English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Items with full text/Total items : 78852/78852 (100%)
Visitors : 35370472      Online Users : 331
RC Version 7.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version

    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://ir.lib.ncu.edu.tw/handle/987654321/1401

    Title: 工程設計文件瑕疵類型化之研究;Type of Construction design defects
    Authors: 沈坤城;SHU-CHENG SHEN
    Contributors: 土木工程學系碩士在職專班
    Keywords: 請求權基礎;設計瑕疵;爭議;爭點;Petition;Issue point;Dispute;Design defect
    Date: 2003-07-07
    Issue Date: 2009-09-21 09:28:29 (UTC+8)
    Publisher: 國立中央大學圖書館
    Abstract: 摘要 鑑於工程實務界因工程設計未盡完備,圖說文件不盡詳實,契約規範不儘公平等問題,往往導致工程疑(爭)議迭起,甚至造成施工進度遲延,影響工程品質等問題,亟待改善。因此如何妥善防制工程設計瑕疵的再發生,實為值得研探討究之課題。 本研究乃藉由相關文獻資料之蒐集與整理,瞭解工程設計文件之內涵及設計者之權利義務和法律責任;其次藉由彙整工程設計問題相關研究調查結果與糾紛案例等資料,深入瞭解與分析工程設計文件瑕疵問題之現況,以設計者觀點找出工程設計文件瑕疵發生的原因,以確認國內現行工程設計文件瑕疵的態樣。 根據本研究之檢討與分析,目前國內設計文件仍存在設計錯誤、遺漏設計、設計不完整、數量表漏列、圖與圖衝突、圖與說不符、情事變更及解釋空間八類缺失,易導致疑爭議與糾紛,亟待檢討改善。有鑑於此,本研究乃彙整實際案例,針對工程設計文件瑕疵的態樣探討,最後藉由案例解析其爭點,並參酌國內之工程契約範本,整理相關請求權基礎供實務運作之參考,俾利提昇工程設計文件品質。 Abstract In construction industry, disputes on construction occur very often. Construction designs and working drawings, for example, are imperfect. Likewise, contracts governing both sides are not fair. The progress of construction and its quality are even influenced. How to prevent the design defects from happening again, therefore, becomes a must lesson to study. By collecting relevant data, this study intends to explore the contents of design drawings and a designer’s obligations and responsibilities in law as well. Besides, drawing defects at the present situations will be further analyzed through relevant investigations and disputed cases. This study tries to find out what causes the drawing defects from a designer’s angle. So far, some defects have been still existed in Taiwan. First, drawings are wrongly designed, missed, and incomplete. In addition, quantity map are missed out. What’s more, drawings do not go well with another drawing and caption. Finally, there might be something wrong with change order and explanations. All of these easily lead to arguments and need improving. In order to promote qualities of design drawings, this study based on real cases focuses on design drawing defects. With issue points and contract samples, it will also examine relevant petitions for practices.
    Appears in Collections:[土木工程學系碩士在職專班] 博碩士論文

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat

    All items in NCUIR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.

    社群 sharing

    ::: Copyright National Central University. | 國立中央大學圖書館版權所有 | 收藏本站 | 設為首頁 | 最佳瀏覽畫面: 1024*768 | 建站日期:8-24-2009 :::
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 隱私權政策聲明