供應鏈管理中首要就是必須選擇適合的供應夥伴，然而企業的採購單位當面對林林總總的零件設計與千千萬萬的供應商下是否也應該要具備有多重的採購策略來應對各種不同的供應商與零組件以滿足公司的要求。假使能夠採用到符合公司規格要求的零組件又可以搭配到滿足供應鏈需求的供應商時，就可以提升企業的競爭力；反之，使用到不符規範的商品與不適用的供應商時，會嚴重影響到整個供應鏈體系的正常運作，輕則延誤交期與生產排程，重則違背客戶承若與損失企業商譽及其財務，因此正確的採購策略應該是依據不同的採購零件和不同的供應廠商在不同的時期做採用不同的決策，而非千遍一律的常用價格來做唯一的重要考量指標。 層級分析法是一套非常適用於多準則企業決策時的輔助工具，透過此法可以量化得知層級分析法架構下各主要項目及子項次之間的權重值，藉以排序優先順序(Setting Priorities)選擇出最佳方案或政策(Choosing a best alternative/Policy)因此AHP研究方法不可諱言的相當適用於決定採購策略時的輔助工具，簡化複雜的決策問題並可以減少主觀的決議錯誤。 個案研究中針對國內外八家各自有擅長產品領域的專業平面式觸控面板領導廠商，進行訪談與依照不同產品別作二份供應商問卷自評，透過過去文獻與本身採購實務經驗建構出成本、品質、技術、營運作業等四大構面，及旗下十六個子項次做為對供應商的採購要求，後續將完成的AHP問卷進行量化與資料分析得出，國內外供應商及不同產品間數據的差異與主要原因。 最後分別對國內外供應商依照AHP的權重值設定適合之企業採購策略達到供給與需求面雙贏的目標。 In the supply chain management the most important is choose the suitable supply partner, however enterprise's procurement team always facing numerous components with great amount of supplier at the same time whether should have to set up the multiple purchase strategy to fulfill companies request. If components can meet the company specification requirement and figure out the supplier who can meets the supply chain demand, may enhance the competitive for enterprise. In another hand if use the wrong parts with unsuitable suppliers it may cause the serious supply problem in whole supply chain operation like schedule delay or impact production plan even loss the credit for customer or goodwill. Therefore the correct procurement strategy should be the basis for various purchase components and the various supply manufacturers does in the different time uses the different decision-making, but not basis for best price. The Analytic Hierarchy process is a suitable set of multi-criterion decision-making tool for enterprise when use this method we can get the AHP structure weight not only for main criteria but also for sub-criteria than setting the priorities or choosing a best alternative solution therefore AHP was absolutely suitable for procurement team make a strategic decision and it will simplifies the complex problems and may reduce the subjective resolution to be wrong. In the case study we list eight local with global leading companies in Touch Window field and arrange the face to face interview and asking fill in two copies of AHP questionnaire which base on the AHP structure (Fore Main Criteria and sixteenth Sub Criteria) at the same time finally count up the weight and analysis the date to figure out the difference between different supplies and different components. Finally set up the appropriate procurement strategies depend on the weight and achieve the win-win situation between supplies and demands. Keywords: Analytic Hierarchy Process, Procurement Strategies, Supply Chain Management
