gloss、以及 Full gloss 組：Gloss-Gloss-Gloss)對於學習
成效、動機、自我效能以及遊戲成效是否有影響。此外本研究也探討個體差異(先
備知識、遊戲經驗)對於學習成效、動機、自我效能以及遊戲成效是否有影響，以
及探討上述變項之間的相關性。其中的學習成效包含 Meaning recall (英翻中)、
Meaning recognition (配對)、Form recall (中翻英)以及整體學習成效；遊戲成效包
含配對任務闖關次數、配對任務配對答對次數、閱讀任務閱讀答對題數、所有任
務按鈕點擊次數以及所有任務獲得金幣總數。本研究之研究對象為中部某大學的
學生 (N=70)，資料分析包含描述性統計、ANOVA 分析、Pearson 相關係數分析
以及信度分析。
研究結果顯示，不同註釋方式對於學習成效的部分，各類型的學習成效
Retrieval gloss 組皆顯著優於 Full gloss 組；而 Retrieval gloss 組對於動機以及自
我效能也都顯著優於 Full gloss 組；然而不同註釋方式對於遊戲成效的部分只有
在閱讀任務閱讀答對題數達到顯著差異。在個體差異的部分，不同先備知識對於
學習成效中的 Meaning recall (英翻中)、Meaning recognition (配對) 以及整體學習
成效都有達到顯著差異，但在 Form recall (中翻英) 的部分則無；在不同遊戲經
驗則對於所有學習成效皆無達到顯著差異；而個體差異對於動機及自我效能，也
皆無達到顯著差異；但個體差異對於遊戲成效的部分，先備知識與閱讀任務閱讀答對題數達到顯著；而遊戲經驗對於遊戲成效則皆無達顯著差異。摘要(英)
With the development of technologies and the spreads of using technologies,
digital game-based learning is becoming the important part of the education. Language
learning embedded in digital games is very prevalently. Vocabulary learning is one of
the essential elements in the field of language learning. Previous studies pointed out
that gloss can effectively improve vocabulary learning. However, effects of different
types of glosses are inconsistent. Besides, there were few studies on glosses in digital
game-based learning environments. Conversely, most of the previous studies on glosses
were focused on the paper or computer monitor. Therefore, this study investigated
effects of three different groups of glosses (i.e., Inference gloss group: Inference-GlossGloss,
Retrieval gloss group: Gloss-Retrieval-Gloss, and Full gloss group: GlossGloss-Gloss)
on learning performance, motivation, self-efficacy and game performance
in a digital game-based learning environment. Moreover, in this study, we also
investigated the effects of individual differences (i.e., prior knowledge, game
experience) on learning performance, motivation, self-efficacy and game performance
in a digital game-based learning environment. Regarding learning performance, it
includes Meaning recall, Meaning recognition, Form recall and overall learning
performance. Regarding game performance, it includes number of times in matching
task, number of correct answers in matching task, number of correct answers in reading
task, number of clicking buttons in matching task and reading task, and number of coins
in matching task and reading task. The participants were college students in the middle
of Taiwan (N=70). Data analysis includes descriptive analysis, ANOVA, Pearson
correlation and reliability analysis.
The results suggest that no matter what types of learning performance, Retrieval
gloss group was significantly better than Full gloss group. In addition, Retrieval gloss group was significantly better on learner′s motivation and self-efficacy than Full gloss
group. However, for the game performance part, different groups of glosses only
significantly influenced on number of correct answers in reading task. As for the
individual differences part, the results showed that different levels of prior knowledge
had significantly difference on Meaning recall, Meaning recognition and overall
learning performance but not on Form recall. In the different levels of game experiences,
the results showed that there was no significant difference on all types of learning
performance. Furthermore, individual differences had no significant difference on both
motivation and self-efficacy. For the game performance part, prior knowledge had
significant difference on correct answers in reading task; however, game experience
had no significant difference on any game performance.關鍵字(中) ★ 數位遊戲式學習
★ 註釋
★ 個體差異
★ 學習成效
★ 動機
★ 自我效能
★ 遊戲成效關鍵字(英) ★ digital game-based learning
★ game performance
★ gloss
★ individual differences
★ learning performance
★ motivation
★ self-efficacy論文目次
摘要................................................................................................................................v
Abstract........................................................................................................................vii
致謝...............................................................................................................................ix
目錄................................................................................................................................x
圖目錄..........................................................................................................................xii
表目錄........................................................................................................................ xiii
第一章 緒論..................................................................................................................1
1.1 研究動機與背景.............................................................................................1
1.2 研究目的.........................................................................................................2
1.3 研究問題.........................................................................................................2
1.4 名詞解釋.........................................................................................................4
1.5 研究範圍及限制.............................................................................................5
第二章 文獻探討..........................................................................................................6
2.1 數位遊戲式英語學習.....................................................................................6
2.2 註釋.................................................................................................................7
2.3 個體差異.........................................................................................................9
第三章 系統設計與實作............................................................................................12
3.1 設計理念.......................................................................................................12
3.2 學習內容.......................................................................................................13
