中大機構典藏-NCU Institutional Repository-提供博碩士論文、考古題、期刊論文、研究計畫等下載:Item 987654321/44120
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Items with full text/Total items : 80990/80990 (100%)
Visitors : 41639499      Online Users : 1269
RC Version 7.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://ir.lib.ncu.edu.tw/handle/987654321/44120


    Title: 承銷業務對金控子銀行後續放款之影響none
    Authors: 江學儀;Hsueh-yi Chiang
    Contributors: 財務金融研究所
    Keywords: 羅吉斯迴歸;借款利差;關係放款;承銷關係;借貸關係;Relationship Lending;Underwriting;Bank Loan;Loan Spread;Logit Regression
    Date: 2010-06-22
    Issue Date: 2010-12-08 14:51:14 (UTC+8)
    Publisher: 國立中央大學
    Abstract:   本研究目的欲檢驗是否在台灣,金控下券商業務是否對金控子銀行的業務有提升的效果?透過探討金控下券商建立IPO承銷關係與子銀行業務關係。同時也檢驗先前借貸關係、公司信用風險、金控主體企業對金控子銀行後續授信的影響。此外,從借款客戶的角度,觀察後續借款利差的影響因素。   實證結果發現,金控子銀行愈不傾向放款給自己輔導上市公司且收取較高的借款利差。對於先前已存在借款關係之企業,金控子銀行會顯著地偏好繼續與其承做放款且收取較高的借款利差。就算是其先前有借貸往來關係的公司是高風險的企業,金控子銀行還是傾向進行後續放款的動作,但是要求較低的借款利差。金控子銀行偏好承做信用評等被調升的公司且給予較低的借款利差。金控子銀行繼續承做放款,其金控主體企業以銀行為主且給予較低的借款利差。   就控制變數的實證結果,金控子銀行放款特徵青睞有要求擔保品且要求較高的借款利差。最後只保留先前無借貸關係的樣本,得到實證結論與先前一致。  The goal of this paper is to examine whether underwriting business can enhance lending business in Taiwan? This study investigates the relationship between IPO underwriting and subsequent lending business. Also, this paper examines the relationship among previous lending, borrower’s credit risk, holding‘s mother enterprise, and subsequent lending business. Finally, from borrower’s view, check subsequent loan spread.   The evidence shows that if a holding company underwrites the IPO of a firm, it is less likely for this holding company to provide the IPO firm with future loans and to charge higher loan spread, compared to a holding company lacking such an underwriting relationship. If a holding company has previous lending with a firm, it is more likely for this holding company to provide the firm with future loans and to charge higher loan spread. Even a risky previous firm, it is more likely for this holding company to provide the firm with future loans but to charge lower loan spread. If a firm’s TCRI upgrade, it is more likely for this holding company to provide the firm with future loans and to charge lower loan spread. If a holding company’s mother enterprise is bank, it is more likely for this holding company to provide the firm with future loans and to charge lower loan spread.   From the results of control variables, if loan term is collateral, it is more likely for this holding company to provide the firm with future loans and to charge higher loan spread. Results do not change significantly when the sample is restricted to firms that have exclusive post-IPO loans.
    Appears in Collections:[Graduate Institute of Finance] Electronic Thesis & Dissertation

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    index.html0KbHTML583View/Open


    All items in NCUIR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.

    社群 sharing

    ::: Copyright National Central University. | 國立中央大學圖書館版權所有 | 收藏本站 | 設為首頁 | 最佳瀏覽畫面: 1024*768 | 建站日期:8-24-2009 :::
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 隱私權政策聲明