English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Items with full text/Total items : 78111/78111 (100%)
Visitors : 30540986      Online Users : 324
RC Version 7.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version

    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://ir.lib.ncu.edu.tw/handle/987654321/4632

    Title: 網路科學探究的合作學習:小組認同與共同作者的決定歷程;A web-based Collaborative science inquiry: group identity reflected in the decision-making process of co-authorship
    Authors: 楊馥祤;Fu-yu Yang
    Contributors: 學習與教學研究所
    Keywords: 協商;共同作者;合作學習小組認同;網路科學探究;Collaborative learni;A web-based science inquiry
    Date: 2008-07-11
    Issue Date: 2009-09-22 09:28:50 (UTC+8)
    Publisher: 國立中央大學圖書館
    Abstract: 本研究源自一個匯聚各地中學生參與的網路科學探究的合作學習,在每週與組員討論任務的互動過程中,從彼此完全陌生,到逐漸關切組員是否重視小組而展現行動力的歷程。利用訪談稿和討論區資料做言談分析,同時採用實踐社群和社型理論為探照鏡,揭露參與心和實踐力落差下的兩類組員,守家者和斷續參與者,如何各取所需的結合,使雙方願意持續上線學習;又怎麼透過對話協商,取得合作時的共識和默契;最後一週共同作者敲定前的喊價拉鋸,組員們對彼此的向心力和貢獻度下註解的歷程,反映了什麼樣的權力議題和價值觀?組員在具化小組認同感時,如何對共同作者資格進行意義賦予,例如學習到作為一名關切小組的組員,究竟該在意什麼,做到什麼,才夠資格成為共同作者?從中捕捉湧現的小組認同樣貌。 This study is a web-based collaborative science inquiry which clustered with the high school students to participate in. In their interactive process of every week which discussed their task, group members from completely unfamiliar with each other, to gradually concern about if their members respect their group and show their actions. Using of the data from interview and discussion forum to do discourse analysis, and also the theories of community of practice and sociation as the searchlight, to explores how the two kinds of members, proactive and ins and outs who have different contributions takes what he needs to enable both sides to continue online learning, and how, through dialogue and negotiation to collaborate and achieve their common consensus; before the decision-making process of co-authorship in the end of the activity, the bids between the two kinds of person reflected what kinds of power issues and values? How the group members given meaning for the qualification of co-authorship. For instance, being a member who attach importance to his group, what he should concern of in order to qualified as the co-author. Thus enable the researcher to capture of the group identity from inside.
    Appears in Collections:[學習與教學研究所 ] 博碩士論文

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat

    All items in NCUIR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.

    社群 sharing

    ::: Copyright National Central University. | 國立中央大學圖書館版權所有 | 收藏本站 | 設為首頁 | 最佳瀏覽畫面: 1024*768 | 建站日期:8-24-2009 :::
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 隱私權政策聲明