工程技術顧問業融資因素分析之研究; Establishment of Fitting Financing Criteria for Engineering Consulting Companies in Taiwan

NCUIR > Engineering College > Graduate Institute of construction engineering > Electronic Thesis & Dissertation > Item 987654321/3052

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://ir.lib.ncu.edu.tw/handle/987654321/3052

Title:	工程技術顧問業融資因素分析之研究;Establishment of Fitting Financing Criteria for Engineering Consulting Companies in Taiwan
Authors:	徐書謙;Shu-Chang Hsu
Contributors:	營建管理研究所
Keywords:	融資;修正德菲法;金融機構;工程技術顧問業;因素分析;factor analysis;financing mechanism;financial institutions;engineering consulting firms
Date:	2006-06-23
Issue Date:	2009-09-21 12:04:01 (UTC+8)
Publisher:	國立中央大學圖書館
Abstract:	工程技術顧問業於國家經濟發展及重大公共建設上佔有極重要角色，其素質及經營環境之健全與否，皆直接影響工程品質與安全。目前於台灣其面臨雖有資金需求卻無良好之融資方式與概念，而金融機構亦對於工程技術顧問業之了解相當有限，造成工程技術顧問業融資困難。因此本研究採用修正式德菲法訪談35位雙方產業專家、召開專家座談會促使其互相了解，並共同訂定問卷之內容；再針對雙方產業進行母體發放問卷1124份，有效回收233份。回收後運用SPSS進行「遺漏檢驗」、「敘述性統計」、「極端組比較」、「同質性檢驗」、「一致性檢驗」共計五類九項之因素分析法，確立14項工程技術顧問業與金融業之重要融資影響因子。而後進行主成分分析，經過因素轉軸後將14項融資因子萃取成4項群組，此四項群組分別為「融資借貸說明」權重為0.328、「公司過往能力說明」為0.270、「工程說明與其他」為0.214、「融資抵押品」為0.188，最後針對群組特性提出相關之融資所需文件，提供工程技術顧問業後續進行融資之重要參考依據，使工程技術顧問業了解金融機構評估放款所重視之方向，並使金融機構可根據四群組之權重排序調整工程技術顧問業之融資標準。 The Taiwan financial institutions utilizing uniform criteria in financing decisions for all industries have impeded strong financial endorsement of engineering consulting firms. The purposes of this research are to identify the factors that influence the financing mechanism so as to raise financing practicability, and to establish fitting financing criteria for engineering consulting firms. An initial survey was conducted with participation of 118 professionals serving in the both financial and engineering consulting markets, and summarized 36 points influencing financing mechanism. To determine significance and fitting criteria of financing, a comprehensive analysis using questionnaire and factor analysis to the population, 691 engineering consulting firms and 433 financial institutions, concluded 14 significant factors classified as 4 principle criteria: repayment and purpose with weight of 0.328, corporation perspective with weight of 0.270, engineering project description with weight of 0.214, and financing protection with weight of 0.188. Finally, the corresponding documents were also suggested.
Appears in Collections:	[Graduate Institute of construction engineering] Electronic Thesis & Dissertation

Files in This Item:

File	Size	Format

社群 sharing

Loading...