3.3 系統架構.......................................................................................................16
3.3.1 角色系統............................................................................................17
3.3.2 場景系統............................................................................................17
3.3.3 商店....................................................................................................18
3.3.4 任務系統............................................................................................20
第四章 研究方法........................................................................................................27
4.1 研究設計.......................................................................................................27
4.2 研究對象.......................................................................................................28
4.3 研究工具.......................................................................................................29
4.3.1 先備知識測驗....................................................................................29
4.3.2 遊戲經驗問卷....................................................................................29
4.3.3 英語字彙知識測驗............................................................................30
4.3.4 動機及自我效能問卷........................................................................32
4.3.5 系統記錄檔........................................................................................32
4.4 實驗流程.......................................................................................................33
4.5 資料收集與分析...........................................................................................35
第五章 研究結果與討論............................................................................................36
5.1 不同註釋組別對於學習成效、動機、自我效能、遊戲成效之影響.......36
5.1.1 不同註釋組別對於學習成效之影響................................................36
5.1.2 不同註釋組別對於動機之影響........................................................39
5.1.3 不同註釋類型對於自我效能之影響................................................40
5.1.4 不同註釋組別對於遊戲成效之影響................................................41
5.2 個體差異對於學習成效、動機、自我效能、遊戲成效之影響...............44
5.2.1 先備知識對於學習成效之影響........................................................44
5.2.2 遊戲經驗對於學習成效之影響........................................................46
5.2.3 個體差異對於動機之影響................................................................48
5.2.4 個體差異對於自我效能之影響........................................................49
5.2.5 先備知識對於遊戲成效之影響........................................................50
5.2.6 遊戲經驗對於遊戲成效之影響........................................................53
5.3 學習成效、動機、自我效能、遊戲成效與個體差異之相關性...............55
5.4 討論...............................................................................................................58
5.4.1 不同註釋組別對於學習成效之影響................................................58
5.4.2 不同註釋組別對於動機及自我效能之影響....................................59
5.4.3 個體差異對於學習成效之影響........................................................59
5.4.4 個體差異對動機及自我效能之影響................................................60
5.4.5 不同註釋組別與個體差異對於遊戲成效之影響............................60
5.4.6 學習成效、動機、自我效能、遊戲成效與之個體差異相關性....61
第六章 結論與建議....................................................................................................63
6.1 研究結論.......................................................................................................63
6.2 研究貢獻.......................................................................................................65
6.3 未來工作.......................................................................................................65
參考文獻......................................................................................................................67
附錄一 目標單字及文本............................................................................................73
附錄二 先備知識測驗................................................................................................78
附錄三 遊戲經驗問卷................................................................................................80
附錄四 Meaning recall (英翻中)-前測 ......................................................................82
附錄五 Meaning recall (英翻中)-後測 ......................................................................85
附錄六 Meaning recognition(配對)-前測..................................................................86
附錄七 Meaning recognition(配對)-後測..................................................................87
附錄八 Form recall (中翻英)-前測............................................................................88
附錄九 Form recall (中翻英)-後測............................................................................91
附錄十 動機及自我效能問卷....................................................................................93參考文獻 AbuSeileek, A. F. M. (2008). Hypermedia annotation presentation: Learners′
preferences and effect on EFL reading comprehension and vocabulary
acquisition. CALICO Journal, 25(2), 260-275.
Aghlara, L., & Tamjid, N. H. (2011). The effect of digital games on Iranian children′s
vocabulary retention in foreign language acquisition. Procedia-Social and
Behavioral Sciences, 29, 552-560.
Alomyan, H., & Au, W. (2004). Exploration of Instructional Strategies and Individual
Difference within the Context of Web-Based Learning. International Education
Journal, 4(4), 86-91.
Anyaegbu, R., Ting, W., & Li, Y. I. (2012). Serious Game Motivation in an EFL
Classroom in Chinese Primary School. Turkish Online Journal of Educational
Technology-TOJET, 11(1), 154-164.
Ayres, P., & Sweller, J. (2005). The split-attention principle in multimedia learning. In
R. Mayer (Ed.), Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (pp. 135–146). New
York: Cambridge University Press.
Bandura, A. (1994). Self-efficacy. In. VS Ramachaudran. Encyclopedia of human
behavior, 4, 71-81.
Barcroft, J. (2002). Semantic and structural elaboration in L2 lexical
acquisition. Language learning, 52(2), 323-363.
Barcroft, J. (2015). Can retrieval opportunities increase vocabulary learning during
reading?. Foreign Language Annals, 48(2), 236-249.
