English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Items with full text/Total items : 66984/66984 (100%)
Visitors : 22918154      Online Users : 421
RC Version 7.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://ir.lib.ncu.edu.tw/handle/987654321/1081


    Title: 無腹筋RC梁利用壓拉桿模式預測剪力強度之研究;Analytical Study on RC Beams Without Steel Stirrups by Means of Strut-and-Tie Model
    Authors: 蕭乃維;Nai-Wei Hsiao
    Contributors: 土木工程研究所
    Keywords: 無腹筋鋼筋混凝土;深梁;短梁;壓拉桿模式;shear strength;short beam;strut-and-tie model;deep beam
    Date: 2006-07-13
    Issue Date: 2009-09-18 17:19:46 (UTC+8)
    Publisher: 國立中央大學圖書館
    Abstract: 根據ACI318-02,短梁是以剪力跨度a及有效深度d之比值作定義,當a/d 2.5則為短梁,反之則為長梁。對於其分析方法,規範是建議以壓拉桿模式來分析短梁,長梁以斷面剪力評估式作分析。本研究主要探討以壓拉桿模式作為分析短梁之適用性,除了應用於矩形梁外,另外也對T形梁作分析,藉以比較T形梁與矩形梁在分析上有何不同之處。 本實驗之試體針對不同之剪力跨深比a/d作設計,矩形梁與T形梁各5根試體,在剪力區內為無箍筋之設計。由實驗得知,無論矩形梁或T形梁,以壓拉桿模式作為短梁之預測剪力分析,其結果還算準確。由結果來看,T形梁在分析上與矩形梁最大不同處,在於T形梁多出了翼版之部分,因此在斷面分析時是考慮翼版寬度,並非梁腹寬度。此外,本實驗所採用的分析模式中,也探討了不同的壓桿軟化模式之影響,由結果得知,以本文所建立之模式做為短梁分析應屬合理。 According to ACI318-02, the behavior of deep beam is defined as the ratio of shear span to effective depth a/d 2.5. Strut-and-tie model analytical method can be adopted to the shear strength evaluation of the deep beams. The main purpose of the research is to see the validity of strut-and-tie model applied to analysis of rectangular and T-sectional beams. The comparison of analytical results between rectangular and T-section beams are discussed. Experimental works were made on testing five rectangle and five T-sectional RC beams, where no stirrup was used. Specimens were controlled by different shear span ratio, a/d. From the experimental result, the proposed strut-and-tie model for analyzing T-sectional and rectangle beams is fairly accurate. The largest difference in analyzing is that T-sectional beams have offered more discrepancy such as flange parts. However, the proposed model is more rational than previous researchers adopted using different softened strut-concrete behaviors.
    Appears in Collections:[土木工程研究所] 博碩士論文

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    0KbUnknown661View/Open


    All items in NCUIR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.

    社群 sharing

    ::: Copyright National Central University. | 國立中央大學圖書館版權所有 | 收藏本站 | 設為首頁 | 最佳瀏覽畫面: 1024*768 | 建站日期:8-24-2009 :::
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback  - 隱私權政策聲明