Becker, K. (2007). Digital game‐based learning once removed: Teaching teachers.
British Journal of Educational Technology, 38(3), 478-488.
Benoit, J. M. (2017). The effect of game-based learning on vocabulary acquisition for
middle school English language learners (Doctoral dissertation, Liberty
University).
Card, M. P. (2016). The Effects of a Reading Comprehension Intervention Package on
Increasing Third Grade Students′ Comprehension Skills (Doctoral dissertation,
Walden University)
Corredor, J. (2006). General and domain-specific influence of prior knowledge on
setting of goals and content use in museum websites. Computers &
Education, 47(2), 207-221.
Cairncross, S., & Mannion, M. (2001). Interactive multimedia and learning: Realizing
the benefits. Innovations in education and teaching international, 38(2), 156-164.
Carpenter, S. K., Sachs, R. E., Martin, B., Schmidt, K., & Looft, R. (2012). Learning
new vocabulary in German: the effects of inferring word meanings, type of
feedback, and time of test. Psychonomic bulletin & review, 19(1), 81-86.
Castel, A. D., Pratt, J., & Drummond, E. (2005). The effects of action video game
experience on the time course of inhibition of return and the efficiency of visual
search. Acta psychologica, 119(2), 217-230.
Cheng, M. T., She, H. C., & Annetta, L. A. (2015). Game immersion experience: its
hierarchical structure and impact on game‐based science learning. Journal of
Computer Assisted Learning, 31(3), 232-253.
Chen, H. J. H., & Yang, T. Y. C. (2013). The impact of adventure video games on
foreign language learning and the perceptions of learners. Interactive Learning
Environments, 21(2), 129-141.
Danesh, T., & Farvardin, M. T. (2016). A Comparative Study of the Effects of Different
Glossing Conditions on EFL Learners’ Vocabulary Recall. SAGE Open, 6(3),
2158244016669548.
Derakhshan, A., & Khatir, E. D. (2015). The Effects of Using Games on English
Vocabulary Learning. Journal of Applied Linguistics and Language
Research, 2(3), 39-47.
Farvardin, M. T., & Biria, R. (2011). Textual glosses, text types, and reading
comprehension. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 1(10), 1408-1415.
Franciosi, S. J. (2017). The effect of computer game-based learning on FL vocabulary
transferability. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 20(1), 123.
Gardner, R. C. (1985). Social psychology and second language learning: The role of
attitudes and motivation. London: Edward Aronld.
Havelka, D. (2003). Predicting software self efficacy among business students: A
preliminary assessment. Journal of Information Systems Education, 14(2), 145.
Hulstijn, J. H. (1992). Retention of inferred and given word meanings: Experiments in
incidental vocabulary learning. In Vocabulary and applied linguistics (pp. 113-
125). Palgrave Macmillan UK.
Hailikari, T., Katajavuori, N., & Lindblom-Ylanne, S. (2008). The relevance of prior
knowledge in learning and instructional design. American Journal of
Pharmaceutical Education, 72(5), 113.
Hashemian, M., & Fadaei, B. (2013). The effect of lexical glossing types on Persian L2
learners’ reading and listening. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 70,
490-500.
Hassan Taj, I., Ali, F., Sipra, M. A., & Ahmad, W. (2017). Effect of Technology
Enhanced Language Learning on Vocabulary Acquisition of EFL Learners.
International Journal of Applied Linguistics & English Literature, 6(3), 262-272.
Horz, H., Winter, C., & Fries, S. (2009). Differential benefits of situated instructional
prompts. Computers in Human Behavior, 25(4), 818-828.
Huang, L. L., & Lin, C. C. (2014). Three approaches to glossing and their effects on
vocabulary learning. System, 44, 127-136.
Hulstijn, J. H., Hollander, M., & Greidanus, T. (1996). Incidental vocabulary learning
by advanced foreign language students: The influence of marginal glosses,
dictionary use, and reoccurrence of unknown words. The modern language
journal, 80(3), 327-339.
Hussin, S., Maarof, N., & D’Cruz, J. (2001). Sustaining an interest in learning English
and increasing the motivation to learn English: An enrichment program. The
Internet TESL Journal, 7(5), 1-7.
Huyen, N. T. T., & Nga, K. T. T. (2003). Learning vocabulary through games. Asian
EFL Journal, 5(4), 90-105.
Kunkel, L. E. (2016). Athletic training student perceptions of preceptor learnercenteredness
during clinical experiences (Doctoral dissertation, Texas Wesleyan
University).
Kalyuga, S., Ayres, P., Chandler, P., & Sweller, J. (2003). The expertise reversal
effect. Educational psychologist, 38(1), 23-31.
Kinzie, M. B., & Joseph, D. R. (2008). Gender differences in game activity preferences
of middle school children: implications for educational game design. Educational
Technology Research and Development, 56(5-6), 643-663.
Lomicka, L. L. (1998). ”To gloss or not to gloss”: An investigation of reading
comprehension online. Language Learning and Technology, 1(2), 41-50.
Laufer, B., Elder, C., Hill, K., & Congdon, P. (2004). Size and strength: do we need
both to measure vocabulary knowledge?. Language testing, 21(2), 202-226.
Meluso, A., Zheng, M., Spires, H. A., & Lester, J. (2012). Enhancing 5th graders’
science content knowledge and self-efficacy through game-based
learning. Computers & Education, 59(2), 497-504.
Moreno, R., & Mayer, R. (2007). Interactive multimodal learning environments.
Educational Psychology Review, 19(3), 309-326.
Nagata, N. (1999). The Effectiveness of Computer‐Assisted Interactive
Glosses. Foreign Language Annals, 32(4), 469-479.
Nation, I. S. P. (2001). Learning Vocabulary in Another Language. Cambridge, England:
Cambridge University Press.
Orvis, K. A., Horn, D. B., & Belanich, J. (2008). The roles of task difficulty and prior
videogame experience on performance and motivation in instructional
videogames. Computers in Human behavior, 24(5), 2415-2433.
Orvis, K. A., Orvis, K. L., Belanich, J., & Mullin, L. N. (2005). The influence of trainee
gaming experience and computer self-efficacy on learner outcomes of videogamebased
learning environments (No. TR-1164). Arlington, VA: U.S. Army Research
Institute.
Ozuru, Y., Dempsey, K., & McNamara, D. S. (2009). Prior knowledge, reading skill,
and text cohesion in the comprehension of science texts. Learning and
instruction, 19(3), 228-242.
Papastergiou, M. (2009). Digital game-based learning in high school computer science
education: Impact on educational effectiveness and student
motivation. Computers & Education, 52(1), 1-12.
Pintrich, P. R., Smith, D. A. F., Garcia, T., & McKeachie, W. j. (1991). A manual for the
use of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ) (Tech. Report
No. 91-B-004). Board of Regents, University of Mi chigan, Ann Arbor, MI.
Prensky, M. (2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants part 1. On the horizon, 9(5), 1-
6.
Pintrich, P. R., & De Groot, E. V. (1990). Motivational and self-regulated learning
components of classroom academic performance. Journal of educational
psychology, 82(1), 33.
Rott, S. (2007). The effect of frequency of input‐enhancements on word learning and
text comprehension. Language Learning, 57(2), 165-199.
Rowe, J. P., Shores, L. R., Mott, B. W., & Lester, J. C. (2010, June). Individual
differences in gameplay and learning: a narrative-centered learning perspective.
In Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on the Foundations of Digital
Games (pp. 171-178). ACM.
Sharmin, R. (2015). Relation of multiple intelligence with participation of the students
of elementary level (Doctoral dissertation, BRAC University).
Stout, H. A. F. (2011). Portrayals of Relational Aggression in Popular Teen Movies:
1980-2009. (Master′s thesis, Department of Communications, USA)
Shih, R. C., Papa, C., Hsin, T. H., & Lou, S. J. (2011, September). The attributes and
importance of online game with language learning for college English-majored
students. In International Conference on Technologies for E-Learning and Digital
Entertainment (pp. 420-424). Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
Sonbul, S., & Schmitt, N. (2009). Direct teaching of vocabulary after reading: is it worth
the effort?. ELT journal, 64(3), 253-260.
Suh, S., Kim, S. W., & Kim, N. J. (2010). Effectiveness of MMORPG‐based instruction
in elementary English education in Korea. Journal of computer assisted
learning, 26(5), 370-378.
Sullivan, S. A., & Puntambekar, S. (2015). Learning with digital texts: Exploring the
impact of prior domain knowledge and reading comprehension ability on
navigation and learning outcomes. Computers in Human Behavior, 50, 299-313.
Tsai, F. H., Kuang-Chao, Y., & Hsiao, H. S. (2012). Exploring the factors influencing
learning effectiveness in digital game-based learning. Journal of Educational
Technology & Society, 15(3), 240.
Yen, L., Chen, C. M., & Huang, H. B. (2016, June). Effects of Mobile Game-Based
English Vocabulary Learning APP on Learners′ Perceptions and Learning
Performance: A Case Study of Taiwanese EFL Learners. In International
Conference on e-Learning (p. 255). Academic Conferences International Limited.
Yip, F. W., & Kwan, A. C. (2006). Online vocabulary games as a tool for teaching and
learning English vocabulary. Educational media international,43(3), 233-249.指導教授 楊接期(Jie-Chi Yang) 審核日期 2017-8-11 推文 plurk
funp
live
udn
HD
myshare
netvibes
friend
youpush
delicious
baidu
網路書籤 Google bookmarks
del.icio.us
hemidemi
facebook
twitter
google
reddit